Talk:Gregory of Narek

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleGregory of Narek has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 6, 2022Good article nomineeListed

Armenian Catholic saint?[edit]

Is he not also an Armenian Catholic saint? And if not, why? 74.141.69.51 (talk) 05:16, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Most Armenians adhere to the Armenian Apostolic Church, which is an Oriental Orthodox church. There is however a small minority of Armenians who are followers of the Armenian Catholic Church. Gregory of Narek is a saint in the Apostolic Church, but I'm not sure if he is in the Armenian Catholic Church. --Երևանցի talk 14:45, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"elevated"[edit]

Is "elevated" a technical term? It is not in the article referenced. Perhaps "named", which is used in the lede, would be sufficient, or the "declared" of the article. Or perhaps the line at the end of the article isn't necessary at all, as it is already in the lede (and shouldn't the footnote go there, where the fact is first mentioned?) --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 17:45, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

armenian catholic saint[edit]

Armenian catholic church is unificate into catholic church within rome - by canonized st gregory of narek into catholic rome saint, automaticly he also became armenian catholic saint. Before canonized by rome he is a saint of armenian apostolic church.

Erenesel (talk) 22:48, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gregory of Narek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:00, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Overcited and nested birth dates citation[edit]

Hello Yerevantsi, I would like to bring your attention to citation #16 of the current revision of the article, the citations are unnecessarily nested, and from my memory of checking them last year during the GAN; some have similar birth dates, how would we be able to improve this? Would you consider changing it to a short footnote (sfn) template with each source's birth date cited with inline citations? - Kevo327 (talk) 23:53, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kevo327, do you mean something like this? ----Երևանցի talk 18:39, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's a great improvement, thank you. - Kevo327 (talk) 18:54, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]