User talk:CambridgeBayWeather/Archive30

PLEASE DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.

About americarx articles

Hi Cambridge,

Greetings from AmericaRx.com. We have submitted article about Americarx. But it 3

I need our article protection. Our article was deleted for advertising or promotion. But We have submitted article with AmericaRx history. Please guide us to submit AmericaRx article next. Please inform us with more details.

Regards, Rachel AmericaRx —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.183.18.194 (talk) 06:49, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Cat and subcat

Hi. I'm contacting you as an administrator. I found tha all or almost all of the articles in the category International Trade Stubs are also in the category International Trade. However, International Trade Stubs is a subcat of International Trade. Is this a problem? Thanks--达伟 (talk) 20:29, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know...but as a general rule, are there are any guidelines I should be aware of, with respect to overlapping categories or anything like that? Thank you--达伟 (talk) 08:32, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Great. Makes sense. So what you said about Category:International Trade and Category:International Trade Stubs is something of an exception?--达伟 (talk) 09:58, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Excellent. Thanks for the information. That helps a great deal. I hope you don't mind me being chatty--do you live in Cambridge bay? I'm an American but I'm extremely keen on Canada and love learning more about its geography. Until a few minutes ago I knew nothing about Nunavut geography but now I know about Victoria Island and Ellesmere and Baffin Island. Is Cambridge Bay located on the "mainland" of North America?--达伟 (talk) 10:21, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the info. That's cold! Nunavut is really fascinating. You must like it otherwise you'd leave? It's so unique...and it's the size of Western Europe! According to Wikipedia, flights from your side of Nunavut to the capital are $2200! Will air travel be expanded in the future? Also, it's quite interesting that the capital was founded as an American airbase in 1942. Also, if you have ABSOLUTELY nothing to do and want to explore some random intellectual musings, you can check out my "blog" of sorts, though a lot of it may be uninteresting to you: User:达伟/pensieri--达伟 (talk) 10:56, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

I will try not to take up much more of your time. I imagine things must be expensive, kind of like Alaska (as far as I know). In towns in the low-population central belt of the US, and in southern Canada -- for example New Mexico where I've lived before -- prices are low, but when you get to be rather isolated geographically (no offense), I guess the costs really go up. I looked up Ulukhaktok, and it seems you have the most northerly golf course in the world, and many of the town's inhabitants are descended from a Danish explorer. Not bad :) How much Inuktitut do you speak? Do you mind if I contact you for time to time with questions about Canada? If you have a busy life please don't hesitate to say no! --达伟 (talk) 11:20, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Would you mind holding this star for me?

		The Surreal Barnstar
		I don't know exactly what you've been up to, and I'd never heard of you prior to yesterday. But the way I see it, you are quite crazy. In a good way, of course. I assume you wrote that poem? It's a good spin-off. A star from that "2D so-and-so" guy talk, sign 13:37, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Oh, I just saw your name under RC. Thought it was a clever name, a semblance to The weather in London. that "2D so-and-so" guy ^{talk, sign} 13:44, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Deh Cho BridgeWiki

I recently became somewhat interested in the Deh Cho Bridge project, and spent some time trying to figure out the various bits of the agreement. I set up a little wiki site to help organize things for myself, and I'm doing some cleanup in hopes that it might be useful for others. I put a link to the site into the Deh Cho Bridge article, but I've temporarily reverted it out again (here). I'd like to have someone else add it back in to avoid any conflicts.

Perhaps you could swing by the article and re-enable the link? Thanks. NorthernRaven (talk) 04:41, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

cm vs mm

Please see Template talk:Infobox weather#cm vs mm. Peter Horn User talk 16:07, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

What is the link to the US guide lines? Peter Horn User talk 16:14, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. I was referring to Crete#Climate. Peter Horn User talk 16:23, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

The source is wrong. The template:convert does not lie: 49 cm (19.3 in) & 490 mm (19.29 in) Peter Horn User talk 17:23, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Add up the cm or the mm manually and then convert. Peter Horn User talk 17:32, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

The person who drew up the chart was "full of prunes". I only get a total of 42 cm (16.5 in) or 420 mm (16.54 in) for the year. Double check my arithmetic, Crete#Climate 17:49, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

The revers: 19.3 in (49 cm) or 19.29 in (490 mm) as well as 16.5 in (42 cm) or 16.54 in (420 mm). The source table is a royal foul up. Peter Horn User talk 19:24, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Oh, I forgot. 19.6 in (49.8 cm) or 19.6 in (498 mm). template:convert works just fine, it is the source table that is in ludicrous error. Peter Horn User talk 19:33, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Yeah that's what I thought. something lame from CBW 21:44, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Skepta

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Skepta. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skepta (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:14, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Pervert snail

hi, im writing about a page i spent at least 45 minutes making about a species of snail. the page was titled "pervert snail" and you just deleted it due to vandalism, i find this highly uncalled for and i am not happy, could you please tell me why it was accused of "vandalism"??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pervertsnail (talk • contribs) 14:21, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Isaaq

FYI and FWIW, I've opened a discussion at WP:CNOTICE#Somali clan listings. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 21:10, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Southampton Airport (Ontario)

Ooops :) But not the one in England. Look at the stop on the island in the north of Hudson's Bay. File:Atcroutes-1sep1945.jpg. This is the airport I'm wanted was Coral Harbour Airport. Thank you for noticing. Bwmoll3 (talk) 08:58, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Just did, thank you :) Bwmoll3 (talk) 12:38, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Siamese Ghosts band deleted 31st march 2010 at 13:39

Hi there my article relating to the Scottish band Siamese Ghosts was deleted yesterday i was just curious as to why, if you could let me know so as i could remedy the situation it would be much appreciated thanks,

Neil9834 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Neil9834 (talk • contribs) 08:41, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Wales Live

Hi there - wondering why you deleted Wales Live? Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.46.0.230 (talk) 15:46, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

I deleted it because it was a direct copy of http://www.waleslive.tv/About. Please see Wikipedia:Copyrights. Thanks. something lame from CBW 10:13, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello

Hello CambridgeBayWeather, Rehman⁽⁺⁾ has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

AfD nomination of Wilderness Air

An article that you have been involved in editing, Wilderness Air, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilderness Air. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Whenaxis (talk) 11:50, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Re:Talk:Edmonton Airports

Done! Kyle1278 18:38, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

From user page

CambridgeWeather made a totally cool edite to the Muso Jikiden Eishin Ryu page recently. Thanks! Scottprobst (talk) 07:57, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

GPS

Well I'm sure it could be added manually to every airport. I could go about and manually add it to the state airports when I find the time, but since it's been used everywhere, it will take a while before it is incorporated in most of the templates. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 17:35, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Veolia Water

Hi. I noticed you had deleted Veolia Water as it was a copyright violation. It's partly my fault you had to, as I made a mistake and moved the article from a article request page into the main space. Would you be able to unprotect the page so that I could create the page properly? Cloudbound (talk) 18:42, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Duck test

quack quack quack - some thing lame from SatuSuro 10:19, 7 April 2010 (UTC) quack quack

article Nicholas Heavens was deleted

hello. you deleted the article about Nicholas Heavens. he is a real person who studies Mars. Could you please put it back up?

thank you. Alockwood2 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alockwood2 (talk • contribs) 17:48, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Western Infirmary Cologne Club

I note that this page was deleted. The Western Infirmary Cologne Club is an illustrious social club for surgeons in Glasgow. Memebership allows its members to use the letters MWICC after their name. An example can be seen on the back cover review for the following book; MRCS Practice Papers Part A: Paper 1 SBAs, by: Mr Irfan Halim ISBN: 9781905635610.

I believe this page should be reinstated to wikipedia.

iainmcgraw@hotmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.11.185.213 (talk) 18:38, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Ismartyparty

Hi CBW, if it's OK with you I'm going to unblock User:Ismartyparty and give him another chance. I think the copyright/socking issues have been made clear, he's apologised, and in the past he's made some substantive contributions to Veolia Water Southeast. cheers, Rd232 ^talk 19:03, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Ruben Vardanian

My friends told me Ruben Vardanian died of a heart attack yesterday. --22:13, 7 April 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.129.110.35 (talk)

deleted

why did you delete my article called Sneakend? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eastwooddesign (talk • contribs) 16:43, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Trouble Down Under

Your Grace, the minions are squabbling again. Sadly, a small group of what appears to be New Zealand based article owners have planted their national flag here: Russell Crowe [1]. Well meaning, foreign crusaders for truth are quickly identified and their edits reverted into oblivion. I pray that you will, as time allows, visit said article and liberate her from the death grip of the Kiwis. As always, I remain your most humble servant, Eudemis (talk) 02:57, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

It is entirely improper to try and raise support by canvassing in this manner. And you are entirely all wet, I am not a New Zealand based editor, I live in the United States, and your continually stating I have ownership issues is a personal attack that simply must stop. Wildhartlivie (talk) 03:51, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Why I Changed My Username

I want to tell you the truth about why I changed my username from User:Bowei Huang to User:A1DF67. But there is a problem. The problem is that if I told you, you wouldn't believe it. I mean, I don't think you would believe it. Nobody would believe it. I don't think anybody would believe it. If I told you it, you would probably think that I was making it up. I think that that is what you would think if I told you it. That is the problem. That is the reason why I didn't tell you the truth about why I did it before. That is the reason why I lied about it. Sorry. I should have told you the truth before. I should told you that before. It is very hard and difficult for me to explain it. I don't know how to explain it. I am afraid that if I told you it, you wouldn't believe it and nobody would believe it.

You should have a look at User talk:Bowei Huang again.

Play N Trade

I am the Public Relations coordinator at Play N Trade and I few weeks ago I update the PNT wiki page. I noticed you reverted it back to the original. Please leave it as it is now.

Thank you

Miles Coffin(miles.coffin@playntrade.com) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.58.138.162 (talk) 16:29, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

If you are the PR person for the company then please take a few minutes to read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and this has some excellent suggestions as to what you should be doing as does the US government. What I suggest you do is create an account for yourself, just you and not to be used by your department or anyone else that works for the company, but don't make the name anything like Play N Trade, see Wikipedia:Username policy#Company/group names for more information. Then start by pointing out your concerns and suggestions on Talk:Play N Trade. Thanks. something lame from CBW 21:35, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Russell Crowe

I appreciate your quick action to protect Russell Crowe to push the discussion to the talk page. As you can tell from there, there is now a clear consensus not to use the name of the other person involved in the lawsuit. Only one editor disagrees, and although he's been asked numerous times to make his case there (or on other relevant boards), he is refusing to do so. He's claiming that everyone who has commented on the matter is a meatpuppet, basically.

In any case, there's no longer any discussion over the matter, so there's no need to keep the page protected. As such, I'm requesting the unprotection of the page. Thanks! Dayewalker (talk) 01:52, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

This is patently false, of course, if you read through the talk page. Wildhartlivie has canvased everyone who weighed in on the issue- all supporting her. This vote stacking attempt included her friends Dayewalker, XLerate, MikeAllen, Victor9876, Nil Einne, CrohnieGal. After I exposed that they were all connected giving citations, they continued on as if in a few hours I would forget. [2] I asked if anyone in the room was not connected in some way to Wildhartlivie and outside her network, no one responded. Worse emboldened by her army of friends in the room, Wildhartlivie called me a "Dick". The others chimed in as well with varying levels of insults. I believe Wikipedia has an interest in enforcing its canvasing rules and putting this type of gang action to an end. If you will look, there was no neutral person in the room to discuss anything substantive (i.e. Wildhartlivie's reversions of my cited edits). If some poor soul ever did look into the talk room, they would never have felt free to comment. It's been a farce. Long, tedious yes, but I would encourage you to take a look. Thank you. Eudemis (talk) 03:07, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

You have absolutely no grounds to make canvassing accusations here and your attempts to attack every single editor who responded on that talk page is sufficiently severe to warrant action. You were guilty of unsoliticited canvassing to editors who you do not know and then you posted a RfC, where you have proceeded to attack every single editor who has responded. Your behavior is toxic and assaultive. You attempted to create connections between me and every editor who responded, even down to trying to prove a connection between me and an editor who posted once to Talk:Judy Garland in May 2009 after I last posted to that page in February 2008. You have attacked every editor who has responded with your specious accusations of canvassing, canvassing behavior for which you were reported to AN/I. You have waged personal war and cast unfounded aspersions against every single editor who responded, down to even dragging in posts to a Star Trek bulletin board where an editor thanked me and another editor for helping on an article. Your behavior is noxious and attacking and there is no valid reason why you haven't been blocked for tenditious editing yet. Your personal attacks spread to each and every editor who responds there. Something needs to be done about you besides your refusal to respond to an WP:AN/I complaint about your behavior. CambridgeBayWeather, could you please take a look at the voluminous evidence posted at WP:AN/I#User:Eudemis, personal_attacks, improper canvassing and edit warring for the evidence and do something about this editor? He even attacked an IP poster for being an IP. This has become untenable and yet, no one at AN/I seems to care enough to take action against this assaultive editor. Wildhartlivie (talk) 05:07, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

I understand that you consider this matter defused (and you're busy) but you mentioned that I, as I am the sole person on my side, had attacked someone. While the "personal attack" claims are made with virtually every post by the group of 7, I am curious as to anything personal or inappropriate I posted. Other than pointing out that everyone commenting was connected to Wildhartlivie. Any nucleus of friends can control each's pet article through cluttered talk pages, sheer numbers and personal attack claims. Nil Einne, the editor she's claiming she's not connected to, is related to XLerate [3]who is related to Wildhartlive[4]. Nil Einne entered with Xlerate and was canvased to support Wildhartlivie. It wasn't hard to figure out their connections. I can't see how Wikipedia would want Wildhartlivie with a disabled sock puppet [5] to control articles by sheer numbers this way. Eudemis (talk) 13:57, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

I am going to say this once, Eudemis, and then I expect you to stop. STOP ATTACKING ME. First of all, you keep finding obscure pages that mirror pages from Wikipedia. Those are frigging EVERYWHERE. I have never posted to the website http://www.theskyiscrape.com, that is a MIRROR site of a Wikipedia page. You are garnering NOTHING by continuing to hunt up your supposed connections. STOP trying to cast aspersions based on what you believe are connections. You cannot link me to Nil Einne. Your contentions are as specious as the connections you allegedly are finding. Sort of like when you claim you can link me to Nil Einne from a posting she made to Talk:Judy Garland 15 months after the last time I posted there. It means NOTHING. That two editors posted to a very long and drawn out discussion on Basically like Xlerate posting a response to a thread wherein I also posted, but she did so the next day and no one responded to it. That means NOTHING regarding anything you are trying to make it into. STOP IT. You have nothing to support your contention that ANYONE was canvassed to post on the Talk:Russell Crowe on my behalf and frankly, I'm sick and tired of your persistent attacks against editors. YOU were the one guilty of canvassing other editors to come in and support you. I posted NO request that anyone come in to post on the Crowe talk page, unlike you who did that exact thing. What YOU did was canvassing. If other editors come to that talk page from various points does not prove or support your bad faith accusation of canvassing on my part. STOP IT. I did nothing of the sort and you have nothing to support your bad faith accusations. What the hell is wrong with you that you feel the need to attack every editor that showed up on the Crowe talk page? WHAT makes you think, even for one second, that this sort of behavior is acceptable? You have NOTHING to support your bad faith attacks on, and it's far and away absolutely time for it to stop. I have no clue why administrators haven't taken you to task for your conduct, but it's frigging time for you to STOP. Oh, and for the record, I did my block time for the sock thing, and I submitted proof that I and the other editor are different and distinct people. There is no valid reason for me to be "run off" Wikipedia. You are reaching and launching attacks against me and I'm sick and tired of it and expect it to quit. Actually, I expect administrators to take you to task for your extremely poor conduct regarding this whole situation and I expect you to desist from attacking each and every editor who posted against you. What makes you think this is acceptable or appropriate conduct. I'm sick of it and I demand you desist from making attacks on me and the other editors on that page. There's something completely wrong with someone who spends his time searching out mirror sites and trying to use them to prove something. This is specious and horribly inappropriate attacks on various editors and your attacks MUST STOP. STOP IT. Wildhartlivie (talk) 18:29, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Oh, and in case you missed it, dick is linked to an essay about that sort of behavior. It wasn't calling you names, it was a commentary on your clearly incivil and personally attacking posts. CambridgeBayWeather, what can a person do to get something done about this editor? He has clearly attacked each and every person that posted to Talk:Russell Crowe, makes unfounded and unsubstantiated accusations of violations of WP:CANVASS, after his own attempts of clearly obvious attempts to canvass support was exposed, and keeps running around the internet, posting links to pages that mirror pages on Wikipedia, and claiming that it is proof that editors routinely communicate in more than one place. And his continued assertions that Nil Einne and Xlerate are "proven" connected to me because I posted a response to Talk:Judy Garland in February 2008 and Nil Einne did the same, ONCE, in May 2009 to an entirely different thread. His continued attacks on me and on the other editors who responded to Eudemis's own RfC to Talk:Russell Crowe went over the line. Can someone please make this editor STOP attacking persons who respond to his own RfC and his specious accusations that I canvassed the responses has gone beyond the sublime into the clearly spiteful search for "proof" based on responses to talk page threads 15 months apart and his specious and unfounded accusations of improper canvassing simply have to stop. He's still carrying on and it's been days since this all started. Why won't administrators respond to Eudemis's blatant attacks to other editors? His crusade to undermine the consensus on his RfC is both bad faith and his continued attempts to stir trouble by attacking everyone who responded is incivil and quite disruptive. This needs to be stopped. Wildhartlivie (talk) 21:06, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

The problem with using Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts is that he flatly refused to respond to the rather length postings on AN/I, despite the fact that several serious points were made by a number of different editors. If he won't respond to AN/I (which essentially was blown off by any and all administrators on that page since NONE responded to the complaints) I can't see him taking WQA seriously either. I'll drop a note to another editor to garner feedback on going for a WP:RfC/U. It's rather sad, and not just a little ironic, that all of his attacks were launched against editors who responded to the editor's own RfC on an article issue. It's intolerable. Thanks. Wildhartlivie (talk) 22:07, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

(OD) Everyone, I sincerely doubt CambridgeBayWeather appreciates this going on here on his talk page. Eudemis did make some out-of-line accusations of collusion, but the article is unprotected, and he seems to be respecting the consensus, so there's no other trouble for now. If anything else comes up in the future, it can be reported to the proper noticeboard but for now, I'd just advise everyone to let this one go and get back to editing. Dayewalker (talk) 22:28, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

In fact, after the first sentence of my post at 21:06 above, my post was to CambridgeBayWeather and the post I made just above the one by Dayewalker was directly a response to something CambridgeBayWeather posted to me from the 21:06 post and was directed to him. Thank you. Wildhartlivie (talk) 22:59, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

i need u to explain to me why my page was deleted

why was this page deleted explain!!!!!

i need u to explain to me why my page was deleted

why was this page deleted explain!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wizad sheraz (talk • contribs) 11:16, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Khadijah bint Khuwaylid

Hi,

Could you take a look at this edit please. To me it seems a clear case of WP:COAT to spawn off some WP:OR. Thanks. → AA ^(talk) — 14:26, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphan tagging

Hi, please see this discussion, which has somehow arisen as a result of this edit you made a couple of weeks ago. Thanks, --RFBailey (talk) 14:26, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

What's Wrong?

Dear Mr. Cambridgebayweather, I would like to apologize if I angered you by my changing of the page. The part I changed was the route of a link, not deleting parts of the article, as you wrote on the Inukshuk history page. In the contex of the Inukshuk,the article was saying where Canadian Inukshuks were brought to other countries as a means of a gift. One of these places was to Washington D.C.. Rather than the link for D.C. to go to the D.C. page, I thought it more fit to redirect the link to go to the Canadian Embassy in D.C., where the actual statue is located. I did not delete any of the actual words on the article, as you wrote that I did on the Inukshuk history page. Again, sorry for any inconveniences, just please be more specific to what I did wrong, so that I work make such horrendous mistakes in the future. Thanks -Bob9999999 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bob9999999 (talk • contribs) 00:52, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Lolz

I caught you with this little accident :) We all make mistakes. Outback the koala (talk) 09:16, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Ha, I didn't even think of trouting you - but in the future I will! :-) I liked the AfD, soo good! To think he looked up all the proper formatting to do it. Outback the koala (talk) 04:29, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

??

You have just wrote something on my talk page, what i don't have a clue what you are on about.. Not one little bit, and i never even heard of the page you shown'n me, get your facts right! --78.145.32.58 (talk) 15:52, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

That's because IP's change hands over time. If you look at the date of the edits you can see that it was dated 10 October 2008, 11/2 years ago when your IP made the edits but was used by someone else. something lame from CBW 16:27, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

R.t.groenlandicus

Sorry for my bad pronunciation but .I know on which site you got the weight of Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus.--Marco zangari (talk) 17:26, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

User:Stickstickley et al

Greetings! I see you reverted this edit made at User talk:Stickstickley, which I have reason to believe was made by Stickstickley using a sockpuppet account. You missed, however, this edit made just before. Based on that one, and based on the one you reverted, I've extended Stickstickley's block to indefinite and revoked his talk page access for abuse of multiple accounts and personal attacks. —C.Fred (talk) 14:30, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Wudu

Hi- Why did you delete the section from Wudu? I believe you are in error.

Please do not try to make these changes because there are obviously three translations at the USC Quran source which you noted. Sunnis believe one is correct and Shias believe the other is correct. That is why there are 2 separate categories for the translation of that verse. You cannot combine them into one.

Thank you.

I agree- however it makes sense to include both versions of the translation of the Holy Quran. Not just one interpretation- because I think it is inaccurate to say that Shia Muslims agree with the translation that verse 5:6 says "wash" feet. If they did, there would not be a difference. Rather Shia Muslims go with the Shakir translation which says "wipe" feet. This is interpretation is root of disunity on the performance of wudu. Thus, both translations : Ali & Shakir should be included. I hope you see that minor ,but very important distinction.

Thank you, Valerie

Redirecting Pages

User:A1DF67 has been renamed User:Bowei Huang 2. [6] Can you please redirect User:Bowei Huang to User:Bowei Huang 2 and User talk:Bowei Huang to User talk:Bowei Huang 2?

Bowei Huang 2 (talk) 06:31, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Settlements in the Arctic

I have nominated Category:Settlements in the Arctic (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Populated arctic places (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:44, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello from Edwin Black

If I can get you a book, or some documentation, or answer any question for you, please do not hesitate to ask. Edwin Black Washington DC (talk) 22:31, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Signature

Much improved. Nicely done. Cheers.--kelapstick (talk) 11:48, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Disruptive editing at this article

Hi there. Would you please be so kind and look thoroughly into this issue? There's an editor who keeps changing the type of album from "studio" to "demo" on this article. He has no reliable verifiable sources to back up his edits, he tried unsuccessfully to have the article deleted alltogether.

The editor has a long history of disruptive editing, blocks, topic bans etc. As his own account is already blemished as such, he basically has nothing to lose if he receives a further block for edit war. This is why I believe he is so adamant in continuing his reverts, wanting to engage me in an edit war.

I am asking you, and have sent the same message to other admins online, to please thoroughly look into this issue. I have reported the whole incident to both Ani and Avi, yet to no avail. Thank you. Amsaim (talk) 20:59, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Anglonuna-neologismcakes

A new username subsequently went and created, you guessed it, Category:Anglo-Nunavois. I've added it to your original CFD, obviously, and given the suspicions this arouses I started a checkuser request at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Éric Gagnier. Please feel free to add any comments there if you think there's anything I've missed. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 18:02, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Jesus H. Murphy, check this new one out: Category:Inukophone Nunavut people of Inuktitut descent. Wha? Bearcat (talk) 21:29, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

And Category:Inuko-Tenois people? We've seriously got to stop this dude. Bearcat (talk) 21:36, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

So now I'm reviewing to see if I missed any other nonsense along the way, and I found this. What on earth do you suppose that's all about? Bearcat (talk) 22:13, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Heh, just trust me that no individual county or municipality in Ontario has ever had a separate history as an independent country in its own right. Well, not in this reality, at least — who's to guess what might have happened in an alternate universe? Bearcat (talk) 22:32, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Identification of meteo equipment?

Hi! Would you be willing to help identify the meteorological equipment on a photograph in this article? − Algkalv (talk) 10:09, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

While I'm here, could I ask you to have a look at fast deletion of Saint-Christian (Greenland), a hoax page created by a vandal, who is right now in the process of blanking tens of pages on French wiki? − Algkalv (talk) 12:08, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

My-e-Director 2012

Please, you have deleted the article My-e-Director 2012 while I was editing.

Parts of the text for this article is based in the Official Project description. This is why you can found in other pages. SENCO (talk) 15:38, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

The new version of the official page will be released in two days or so. The page will be licensed with CC-BY-SA 3.0. Is it possible to left the article until friday while we release the new website?

I have sent an OTRS Request. Could you undelete the page, so I can put the OTRS pending in the discussion page? --SENCO (talk) 16:30, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Hazrat Ali's Birth date

Dear CambridgeBayWeather,

You reverted the page regarding the date of Hazrat Ali's birth calculated by me. I want to tell you that I really appreciate the way you explained to me the reasons behind the reversion and not being blunt like many other Wikipedians. Such good mannerisms will encourage many new Wikipedians like myself.

--Myshare (talk) 12:51, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Your sig line

Seeing it now on the Ref Desk, it threw me off at first. It appears to be part of the text of your response and I started wondering what the CBW was. It took me a second to think, "Oh! That's his signature!" So, I think it might be even more confusing for novice editors. Dismas|^(talk) 20:44, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

A different question, amazingly enough...

I'm trying to remember, was it you who had expressed a concern to me way back when the Category:Communities in Canada tree was moved to Category:Settlements in Canada, regarding the fact that some places in the territories actually have "settlements" as their formal designation? For what it's worth, there's now a move discussion underway to propose the naming convention Category:Populated places in Canada instead; it looks likely to pass, thankfully.

Could you clarify for me whether we need to retain Category:Settlements in the Northwest Territories and Category:Settlements in Nunavut as subcategories of the new Category:Populated places in the Northwest Territories and Category:Populated places in Nunavut, once those are created? And if so, which places will need to be retained in the settlements categories? I've already established what needs to be filed where in the Yukon. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 02:46, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Gilbert Lapointe

Oops. Thanks for catching that.—Kww(talk) 14:59, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Blocked user

Probably against my better judgement, I gave this blocked user another chance to make a valid unblock request before locking off his talk page, but I find it rather offensive that he's trying to use a deceased editor as an excuse for his actions, so if you want to yank it anyway, be my guest. That being said, I have to head out now, so you may want to keep an eye on that page in case he makes another request. Regards, Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 18:27, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Our anglo-inventing friend

Good catch, thanks. I suspect we're going to need a continued watch for more of this; I'll also raise the topic at WP:CWNB to get more hands on deck.

I made another interesting discovery, by the way; I did a reverse DNS lookup on one of the anonymous IPs involved in this, and then because it was a generic bell.ca domain I did a Google search for the specific server name. That led me to a fascinating discussion on the WP:ANI equivalent on fr: -- since I don't know if you're able to read French or not, I'll summarize:

problematic edits from an IP range regarding (a) POV-pushing that presents Prescott and Russell as an independent country, and (b) weird and illogical ethnolinguistic creations, such as a fr:Liste de Canadiens anglais which includes the likes of Jack Anawak as, guess what, an "Anglo-Nunavois", and people like Jon Mirasty (who's Cree) and Agnes Martin (who's Fransaskois of some description, possibly even Métis) as Anglo-Saskatchewanais, can we please do an IP range block?

As frustrating as this is, I find some strange reassurance in the fact that other people have identified the same problems. Bearcat (talk) 18:54, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Oh, and by the way, as for the settlement categories I think that once the parent categories are switched over any leftover subcategories can probably just be speedy-moved or listed for discussion as needed. I haven't really given too much thought to metaorganizing the whole thing; I figured that once the stuff is switched over we can figure out if anything still needs to be changed once the basic structure's in place. Bearcat (talk) 18:57, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Question regarding humidex

I can't find any cities where you have used the humidex parameter in the weather infobox. For the year value have you used the average, or the maximum? Likewise for wind chill, average or minimum? I am rewriting the template. 117Avenue (talk) 14:22, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Duh, check Cambridge Bay, (facepalm). I think I may have seen the out of order references before, but dismissed it as the second one being used earlier in the article. This must have been a result when I used Source2 in an #if for the Source: | Source #1: label. I already have it fixed by using Source1 in an #if for replacing {{{Source}}} with [Citation needed]. But thanks for pointing that out. 117Avenue (talk) 00:12, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Amougies aerodrome

Thank you for updating/correcting the page about Amougies airfield EBAM. I am however confused with your changing "restricted" into "private", could you elaborate on your reasons? To me, "restricted" is the correct classification, as it illustrates the aerodrome basically allows visitors, however with the restrictive condition of first calling to get permission PPR. This corresponds to the French "Aerodrome à usage restreint" or German "Sonderlandeplatz" and is, by the way, the case for most Belgian recreative airfields. "Private" would mean to me that basically no visitors are accepted; or only on express invitation, as for the a/d of a hotel or restaurant.

Also, I regret you removed the reference to the Belgian AIP: this is the one and only official source of information. Is that not our preferred source of information? Jan olieslagers (talk) 07:44, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Alkan Air

The article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alkan_Air is about the Canadian Alkan Air and not the Egyption Alkan Air.

I was looking for information about the Egyption Alkan Air when I found the article. I wasn't previously aware that the Canadian Alkan Air existed. To help other people I added a line mentioning the existence of the Eqyption Alkan Air.

Please explain why you deleted this line. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.155.234.84 (talk) 11:02, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Assistance required for user in clear violation of Wikipedia Neutral point of view policy

Hi Alan. Need assistance with distruptive/openly biased user Gwillhickers whose admittance of national bias and disproportionate national imagery on the Alexander Graham Bell article is a breach of WP:NPOV. Had to point out to him that Bell invented the telephone as a British citizen (which is dealt with in the article intro). Inspite of having advocated fair/balanced/proportional representation that meets neutrality standards (ie.equal national commemorative images from Scotland, US and Canada), the user has continued to be disruptive and breach fundamental NPOV wikipedia policy. Furthermore commemorative image placement is in the legacy/honors section (of which there is one from the US), so placing images with no relevance to the text in other sections is also breach of WP:MOS. Thanks for your assistance.Gold coast surf (talk) 13:30, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Template:Infobox airport

Hi CambridgeBayWeather. I have added a suggestion for new parameters for the template Infobox airport here and, since you are very involved on airports in Wikipedia, I thought you may well like to express your opinion on it. Coyets (talk) 14:03, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Alexander Graham Bell image dispute

I left an explanation in the AG'Bell discussion page, and also sent the complaintant the same message on his user page. GWillHickers (talk) 18:47, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

NPOV

Hello again, CBW,

It is not I who feels I have violated NPOV, it is user: gold coast surf. See discussion page. In any event, thanks for your interest. All the best. GWillHickers (talk)

ONLF

The Somali people are not Arab. We are purely Muslims, and the ONLF is a struggle for the Somalis and it is the vision of GREATER SOMALIA, nor GREATER ARABS. It has ZERO to do with Arabs, so could you please understand that?

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FancyFaceU (talk • contribs) 15:23, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Removal of Goat Glossary of Terms

I contributed this page that I wrote and contributed 10:48, 1 July 2005 I don't see this change in your history page nor can I find the page in Wiktionary

05:54, 6 April 2007 CambridgeBayWeather (talk | contribs) deleted "Goat Glossary of Terms" ‎ (Prod:This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary.)

Thank you goatlady (talk) 14:01, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

i was trying to add other Prophets in islam to the table. Can you somehow help? I though adding Seth, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Daniel, Samuel, Uzair and Luqman would be good —Preceding unsigned comment added by Imadjafar (talk • contribs) 18:41, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

The Prophets in Islam template

Can u help me add Seth, Luqman, Uzair, Jeremiah, Isaiah, Daniel to the table please? --Imadjafar (talk) 18:44, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Page deletion/admin civility

I'd appreciate it if you'd be so good as to look over this exchange and let me know your view. Regards Redheylin (talk) 19:00, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

The assertion of notability (products reviewed in trade magazines, 50,000 google hits) WAS on the talk page. The article was deleted apparently without an answer on the talk page or my page and despite a hang-on notice. The policy that "the notability of a company need not be asserted in the article so long as it is verifiable" has been pointed out to the deleter, who is now ignoring requests to userfy the talk page so that the unanswered evidence may be examined. Redheylin (talk) 22:28, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

"I challenge you to a battle of wits, namely a nineteenth century underpant wearing contest. We stand back to back and the first man to wear out the seat of his pants dies, of exposure." Redheylin (talk) 22:38, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

"The north wind blew, flakes of white settled on my shoulder. To cap it all, I've got dandruff..." Ah, so! Contradictory guidelines. Well, that explains everything about why the "hang-on" should be ignored, the request for userfication of the talk page ignored, the guideline should be ignored and my requests for guidance should be ignored for days before being told to "get lost", of course! And how long did it take you? Gosh. And there was I thinking someone was being incivil. You should be made an admin. A what, Henry? An admin, Min. Redheylin (talk) 23:27, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Practically, though, ought steps be taken to sort out the misleading guidelines? And may I refer the article to you when notability is established? Note: I have spent a good deal of time sorting out music technology articles - several thousand edits - and am in a position to know which important articles are missing. I'd like to be able to add them without disruption. A speedy delete was added to this article within seconds of the first save. I followed guidelines to the letter and stopped work till the matter was resolved. There was no attempt whatsoever to resolve it or even to contact me. It's not possible to work like this, especially if the guidelines are contradictory and admins delight in ignoring them anyway, refusing advice with abuse and discourtesy. I am not asking you to fix everything - but what to do? Redheylin (talk) 01:49, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

POV Tags

Hi CBW, My apologies for not responding directly sooner. Regarding the POV tag I elected to use at the Alexander Graham Bell page last week, I just wanted to mention that several brief attempts at discussion were made through the edit notes in the edit history log. Not sure exactly at 'what' point the POV tag went up, but I do know it did so when discussion was initiated in the discussion page. That was the first time I have ever used a POV and wanted to assure you that it was not used without any reservation. The issue began when an 'editor' whose name, 'gold coast surf', just appeared in the edit history of the last several days there, removed an image of Bell's telephone on a U.S. postage stamp, not because of its content, but because of its 'national origin' claiming that to include another image on the page from the U.S. would disturb the balance of neutrality, etc. I argued that the entire Bell article could be presented in a NPOV capacity even if the author(s) was from the U.S. and used only images from the U.S. I also took issue with the idea that if we were to establish such rigid rules of inclusion it seems it would force the removal of many images throughout Wikipedia as most of the pages have images from one country of origin. At least for myself, I thought the issue important enough to use the POV tag. Ultimately my request for mediation failed because the other party refused to participate, so I removed the POV and bowed out, as the three parties involved in the dispute were not from the US.

The whole issue was terribly divisive which is another reason why I pursued it no further. Ashes have since settled there and the image I included no longer remains. I make mention of this now as the issue involved a lengthy, unresolved dispute over something like national origin and that issues like this perhaps need to be addressed or reviewed by administrators and policy makers. -- May I also add that I seek no assistance in the past dispute, as it is quite over on that page. I could have easily solicited support by going straight to the Philately project with the news of what had happened, and why. Of greater importance here is that the disputed image was declined on the basis of national origin, in the name of balance, as if the entire page took on a completely different aspect upon inclusion of this one image. Its removal was based on an assumption such would have occurred. Again, I hope an issue like this will have at least been addressed among administrators when the chance presents itself in the future. All the best. GWillHickers (talk) 23:07, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Charron (rapper)

FYI, PROD has been contested by the author.  --Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) 03:56, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

He's_Got_the_Whole_World_in_His_Hands

Hi there, I wanted to ask you why you deleted my addition on the page He's_Got_the_Whole_World_in_His_Hands? Do you think it's some soft of marketing action from the band? If you think so, this is not the case. If you don't believe, that He's_Got_the_Whole_World_in_His_Hands is part of the song "The small of your back, the nape of your neck" please check http://www.songmeanings.net/songs/view/3530822107858778841/ (of course the line is only mentioned once, but it's used several times. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.70.169.36 (talk) 14:25, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Re, Islam source templates

Re, your message: It has been done. Your template is ready for use. Please see {{Hadith-usc}} for more info. I'm working on replacing all instances of the other ones with this one... if that's okay with you.— Dædαlus ^Contribs 23:26, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Re, your message: The following templates which have been struck out have been replaced with {{Hadith-usc}} in the article namespace. Please delete them. The ones which are not struck out have of course not been dealt with yet:

{{Abudawud}}	Proof
{{Abudawud-usc}}	Proof
{{Bukhari}}	Proof
{{Bukhari-usc}}	Proof
{{Muslim}}	Proof
{{Muslim-usc}}	Proof
{{Muwatta}}	Proof
{{Muwatta-usc}}	Proof

Please take care of them when you have time :) — Dædαlus ^Contribs 05:34, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

I actually knew about that error, but didn't know how to tackle it. Quite simply, the template you linked on my talk page is the only one out of the eight that has intricate code. The rest are the same except for the urls they link to. Although wikipedia parser functions are the first 'code' I learned, after learning others, it leaves much to be desired.. I'm not giving up on the intricate one, but it's going to be a big longer before I fix it. Also, as I don't want to do it later, do you want the one's code to be the same for the rest?— Dædαlus ^Contribs 05:31, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Note, most of these are now nominated at WP:TFD. Thanks! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:28, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

:D

{{Hadith-usc}} I bit the bullet and looked into the old template, and with the help of an admin retrieving it, I realized everything wasn't immensely nested as I once thought. To this end, the template is now fully functional, with all the special parameters in bukari-usc accounted for.— Dædαlus ^Contribs 00:10, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Magool

I would like to ask why did you delete what I have written in the page? It might not have source, but in actually it is the truth. She was a singer who sang songs about harming people from different clans. And do not tell me that I have no source for my claims, because that whole page lacks any sources. Therefore, I would like to know what is your motivation to remove the source? --FancyFaceU (talk) 20:39, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

question

I see you are a Canadian administrator. I seek your wisdom. If someone wrote in the Jason Spezza article that he has genital herpes, is this a BLP violation? Jason is a famous hockey player. What if the reference was a reliable source, like ESPN? The article in question is not Jason's but he is Canadian and you are too. The article in question is about a famous Pakistani. Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 19:48, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Back

psst. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 16:57, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

"English Ontarian"

Hello CambridgeBayWeather, thank you for immediately putting a stop to the "Jean Simard" debacle that erupted this afternoon. I caught them when they added Joseph Brant to the list and was in the process of attempting to alert administrators when you stepped in, thanks again. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 17:17, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Subpage

Could you please delete these subpages i have and the talk pages that are with them i was using them for Archiving but i decided to merge them into a lager archive. Thanks Kyle1278 02:53, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

• Pages
  • User:Kyle1278/April-May 10
  • User:Kyle1278/February-March
  • User:Kyle1278/June-July 09
  • User:Kyle1278/August-September 09
  • User:Kyle1278/February-March 09
  • User:Kyle1278/October-November 09
  • User:Kyle1278/April-May 09
  • User:Kyle1278/December-January 09-10
  • User:Kyle1278/February-March 10

Thanks for the help! Cheers Kyle1278 21:56, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Responding to your message

I am new to Wikipedia and do not fully understand how to edit pages but I do know when a page is put on Wikipedia as a means to advertise and I see no reason why Livemercial should be on Wikipedia. Can you submit it for deletion as it is not worthy of being listed, it is written like an advertisement, and the numbers and figures they state have no proof. When a private corp makes a Wikipedia page shouldn't they be relevant?

Can you please submit this for deletion or discussion for deletion for me and let me know what I can do to make sure that there are no issues going forward? I apologize for the problem I may have caused with you, I was just trying to help. Thank you for your help and understanding.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Livemercial —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.175.243.228 (talk) 19:40, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Userpage

I just wanted to drop in and say I really enjoyed your take on the Cremation of Sam McGee found on your userpage. The poem is very familiar to me, and I immediately recognized the structure. Nicely done! Bravo! I happened across you while wiki traveling from today's FA at Halkett boat. I thought it interesting that the population of Cambridge Bay has increased by more than 100 from 2001 to 2006. Population boom! Is this primarily immigration or local births? --Hammersoft (talk) 14:46, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Foreign vs. Exotic in Nanook

Hello CBW,

Saw your edit to Nanook of the North. I for one would vote for "exotic." "Foreign" is a word other Euro-Americans apply to one another -- the Brits to the Norwegians, the Americans to the Spanish, or the Germans to the Portuguese -- Foreigners are not necessarily "exotic." Whereas groups which, from the Euro-American view, are further flung -- the Eskimos, Hottentots, or Igorrotes -- are not only foreign but also exotic, of intrinsic interest for their seeming strangeness. Clevelander96 (talk) 22:36, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Great solution -- I like it phrased just the way you've done it. Clevelander96 (talk) 18:21, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

article katlin bridge

whyd you delete my article and what vandalism —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pollyxpollyester (talk • contribs) 16:03, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi there,

I hope you don't mind, but I undid your redirect on my article, "Fashion Faux Pas". This is actually a group assignment for a university course and there is still much work to be done my group on it. They will be applying edits over the next few days and by then, we will have a more robust submission to stand on its own.

Thanks, Carrie —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cross01 (talk • contribs) 16:53, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Ref-desk question

You may want to weigh in on this one. Deor (talk) 02:10, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

halayeb triangle maps

thank you for posting the army maps , and by the way how are the dictators running wikimapia? and what do you know you personally about halayeb triangle? and why do you write about it? for what reason? Abdelhamidelsayed (talk) 00:48, 15 June 2010 (UTC)abdelhamidelsayed

Hi

I seem to keep seeing you in a wide variety of articles that I'm interested in, and I've come to recognize and trust your wonderfully reliable editing, so I just wanted to finally say "hi". Of coarse, it would serve you right if I threw a sausage instead  : ) Doc Tropics 16:21, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Hello, CambridgeBayWeather. You have new messages at Falcon8765's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Falcon8765 (talk) 05:02, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Infobox weather

Could you please join the conversation at Template talk:Infobox weather#Mean Number of Precipitation/Rain Days. You know more about meteorology than I. 117Avenue (talk) 22:05, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Weather observer

Just out of my curiosity, do you still observe the weather in Cambridge Bay? OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 04:28, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

At Cambridge Bay 'A'? OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 05:09, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Ah, then I might be reading the data collected by you at work *cues form 2304/2322/2325* OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 05:40, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Let's switch to email chat. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 05:48, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

History of Canada

Hello my friend, Ok was wondering if you think that the History of Canada article is ready for GA review...I think all refs are ok and grammar too..only thing i see is alt text missing ...Pls when you have time - tell me what you think - again only if you wish and have the time.. i am in no rush. I will be asking User:Nikkimaria and User:SriMesh to also look at it. Moxy (talk) 18:30, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Greetings

Greetings CambridgeBayWeather - No problem. I thought I'd better do it without asking your permission first. If you were curious, there was always the history to fall back on. Cheers!--Technopat (talk) 06:48, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Your 'disruptive edit' warning message re Alan Plater

Alan Plater is dead, you idiot. Saying so is not a disruptive edit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.12.252.18 (talk) 13:09, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Resurrection from the Tailbone (Coccyx)

The book, hadith number and the author name are given. What is confusing you find ?

Please let me know K.butt —Preceding unsigned comment added by Passionhunter (talk • contribs) 04:41, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

I am quoting the sayings of the Holy Prophet Mohammd (p.b.u.h) just like there are quotations from the Holy Quran on this page. If we start explaning these quotations, we will be needing a lot of pages. Why i put it in the beginning because its the first stage i.e. resurrection. It basically tells you how will we be resurrected on the day of judgment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Passionhunter (talk • contribs) 05:24, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

"Glasgow Rosses"

Hi, I had this page on my watchlist from when I originally new-page patrolled it, so it came to my attention immediately when this was recreated; however, I wasn't sure how it had been deleted the first time, and I couldn't see a reason to speedy it. Could you explain the reason it met G3? Was this simply an already-discovered hoax or did I miss something? Thanks in advance. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 14:34, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, CambridgeBayWeather. You have new messages at Giftiger wunsch's talk page.
Message added 16:00, 28 June 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

another page gone..

you deleted the page Epilepsy York Region and i just wanted to know why/what to change so it can stay up —Preceding unsigned comment added by Purpleepilepsy (talk • contribs) 17:54, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Nunavut island templates

Hi CBW - I know this comes months late, but all those geo templates, especially the island ones (there are so many islands!) are wonderful. They certainly help in navigation, and really influence understanding of what is where, IMO. Good job! --Rosiestep (talk) 02:08, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Well, hopefully there are others besides me! You could try a straw poll... --Rosiestep (talk) 02:53, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

CFS Debert

Don't worry, I'm not gonig to 'bash' you. Actually, wanted to thank you for pointing that out (Servinghistory.com...), it's in pretty small print, so it's not easily noticed. I honestly didn't notice it, until after you mentioned it.

Now, to continue on my hunt of updating the CFS portion (I'm working at the Debert Military Museum, so I figured i'd try to update it some, and it's bothering me how little refrences there are.

Once again, thanks,

Mulch, TheUndeadDwarf 12:59, 7 July 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheUndeadDwarf (talk • contribs)

From QMarion II

Hi CBW -- thanks for the welcome and the virtual cookies; nice of you to want to help out *new* Wikipedians although actually I've been editing for a few years now -- I'm sure I'll run into you again on some of my projects (I'm working with TheUndeadDwarf on CFS Debert, above). Cheers. QMarion II (talk) 18:48, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

-- No worries. —Preceding unsigned comment added by QMarion II (talk • contribs) 13:03, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Glasgow Rosses

Looks like it's back again; I've added db-hoax to it but I thought I'd let you know in case you wanted to do something about it. This may have to be salted. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 11:11, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Peer review/Somalia/archive1

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Peer review/Somalia/archive1. Gyrofrog (talk) 17:00, 12 July 2010 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}}) -- Gyrofrog (talk) 17:00, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

You know what, never mind, treat it as more of an FYI rather than an invitation or suggestion. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 19:51, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Re: deletion of CEE4 related pics

With regards to points 1 through 4 (was there 5 and 6? depends how one parses, I guess) I think you're right, right, right, and right.
I though my taking a screen-pic created value, so could be claimed by me. But you're so confident I'll defer.
As for accuracy ... you know, I never thought of that. Of course I wouldn't propose charts be used IRL but ... I didn't even assume the pics would be good; simply never considered it. So thanks for the brick/head on that. cheers p.s. was Pin3 early 70s. :-) --BenTremblay (talk) 21:00, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi

why did you delete me page? I am a young company trying to make a name for myself and had not finished editing.. please put it back up as it did not violate anything rights, and it it did was try and expaln what my company was... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.225.225.119 (talk) 22:25, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Please undelete my article about my small company young&ng

Hi

I do not understand why you deleted my article about my company young&ng. It took me a long time to start it and i had not finished. It did not violate any rules or was unlawful.

Please put back up my article. It took me a long time.

Artile anem : young&ng en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young%26ng thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.225.225.119 (talk) 22:29, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

I suggest that you log back in and recreate the article in your user space such as at User:Mng2311/Sandbox. Then makes sure you show how the article meets the criteria set out at Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) and that it's sourced and does not look like an advert. Get the advice of another editor and then move it to the article space. If you work on it in your own space it won't get deleted. I'll move the deleted version there now. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 22:33, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

User:Sourisnaine

Thanks for taking care of the Sourisnaine talk page deletion. However, it appears that you may have overlooked this redirect, which was part of the WP:MFD request. Cheers, Ohconfucius ^¡digame! 17:04, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Assistance

Hi! What is usually done with a cloud of sockpuppets (across several wikis, some as IPs, most as 'new users') of a banned user who blanks pages en masse, creates hoaxes, uploads cpvios to wikimedia, 'translates' content from enwiki to other languages without proper attribution (and nominates said content for featured content there), demands creation of new wikis claiming to be of a minority American group in one such case, and edits other people's user pages? Nearly all of this is related to Greenland, and is quite easy to see over time. This is of course getting quite tiresome at some point. Would you be willing to lend a hand? — Algkalv (talk) 12:06, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. I'd like to do it now, as I won't have time later. Would the admin incidents page be fruitful? I'm asking, as I have already done this once on commons, in early May, but got zero response, although both the enwiki hoax and the cpvios were deleted. There is a lot more than this, this is just a sample. archive. So, which should I pick of those you quoted? And, what would be needed, a list of IPs and usernames and a list of diffs for each? There is a truckload of those. — Algkalv (talk) 17:23, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Ok, but the WP:AN/I page states in bold that that board is only for English Wikipedia issues, and in a list below directs to sockpuppet investigations. This is a crosswiki issue. So, should I post there anyway? I just want to be extra sure before I post ;) — Algkalv (talk) 17:36, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

That's exactly the problem, the issues are cross-wiki. What should I do then? — Algkalv (talk) 18:57, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Then it looks like nothing can be done globally. The vandal had everything I know of reverted already on en-wiki, so my post on the board would be ignored, I suppose. I think it's a 'hole in the system' that a problematic user and their sockpuppets can operate globally at will. I think that if someone is banned in X, this person should be bannaed at Y, for any Y!=X. Ok, then I'll drop it, and deal with the recent problems on relevant wikis, though I have better things to do than chase a troll. And thank you for many replies ;) — Algkalv (talk) 19:17, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Thank you ;) Greenland-related pages have very few contributors (and watchers, and interested admins), and it gets very lonely there. It's good to have someone who is willing to help out with issues (though on the other hand, for the same reason these issues are relatively infrequent, apart from the main article about the country, which seems to attract people the same way as the main page about Inuit does). While I'm here, I'll say that I commiserate with the high flight prices you have to endure up there in CB ;) I once calculated what it would cost me to fly through the most important towns in Nunavut, and I came up with.... 30,000 NOK... I couldn't sleep afterwards :D — Algkalv (talk) 20:34, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Right, that goes to show that the only sensible route to Nunavut is through Greenland ;) The far south of Canada would be too hot anyway... Here is to hope that the Nuuk-Iqaluit route is opened for good. Strange though that one of the most expensive connection within Nunavut seems to be the Iqaluit-Rankin Inlet route (the loop through Resolute seems to be more theoretical than real), as if the two parts of Nunavut had little contact, and going through the far south was more common. — Algkalv (talk) 08:20, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Finally spotted something Canadian in Greenland. Preparations for war over Hans Island? ;)

(been away up north, so this is a delayed reply) I once attempted to draw an SVG of all relevant connections in Canada (ignoring the south, mostly), and came up with this, before I got seriously looped in Labrador and gave up ;) But still, it should be accurate and complete as of late last year regarding the north. What I'm after is not a transfer in Yellowknife, or at least, not both ways. Apart from a hop to Baffin Island from Greenland, I'm thinking of a twisted round-the-world itinerary which would be as far 'up there' as I can make it, hence my interest. There is a big gap northeast of Rankin Inlet, but otherwise possibilities there seem to be many. A once-weekly through Resolute sounds good, if only I could combine it with Nanisivik, for example. Strange that Repulse Bay is so isolated. Kugaaruk or Hall Beach are so 'close'... Eeh, a flight itinerary combining as many airports as possible in Nunavut would be just as good as a RTW ;) — Algkalv (talk) 17:11, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest - Question

I have read the article on Wikipedia's COI and had a question. If there is an article related to rules for a game that I created solely ( but did not create the article for as to per avoid COI ), what is the proper procedure for editing? If there is a rule that is incorrect, am I allowed to correct it? If so, where do I have to cite my COI? The article's talk page, or my user page, or both? Or do I have to make a suggestion to correct in the talk and wait for a non-COI user to make that edit by proxy if they feel it is up to standard? If I only modify existing entries with fact corrections (no promotion or controversy), am I within editor guidelines? BaShildy (talk) 01:24, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Navis Marine

Dear Madam/Sir,

If I want to introduce Navis Marine to wiki users, What should I do with article?

I am a new with wiki, please help.

Thanks,

Wuchjun —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wuchjun (talk • contribs) 02:41, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Frank Pape

Why was the Captain Frank Pape page deleted? I own and operate IPSN.org, which is why I used content from that site to be placed on Wikipedia.

Sincerely,

John J. Flood —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mppavese (talk • contribs) 23:06, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

IPSN.org

I have removed the "IPSN 1997 - 2010 All rights reserved. Not for republication on the internet without permission." from the IPSN site. Will I now be able to copy and paste historically factual material from the site to Wikipedia?

Thank you,

John J. Flood —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mppavese (talk • contribs) 23:19, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Geter Sheeted

I was wondering why you deleted the Geter Sheeted page. It's an actual phrase that people from 14 states use and its spreading to other states and countries thanks to future engineers. The phrase 'Geter Sheeted' is not in any way bad, its a better way of saying 'Git-R-Done', if I may say so myself.

Future Engineer —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mppavese (talk • contribs) 23:47, 1 August 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Beeky21 (talk • contribs)

Snitches

So where is it being discussed? --Triton Rocker (talk) 02:23, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Question

CBW, I left you a question at [[User talk:Abdi 909]. Drmies (talk) 01:24, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

i was not deleting i was editing —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abdi 909 (talk • contribs) 15:50, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello CambridgeBayWeather! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 943 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Geoffrey Hattersley-Smith - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:53, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Stuff

Hi. Per your close at

• Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Wildhartlivie/Stuff (2nd nomination)

could you please delete the June revs concerning me. Livie has retired and no use was made of this page. I've no issue with some sort of note going in the visible history about what occurred and with it all landing back on the 'April' version about 'funny stuff'. Cheers, Jack Merridew 01:36, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Announ.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Announ.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:02, 23 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:02, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Hello!

If your at all interested pls jump in,,,,---> Talk:History of Canada/GA1..Moxy (talk) 05:44, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Greenland tag

Category mishap? I tagged some Inuit topics as Greenland-related simply because they are all under Category:Greenland; I'll review them and see which need to be untagged. Thanks. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:58, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

RE: Lloydminster

Thanks for catching and fixing that. My bad! 1brettsnyder (talk) 02:03, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

M-A92

Yeah, the word "Inukophone" and the "fact" of Prescott and Russell joining the "municipality" of Upper Canada in 1820 were pretty much dead giveaways. Though, in truth, combing through his edit history I'm finding an unexpectedly large number of edits that actually aren't problematic at all — though of course the ones that are problems are whoppers. Bearcat (talk) 18:20, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Okay, this and this are a new one for the classic files. Bearcat (talk) 18:43, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Roman Rewald

I want to ask you why you deleted the chairman's profile of the American Chamber of Commerce in Poland. Could you please explain? I wrote to the talk page, but you never responded: Roman Rewald is the Chairman of the American Chamber of Commerce in Poland and therefore should have his own Wikipedia page. This information can be researched by potential new members to the Chamber.

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amchampoland (talk • contribs) 12:56, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

"Adhan"

This message is to inquire why the recent reversion of the wikipedia article "Adhan"; Change back from allah to God. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Editor799 (talk • contribs) 17:25, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Banners

Hi. Could you have a look at the Ilulissat article? It's a page for a town, and has an entire section devoted to a conference, and a related political statement of 2008. The declaration has its own article. Someone is inserting and reinserting an annoying banner at the top of the page. I don't think city/town/settlement pages should be peppered with such banners unless it's a disambiguation. — Algkalv (talk) 12:46, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the judgment! I'm about 1 mm (0.039 in) from the 3-revert rule though, with respect to this particular issue... :) Hopefully, there will be no more need to revert. — Algkalv (talk) 13:17, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia and public domain for upcoming edits.

Please discuss seriously about http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#Wikipedia_and_public_domain_for_upcoming_edits.

Rishikeshan (talk)

Hello, CambridgeBayWeather. You have new messages at Rishikeshan's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Standard for including Alberta in place name

Hello again. I hope it is not too much of a bother, but I was hoping you could chime in on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Alberta#Standard for including Alberta in place name, because it involves moves only an administrator can do, and none of the current commenters are admins. Thanks, 117Avenue (talk) 05:18, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

larnaca and pafos airport are on the greek side. so i dont see why they should have the turkish name for them. its mainly the greeks who use them. have you ever been the them both. as you walk in. they have the name in english and greek. not turkish. so stop what your doing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyprus10 (talk • contribs) 14:47, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

good call

you literally edited the ramadan page as I was about to dive in and subtract the PBUHs. Glad to see there are still people removing bias from articles on wikipedia. 173.66.245.195 (talk) 19:50, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Premier League FAR

I have nominated Premier League for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Cordless Larry (talk) 22:40, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Early photgraph of CambridgeBayWeather.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Early photgraph of CambridgeBayWeather.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:56, 8 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Imzadi 1979 → 06:56, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Early photgraph of CambridgeBayWeather.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Early photgraph of CambridgeBayWeather.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Imzadi 1979 → 20:39, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

{{talkback}} Set Sail For The Seven Seas 210° 4' 15" NET 14:00, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Hello, CambridgeBayWeather. You have new messages at Thesevenseas's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Set Sail For The Seven Seas 275° 4' 45" NET 18:20, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Sirmilik National Park

Hi again. Was Sirmilik National Park established in 1999 or 2001? I'm assuming that Parks Canada is the authority on this? Thanks, --Rosiestep (talk) 03:59, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) ......2001 [7].Moxy (talk) 04:09, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Welcome back :) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:50, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

'Burlesque' Wiki Page - Highly relevant sites/links have been deleted - why?

I would just like to know why some of the external links on the Burlesque wiki page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burlesque) have recently been removed, and other, less relevant/significant links have been allowed to remain, both in 'External Links' and 'See Also'.

Both The Ministry of Burlesque and 21st Century Burlesque Magazine, for example, have well established, high profile and informative burlesque websites - it makes sense to have them listed as a point of reference.

Just wonder if you could explain your decision to remove them.

Thanks.

87.112.110.172 (talk) 23:10, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

I've been away for a while, so sorry I didn't reply sooner. It appeared that there was an effort to promote one site over another starting here, which I then restored. An IP then removed two links so I removed the third. Rather than have a back and forth over which commercial site(s) should be included I thought it better that all go. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 14:52, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

I see - that makes sense. However, both 21st Century Burlesque and Ministry of Burlesque are leading burlesque websites, and they really should be there. Nothing to do with bias or promotion - they are simply very significant points of reference. There are other websites and individuals that should also be listed. There are other links currently on that page which point to sites that have not been maintained in a very long time, or are fairly random links to things that are not very established or significant.

I am happy to propose a list of appropriate links for you to consider adding - I just think the links and references on this page need to be brought up to date. I say this as someone heavily involved in the current scene/industry.

Thank you for taking the time to reply to my first message - I appreciate it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.93.185.94 (talk) 13:58, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Feel free to add back the ones that you think are important and worthy of inclusion. My interest in the article had more to do with keeping it tidy rather than trying to add material. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 21:56, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I have begun to add and amend a few links, but when I have more time in the next day or so there are more additions and edits that should be made. I think a few sections could even be expanded a little. If you think anything I have added thus far should be moved to a different heading/section let me know.

84.93.173.69 (talk) 17:27, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Looks fine to me. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 17:19, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Hi - you have deleted some 'unsourced' links. Can you tell me what that means? I added one or two very significant names. Thanks.

84.93.173.69 (talk) 22:14, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

I removed anybody that does not have an article such as Kelly Setliff and had no references to prove that they were notable. Others like Kittie Klaw and Jo Weldon, have a web site, but need something more to prove that they are notable in the field. Although for Weldon the fact that she has a school in part demonstrates notability but it would be good to have a second reference not connected to her. On the other hand Red Hot Annie could probably stay based on the NBC reference. The problem is that once red links get put in without a reference then you can't tell if they are legitimate burlesque performers or just people who want to see their name, or their friends, in Wikipedia. The burlesque article is not bad for that, its more common in articles about towns where people add names. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 10:26, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

History of GetEQUAL article?

Hi, i noticed this edit [8] on Direct action, which leads me to inquire: what is the situation with a possible GetEQUAL article? thanks, Richard Myers (talk) 16:14, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

October 9th, 2010 will be our one year friendship Anniversary

I just wanted to write and say hello and wish you a happy one year friendship anniversary!

GiggitygiggitygogogogogomezBUSTAAAA!!! (talk) 19:41, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

XRumor

Hi, CBW,

I wonder why you deleted XRumor.

I read about XRumor on Slashdot, which said it was the most popular (and annoying) program of its type, and I wanted some more information.

I found a copy of the page on the Wayback Machine http://web.archive.org/web/20071014015902/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XRumer. I thought it was wp:notable, it was well-sourced and I don't see anything that violates Wikipedia rules. And now there is a detailed discussion of how XRumer operates for the benefit of people who want to protect their forums from it.

I couldn't find any reason in the deletion log and I couldn't find the deletion discussion.

Why was it deleted? -- Nbauman (talk) 18:38, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Steven Truscott article

We seem to have an editor tackling this article who appears to be on some sort of POV "mission" [9]. I've attempted to communicate with them on their own talk page after reverting their edits, suggesting that they take it to the article talk page first for consensus and was subsequently ignored. Could you please have a look at this when you get a chance. Thanks again for your time. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 18:25, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

I just noticed that you're pressed for time at the moment; so I'll drop this missive on Bearcat's talk page as well. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 18:31, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Bearcat handled this; sorry for the bother. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 19:03, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for deleting the 'Danielle Vass' article, i wasn't sure whether i used the right type of deletion and criteria but obviously it was okay, so thanks a lot! Grey Matter (talk) 18:27, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

The Wine Cellar Insider

Am I able to upload a new page that isn't misconstrued as promotion or advertising? It is biographical. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JLeve (talk • contribs) 17:27, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

GA reassessment of War in Darfur

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article after an editor placed a reassessment tag on the article talk page. You are being notified as you have made a number of contributions to the article. I have found a number of concerns which you can see at Talk:War in Darfur/GA1. I have delisted the article as it is not in a good state. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:52, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Talk:XRumer

See User_talk:Lectonar#Talk:XRumer --Hm2k (talk) 08:43, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Regarding your undoing of my edit on the "Mecca" page, since when can 7th and 8th century penned "Islamic tradition", stand as a substitute for a couple thousand years of prior history? Particularly since that "tradition" neither references the historical record, nor is there prior historical or archaeological record that supports it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by PeterWaldo (talk • contribs) 13:48, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

hamza

thanks for the article clean up :), still working on adding more info and sources. (Ewpfpod (talk) 15:33, 22 October 2010 (UTC))

spelling on Nunavut page

Ouch! My mistake . . . and thanks for catching it (licence: and here I thought I was familiar with the usual "Britishisms"). Ed8r (talk) 20:56, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Winnipeg Climate

I have a question for you...I just can't figure this out without your help.

If Winnipeg (pop. 0.7 million) has average winter (Dec.-Feb. incl.) minima of -20.2°C, Harbin, China (pop. 4.8 million) has average winter minima of -21.2°C and Ulan Bator, Mongolia (pop 1.1 million) has average winter minima of -24.8°C, Does Winnipeg have the coldest winter minima of any city in the world with a population of over 600,000? You seem to think it does, but I don't understand how you reached this conclusion. Can you help me out with this one? --24.77.41.241 (talk) 23:21, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

I really don't have anything to do with that anymore. However I will point out that the section in question says "...average night-time temperature during December, January and February..." It does not say anything about the 24 hour average temperature for December, January and February. In other words it is taking about a very specific set of temperatures. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 04:51, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Personal opinion only, but having been in both Winnipeg and Ulan Baatar in the winter time, I am willing to say that Ulan Baatar is the coldest city on the planet. Although this particular passage is giving very specific criteria, I am just saying UB is GD cold....--kelapstick^(bainuu) 13:03, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Unlike here which is having one of the warmest periods for this time of year. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 06:25, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Hello CBW, Please see my reply at User talk:Peter Horn#Coordinates. I was acting in good faith and may be I have to do some "bug hunting". Peter Horn User talk 15:05, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Chesterfield Inlet

Regarding your move proposition of Chesterfield Inlet, do you think the inlet should be at Chesterfield Inlet (Nunavut) and Chesterfield Inlet should be a DAB page? Just a thought.--kelapstick^(bainuu) 01:39, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Mayor lists

I split up List of mayors in Canada, a list of "current incumbents" which wasn't always properly updated and had an arbitrary population cutoff being applied to it. So those lists should be current incumbents only (but at least on the old list, that was claimed to also be inclusive of "mayor-equivalent" roles like the reeve of a village or hamlet, or the chief of a First Nation, even though those almost always fall on the wrong side of that arbitrary population cutoff.)

Given that all I did was split up an existing list that wasn't always properly maintained, if there are wrong names they can just be updated to whoever is now in the position, and other places that haven't been added can also be listed — but "all people who have ever been mayors" lists should be grouped by individual municipality instead of by an entire province or territory. Bearcat (talk) 15:44, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

You should reinstate the Zhao Lianhai article

Zhao Lianhai has been detained in Beijing without receiving a verdict (despite being tried 7 months ago) for his work as an activist on behalf of Chinese children who became sick after ingesting milk products tainted with melamine. The article should be linked to the 2008 Chinese milk scandal article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdlipes (talk • contribs) 17:48, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Qikiqtarjuaq

I note you have deleted a couple of URLs from the Qikiqtarjuaq page relating to its airport. In your revision comment you noted a remark added to the Instrument Approach Plate was spam. The airport at Qikiqtarjuaq, serving an important function in transatlantic aircraft ferrying (in addition to being a vital asset to the community), warrants a mention on the article page. (92.236.40.241 (talk) 14:26, 5 November 2010 (UTC))

Reference Desk-style question

Hope you don't mind an WP:RD/S question at your talk page; I doubt anyone would be in a better place than you to answer my question. The link to the real Cambridge Bay weather on your userpage tells me that Friday's and Saturday's highs are supposed to be just 1º and 2º respectively warmer than the lows; why does the temperature vary so little? Nyttend (talk) 03:08, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

By the way, if you reply here, please leave me a talkback. Nyttend (talk) 03:10, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)If I may, Cambridge Bay is heading into (or is already in) the dark season. No sun to warm up during the day? (In simple terms). Close? I likely shouldn't be answering weather questions on a meteorologists talk page...My RD style question is why don't meteorologists study meteors?--kelapstick^(bainuu) 04:46, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

I thought of that, but the graphic shows the sun during the daytime, so I figured that it was above the horizon somewhat. This is supported by our article on Cambridge Bay, which says that night doesn't begin until the very end of November. Nyttend (talk) 05:09, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

If it's cloudy and windy, maybe the warmth (that's sub-zero warmth, son!) can't really accumulate. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 05:28, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

It's been a while since I looked at a weather report for the arctic in the winter (probably since I was last there 10 years ago), but I believe it uses the sun during the day, not becuase it is sunny, but because it is daytime. As you get closer to polar night, the daylight hours get shorter. Looks like the sunrise is at 9:00 am, and the sunset is at 2:00pm.[10]. Not a whole lot of time to heat up. I am sure that Mr. Weather will be glad to educate us when he wakes up, but for now I am happy to speculate.--kelapstick^(bainuu) 06:00, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Dear RD: Why don't cosmetologists study the cosmos? — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 05:28, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Partly because that falls under the long range forecast. The further ahead the forecast the less accurate it becomes. However, it's an indication of a fairly stable weather system. On a daily basis the temperature variation will usually be no more than 5 °C (9 °F) to 10 °C (18 °F). If you look at Coral Harbour for Saturday they have an 8 °C (14 °F) change. That would be due to the cloud moving in to cover the sky and keeping the warmth in. Once the cloud cover is there the temperature will rise. It sounds wrong that a lack of sun makes the temperature rise but that's what happens in the winter. No cloud and the sun reflects off the snow/ice and heat is lost and it works during the polar night when there is no sun. We can get extreme changes in temperature in January/February with −40 °C (−40 °F) one day and −5 °C (23 °F) then next. Unfortunately the rise in temperature is accompanied by a blizzard. One other thing to look at is the long range forecast. There is a large difference between the current forecast and the normal temperatures for this time of year. All of October and most of November has been warmer than normal and may be another reason why there is only a 1 °C (2 °F) to 2 °C (4 °F) range. The weather in October was somewhat like the normal for September with little snow and quite a bit of rain. The ice, which we normally start measuring during the last week of October, had just started forming then and has only just reached the safe thickness of 20 cm (7.9 in).

meteorologists study meteors - well would you want to stand under a large rock that was working hand in hand with gravity waiting to see if was going to turn into a meteorite?

cosmetologists study the cosmos - given the choice between studying the Universe or beauty which would you pick, not to say that there isn't any beauty in the Universe but most of it is a long way off. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 06:18, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the detailed reply! Much of what you say surprises me — for example, I know that cloudy winter nights aren't as cold as clear winter nights here in the central USA, but I didn't expect that the cloud cover would actively warm the area. Nyttend (talk) 12:30, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

No problem. It's certainly an odd effect. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 19:03, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Don't know if anybody is still looking at this but here is an interesting view of the last 24 hours temperature. I thought it felt a bit cold this morning and much warmer in the afternoon. And tomorrow it is supposed to go right up. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 22:31, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Reply for you

... at User talk:Jerzy#Lot.
--Jerzy•t 03:06, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Osman Mahmoud somali clan

Hi there I'm wring to you regarding Osman Mahmoud somali clan article. I was adding Ayaan Hirsi Ali to prominent figures but you are deleting her. Why is that?

Regards Igor —Preceding unsigned comment added by Parmatula (talk • contribs) 13:35, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

CBW, the mention of the subject in various articles has gone back and forth for various reasons. I take it that the subject is deeply unpopular in some quarters, and previous removals were apparently made to somehow dissociate her from one group or another. (I've also seen her removed from "Notable Mogadishans" because she is a Dutch citizen, and (somehow) no longer a Mogadishan.) The article Hirsi Magan Isse, about her father, states that he is part of the Osman Mahmoud clan, but does not cite any source for this (I've now flagged it accordingly). The Ayaan Hirsi Ali article only specifies Darod clan (see citation #13). I think you are right to challenge inclusion in the Osman Mahmoud article, absent a source (in one of the articles) that would justify it. Have a better one, -- Gyrofrog (talk) 17:52, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi Grayfrog Ayaan Hirsi Ali writes about her clan and roots in her book Infidel she clearly states her clan as Darod and Osman Mahmoud as well regarding her removal from Notable Mogadishans she was born in Mogadishu. Igor —Preceding unsigned comment added by Parmatula (talk • contribs) 13:07, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

If she has said that then it could be included using the book as a reference. Don't forget to include the page number. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 16:20, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Reer Cumar etc.

It's possible, perhaps likely, that there is more than one Reer Cumar as these are based on given names (Cumar = Omar if I am not mistaken, and Reer or Rer is some kind of descriptor). For all I know there are other Reer Cumar clans besides Majeerteen and Isaaq. (There is at least one other one like this, but I can't recall the name, starts with "Habar" I think.) Perhaps Reer Cumar could/should be a disambig. page, pointing to Majeerteen and Isaaq. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 17:15, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

P.S. I also weighed in with this at AfD. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 18:11, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

McLeod Lake population

Saw your fixes....one of the problems with StatsCan's data-collection methods is they don't chronicle individual communities, at least not in publicly-searchable tables, only by electoral areas, which are vast, often bigger than a whole Maritime province and often mostly empty. So where we'll find specific figures for McLeod Lake's non-Indian, non-reserve population, that's debatable....and it's not just this case, and in others like Alkali Lake, Moricetown, and so on, we n eed to find population figures for given settlements and info on what else is there other than Indian Reserves....as you may have picked up I'm opposed to using the FN categories on regular placenames, they should actually on on named IR articles or IR-redirects.....some in the cat e.g. Mount Currie still don't make that distinction, but when you see "First Nations reserves in British Columbia" on a comma-province placename, it often isn't exact and precludes the notion that the place in question might not be just native. The only data on McLeod Lake that was available was native....although I think this article was band-engendered....but if so isn't it interesting that the existence of other people there was not of sufficient interest to include....there must be population source for such smalltowns SOMEWHERE.....Skookum1 (talk) 17:36, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

mic. bomb

Well, I don't know what happened his official web site, I'm just a fan of him. But he was a headliner of a some festivals in Turkey. Just let you know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SES94 (talk • contribs) 12:25, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Signature

Hey, this revert you made, [11], that was actually my edit. I was accidently logged out. I would prefer it if you revert it, because it looked neater that way. Zaza8675 (talk) 22:33, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Okay, see?

Thanks, but I was trying to show him good faith by giving him four warnings before getting him blocked. By the way, his IP is 65.184.87.113. 117Avenue (talk) 05:48, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Georgidimitrov.jpg

What do you mean by "unsorced image " .. this is Georgi Dimitrov ... the picture i took from a album of his pictures . — Preceding unsigned comment added by T3443 (talk • contribs) 15:45, 6 December 2010

Talkback

Hello, CambridgeBayWeather. You have new messages at Talk:Islamic view of Daniel.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your assistance please

Since you have lived in Cambridge Bay would you please look at User:Geo Swan/The voyage of the Berserk II? Geo Swan (talk) 02:28, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Nice job!

Thanks for all your recent work on Kananginak Pootoogook. You might want to submit it to DYK if you haven't already. I don't know if the expansion was large enough but it certainly looks like it. Lithoderm 01:50, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

President Reagan

Thanks... that was random. A sockpuppet perhaps? 117Avenue (talk) 06:53, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Reconfirmation diff to Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe

Hello. This is a message to inform you that your name has been removed from from the list of Wikipedia Signpost subscribers. Do not worry; this is simply a method of reforming the Signpost so that automated bots do not fill up retired users' talk pages with Signpost subscriptions (see discussion here) and to make life easier for the Signpost. If you wish to re-receive subscriptions, please send a reconfirmation edit to Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe by signing with

1. MessageDeliveryBot [you can also use a user talk subpage (like
2. MessageDeliveryBot, replacing SUBPAGE with the subpage for the delivery), but this won't trigger your "New messages" bar.] Thank you for understanding.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of TeleComNasSprVen (talk) at 05:56, 21 December 2010 (UTC).

Dealing with the articles of Islam

I know that you are a regular contributor to Wikipedia and may I ask for your opinion. I had made the following pages:

• Islamic view of Sarah
• Islamic view of Cain and Abel
• Islamic view of Elizabeth
• Islamic view of Hagar

I had also made a template 'Honoured women in Islam'. All of these are now being discussed for deletion? May I know why? I would like it if none were deleted, as all these people are important to our faith --Imadjafar (talk) 09:26, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

I proposed for deletion because they go against Wikipedia:Notability policy. read it and come back, instead of typing questions Someone65 (talk) 09:54, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Also, Shias dont accept bukhari hadiths and Shia hadiths dont mention those female names. You cant only think of Sunni point of view. If its in the Quran, then okay; if not, then leave it out of wikipedia. Otherwise its against Wikipedia:Neutral point of view Someone65 (talk) 09:58, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Consent

User:Imadjafar has consented to the deletion of Islamic view of Sarah and [Islamic view of Elizabeth] here [12]. So can i revert it to the speedy delete option? Someone65 (talk) 11:09, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

review

Hey, maybe you would like to review your keep decision for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic view of Cain and Abel, considering User;Imadjafar has agreed to the deletion of all sites redirected and merged in Biblical figures in Islamic tradition here [13] Someone65 (talk) 19:49, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Ref desk question

There's a question here on the reference desk that seems right up your alley. Deor (talk) 23:33, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Change of heart

User:imadjar seems to have had a sudden change of heart [14] and is recreating the deleted pages. He's also deleting templates. [15]. What should i do? Someone65 (talk) 20:11, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

As well he should, Someone65. As I have explained on your talk page, these biblical figures and biblical prophets are the subjects of 1400 years of Islamic scholarship. And they are well covered in the modern academic literature. Notability. Aquib (talk) 20:19, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

I object to these prophet additions by user:Imadjar because he provides no reference from anywhere. His articles are textbook violations of Wikipedia:No original research policy;

- There are no mentions in Sahih Bukhari

- no mention in Sahih Muslim

- No mention in the Quran

- No mention in Shia hadiths

- No mention in the Six major Hadith collections

- Most articles dont even have legit Primary sources

User:imadjar either uses

• bible verses (for an islamic article) .... or
• Quran verses which do not reflect the article title.

Its an absolute joke. I dont mind even if they were solely mentioned in Sunan Abu Dawood or something, but these figures play absolutely no role in Islam. This is making wikipedia look like a best-seller fiction novel. Look at my concerns with User:imadjar a month ago. User Imadjafar has a long history of falsely associating associating Biblical figures with Quranic ones Someone65 (talk) 23:09, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Deleting Islamic view of Elijah

Hello, is it possible that the page Islamic view of Elijah can be deleted? I copied the information onto the main Elijah page as it was not too much. --Imadjafar (talk) 09:32, 25 December 2010 (UTC)