Talk:Beaumont, Cumbria

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

CCHT external link[edit]

This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do). Laplacemat (talk) 10:07, 09 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Old sources[edit]

Some content has been copied from external sources that were written over a century ago. Is the information still up to date? For example, the first paragraph in the History of the parish section describes the borders of the Beaumont parish, which is from a source dated 1901. Are the borders the same today? In the second paragraph of the same section, describing the manor, states the manor belongs to the Earl of Lonsdale. Is the manor still owned by the Earl? How is this even relevant to Beaumont? And I have no idea what the currencies are when the source is quoting donations, benefactions and the like. -- Discboy 21:05, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

I've cleaned-up the page -- I don't pretend to be an expert on Beaumont, but I think you're right to suspect this out-of-date information. The whole manorial system in England collapsed not long after 1901, so I can't imagine for a moment that the village in any meaningful sense belongs to the "Earl of Lonsdale." The benefactions, too, might have been of interest in 1900, but as far as I know, most of them these days are only of antiquarian interest. Pasicles (talk) 18:10, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Beaumont, Cumbria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:01, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Beaumont, Cumbria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:30, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]