User talk:HPJoker

Re:Editing tips[edit]

What sort of editing tips? Well, if you're looking for articles to edit, try the random article button (or I can give you huge lists, and yes, I mean huge :)).

The bad thing is, many people will oppose people in RfAs if the main thing they do is vandal fighting. :( Hmmm... do you think an RfA is a good idea? jj137 (talk) 01:19, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it could. I mean, when RfAs fail, people generally expect candidates to wait at least 3-6 months (roughly) before retrying. Then they will ask you questions about how you've improved since your previous RfA, etc. jj137 (talk) 01:25, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Fantasy Baseball[edit]

How about March 15? STORMTRACKER 94 ^{Go Sox!} 01:30, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think you need to create an account. STORMTRACKER 94 ^{Go Sox!} 02:09, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?[edit]

You left on my talk page something about Vandalism, you failed to mention which page was reverted and considered vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.137.207.191 (talk) 23:34, 1 February 2008 (UTC) Yes but what page, I hardly limit my "vandalism", which usually expresses it self in the form of removing original research and opinions. For instance I've been occupying my self lately by removing Trivia expressing Fan opinions from Babylon 5 episodes. DO NOT vandalise my User PAge with your welcome thing, I know your rules and your welcome thing and how to sign, I do not on the other hand care for them. Had one, I do not wish another, unless there is a rule that states I NEED an account to make more than a certain amount of edits. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.137.207.191 (talk) 23:58, 1 February 2008 (UTC) I already said I didn't care, I've never been to my user page before you started posting there and I'm only going there because a thing comes up at the top of the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.137.207.191 (talk) 01:03, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have still failed to tell me exactly what article I "vandalized", my original reason for acknowledging you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.137.207.191 (talk) 01:16, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Should I leave the Trivia title when I delete all of the trivia within? And that still isn't specific, I asked "exactly what article" and "which page". You can't be saying you object to me deleting the unreferenced, original research, trivia (that often goes along the lines "Fans believe blah blah blah" or "this is a clear homage/reference to [insert geek subculture icon]", and I don't mean that in a negative way, I'm rather geeky myself, Warhammer behind me, Star Wars and Dragonlance to the right, WWII stuff and Battletech stuff to my left over half of my bed) in the articles for episodes from the first 3 seasons. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.137.207.191 (talk) 01:42, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was a Blue Jay fan when I was a kid, other things got me to stop paying attention —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.137.207.191 (talk) 02:10, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Johan Santana[edit]

Here's the link to this week's newsletter. On the Johan Santana article, it looks like it has since been changed to Mets. jj137 (talk) 16:27, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfA[edit]

I'm sorry, but I've closed your Request for adminship prematurely. Simply put, you have too few edits on Wikipedia; while edit count isn't the only determining factor, and numerous people have their own personal standards that they judge RfA candidates by, there was no chance that the RfA was going to pass.

I'm sorry about this, and hope you don't take it personally. If you continue to contribute to the project in a positive fashion, I'm confident that you could possibly run a successful RfA in the future. You may want to consider submitting yourself to Wikipedia:Editor review for feedback on where to get some good experience, and when you're ready for RfA again, there's a great Wikipedia:Admin coaching program for you to use, as well as a guide to requests for adminship.

If you have any other questions about becoming an administrator, please don't hesitate to ask me. Good luck! Maxim_(talk) 17:02, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Boston Red Sox newsletter - February 3, 2008.[edit]


The Boston Red Sox WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 2, Issue 3 • February 3, 2008 • About the Newsletter
News Project and team news: Project News Santana Deal	Features Featured Red Sox articles of the week: Javier López Curt Schilling Carlton Fisk	New Articles New Boston Red Sox related articles: Jake Jones
Archives • Newsroom

You are receiving this newsletter because you are a member of WikiProject Boston Red Sox. If you would not like to receive this newsletter, please add your name here. JJBot (talk) 15:26, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK, you don't have to make anything up! :) So, are you going for the Pats or the Giants in the Super Bowl? jj137 (talk) 16:22, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going for the Pats too! Check out my userpage. jj137 (talk) 17:45, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Super Bowl[edit]

NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! jj137 (talk) 03:09, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Thanks. jj137 (talk) 03:21, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the box - I think I'll need "...and lost a lot of $cash$" after the "is sad" part. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 03:24, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, also to edit my userpage, simply click here. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 03:25, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks =) - That will leave a mark on my history BTW =( - Milk's Favorite Cookie 03:42, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

chiefs wikiproject[edit]

Hey, I saw you're comments on conman33 talk page. Have you met LJ? RC-0722 ^communicator/_kills 18:18, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Really? That's kind of suprising. What about Brodie Croyle? RC-0722 ^communicator/_kills 23:45, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. What about Trent Green? I'm pretty sure he's nice. RC-0722 ^communicator/_kills 04:20, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mitt[edit]

Did he invent Mittens or the CD Romney? BTW, I like him too. RC-0722 ^communicator/_kills 23:57, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, since fred thompson dropped out I have to pick him, but I can't vote so where does that leave me? RC-0722 ^communicator/_kills 01:39, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I did the same. I'm actually one of our state reps "Youth Coordinator" Not a good job to have if you ain't popular. RC-0722 ^communicator/_kills 15:43, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Fantasy Baseball[edit]

Head-to-head sounds good. It don't know the differences, but will probably look into it.

How were you able to get CBS Sportsline to work? It still tells me an error has occurred. jj137 (talk) 01:37, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just checked it right now, the error still comes up :( - Milk's Favorite Cookie 01:42, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A player name? I created an account, what do you mean by 'a player name'? - Milk's Favorite Cookie 02:06, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - in the 'Toolbox' (under the searchbox) it should say "Email this user" when you are on my userpage or my talk page. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 02:14, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure you gave the right email address - try refreshing the page. Also, can you give me a link where you can join a league - I can't find it. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 02:23, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mind the date or the time. We have to check when JJ, and stormtracker are open. Do you have a link to the website where I can join your league? - Milk's Favorite Cookie 02:26, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm...ok lets wait. Ask JJ and stormtracker if Friday at 3:30 p.m. eastern is good. I know JJ is in the same time zone as me not sure about you or stormtracker. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 02:30, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yep - so you are 2 hrs. behind me (I think) is it 7:40ish over there? - Milk's Favorite Cookie 02:37, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So are you for 1:30 on Friday? (I changed the time above to 3:30) Oh, and Stormtracker is in Eastern too. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 02:41, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IDK, we'll see, it depends on JJ, and Stormtracker. Until then I have to wake up at 6 tomorrow. Gotta go to sleep. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 02:45, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It says I need a group password, do you know what it is? (I followed the directions until the end, and when I searched for the league, nothing came up. I must be doing something wrong.) jj137 (talk) 02:58, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you confirm an email in Special:Preferences, it will work. You can always remove it if you don't want it there ;) jj137 (talk) 03:15, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And, I really don't care when we do the draft, but I can probably tell you if I can't do it at a certain time. jj137 (talk) 03:16, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, does the email-confirmed not work? jj137 (talk) 03:17, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(Don't really want to post it here, will probably get spammed :() If you just put in an email address in Special:Preferences, confirm it with the message in your inbox, you can use Special:Emailuser/Jj137, then remove it if you want. The email addresses aren't "public", you can only know what they are if you get sent an email with one. jj137 (talk) 03:20, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anytime after 3:00 PM on a Friday or a Weekend is good for me. (Except anytime between 7 PM and 9:45 PM this Friday. STORMTRACKER 94 ^{Go Sox!} 11:10, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, when I said time time above I meant 3:30 not 1:30. I would be at school as well. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 21:03, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fantasy baseball[edit]

OK, check your mail. (I had just forgotten to finish confirming my account, that's why it didn't work.) Now, are we creating a new league? "League of the Wiki" is full with random people. jj137 (talk) 20:59, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the new league. jj137 (talk) 21:18, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vote![edit]

User:Milk's Favorite Cookie/elections - Milk's Favorite Cookie 00:14, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, true, a little on the racism side their HP_{(You don't mind if I call you that I hope?)} But I lived in Mass all my life - never really liked Romney much. I'm acutally going to change to McCain. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 01:02, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, last time I checked the only 3 who joined were, me, JJ, and storm. Have you joined yet? - Milk's Favorite Cookie 02:18, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

User:Earthbendingmaster/thanks Earth bending master 01:02, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fantasy baseball[edit]

Yep, those are us. It looks like the draft is this Saturday at 1 P.M. (EST) jj137 (talk) 02:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What's the link to your league? jj137 (talk) 02:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I guess so, if you want to. jj137 (talk) 02:45, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Are you able to make the draft Saturday? jj137 (talk) 02:56, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Of course I'll give ESPN a try. We have two days to get a few more people, so I'm not sure how that will work out. jj137 (talk) 20:09, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have you asked Milk's Favorite Cookie or Stormtracker yet? jj137 (talk) 20:22, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, you should probably go ahead and do that. If we can't get enough people for the CBS league, it will be good to already have that ready. jj137 (talk) 20:46, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, you might want to see this... jj137 (talk) 20:48, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're pretty active. Most people just added their name to the members list and haven't done anything since.

It is sad that JA10 left... I don't understand why so many good editors are leaving these days. I still don't know why we know our "number" in the project, but if you want to be #3, that's fine :) jj137 (talk) 20:36, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: ESPN Fantasay Baseball[edit]

Yeah, ESPN is better, but if we have enough people by the time, lets not go to ESPN. Also, what do you mean by 'Change my background'? - Milk's Favorite Cookie 20:36, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is it? JJ said it looked cool. I can read it pretty easily... But if you really think so :(. I'll keep it till additional people complain. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 22:24, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fantasy baseball[edit]

(I also left you a message above, if you didn't see it yet) It looks like the league is full now. Just wondering, do you know what would happen if someone missed the draft tomorrow? jj137 (talk) 21:20, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... do you think we should? Our league is full now with 10 people. jj137 (talk) 00:29, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's a really good point. Should you go ahead and mention it to Stormtracker and MFC? jj137 (talk) 02:03, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! That would be great. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 02:14, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like Milk already thinks it's a good idea. We'll have to wait for Stormtracker's response -- jj137 (talk) 02:16, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not really - I have a lot of HW - but as usual I'll save it till Sunday. I was just watching TV. Why? - Milk's Favorite Cookie 03:03, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, uh, ask JJ. I don't think its possible with 2 people. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 03:09, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds pretty good. I'll join whenever you tell me to. STORMTRACKER 94 ^{Go Sox!} 12:58, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I should be there most of the time. jj137 (talk) 16:43, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, maybe all of the time. Do you know how long it will be? jj137 (talk) 17:00, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing I can think of right now... jj137 (talk) 17:05, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. When I said "most of the time" I probably should have said "the whole time". It's kind of hard to tell without knowing how long it is. jj137 (talk) 17:10, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. jj137 (talk) 17:15, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mets[edit]

Hey, the Mets look good this year. RC-0722 ^communicator/_kills 04:24, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I do. But is there money involved? RC-0722 ^communicator/_kills 04:55, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then yes. RC-0722 ^communicator/_kills 13:44, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Boston Red Sox newsletter - February 10, 2008.[edit]


The Boston Red Sox WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 2, Issue 4 • February 10, 2008 • About the Newsletter
News Project and team news: Project News Team News	Features Featured Red Sox articles of the week: Luis Aparicio Yankees-Red Sox rivalry Tris Speaker	New Articles New Boston Red Sox related articles: Ed Morgan Johnny Marcum
Archives • Newsroom

You are receiving this newsletter because you are a member of WikiProject Boston Red Sox. If you would not like to receive this newsletter, please add your name here. JJBot (talk) 03:54, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Where were you?[edit]

Sorry! I was out on the cape all day, and I got hung up the snow while coming back - sorry. But it picked automatically for me - so :) - Milk's Favorite Cookie 17:20, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Fantasy Baseball[edit]

Would you say that's a good thing or a bad thing? jj137 (talk) 02:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but when it is available again it sounds like it will be really good. (And from what I've heard from you, I'm sure it will be.) jj137 (talk) 02:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LOL :) -- jj137 (talk) 03:04, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's hilarious. I saw one once that said (next to a railroad track, I think): "Danger. 100,000 volts. Do not touch, or you may be prosecuted." (Well, it may not have been 100,000, but it was some big number.) jj137 (talk) 03:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Funny. Burner 0718 00:31, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandals[edit]

Hi, I rvd a page blanking of this page by 68.61.141.237. I'm not sure if the IP should be blocked, submit if you like :) JPilborough (talk) 00:25, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Wikicup[edit]

That MFD is just plain silly.

You're a Brit! I'm Germany. jj137 (talk) 02:39, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:ESPN[edit]

Yes! Have you created a league yet? jj137 (talk) 22:37, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I sent it. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 01:06, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Newsletter[edit]

Do you want to write something about spring training in the newsletter this week? jj137 (talk) 22:45, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How about this direct link: Wikipedia:WikiProject Boston Red Sox/Newsletter/2-17-08/Spring Training jj137 (talk) 00:32, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you almost done with the article? The newsletter delivery is tomorrow. jj137 (talk) 02:14, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage[edit]

I fixed up your userpage a little (hope you don't mind). Since you had my status link, it would just say my status - not yours. Each time you want to update your statues go here. Edit the page and change 'in' to 'out'. Thanks. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 18:20, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay[edit]

Cool page (neat indeed). Do you have a guestbook? Basketball 110 _{proof that this user is crazy} 23:21, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Boston Red Sox newsletter - February 17, 2008.[edit]


The Boston Red Sox WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 2, Issue 5 • February 17, 2008 • About the Newsletter
News Project and team news: Project News Spring Training	Features Featured Red Sox articles of the week: Tim Wakefield Gavvy Cravath Jackie Jensen	New Articles New Boston Red Sox related articles: Earl Johnson
Archives • Newsroom

You are receiving this newsletter because you are a member of WikiProject Boston Red Sox. If you would not like to receive this newsletter, please add your name here. JJBot (talk) 15:50, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Lol[edit]

LOL, I guess we were both going after that vandal. jj137 (talk) 16:01, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ESPN[edit]

I got the invite. And I joined - Milk's Favorite Cookie 20:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:House[edit]

Congratulations!

Maybe you should leave Stormtracker a message. jj137 (talk) 23:20, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's strange. Has he not responded? jj137 (talk) 00:43, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I completely forgot! Could you e-mail me an invite? STORMTRACKER 94 ^{Go Sox!} 13:32, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Newsletter[edit]

I think we're going to have to do something about the newsletter. More people are adding their names to the no-receiving list. We're usually waiting until the last day to add everything. I really don't think each issue is as good as it could be. Something needs to be changed. As for this week, it probably needs to be delayed. -- jj137 (talk) 04:56, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invite[edit]

Please accept this invite to join the Bruins WikiProject, a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles associated with the Boston Bruins. Simply click here to accept!

STORMTRACKER 94 ^{Go Sox!} 17:08, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's okay. Anyways, I will join the league. Sorry I forgot. STORMTRACKER 94 ^{Go Sox!} 17:23, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I even got one. If you could, sure. STORMTRACKER 94 ^{Go Sox!} 11:17, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LOL[edit]

Hey, check the bottom of your userpage for something chiefs related. RC-0722 ^communicator/_kills 18:28, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fantasy Baseball league[edit]

Ok, Stormtracker94 is my best friend onand off Wikipedia. He invited me to join your fantasy baseball league but I need an invite sent or a password e-mailed becuase it's a private league. My e-mail is mXlancerX@gmail.com. So, you problably don't knwo me but I've been here for sometime now so here I am. My user on ESPN is CarerraZ. See you around! -- Carerra^"OoOoOooh!" 20:21, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: ESPN[edit]

It's tjc94@comcast.net. STORMTRACKER 94 ^{Go Sox!} 12:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. I will find a friend who would like to join. Do you want someone from Wiki or not? -- Carerra^"Chatter" 13:22, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to log in, but it says "500 Internal Server Error." I don't really know what's wrong. STORMTRACKER 94 ^{Go Sox!} 11:00, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Got it! Just had to create a new account. You should try renaming your team and creating a logo. STORMTRACKER 94 ^{Go Sox!} 11:11, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation[edit]

Please accept this invite to join the Homeschooling WikiProject, a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles associated with Homeschooling.
Simply click here to accept! DiligentTerrier^{and friends} 17:46, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Section[edit]

Please visit the Achievments section in the Wikipedia:WikiProject Boston Red Sox that has been approved.--RyRy5 (talk) 21:23, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Draft[edit]

Next Sunday? (is good for me) BTW, you had us worried Glad to see you! - Milk's Favorite Cookie 22:33, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't care when. Next Sunday though, I think I'm going to be gone for a few hours. jj137 (talk) 23:17, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then scratch that date then. Next Saturday? HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 00:33, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great. Next Saturday, I'll be in the cape. Next to Next Sunday? - Milk's Favorite Cookie 01:03, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Saturday is fine with me. jj137 (talk) 02:47, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is next to next Sunday the 23rd? If it is that should work out great. HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 17:15, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me. jj137 (talk) 17:15, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Boston Red Sox newsletter - March 9, 2008.[edit]

	Error: Image is invalid or non-existent.
The Boston Red Sox WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 2, Issue 6 • March 9, 2008 • About the Newsletter
News Project and team news: Project News Team News Collaboration	Features Featured Red Sox articles of the week: List of Boston Red Sox seasons Joe Judge Bill Pulsipher	New Articles New Boston Red Sox related articles: Keith Johns Ray Jarvis John Henry Johnson Vic Johnson Hunter Jones Rudy Kallio Justin Masterson Tony Granadillo Gil Velazquez Benn Karr Charlie Jones
Archives • Newsroom

You are receiving this newsletter because you are a member of WikiProject Boston Red Sox. If you would not like to receive this newsletter, please add your name here. JJBot (talk) 21:46, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sample Newsletter[edit]

Please visit my sandbox for the newsletter that will be delivered 3-16-08 FOR THE WP:SOX. I would like your opinion on it. This is my first Newsletter I have created. I don't know where to find the featured Red Sox articles of the week for the newsletter. This message is sent to all writers of the Newsletter.--RyRy5 (talk) 18:44, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Draft[edit]

It sounds like a good day. I am free then. STORMTRACKER 94 ^{Go Irish!} 00:03, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is XFire that thing you play Civilization IV online with? STORMTRACKER 94 ^{Go Irish!} 00:07, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't have that. Do you have a Playstation Network account for PS3? STORMTRACKER 94 ^{Go Irish!} 00:09, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest a PS3, I've played a Show demo, and own Madden and NBA Live. The games have amazing graphics, if that's what you are looking for. STORMTRACKER 94 ^{Go Irish!} 00:14, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah - it's good (the date) - Milk's Favorite Cookie 00:40, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anytime (after 12 Eastern) :) - Milk's Favorite Cookie 01:03, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good with me. :) jj137 (talk) 20:13, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scout Invite[edit]

Please accept this invite to join the Scouting Business of the Boston Red Sox WikiProject, a job where scouts find news to add to the Scouting Report on the mainpage. It is used so people can see what is happening around the Red Sox WikiProject. Click here to accept and become a scout!

If you have any queations, ask me, the founder of the Scouting Business.--RyRy5 (talk) 22:26, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup[edit]

STORMTRACKER 94 ^{Go Irish!} 22:37, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Draft[edit]

Very sorry, I wasn't able to make it. :( jj137 (talk) 20:24, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Boston Red Sox newsletter - March 30, 2008.[edit]

	Error: Image is invalid or non-existent.
The Boston Red Sox WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 2, Issue 7 • March 31, 2008 • About the Newsletter
News Project and team news: Project News Scouting Report Team News Collaboration	Features Featured Red Sox articles of the week: Rickey Henderson Clay Buchholz Carl Yastrzemski	New Articles New Boston Red Sox related articles: Ed Kelly Judge Nagle Harry Niles Chet Nourse Hank Olmsted George Orme Harry Ostdiek Bill Marshall Tom McCarthy Andy Merchant Spike Merena Jack Merson John Michaels Dick Midkiff Dee Miles Dick Mills
Archives • Newsroom

You are receiving this newsletter because you are a member of WikiProject Boston Red Sox. If you would not like to receive this newsletter, please add your name here. JJBot (talk) 23:35, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kansas[edit]

Whoa. That was a great game. jj137 (talk) 17:17, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Message[edit]

Actually, I did. You left me one. STORMTRACKER 94 ^{Go Irish!} 21:51, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-retirement[edit]

No, I didn't see that. Wow... very sorry to see you go (a little late there...). I've been pretty inactive (or at least not on here as much as I would have liked) for most of the month. jj137 (talk) 01:53, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I know, but it always feels odd when people on here leave. jj137 (talk) 23:07, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, that's hilarious... jj137 (talk) 19:21, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Won't Get Fooled Again Userbox[edit]

Wow, this is an EXTREMELY belated response, but I made a Won't Get Fooled Again userbox. Use this link: {{User:Xnux/Userboxes/WGFA}}.

The Who

This user won't get fooled again.

-Xnux the Echidna 23:08, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday[edit]

Happy Birthday, HPJoker, from Milk’s Favorite Cookie ^(Talk)! Have a great day!

Milk’s Favorite Cookie ^(Talk) 22:21, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Boston Red Sox Newsletter for April 31, 2008[edit]

	Error: Image is invalid or non-existent.
The Boston Red Sox WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 2, Issue 9 • April 31, 2008 • About the Newsletter
News Project and team news: Project News Team News Collaboration	Features Featured Red Sox articles of the week: Justin Masterson Tony Granadillo Tom McCarthy	New Articles New Boston Red Sox related articles: Jim Wright (1978-79 pitcher) Mike Trujillo Marino Santana Johnny Welch Scott Taylor (baseball player) Bill Mundy Win Remmerswaal
Archives • Newsroom

The message above has been delivered by Diligent Terrier Bot, a bot operated by Diligent Terrier. 00:53, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Lester[edit]

Yeah, it was an awesome game. A nice play by Jacoby Ellesbury as well. « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie ^{( talk / contribs)} 21:59, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lester[edit]

That was awesome. jj137 (talk) 00:31, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply[edit]

Oh my god, I am really getting tired of these sort of things... half the reason I've barely edited in months. jj137 (talk) 03:42, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, a lot of times I do. People are a lot more critical of the things you do and it can be really frustrating. jj137 (talk) 03:21, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MLB 07: The Show[edit]

Your recent conduct on the page and talk page of the aforementioned article is way out of line and is wholly uncivil; I've started a discussion at the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents for it to be reviewed. The discussion can be found here. AllynJ (talk | contribs) 11:41, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a message regarding this matter on the article talk page. Please take a look when you have a moment, thankyou. Exxolon (talk) 12:45, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think i've solved the dispute on the article. I hope you're happy with the results. See the talk page for more info. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 16:24, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:George Carlin[edit]

Yeah, I did... jj137 (talk) 03:51, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: All star game[edit]

Yeah. Go AL! Also, do you like the idea of a 10-14 person fantasy football league? I think a bunch of people from WP would play. Here's a list:

Me
You
Jj
MFC
Vhoscythe
Gears of War
Shapiros10
Diligent Terrier
RyRy
Kmweber
Basketball 110

RedThunder 23:36, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Baseball Newsletter[edit]

The Baseball WikiProject Newsletter

Issue I – July 2008

: "A home opener is always exciting,; no matter if it's home or on the road."; - Yogi Berra

News and announcements

Welcome to the first Baseball WikiProject Newsletter, dated Tuesday, July 15, 2008.
The Article Improvement Drive has been revived. Check it out!
The Outreach department is in the works, please contribute your ideas!

Featured content

In the past month, WikiProject Baseball has had the following articles promoted to Featured Article status:

This month's newsletter was designed and written by Wizardman, jj137, and Black ngold29. If you would like to contribute to future newsletters, please contact the Baseball WP outreach dept.

News from the diamond

The 79^th MLB All-star Game is scheduled for this evening.
The 2008 Home Run Derby took place yesterday. Justin Morneau defeated Josh Hamilton in the final round, 5 home runs to 3, although Hamilton broke a record with 28 home runs hit in the first round.

From the Editors

Baseball has a history unlike any other sport. It has been played in countless countries throughout the decades, and it will undoubtedly continue play for many more. On this eve, some the finest players the sport has to offer will take the field at the Yankee Stadium. Four popes spoke there, Pelé scored goals there, "The Greatest [football] Game Ever Played" was battled out there, John Philip Sousa lead a band there, George Costanza worked there; but what do all these events have in common? They fail to reach the level of greatness that the baseball that was played there did.

In 1923, a man named Babe Ruth decided to build a new house, and over the years, that house was a home to some of the greatest baseball ever played. If I were to list out all of these great moments, it would be longer than the bill for the New Yankee Stadium. So I'll sum it up by saying that we can remember these great moments by adding them to this place we've gathered at for future generations to read about, to learn about, to dream about; but more importantly we can watch tonight and we can remember how baseball is unlike anything else that we will encounter in our lives. — Black ngold29

-- jj137 (talk) 03:05, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply[edit]

Hehe, I don't think I've heard him say that. Then again, maybe I didn't listen closely enough... jj137 (talk) 03:05, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you believe that you can edit constructively and within our expectations and behavior norms, then you are welcome to come back on Tuesday and edit again. Please take some time off and consider what are appropriate ways of engaging in conversation and building the encyclopedia. Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 06:39, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On my talk page, you wrote: Yea, I WAS TRYING TO STOP ANOTHER ARGUMENT LIKE THE SECTION ABOVE IT! LOOK AT IT NOW! I WAS RIGHT!

I understand that. It was clear from the edit summaries that you intended that.

What you need to understand is that it's not your right to "stop arguments" like that. You don't get to decide which discussions are worth having on talk pages and which aren't. It's not your right to remove other people's comments like that.

If discussions get particularly hostile, or particular editors are disruptive in discussions, then something can be done to tone things down. But random editors are not allowed to just short circuit discussion by randomly deleting others' comments like you did.

It's fundamentally disrespectful of all the other participants in the discussion to take away anyone else's comments.

Trying to minimize conflict and keep things civil and constructive is good. But doing so by removing talk comments is far far worse.

Please do not do it again. As I said, and as you were warned, it's absolutely not OK to remove those others' comments like that. Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 01:44, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply[edit]

Holy shit, I didn't know he changed his name. It's funny though, your comments always entertain me, HP. jj137 (talk) 20:07, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, talk to you later. (and [2]) jj137 (talk) 01:41, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you do have a good point, it basically only led to more wikidrama and more edit wars (and you predicted it...). I don't know if I'd call it spam, but either way, it's completely pointless. jj137 (talk) 00:58, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, now that I think about it, it is. :P And now the NFL is "officially" calling him Chad Ocho Cinco... I just don't know what to think. jj137 (talk) 02:50, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hah, yeah, the whole thing is just a joke -- his name and his talk page. ;) jj137 (talk) 21:12, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Johnny Pesky[edit]

Yes I have one all ready to go for when they formally retire his number.

Chad Ocho Cinco[edit]

His legal name is actually Chad Ochocinco, bug the common name is Ocho Cinco so it should be that way. Just letting you know.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 22:58, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October Baseball WikiProject Newsletter[edit]

The Baseball WikiProject Newsletter

Issue III – October 2008

: "If a woman has to choose between catching a fly ball and saving a baby's life...; she'll save the baby without even considering how many men are on base!"; — Stephen King (The Dark Tower)

News and announcements

The Baseball Project promoted 13 lists to Featured status in August and 8 more in September. Amazing job!
A combined eleven articles were promoted to Good Article status in August and September.

Featured content

In September, WikiProject Baseball has had the following articles promoted to:
Featured Article status:

Nashville Sounds

Featured List status:

List of New York Mets Opening Day starting pitchers, List of Colorado Rockies Opening Day starting pitchers, List of Florida Marlins Opening Day starting pitchers, Nashville Sounds seasons, List of Tampa Bay Rays Opening Day starting pitchers, List of Seattle Mariners Opening Day starting pitchers, List of Boston Red Sox Opening Day starting pitchers, List of Arizona Diamondbacks Opening Day starting pitchers, New York Yankees seasons

Good Articles of August and September:

All the Way (Eddie Vedder song), Cy Young, Dan Brouthers, Harmon Killebrew, Rickey Henderson, Billy Pierce, Kinston Indians, Three Rivers Stadium, Bill Lange, Calgary Cannons, Hugh Daily, Homer at the Bat

This month's newsletter was designed and written by Wizardman, jj137, and Black ngold29. If you would like to contribute to future newsletters, please contact the Baseball WP outreach dept.

News from the diamond

The 2008 opening round playoff matchups with be:
- Boston Red Sox vs. Los Angeles Angels
- Milwaukee Brewers vs. Philadelphia Phillies
- Los Angeles Dodgers vs. Chicago Cubs
- Chicago White Sox vs. Tampa Bay Rays
Help to keep the articles of the postseason updated

From the Editors

We apologize for not sending out our August newsletter, we have tried to cover some events of the month in this issue.

The playoffs have started! The Dodgers and Phillies have won their respective Division Series and will face off in the NL Championship Series. Both series in the American League have yet to be finished. Show your support for your favorite teams by keeping up with their season pages!

Thought you might be interested in this/like this/something/I don't know. :P Go Sox! -- jj137 (talk) 00:03, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I completely see what you mean- I was hoping to update it with some of that as soon as I deliver it to everyone. Hey, if you want to, go ahead and add a bit yourself- the page is at Wikipedia:WikiProject Baseball/Outreach/newsletteroct08. (Try not to add anything too crazy though, it'll show up on like 250 people's talk pages :)). jj137 (talk) 00:12, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, OK. What kind of music do you like? jj137 (talk) 03:16, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Dropkick Murphys are pretty good. I'm not much of a fan of country, but I'll listen to just about any kind of rock. jj137 (talk) 23:42, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HA! jj137 (talk) 23:45, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, I wonder how well he'll do in the NLCS... jj137 (talk) 23:50, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, he pretty much strikes out or hits a homerun every time. :P jj137 (talk) 02:21, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Team[edit]

Ah, yes. I'm assuming you watched the game(s)? :( jj137 (talk) 23:32, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Never thought I would say it, but I think the Rays are bigger threats to us now than the Yankees. jj137 (talk) 02:16, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Who doesn't? :P jj137 (talk) 00:42, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Hey[edit]

Ah, cool to see you're keeping up with your userpage again :) Lol, I forgot about trade though! I really thought that meant nothing too, but, wow... jj137 (talk) 01:09, 4 November 2008 (UTC

November 2008[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a social network. Wikipedia is not a place to socialize or do things that are not directly related to improving the encyclopedia. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. This message is not meant to discourage you from editing Wikipedia but rather to remind you that the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia. Thank you. Megaman en m (talk) 20:59, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On your user page you seem to be writing a blog.--Megaman en m (talk) 21:03, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pedroia[edit]

Yep :D I was pretty happy to hear it. jj137 (talk) 23:26, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty good, actually. I've barely been on here at all lately (a ton of schoolwork) but yeah, pretty good. The Mike Mussina article kind of amuses me, it's funny how there's always people who want to try to keep the "policies" perfectly uptight ;) jj137 (talk) 22:24, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LMAO! That's pretty funny :P jj137 (talk) 04:34, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, sorry, I don't know any plays. However, Template:Infobox Play should do the trick :) jj137 (talk) 17:21, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sport roster changes[edit]

Per WP:CRYSTAL, we don't include any expected/suggested/impending sport roster changes. We only report on those that have occured, since such events don't occur on a regularly scheduled or predictable basis.

See Talk:Jason_Kidd#Dallas_Mavericks_2008 to see how some editors jumped the gun and added details to a deal that was "done in principle", but never approved by the NBA. The trade got blocked by a clause in Devean George's contract and had to be re-worked with different players a week later. --Madchester (talk) 01:09, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: deleted sawyer the musical[edit]

Re your message: I deleted the article because of borderline WP:BLP issues regarding the student who is the focus of the play. Additionally, there is no notability claim for the play and, since the writing of the play is not completed, the article would be deleted per policy. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:07, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: I noticed that when I read the article. No, it does not make any difference. If anything, it adds to the issues with the article as you have a conflict of interest. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:14, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: Alright, as long as the play meets the notability requirements. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:23, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Outtakes[edit]

Sorry about the reverting. I tried to revert my own edit, but you were faster. My mistake, I'll be more careful in the future.Sjö (talk) 10:03, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Red Sox-Junichi Tazawa links[edit]

I wanted to let you know that I reverted your edit in Junichi Tazawa, since the current reports look flimsy in my opinion. No US organization is actually reporting the news, but instead reporting on an article in Sankei Sports (or Sanspo), a Japanese sports tabloid. No other source has reported this news to my knowledge, and the details are sketchy right now. I would be careful about citing any news coming out of Japan - most US media are probably ripping stories off NPB Tracker, and if they're citing a Japanese sports daily, that means they probably have nothing. --Mosmof (talk) 23:32, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I realized that they're working off two Japanese newspaper sources now, but they're still unreliable, I think. But Boston Globe actually got a confirmation from Shipley, so I'll put that source in. --Mosmof (talk) 23:38, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nov 2008[edit]

I placed a Wikiquette Alert in regards to some of your postings here: Wikiquette Alert Atlantabravz (talk) 16:37, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contribution to User talk:Jj137, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the sandbox to get started. Thank you. Referring to other editors as "cunt" or "asshole", and refactoring their comments on others talkpages is not permitted, even when they are attempts to be humourous with "friends". They are significant violations of WP:CIVIL and will not be tolerated. ►BMW◄ 13:08, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a social network. Wikipedia is not a place to socialize or do things that are not directly related to improving the encyclopedia, as you did at User:HPJoker. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. This message is not meant to discourage you from editing Wikipedia but rather to remind you that the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia. Thank you. Please refrain from using your Userpage as a blog for off-Wikipedia issues or similar. ►BMW◄ 13:11, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: User talk:Bwilkins. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Atlantabravz (talk) 22:15, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HPJoker. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding accusations of your personal attacks and incivility. Thank you. Atlantabravz (talk) 01:00, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated incivility. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Blueboy 96 01:12, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to just warn you about your behavior of late, but after seeing this and this, I think you need a three-day Wikibreak. If you keep this up, the next block will be a lot longer. Blueboy 96 01:15, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HPJoker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You'll see that JJ laughed when I called that dude a cunt and GOD DAMNIT STOP TRYING TO SHUT DOWN MY USER PAGE. Look at this

Decline reason:

This seems like an unusual way to request the release of a block for incivility. Kuru ^talk 23:51, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

And since you've seen fit to not only evade your block, but do so with still more personal attacks ([3], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Atlantabravz&diff=prev&oldid=255395637}), you are now blocked indefinitely. I initially merely reset the timer on your 72-hour block. However, after looking at your track record of late, your contributions since November 22 have been a continuous spray of uncivil behavior. Sorry, we don't need that here. You can post an unblock request if you want, but I should advise you that given your history, it's not likely you'll be able to convince another admin that you've changed your ways. Blueboy 96 13:47, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

.........[edit]

we need to talk blueboy......... and don't evade it by just blocking every IP I use. 74.50.119.142 is NOT my IP. I can get you my home and laptop IP when I get home in an hour. HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 20:54, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will warn you though, my home IP has vandalized before. Ron is one of the people with my group of friends and Tim was over one night and must've done it while I was watching TV. I'm saying this because I don't want you jumping on me because that IP has a record of vanalizing before. HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 21:00, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Let's see here now. One of your "friends" just happens to go to the userpage of a user with whom you've had a dispute, and posts a personal attack in the very same section in which you posted a personal attack? You really expect me, or anyone else, to believe that? Come off it. Blueboy 96 21:27, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No.... I never said that. I said that my FRIEND used my COMPUTER and vandalized wikipedia. THEREFORE my IP for my home computer has a record of vandalism. HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 22:53, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And BTW the IP for my laptop is 76.120.0.210 and I'll go and get the one for the computer downstairs. HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 22:54, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The IP addresses for the Laptop and the Home computer are the same, 76.120.0.210. Makes sense since the laptop's internet is running on our router. HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 22:58, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just did an IP trace for that IP that left the messages on Bravz and the ISP is NOC4Hosts Inc. I use Comcast HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 23:08, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did another IP trace, and the IP is IN NEW YORK, NEW YORK. Check that one IP I used that I tried to argue my innocence with (161.97.198.130), you'll see that it is a BROOMFIELD IP. HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 23:16, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WELL? HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 02:40, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You do realize you need to use the {{unblock}} template to get admins to look at the page. MBisanz ^talk 18:04, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This IP is an open proxy. 74.50.119.142 (talk) 18:18, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- That's me, by the way, accessible through http://proxisurf.info Checkuser is therefore Inconclusive. Thatcher 18:32, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HPJoker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It has been a while and I would like to be unblocked. HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 19:25, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You provide no reason why you should be unblocked. — Sandstein 19:50, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HPJoker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Because it has been a while and both considering the lack of evidence for this indef ban I feel like it is time that I should unblocked. 76.120.0.210 (talk) 23:35, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The rationale provided for extending the block (evasion + repeated incivility) seems clear to me. Typically, indefinite blocks aren't reviewed due to the passage of time unless a significant amount of time has passed - one week is not a sufficient amount of time. UltraExactZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 00:08, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HPJoker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The point is that he extended the ban with insufficient evidence. He indef banned me with NO proof that that was actually me and to this day, hour, minute, second, still has no proof that that IP was actually me. HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 00:44, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The pattern of behavior would seem to clearly indicate that you have intentionally attempted to cicumvent your block. If you can prove you are willing to abide by all Wikipedia rules, such as NOT editing while you are blocked, for a significant period of time, then your unblock request may be reconsidered. However, one week is not sufficient time to demonstrate that you are reformed. If you continue to repeatedly request unblocks in rapid succession, this talk page may be protected to stop that disruption. — Jayron32.talk.contribs 04:00, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You were setup!![edit]

Atlantabravz set you up. Those comments that were written on his talk page were written by Atlantabravz to make you look bad so you would get banned permanently. Notice how straight away after they were written he went and informed Blueboy96? He knew he would block you indefinatly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.192.79.97 (talk) 21:50, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've no idea who is making the above comment, or indeed the veracity of such a claim (timing of a "set-up" is way out), but I have to say that an indefinite block seems out of proportion in this case. It is obvious that HPJoker is guilty of some incivility but to justify an indefinite block I would imagine that means that his presence is a negative one. I believe that claim to be false as the user is not beyond reform. Furthermore, the inconclusive checkuser undermines the indefinite block in these circumstances. Perhaps there are signs of immaturity here, gross immaturity and a brusque manner to boot, but I think that the block should be removed after a week if:

No attempts to avoid the block are made
HPJoker agrees to keep within the bounds of civility
HPJoker realises his behaviour must improve and apologises

If unblocked I'll be sure to keep an eye on this talk page and recommend a re-blocking if I turn out to be wrong about this.

HPJoker: if you're reading — what do you think? Sillyfolkboy (talk) 23:22, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am wondering who that IP is......

I just know that Blueboy has caused hell for me. I write an MLB free agency thing on my userpage and I haven't been able to because I've been blocked. I am truly pissed off at him. If I never see him again that would be perfectly fine with me.

I am not attempting to avoid the block. I was using the computers at my school so I could argue my block with Blueboy. When he says that incivility is continued by the use of an IP timer reset is BS. I feel like this guy. Wrongfully accused and sentenced. I will apologize to atlanta but will NEVER speak to Blueboy again. But to tell the truth I feel like they need to lighten up. You got insulted online, lighten up. The whole reason I said that to him in the first place was because he told me to shut down my user page. I said something back to him because someone tried to bring it down last year and it failed.

What is that IP? HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 00:19, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see that your userpage seems to be the real case in point. Why not signup for a wordpress blog account instead? Personally, I see your blog/newsfeed thing as quite harmless but I think it's a valid question as to why you should be doing this type of thing on Wikipedia. People have also suggested moving it to a sub-page as a compromise. Why not try user:HPJoker/RedSox? To be honest I think that getting a blog would better suit your needs anyway and bring your thoughts to a wider audience. I imagine there wouldn't be anything wrong with linking it from your userpage anyway. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 03:40, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have to say, I agree with Sillyfolkboy, that you should be allowed back under certain restrictions, cause you do have some legitimate contrubutions that have helped out. And the fact that the only sock was your IP, which you claim is very active. So I'm all for letting you back, but with the restrictions Sillyfolkboy gave and having a "parole officer" to monitor your edits and if you break a restriction they reblock you indefinetely.--Iamawesome800 16:52, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmmmmm, can I be unbanned now? HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 00:11, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You should leave an unblock request, or email the admin who blocked you. You can do the latter if you enable emailing other users in your preferences. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 02:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HPJoker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It's been too long.... i think we all know that the time is WAY overdue to unblock me.

Decline reason:

Based on your conduct, I think it was a good call to block you indefinitely. I don't consider there is any evidence that you've changed. — PhilKnight (talk) 01:53, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How is that? HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 05:59, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think that we should take this to ANI or ArbCom and try and come to a consensus whether or not you should be unblocked. And obviously there would be a parole officer that can and will block you if you violate a term of your unblocking.--Iamawesome800 Talk to Me 21:57, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know it's been too long when two of my former buddies have retired and my other friend Jj isn't on that much. HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 00:44, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HPJoker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think I'm ready to be unblocked and if you don't agree, I want to find out who I can talk to to get unblocked. HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 23:28, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The passage of time, by itself, doesn't make an unblock called for. If you think you've solved the problems that made the block necessary, you should be more specific about why you should be unblocked and what you'd do differently. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:31, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Well now I know that I can't lash out at someone else whether they be a douchebag or not. Now that I know that, I won't do it again. HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 23:33, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HPJoker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

it's been a long long time. i've aged and matured. HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 01:44, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm unconvinced. Sandstein 06:03, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You've got to give more a reason, other than length, age and maturity. Admitting you did it, would be a start.--Giants 27(Contribs|WP:CFL) 13:30, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

the unofficial unblock thread for HPJoker[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HPJoker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

no giants i won't admit i added that final comment because i didn't. do you want me to post my schedule for last year? I was in 1st period us government. HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 00:12, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Further frivolous unblock requests will result in the loss of your ability to edit this page. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 01:01, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HPJoker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i've had three years to think about it. i'll be good.

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:36, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

OBAMA listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect OBAMA. Since you had some involvement with the OBAMA redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé –selbert 19:15, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]