User talk:Miranda/D

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

RfA thanks

Thank you for your Support on my recent nomination for adminship, which passed with a final tally of 89/1/1. If there's anything I can help with, then you know where to find me. Cheers.

- Michael Billington (talk) 12:35, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for reverting vandalism on my user page, cheers :-) Myanw 10:58, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

No problem. Real96 20:18, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

vandalism

My edits were NOT vandelism. I just removed the mis. section because it judt didn't need to be there. It didn't not have useful info for the album and it just did not fit with the page.

You removed a paragraph without an edit summary. Real96 20:18, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

User:Tanitani warnings

This user is tediously going through and writing up the (vast) number of The Hardy Boys book series titles with minor plots. You mistook them for being nonsense articles and warned him. Would you be willing to remove those warnings? Thanks, and keep up the good work. --Auto^{(talk / contribs)} 23:41, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Contact an administrator. Real96 20:15, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

flagellates

how are flagellates important to anything besides the food chain? answer as soon as possible on Wikipedia. Also, what is 1+1? Just had to ask. (hint: its 11)HULK SMASH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

thanks,

The Ever Loving Hulk —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.26.212.0 (talk) 23:55, 2 April 2007 (UTC).

Maybe you want to look at the page to answer that question. Also, "22+1" is how I keep track of vandals. Thanks! Real96 06:29, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Biography Spring 2007 Assessment Drive

Thank you for your contributions! -- WikiProject Biography Spring 2007 Assessment Drive 16:56, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		For your tireless and endless efforts in assessing biography articles, WikiProject Biography Spring 2007 Assessment Drive hereby awards you The Working Man's Barnstar. 16:56, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

		The Golden Wiki Award
		For your exceptional contributions to the WikiProject Biography Spring 2007 Assessment Drive, WikiProject Biography Spring 2007 Assessment Drive hereby awards you The Golden Wiki Award. 16:56, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 2nd, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 14	2 April 2007	About the Signpost

Poll finds people think Wikipedia "somewhat reliable"	Wikipedia biographical errors attract more attention
Association of Members' Advocates nominated for deletion	Reference desk work leads to New York Times correction
WikiWorld comic: "Charles Lane"	News and notes: Alexa, Version 0.5, attribution poll
Wikipedia in the news	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:14, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

WP:BIO Awards

Do you want me to help you distribute assessment awards? Cheers! Real96 21:37, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your post. There was interest in extending the drive through March 2007 and it seemed important to give people some time to add their names to the nominations list and/or update their running total. The awards have been distributed and the drive closed. Thank you for your thoughtful offer of assistance and participating in the drive. -- Jreferee 18:18, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. Real96 20:02, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

MySpace Events (Part One)

as this may seem like advertisement it is NOT you can write it for it to sound less like an ad if you want this was clarified before and it meets wikipedias criteria also it was fromerly myspace secret shows which was made broader thank youMartini833 05:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

This article has been listed for WP:AFD as delete, and now you are recreating the page? Please see WP:CORP on the notability of such articles. Real96 21:02, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

MySpace Events (Part Two)

It's back. I'm sure that this is an exact copy-paste this time. Perhaps an AfD? John Reaves (talk) 15:46, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Yes. I will start one as soon as possible. Real96 19:38, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

NeoChaosX beat me to it. Real96 20:54, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

I actually started work on the MySpace Events article today, and I hope that it's already more presentable. I've removed numerous problems with tone, grammar, advertising, and fixed formatting issues. I'm interested in making this article acceptable, and I've listed out a few problems I found and ideas at the talk page. My next endeavor will be to correctly cite the references in-line with the content; that should be completed today. Please let me know what else needs to be done to the article, and I'll attempt to salvage it. Thanks! *Vendetta* _{(whois talk edits)} 20:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Your Response

Umm, the problem is with the Category itself, and how it is making names go under the wrong letter heading, as in putting my name under "U" because of the "User:" namespace. Thank you though ;) Chrishyman 00:22, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

There's two different userspaces. One for User and another for User talk:. Hope this helps. Real96 15:25, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Thank You

Thank you for the information on creating my sandbox.

Cheers, Vinwe

No problem. Real96 15:26, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: Helpme tag

...I really do need help with an article though. Did I not place the tag correctly? --Lmblackjack21 00:51, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

=]

Pretty Ricky aint breakin up yall! yay!! Tam` Tam` =] has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Reply

No. John Reaves (talk) 17:43, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

See User talk:Mutt Lunker, he has checkuser question. John Reaves (talk) 21:37, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Answered. Real96 22:29, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Le Mans

Hi.

As I can see you're online, can you have a look ath Le Mans for me please. The script size seems a bit wrong and I'm not sure how to change it

Stui 21:39, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I corrected it. You forgot to place the tag at the end of the citation. See this. Real96 21:50, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Ah cheers - I didnt do the original editing though, i just noticed the oddity and didnt have a clue what to look for XD Stui 16:41, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: Congratulations

Hey, thanks for adding the image of the mop to my user page. I hadn't actually noticed that image before, so you've added to my store of Wikipedia knowledge. Thanks! --Akhilleus (talk) 05:15, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Existent Article

If exist Marie Antoinette. What one user Papirini, create a article wiht name User:Papirini/Marie Antoinette?. Excusme, if cause problem for you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 200.112.14.232 (talk) 06:04, 9 April 2007 (UTC).

Lo siento que ingles no este tu lingua prima. Pues, ese articulo esta en espacia del usario y es legitimo. (Translation [rough]: Sorry that your language isn't English. However, the article is in user space and is legit.) Real96 06:09, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Your semi-automated re-prod of CIAO! Festival

I noticed you re-added the {{dated prod}} template after the creator of the article removed it. Since WP:PROD allows for anyone to remove the {{dated prod}} if they object to deletion for any reason, please look carefully at future removals of the prod template and do not revert unless the removal is really not an objection to deletion; however most such removals are (from my own experience). If you really think the article should be deleted anyway, nominate it for AFD. Resurgent insurgent 08:39, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

It's vandalism if a user removed the speedy templates or the afd templates. Also, I was about to tag the article as db-adv, but I noticed that there was an existing template. So, I reverted it. Real96 19:13, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Misidentification

[1][2][3] This section was new, added by User:4.224.24.94 four minutes before it was initially reverted. The section appears to be composed of deliberate factual errors, and removing it was the correct course of action. –Gunslinger47 19:16, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

I was confused upon why this was reverted by different IPs without any edit summaries. I was going to request semi-protection on the article. but I received the new messages bar. Thanks for telling me. Real96 19:20, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 9th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 15	9 April 2007	About the Signpost

Danny Wool regains adminship in controversial RFA	Leak last year likely to produce changes for handling next board election
Association of Members' Advocates' deletion debate yields no consensus	WikiWorld comic: "Fake shemp"
News and notes: Donation, Version 0.5, milestones	Wikipedia in the news
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

Special note to spamlist users: Apologies for the formatting issues in previous issues. This only recently became a problem due to a change in HTML Tidy; however, I am to blame on this issue. Sorry, and all messages from this one forward should be fine (I hope!) -Ral315

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:20, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: AN/I

They already posted a thread there early this morning. John Reaves (talk) 22:33, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Okay, I commented there. Real96 22:41, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Please Stop

How many times must I post this to people? The guidelines clearly state my right to delete content on my own talk page, so please stop reverting my edits. This is getting extremely tiring and is very unfair to me.67.163.193.239 22:17, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Warnings help to keep track of the pattern of vandalism which is coming from this IP address. Please see the guidelines. Real96 22:19, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

You are mistaken. I am being spammed with fake and uncalled for warnings, and have reported this to the admin noticeboard. The guidelines say I can delete my talk page. Please respect my wishes and stop reverting my deletions.67.163.193.239 22:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

I commented on the thread related to this incident here at ANI. P.S.: Your IP talk page doesn't "belong to you." Real96 22:41, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

It does so! I read the guidelines. My IP and my talk page. Why can't you guys just stop harassing me?67.163.193.239 22:52, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

239 is correct that you are technically allowed to remove comments from your account's user talk page. You are encouraged to archive and not delete, but it's not a strictly mandated policy. This even applies to good faith, valid warnings. All that said, it's quite rude to do so without good reason or explanation. Handled inappropriately, it could potentially violate Wikipedia:Civility. –Gunslinger47 23:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

In this case, the user's talk page guideline doesn't apply, since this is a dynamic IP. Real96 03:43, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Ah, good point. :) –Gunslinger47 04:37, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

...however, this matter has been taken care of (due to archiving warnings). Thanks. Real96 04:18, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

It was an admin decision to allow my user page to be blanked, so please STOP reverting the deletions and drawing attention back to it. Ivo and I will be continuing the discussion on HIS talk page, so that mine is not spammed again.67.163.193.239 07:40, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Already blocked. Real96 15:27, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppet complaints

I haven't been editing. It also isn't fair that individuals who are editing and doing bad are being blamed on me. Please file a checkuser

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Alpha_Phi_Alpha_being_disrupted_by_sockpuppet_of_banned_user

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Maxman23

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Maxman23&direction=next&oldid=114961187

You can also go on do the "This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address.

[IP info · Traceroute · WHOIS · Abuse · City · RDNS] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean]" That you may see on some userpages that are just ip address based. My brother is doing better. thanks. i'm going to copy and paste this to robotam.

mykungfu —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.131.205.111 (talk) 05:28, 11 April 2007 (UTC).

This situation has been resolved. There is no need to file a checkuser. Real96 15:25, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Checkuser

Can you also add "209.160.65.68" to the search, please? I think he's the same guy as VietFire. Thanks, John Smith's 22:35, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Done Real96 03:25, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

I Love New York poll?

Are you planning on posting about the text message poll taken by VH1 on the I Love New York trivia page?--209.244.188.186 00:24, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

No, because it's unreliable. Real96 03:35, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

for restoring those comments on Talk:Jack Thompson (attorney). I was obviously editing an old version, which I hadn't noticed. Er rab ee 09:29, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

MessedRocker's Contest

Hello! If you have received this message, that means you have an article entered in MessedRocker's Contest. To help stimulate the contest, the rules have been modified: the next five people who promote an article to Good Article status will win, and that's it. Get writing so you can be one of the five! —Signed, your friendly neighborhood MessedRocker. 10:53, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Created

And what are u goin' to do wit the pages iv created
Next Fiday 12:18, 13 April 2007

They will be deleted by an administrator. Real96 19:19, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Safeway

I deleted the section based on the fact that one it is trivia and two its unencyclopedic as it is as it is written poorly and also a common practice everywhere for every business so it doesn't contribute much its just like when people complain about an article or section being ethnocentric expect its within one country. If we want a section like this we should rename it and it should have examples from more than DC and a mere mention it happens in San Fransisco. I am unsure this section is helpful though. Oh and I do have an account I just didnt realise i had logged out and i need to log back in lol I just was explaining my actions for the benefit of explanation im not going to repeat them but i will put it on the pages discussion page instead so someone else can figure it out because im not going to unilateraly remove something and I know I cant rework it to fit so I'll give someone else the chance 71.131.33.187 19:31, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Trivia sections are included in some articles, but not recommended. See WP:TRIVIA. Real96 19:50, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

I've always understood it as a don't use one unless you are using it as an expansion point as it talks about incorporating it into the articles main text when possible. But anyways the general Wikipedia population will be able to decide what to do with it I put a discussion page [[4]] on there and hopefully something will be done be it deletion or expansion or at least a broader understanding of what we should accept in here (even if its me who has to reinterpret the rules)(finally logged on-->)Shimonnyman 20:06, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Revert

The revert you made earlier was not a just one and I assume it was done by a script. You reverted my vandalism correction, thus creating vandalism. Idontsteal 19:22, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

You placed personal information on the page. Please see the privacy policy. Real96 21:04, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Response

The media presence on campus has been noticeable since the comments were made. The Daily Targum, our student paper, as well as the state's largest paper The Star-Ledger have made several articles on it. I know that Imus came down, yesterday I believe, to personally apologize to the coach and the team. I doubt that the actual press is going to come on here to ask RU students about the situation. With regards to the link, feel free to add it on, it's an official response from University President McCormick after all.--Jersey Devil 17:39, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Sig problem

No, I'm still getting the same problem; I tried your formula, and checked the "raw sig.." but it still gives me a "Invalid raw signature; check HTML tags." message Lobbuss 15:13, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Try this. ''''''[[User:Lobbuss|Lob]]'''[[User:Lobbuss|bus]]''' Real96 15:23, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

I am still getting the same message: Lobbus 15:30, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Try making your signature simpler. Or better yet, please contact Gracenotes of this problem, because I am not good with HTML tags. Real96 15:35, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Checkuser

You could possibly archive this checkuser on reflection. The account has since been blocked as a clear sock, and after checking any pages created were made before the community ban was official, so aren't technically eligible for deletion using {{db-banned}} so it would be a checkuser for no real purpose. Thanks. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 18:39, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

The check user case can't be archived due to the check user not making his, or her decision to decline or accept the case. Real96 00:08, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Trading Spaces Program

Hello, Real96, thank you for signing up to participate in the trading spaces program. As you requsted to have your user page renovated by another user, Andrew Hampe will be renovating your userpage. Please contact Andrew Hampe on their talk page about the renovating. The renovating will be listed at Trading Spaces: Undergoing Renovation, please feel free to update the status as it changes. Enjoy! --Andrew Hampe ^Talk 01:31, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Bluegirl

Be my guest, but treat her well. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 03:01, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Help Me

When I get new messages on my Talk Page, why is it that the orange bar ("You have new messages") does NOT appear? How do I correct that? Thank you. (JosephASpadaro 03:53, 16 April 2007 (UTC))

Maybe your cache is stale? To solve this, clear your cache, and re-login. Real96 03:55, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. How do I clear my cache? Thanks. (JosephASpadaro 04:15, 16 April 2007 (UTC))

Go here. Real96 04:21, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. That seemed to work. I got my orange bar back. Thank you. (JosephASpadaro 04:36, 16 April 2007 (UTC))

Please vote on the Genocide Portal Logos

Follow this link and tell me which of the four Logos you like most to be the new Genocide portal LOGO. Leave your vote in a comment in the "YOUR VOTE" esction on the page and indicate which # is best. Thanks. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Genocide/Things_you_can_do/Logo --EricSRodrigues154 03:18, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 16th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 16	16 April 2007	About the Signpost

Encyclopædia Britannica promoted to featured article	Wikipedia continues to get mixed reactions in education
WikiWorld comic: "Hodag"	News and notes: Wikipedia television mention makes news, milestones
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:29, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

User talk:Anthony cfc#Last User Page

...I've replied... anthony^[review] 21:40, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Leaky bottoms?

Look what happened when someone added another comment to User talk:68.39.174.238. (see how it actually looked at bottom of page) When I moved the userboxbottom to a separate line it "got better". Y'all got me spooked now. ;-) Shenme 00:17, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Ooh, my bad. I will fix it later. Real96 00:18, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Reverted

Can you please stop reverting my talk page? I don't understand how the removal of old user specific messages can be considered as vandalism? Thanks 144.135.1.196 07:13, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Keeping the page history is crucial in order to know the pattern of vandalism on this page. Real96 07:15, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Please block 124.191.195.52

See this page. -- Sandycx (Talk) 08:44, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

I can't block a user, because I am not an administrator. If the user has a persistent pattern of vandalism and has been given the proper warnings, please report to WP:AIV. Real96 18:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Alpha Phi Alpha and the Omega Phi Psi Pages and Fort Des Moines

The listing you have on the Alpha Phi Alpha page about Fort Des Moines is incorrect. It is about Omega Psi Phi. Why did you change it back, and said i was a vandalize Wikipedia for making the correction?

Please talk this out on the Alpha Phi Alpha talk page, and please sign your comments with four tildes. Thanks! Real96 18:29, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Werdnabot having trouble?

WerdnaBot hasn't been archiving my page lately. Can someone fix it?

Try Miszabot to archive your page. Real96 18:58, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Now will the new bot archive every 7 days on my talk? WikiMan53 (talk) (sign?) 19:04, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Place this code in your page, it archives messages left after seven days. In "archive," place the directory where you want your talk page to be archived. (i.e. User talk:WikiMan53/April).

 {{User:MiszaBot/config
  |algo = old(7d)
  |archive = 
  }}

-- Real96 19:09, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Did I do it right? Can you check please? WikiMan53 (talk) (sign?) 19:18, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

(reduce indent) Yes, you did it right. Real96 19:22, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Ok, is there a note that says Msza Bot archives this page to blah blah blah? WikiMan53 (talk) (sign?) 19:26, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

I will watch the page to see if Misza bot does it right. Real96 00:39, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Alpha Phi Alpha

Just wondering why you reverted my edit on Alpha Phi Alpha where I added a verylong tag. The article is quite long and could be broken up. Jmlk17 00:51, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

The article is an FA. If the article was too long, before the FA, the article would have been broken up prior to FA status. There are much longer FA articles on Wikipedia. If you have any questions about this, please go to the talk page of the article. Thanks. Real96 00:52, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Logs

Per your response on User talk:98E#Help!, you don't need to be an admin to see a log, just to see the deleted page. Anyone can view the logs at Special:Log. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 01:57, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Oops, I didn't see you corrected it, ignore the above. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 01:58, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Artaxiad

I believe there is a "third wave".

Ashkani (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) - likely created few days ago
Jamie Mercer (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) - possible (if so it is a leftover sleeper - could be innocent)

-- Cat ^chi? 03:08, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Done Real96 03:27, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Hello all but I am confused why I wasn't notified about alleged sock puppetry against my account. Artaxiad and Jamie Mercer are irrelevant to me thus these accusations should cease. If there was a problem regarding other users they should have contacted me directly so I can improve my editing within the community that is all I ask thank you. Ashkani 05:46, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

DefCon

Thank you :) MojoTas 04:00, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Adoption

Thanks for graduating me. But what I found weird, I have only asked you one question. lol. ^_^ Sodaplayer ^{talk contrib}^{^_^} 01:23, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Yes you pretty much know how to make templates. I am going to place another welcome template for you to know the policies (I forgot to do that last time) :-(. Real96 01:37, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Ok thanks!! ^_^ Sodaplayer ^{talk contrib}^{^_^} 01:40, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

help

hello. i'm semi-new to wiki. i LOVE it. i love reverting pages b\c of vandalism as well as writing articles.

i seem to be having a problem on porky pig's feat with the user thomas logan. we have reverted his posts several times. i have warned him, you have warned him and he just got warned by MartinBot who identified another post he made as vandalism.

i'm unsure how to proceed and would love to learn the steps. i checked out teh 'report abuse' page but it indicates that you shouldnt report the person there unless they have been blocked at least 5 times. so i was wondering where should i report him for the repeated vandalizing ?

thank you for your time, any help would be much appreciated. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Matthew Yeager (talk • contribs) 07:15, 21 April 2007 (UTC).

I reported him to WP:AIV. Real96 07:15, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

thank you, now i know where to go for this. he just re-vandalismed the page. i reverted it again. THANK YOU FOR YOUR HELP! is there any other places i should know about to report people when needed ? Matthew Yeager 07:24, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Check the instructions on WP:ANI. Real96 15:07, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

WASP article

It could have been made more clear by noting these things. There was nothing said that was uncivil. I cleared your comments because you seemed to misunderstand or confuse something (assuming that the changes were of quotes rather than comparing). No biggie, we're all human and again, I am sure I could have made it clear earlier but this stuff is far down my priorities. I would say it would help if you would check before speaking about "reporting" and "vandalism", that you might want to be sure to compare edits or send something sans that sort of language. Thanks for taking the time and effort.

Real 96 you are wrong, the pages wasn't blanked and this seems to have become an error that you are not correcting, retracting or making note of. There is no edit in the history of that article where the page was blanked or the quotes changed. Surely I didn't "blank" that page. You might want to take those comments down from this page, if only to not seem so off base. I hope you are not engaging in vandalism Real 96 because there is something of personal contention (in what is probably an objective article, haven't read the whole thing). I hope you are trying your best to make things better. I like your articles and I would be surprised if it was otherwise. Thanks!

First, please sign your posts. Second, you removed content without providing an edit summary. If you would have provided an edit summary of what you removed, I wouldn't have suspected what you were doing. You should have said "removed unsourced/original research" information. If you remove content from a page, that's considered vandalism. Thanks. Real96 14:57, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Vilina Vlas

Thanks for dealing with the deletion at the article on Vilina Vlas. --Opbeith 08:28, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

I don't remember voting on this...Real96 15:06, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Is this vandalism? It kinda looks like vandalism, what with all the long words with stringsssssssssss of letters in and RANDOM INSULTS IN CAPITAL LETTERS, YOU FOOL! The question is, will an unsuspecting FNORD FNORD FNORD Twinkle user be daft enough to revert it???????????????????????? I actually have the edit toolbar turned off, so I'm even going to have to type this bit out by hand, Bold text Italic text moo bar woeigoerhigmh &%$£". Anyway, hi – Gurch 19:47, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Gurch, seriously. SERIOUSLY?!?! :-) Real96 19:48, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Deletion

Thanks a lot :) I will keep note of the template for use by myself in future.--Scheibenzahl 22:17, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Like this?

REDVERS ↔ SЯEVDEЯ 09:00, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Yes! I love it! Real96 09:01, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Excuse meh?

User: NFAN3 has his myspace page on his wikipedia page and nobody sayd anything to himm...>=[ Push It Baby!! ..Dats Muh Song!!..=] (Tay) 20:47, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

I happen to agree with her on this point; I don't think that a simple link to a Myspace site is using Wikipedia as a social networking site. Veinor ^{(talk to me)} 21:31, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Personally, I feel that since Tay's page looks like a personal webpage, and not containing a brief overview of what she does on wikipedia (although, I admit, I have VANITY on my page). However, I am following WP:NOT#WEBSPACE and WP:PRIVACY on this case. Real96 21:34, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

lemme see i have a section dat says "page i created" and that list that says my fav pages is actually alll on my recent changes patroll list and besides if NFAN3 can do it I can do and thanks for the support Veinor..=] Push It Baby!! ..Dats Muh Song!!..=] (Tay) 00:04, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Three revert rule

Send also a warning to User:Ned Scott as well. I find it unfair that he doesn't get a similar warning as well. Also, would it be okay if I add {{fact}} tags due to the numerous vioaltions of Wikipedia: verifiability per the dispute here? Am I permitted to do that??--293.xx.xxx.xx 05:40, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Please discuss the source of conflict on the talk page of the article. This will be the best thing to do. Real96 05:41, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Cooling off first. But I refuse to speak with the anonymous editor anymore. I can't be leading him by the hand all the time. --293.xx.xxx.xx 05:59, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

User Pages

hello ! we have been fighting vandalism and recently have been appearing on the same pages, reverting edits. thanks for the help in reverting \ warning. Yet i'm fairly new and have a question... a user has been warned 3 times (2 times by me) within the past 24-36 hours and he has reverted his page to not show the warning. I am positive this is not allowed, but is there any guildlines to when, if at all, they can revert their page to not show warning ? thank you for your time Matthew Yeager 15:11, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

as well as that, what type of warning should i give ? i looked at the choices... censorship ? userpage vandalism ? once again, thanks ! Matthew Yeager 15:19, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Request for Page Protection. Real96 17:28, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

if i understand the protection levels correctly... i dont see how that helps ? fully would not allow anyone except admin to edit it (this is a problem if other editors need to warn him), semi would still allow him to edit it (right ? cause thats just against new users or ips) and move(which doesnt apply) unless i should have it fully protected and then have editors request an admin to warn him, if needed ? Matthew Yeager 17:40, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

You can request for full protection, but I would just leave it alone, since we and the admins know that he is indefinitely blocked. Real96 17:42, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

this was for a different user User talk:Zdp0178 he is not blocked...... yet Matthew Yeager 17:51, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

(reduce indent) Take it to WP:ANI, but read over WP:USER first. Real96 18:05, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my User page. I don't think I've ever seen that IP address before and it was just some random personal attack. Sodaplayer ^{talk contrib}^{^_^} 23:34, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Could have been a proxy address. Real96 23:37, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the pointers on the use of {{helpme}}. What should I use in the future when seeking help with something like ISBNs? mr_flea 04:20, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

See WP:ISBN. Real96 04:41, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

how the hell am i supposed to use wikipedia?

if everything that i try to do gets deleted??? this is insane. i was only trying to add information to wikipedia about a freaking smoothie shop in st. george - but i guess thats just not allowed. iderek 06:48, 24 April 2007 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Iderek (talk • contribs) 06:47, 24 April 2007 (UTC).

The page was deleted b/c of failing WP:N. Also, I put a welcome template on your page. Real96 06:49, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 23rd, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 17	23 April 2007	About the Signpost

Administrator goes rogue, is blocked	Wales unblocks Brandt, then reverses himself
Historian detained after his Wikipedia article is vandalized	Efforts to reform Requests for Adminship spark animated discussion
Canadian politician the subject of an edit war	Virginia Tech massacre articles rise to prominence
Wikipedia enters China one disc at a time	WikiWorld comic: "Buttered cat paradox"
News and notes: Unreferenced biographies, user studies, milestones	Wikipedia in the news
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:58, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

WP:BLP

Hello,

I am beginning to wonder why I am getting so much attention lately. My name is Scott Woeckel. It was brought to my attention that I have a wikipedia citation. Why? Not sure, but I think it's a bit much and to be honest, I do not feel that I belong in an encyclopedia! I hope the editors here understand and will allow this deletion.

Sincerely,

Scott Woeckel

I will report the incident on the BLP board. Real96 01:08, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

The article has been deleted. Real96 01:09, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

The WikiProject Biography Newsletter: Issue II - April 2007

The April 2007 issue of the WikiProject Biography newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you BetacommandBot 19:53, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

??

--Note: This was in response to this. Real96 21:22, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Are you serious about leaving or thinking about leaving wikipedia, you are an excellent editor, in three months you amasses about 7000 edits and you are on of the best vandal fighters with an excellent policy knowledge, their is no need to leave, I hope you reconsider and decide not to leave.Telly addict 17:20, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

No, I am not leaving Wikipedia. Just got angry last night for reasons which are crazy to mention. Real96 19:04, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: Spotlight banner...

Where's the spotlight banner? Real96 21:19, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

I haven't made it yet. I may well never make one. It depends how much time I have – Gurch 22:58, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Help reqd.

Well I hadn't realised you needed the actual question there already, I assumed it was just a call for attention, to see who was willing/available! Anyway.. my question is, do you know why my left-hand nav frame would be missing in Firefox browser but still available in iExplorer? This has happened only recently - I'd estimate within the last few hours really. I had suspected my monobook script as having been vandalised, but it appears untouched.

Any ideas? Cheers. --Mal 05:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm not a techie. However, looks like someone answered the question. Real96 08:40, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Help

Thanks for your welcome message. I've been reading extensively all those helpful pages, but it's a bit overwhelming! There's just so much stuff! What are the 3 or 4 most important basic things that I need to know? Specifically: how do I register as a contributer to Wiki Wine Project? The other contributer is the box have all sorts of weird code/brackets/time stamps/asterisks/etc !!! how ddoes one type the tilde mark on the keyboard? Sorry to be such a bore! Don't even know if this is the right place to be asking all this! :( — Preceding unsigned comment added by BodegasAmbite (talk • contribs)

Sure, see the five pillars in your introduction. But, in my own opinion, the most important rules are: notability, attribution, no original research, cite your sources, don't disrupt Wikipedia to make a point, along with the occasional tone of civilty that users need to have. Real96 11:02, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

I posted information about the wine project on your page. Just follow the links and they should give you instructions on how to sign up for the project. Also, if you have any technical needs, go here. Also, have you ever thought of being adopted? Real96 11:08, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Feeding trolls

Thanks for updating the defcon meter. However, I kindly ask that you do not name any specific vandals or abusive sock creators on such a widely visible template. These abusive editors are generally doing it for the attention, and giving it to them will just make it worse. deny recognition and dont feed the trolls. Thanks! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 13:41, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

In my humble opinion, my decision was correct in updating WP:DEFCON. Feeding the trolls is not applicable to this situation because, 1.) Oompapa does not have access to WP:DEFCON and 2.) Mr. Oompapa is a high alert vandal, and 3.) comments concerning high alert vandals such as Oompapa are crucial in attaining a quick response. Previous to your complaint, the WP:DEFCON alert has mentioned Oompapa's name at least three times, shown here - by Misza13, here, by RV and here, by Zero. Also, I have altered WP:DEFCON for three months. I pretty much know what I am doing. Cheers! Real96 18:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

First off, i apoligize if I implied that you do not know what you are doing. I believe you very well do. In regards to the defcon meter, I have posted a thread at WP:ANI here asking for community input on this issue. Thank you for addressing your concerns. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 19:05, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Okay, I will add my two cents to the discussion. Noticing from your userbox, I am glad that you are okay! Have you thought about adding a ribbon to your userpage? Sorry for being harsh, but I read your note in the morning hours and hadn't had my coffee, yet. Real96 01:57, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your help. Now that I know that, I doubt I'll ever be able to use AWB. Thanks a lot for your help and have a nice day. -- iguana_nirvana14 (talk · contribs)

Thank you

I would like to thank you for helping me with my problem. have a great wikibreak!!-politices rule 6:11 pm est.

Directing me to the article

Thanks, it's really really apriciated. TheBlazikenMaster 00:12, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Rating of The Links, Incorporated

I gave it a rating of B with a Mid Importance. Great article btw. Acidskater 02:28, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Hopefully it will be a featured article, soon. I just need more resources. Real96 02:47, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the mop

It's about time I had one of my own, I guess. Uh, what does the template do? Nothing but add me to Category:Wikipedia administrators ? I don't see anything else happening on the page from your edit, but that could be me. Bishonen | talk 02:42, 28 April 2007 (UTC).

Bish, you are a great admin...cleaning up s**t on Wikipedia and feeding it to bishzilla. :-) Real96 02:47, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your response to my copyright question. Much appreciated... BeeDub65 22:39, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: Spotlight banner...

Where's the spotlight banner? Real96 21:19, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

– Gurch 00:09, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Cha-ching! Thanks. :-) Real96 00:12, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Copt

Dear Real96, Thank you for your message concerning the article Copt. I have put a lot of effort and work into the article and found that User:Egyegy simply discredits everything I do by reverting my edits back. I have supplied my info with sources, and even agreed to reach certain consens on certain issues. I also extended an invitation on the talk page to discuss the issues of mutual disagreement. All I got back with additional deletion of my work! I had to continue reverting my work back. Any advise about needs to be done in this case? Thanks. --Lanternix 03:03, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Try to take the dispute to the talk page. If not, do an request for comment for imput on the community. Real96 03:06, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Miscellany for deletion

Hi, I would just like to tell you that User:Real96/sandbox1 and User:Real96/sandbox2 have been nominated for deletion at WP:MFD. Both entries are merged together for convenience for users, you are free to join in (or start) the discussion there, but remember bot to remove the {{subst:md1}} tag from the nominated pages. Thank you. Telly addict 18:09, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

And, the discussion has been closed as Speedy Keep. Real96 20:25, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

I apologise for my actions, me nominating that sandbox for deletion was completely out of order and I understand if you dont like me any more, I hope you can forgive me.Telly addict 09:36, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I forgive you. Real96 15:46, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!!!

Shalom:) Thanks a lot for reverting the vandalism on my User page. God bless:) Again, Thanks!--James, La gloria è a dio 20:50, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

No problem! Real96 22:17, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your swift help. Wolf of Fenric 03:22, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

No problem! Real96 15:17, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Hi! Lesley Turner (Ireland) <<Original Thread>>

Well, she was a favorite among the Miss Universe 2001 delegates... is that notable? :-) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Franz madrid (talk • contribs) 05:30, 30 April 2007 (UTC).

Yes it is notable. By the way, have you ever thought about joining this Wikiproject? Real96 15:14, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Gazi Imza.jpg

Hi!

I read your comment on Denizg's talk page. The image belongs to Alumni Organization of the High School. I am one of the alumnis. I got in touch with headmaster of the organization and he said me we can use the image. My problem is that I do not know how to tag image's copyright status. Can you help me? --Ugur Olgun 07:48, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

You use this template -->Template:PermissionAndFairUse<--- and post the e-mail notice (you don't have to include your name, but however, include the name of the headmaster who allowed you to upload the image. Real96 15:46, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Karl Meier

Karl Merier case is Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Karl_Meier closed without giving any reason. Where should no I go and post it. Admin notice board or where? Do you think it is right to decline without any reason to a case that is properly filed? I will appreciate your help. --- ALM 17:23, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

See the talk page, the answer is listed. Or, contact the CU who performed the case. Real96 22:02, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

RFA thanks

Thank you, Miranda, for your constructive comments in my recent RFA, which passed with 86 support, 8 oppose, and 5 neutral !votes. I will keep in mind all your suggestions and/or concerns, and will try to live up to your standards. Please, if you have any comments or complaints about my actions as an administrator, leave a note on my talk page, and I will respond as soon as I possibly can, without frying my brain, of course.
Thank you once more,
· AndonicO ^Talk

Egyptians

Hello, User:Egyegy seems to be involved in an edit war on the page Egyptians. I have refrained from making more than 2 reverts, so please advise on what should be done concerning this. I have already added a 3RR tag to his/her talk page. Thanks! --Lanternix 19:50, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

File a request on WP:3RR. Real96 22:02, 30 April 2007 (UTC)