User talk:Abdelhamidelsayed

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Abdelhamidelsayed, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Gary King (talk) 17:34, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alshalateen[edit]

A tag has been placed on Alshalateen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ecoleetage (talk) 02:00, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments in articles[edit]

Dear Abdelhamidelsayed - You have recently placed comments in articles, such as 22nd parallel north and Bir Tawil. If you agree with something (e.g. that Egypt does not claim Bir Tawil), then there is no need to say so. If you disagree with something (e.g. that Sudan controls the Hala'ib Triangle), then please either amend the article accordingly or place your comment in the discussion page. Please do not place comments in articles in the future - it is untidy and unencyclopaedic. (Incidentally, it would seem that your statement about the control of Hala'ib is correct - I have amended the 22nd parallel article.) Thanks. Bazonka (talk) 18:23, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

22nd parallel north - self-contradictory edit[edit]

You recently amended 22nd parallel north. You said that the original sentence "Bir Tawil is not claimed by any country" is wrong. Your edit then stated that "Sudan does not claim it" and that Egypt has "no claim on Bir Tawil". Hence your argument is self-contradictory.
Wikipedia operates a policy of neutral point of view (NPOV) - it is Egyptian POV to say that Sudan owns Bir Tawil and conversely it is Sudanese POV to say that Egypt owns it. Arguing one side over the other runs counter to Wikipedia's policies. Articles must state a neutral position, either giving both points of view, or neither. Stating that neither country claims Bir Tawil is NPOV, and your argument agrees that this is the case. I have therefore reverted your edits.
Also, despite my previous post on your talk page, you are still placing comments in articles. You must not do this. If you see an error, then correct it - do not insert text like "Wrong". And if you think that your edit is likely to be controversial, then discuss it on the article's talk page first.
Thank you. Bazonka (talk) 15:10, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to WikiMapia, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Wperdue (talk) 15:05, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hala'ib Triangle[edit]

In April, you moved the article Hala'ib Triangle to Halayeb Triangle without discussion on the article's talk page. A Google search found that there were over 145,000+ hits for "Hala'ib Triangle" compared to only 1,240 for "Halayeb Triangle", indicating that "Hala'ib Triangle" is, by far, the more common name. Because of this I requested that the page be moved back where it was, and this has been done.

If you believe that "Halayeb Triangle" is a better name for the article, please make your arguments for that move on the article's talk page. If the consensus of the discussion there agrees with you, then you can ask that the article be moved again, but please do not attempt to do so without having consensus behind you. Beyond My Ken (talk) 07:33, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A comment about this from your user page:

My main mission is to show the whole world that Hala'ib (Halayeb) triangle is egyptian.

While that may be your overiding mission in life, you should be extremely careful that the edits you make on Wikipedia do not promote that point of view. It is the policy of Wikipedia that all articles should present a neutral point of view and not be biased towards either of a set of competing claims, in this case those of Egypt and the Sudan. Please review the WP:NPOV policy and be certain to abide by it; those who do not can be blocked from editing Wikipedia as "POV-pushers". Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 07:46, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Personal information[edit]

A word of friendly advice: It is probably not a good idea to post your personal information on Wikipedia, where anyone can see it. You never know who's reading and what they might be capable of doing. Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:37, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your move of Hala'ib Triangle, etc.[edit]

Perhaps you didn't understand what I said to you before: you can't move the article simply because you "know" that the title you want is more correct, you have to get the consensus of other editors to agree with you. That means that you have to discuss it, tell your reasons, and convince others that your reasons are correct and your title is the best title. If you don't get that agreement from others, and that includes me, your move will just get reverted and, eventually, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

As for the edits you made to the article itself, you have restored unsourced material, despite my explaining to you that you need to find reliable sources for the information you want to add to the article. Once again, it doesn't matter what you know to be the case, you need to get a reliable source to support the information. I suggest, again, that you read WP:Reliable sources for an understanding of what kind of source is needed, and then do some research and find a source to support it. If, as you say, the "facts on the ground" are so clearly obvious, it should be easy to find a good source that say so. In the meantime, please do not add stuff to the article that is unsourced. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:18, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Cirt (talk) 06:40, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

halayeb triangle maps[edit]

I think you may have mixed me up with someone else. I did not upload the maps, I have never added anything to Wikimapia and I have made no edits to Hala'ib triangle. In fact until you left the comment I had never even heard of the Hala'ib triangle. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 04:21, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Hala'ib triangle. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Beyond My Ken (talk) 09:43, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do not edit Hala'ib articles[edit]

You have a self-declared POV conflict of interest regarding the Hala'ib triangle which prevents you from making neutral edit.s All edit you make to these articles must be accompanied by citations from reliable sources. I have reverted your edits. Beyond My Ken (talk) 15:30, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011[edit]

As you have been told many, many times before, as an editor with a self-proclaimed POV regarding the Hala'ib Triangle, and a self-proclaimed mission to show the world that it belongs to Egypt, you should not be editing this article. The next time you edit it in any way whatsoever, I will bring you to the Adminstrators' Noticeboard. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:08, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your message on my talk page, in which you say that you are "ready to fight" -- please see WP:BATTLEGROUND. Wikipedia is not the place for you to fight for your beliefs. We edit here from a stance of a neutral point of view, without picking favorites or pushing a particular point of view. We're not here to fight, we're here to make an accurate encyclopedia, and to do so we require citations from reliable sources to back up contentious edits, somethting that you have consistently failed to understand, or follow through on. While your goal in life may be, as you state on your user page, "to show the whole world that Halayeb (Hala'ib) triangle is egyptian", our goal is to present the facts about the Hala'ib Triangle as revealed by reliable sources. If you cannot edit according to our requirements, then it may be that you cannot edit Wikipedia. We shall see - certainly you have shown no indication in the past that you understand what we're about. Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:06, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User talk:Beyond My Ken with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Calabe 1992 04:18, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop[edit]

Please refrain from continuing the revert cycle on Hala'ib Triangle. See Wikipedia:Edit warring. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 17:36, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. WP is NOT for promoting anyone's point of view. Your word choice on your and other editors' talk page seems to indicate that you are mistaking this encyclopedia for a forum. Drmies (talk) 17:39, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion at WP:AN concerns you[edit]

Please see [1]. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:11, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Abdel, PLEASE see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines and follow the conventions. Your comments on talk pages and noticeboards do not--as a result they are unattractive and hard to follow. And because you still don't sign your messages (just type four tildes, ~~~~!) I keep running into edit conflicts and have to recopy and paste all my messages. Also note that the complaint on the noticeboard is NOT about the Arabic spelling of a name. Please read the complaint carefully: your future here is at stake. If I were you, I would reconsider the zealous wording of some statements you have made here. Best, Drmies (talk) 04:34, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- You are mentioned in this. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:48, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Abdelhamidelsayed. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Abdelhamidelsayed. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Abdelhamidelsayed. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Abdelhamidelsayed. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of العرص[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on العرص requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ... discospinster _talk 01:15, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note that this is the _English_ wikipedia and articles need to be in English. If you wish to write articles in Arabic, try ar.wikipedia.org.----Fabrictramp | talk to me 02:12, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pathawi[edit]

Dear Pathawi, We do not have to fight about Halayeb, because I speak Arabic and English fluently, being from Arabic ancestry (exactly from Egypt and my mother is from the Halayeb triangle) and I have been living in USA from 1998 (which means I speak excellent English).Beside that the major websites worldwide call it Halayeb. Feel free to contact me at abdelhamidelsayed@hotmail.com or if you live in USA at 2622275793.Also on Whatsapp. Best regards, Abd Elhamid Elsayed

Halayib[edit]

This is warning that your recent edit to this article [2] was made without a consensus to do so, which it disruptive behavior. If you do this again, you take the risk of being blocked from editing. Please discuss your proposed change on the article's talk page. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:21, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hala'ib Triangle[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

The edit made by Pathawi was made with a consensus gained at the article's talk page, your edit did not have consensus, so it has been reverted. Once again, this behavior is disruptive. Please participate at the article talk page and provide evidence that the name you prefer is the common English language name. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:34, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]