User talk:CAPTAIN RAJU/Archive 14

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 10 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15 Archive 16 Archive 20

2016 GA Cup-Finals

WikiProject Good Articles's 2016 GA Cup - Round 3

Hello, GA Cup competitors!

Tuesday saw the end of Round 3. Sainsf, for the third time, won with a sizable 487 points and a shocking 29 articles reviewed. In second, MPJ-DK had 168 points and 7 reviewed articles. In second place, MPJ-DK earned 168 points with just 7 articles, and in third place, Carbrera received 137 points with just 9 articles. Our two wildcard slots went to J Milburn with 122 points and Sturmvogel 66 with 101 points.

In Round 3, 65 reviews were completed! At the beginning of the GA Cup, there were 595 outstanding nominations in the GAN queue; by the end of Round 3, there were 394. Another demonstrable way in which this competition has made a difference is in the length of time articles languish in the queue. At the beginning of the GA Cup, the longest wait was over 9 months [1]; at the end of Round 3, the longest wait had decreased significantly, to a little over 5 months [2]—nothing before 2016. It's clear that we continue to make a difference at GAN and throughout Wikipedia, something we should all be proud of. Thanks to all our competitors for helping to make the GA Cup a continued success, and for your part in helping other editors improve articles. We hope to see all remaining users fighting it out in the Finals for the GA Cup so that are successes continue.

To qualify for the Finals, contestants had to earn the highest scores in each of the three pools in Round 3; plus, as well as the top 2 of all remaining users in all of the pools. For the Finals, users were placed in one pool of the remaining five users. To win the GA Cup, you must have the most points. The Finals started on June 1 at 0:00:01 UTC' and end on June 30 at 23:59:59 UTC. Information about the Finals and the pools can be found here. A clarification: in order for the points to count, you must mark your reviews as completed; it's not up to the judges to ensure that all reviews are completed by the end of a round.

We wish all the contestants the best of luck!

Cheers from Figureskatingfan, 3family6, Jaguar, MrWooHoo, and Zwerg Nase.

To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

The IP who added "?"

this edit wasn't a test or vandalism: as the edit summary makes clear, it was asking for clarification of a confused sentence (the text was " male literacy was 80%, and female literacy was 63.9% of the population was under six years of age.", which makes no sense: a statistic was obviously missing). The IP probably didn't know about {{clarify}} or any similar way to query this statement, but it was unhelpful to revert their edit and label it wrongly. I've now found the statistic, from the source cited, and tweaked the sentence to clarify it. PamD 19:55, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 June 2016

This week's article for improvement (week 23, 2016)

The Hilton Athens is part of the Hilton Hotels & Resorts hotel chain.
Hello, CAPTAIN RAJU.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Hilton Hotels & Resorts

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Photodetector • Whirlpool


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:07, 6 June 2016 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Wikidata weekly summary #212

It was a correction. If corrections aren't constructive, please ignore it. Or convince Dawn French to have a sex change. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.69.9.67 (talk) 17:17, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

20:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Oklahoma City FC

I am the webmaster for Oklahoma City FC and control all social media for the club.

There is no longer a men's team, Oklahoma City FC of the WPSL has the trademark on the name and owns the club.

I am attempting to update the page and history.

I had an issue with the box, am trying to correct.

Please do not tamper with my changes.

I am the only authorized person from Oklahoma City FC to make these additions.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ndwell (talkcontribs) 19:02, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

And you too, look at what you revert

--94.246.144.29 (talk) 06:40, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

I am reinstating my changes, because I am Oklahoma City FC and the only person authorized to make changes to the page on behalf of the owners of the team.

I am www.oklahomacityfc.com and am the reference for the changes made. This information is current and should not be undone. Please contact me before any future changes to the page. I am overriding your reversion to the old page and reinstituting my changes.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ndwell (talkcontribs) 14:41, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)With all due respect, you do not own the page. Anyone may edit the page as they deem fit, not needing your permission first to do so. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:42, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi Captain Raju

The edit I recently made on Peter Dinklage's page was based on a letter he sent to a fan. How should I reference this?

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Penpalthe (talkcontribs) 19:32, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello, CAPTAIN RAJU. You have new messages at 86.17.222.157's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The actual word is DALEEM

Kind request to change to actual word DALEEM, HALEEM is one of the name of ALLAH

Edit to TMBG 'Apollo 18'

The NASA mission Apollo 18 was not 'aborted' as it was never flown. The mission was cancelled from the flight schedule in September 1970. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.116.170.53 (talk) 20:15, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Reverted Edits

I have reverted your good faith edits to Charles George Baker - it appears that you think I have "vandalised" the article by removing text that was added by myself in the first place. I believe this to be a "false positive" as a result of using automated tools to scan articles. Your edits have been reverted and I would ask you to monitor the settings your software is using so you can prevent another occurrence of this issue. Exemplo347 (talk) 20:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Underlinking

You are tagging a lot of articles with the Underlinking tag. What kind of links are you missing on the gymnasts articles? Sander.v.Ginkel (Talk) 20:58, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Daniel Paladini

In response to your message regarding removal of Daniel Paladini's personal information. Reason being, that story was fabricated, there is no reason why that has to appear on his Wikipedia page. Do yourself a favor and do a background check on the person who claims she was abused. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trooper1131 (talkcontribs) 17:33, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

I've reverted Trooper1131's revert - subject of the article pleaded guilty, therefore swearing before a court that the events took place. This negates any possibility that the events in question are fabricated.Exemplo347 (talk) 00:08, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Celebrating Pride @ Women in Red

You are invited...

LGBTQ worldwide online edit-a-thon

Delivered by Rosiestep (talk) 04:02, 10 June 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage. (To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)

I fixed a typo "therefor" to "therefore"

All I did was to fix a typo from 'therefor' to 'therefore'.

you do have a mistake!

Greg Berlanti worked on Supergirl bro! and don't trouble yourself ill re-edit that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.96.6.54 (talk) 18:10, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Still vandalism

On Wig, You forgot to revert the other one which includes vandalism, and advertising which already done for you, but keep up the good anti-vandalism work! KGirlTrucker87 talk what I'm been doing 20:15, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Yatton RFC for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yatton RFC is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yatton RFC until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. for (;;) (talk) 08:54, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: May 2016





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Edit summary

Hi Captian Raju! I described my changes to midwifery with an edit summary. This is not a medical intervention, it's a health profession (great difference), so the used infobox don't apply in this case. --190.236.118.209 (talk) 12:26, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 24, 2016)

A cubic zirconia crystal made by the Shelby Gem Factory
Hello, CAPTAIN RAJU.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Shelby Gem Factory

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Hilton Hotels & Resorts • Photodetector


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:07, 13 June 2016 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

A kitten for you!

Your user page was vandalized. You need a kitten.

ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 12:43, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #213

ScrumMaster vs. Scrum master

Hi,

The Scrum Alliance has trademarked "Certified ScrumMaster" - note there is no space between Scrum and Master. During the class that led getting the certification, the instructor said there is no space between the two words.

Lyssa Adkins is highly regarded for her expertise, and she wrote on the topic: http://www.agilelearninglabs.com/2011/01/scrummaster-vs-scrum-master/

She points to the Wikipedia style guide to support her feeling that Scrum master is better that ScrumMaster, though she respects the Scrum Alliance's trademark.

I'd argue that the Scrum Alliance is correct, and that Wikipedia's style guide should be changed to support ScrumMaster. I don't think it's about the "pride" capital letters, it's about making it one word.

Thanks for your consideration!

Bob

bgroethe@gmail.com 167.182.60.254 (talk) 18:20, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

18:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC)