Wikipedia:Cambridge/Approved

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  1. Paulscrawl (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)) Wikipedia Library Research coordinator and frequent helper on Research Desk (lately busy on another project, just completed and ready to renew 11-year WP commitment). The various handbooks and companions on every subject under the sun published by Cambridge University Press would help me provide authoritative references posed on Research Desks, congruent with my long-term goal of mining archived Research Desk answers for sourced content to improve WP articles lacking such answers and reliable sources. Thank you. -- Paulscrawl (talk) 21:15, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Paulscrawl: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Darafsh (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I need Historical journals to improve articles about Iranian studies. Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk) 21:18, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @درفش کاویانی: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Continua Evoluzione (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I edit mainly on the Italian Wikipedia, especially articles about history of ancient Greece and ancient Greek people. Thanks to the TWL resources I've been able to improve several articles on this matter and I think I'd find the Cambridge journals and ebooks on Classical studies very useful. ContinuaEvoluzione 21:35, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Continua Evoluzione: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Maile66 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)) I've been here 9 years, with over 50,000 edits on Wikipedia, 89,068 if you count Commons and all the other sites I've edited on. I deal in a lot of historical articles, biographies and otherwise. I'm active in United States and European histories, women's histories, and also do reviews on DYK, GA, FL, FA. Cambridge University Press would be a great help to my various efforts on Wikipedia. — Maile (talk) 21:46, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Maile66: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. MrLinkinPark333 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I help at the Resource Exchange and come across requested articles that I can only locate at Cambridge's site. By having access to this resource, I can help more Wikipedians out with their requests. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 22:48, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @MrLinkinPark333: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Justlettersandnumbers (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) This is the pay-wall I hit most often; access would be invaluable both for content creation and for copyright clean-up work. I edit in many areas, including biography, music, domestic livestock and Renaissance topics; list of article creations is here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:30, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Justlettersandnumbers: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Ealdgyth (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Cambridge has many journals I find useful for my work with medieval history or horse history. Taking care of my elderly mother, I no longer am able to drive the close to two hours to get to the nearest university library with access to Cambridge's journals. I mainly work with medieval ecclesiastical history, but also work on secular biographies of the time period and other medieval topics. Over 100 GAs, over 50 FAs I've worked on. Ealdgyth - Talk 23:37, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ealdgyth: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. RolandR (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)) CUP has many otherwise unavailable books and journals which I would find useful in editing content related particularly to the Middle East. RolandR (talk) 23:49, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @RolandR: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. SlimVirgin (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Cambridge Books Online would be particularly useful for maintaining content about female genital mutilation and related issues. SarahSV (talk) 00:11, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @SlimVirgin: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I wish to use this access to develop more articles on European history, specifically Balkan history of WWI and WWII. Many of these journals and books will be of value. Regards, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:13, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Peacemaker67: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Lingzhi (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) More than 40K edits under another user name; 6 FA's; onwiki for about 6 non-continuous years (started 9 years ago). Although I have a PhD, I live and work in a place with very limited access to English-language resources...Currently doing a total, top-to-bottom rewrite on the surprisingly inadequate article on Bengal famine of 1943 in my personal sandbox; shooting for FA in a month or so. After that will be scouting for new topics, perhaps with a humanitarian bent... Also help out with many friends on FA drives (seem to often be involved in painting/visual arts, but am open to any academic field).  Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 00:56, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Lingzhi: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Signedzzz (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) CUP books and journals would massively help my editing in several areas, especially Renaissance philosophy, modern and ancient history, astronomy and marine biology. zzz (talk) 01:47, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Signedzzz: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Dschslava (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) These sources will allow me to significantly improve my editing in history-related subjects. Dschslava (talk) 02:50, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Dschlava: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Kmhkmh (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Would come in very handy for proofreading, extending or creating articles over a wide variety of subjects, in particular math, history and biographies.--Kmhkmh (talk) 02:56, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Kmhkmh: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Mendaliv (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I've just skimmed their catalog, and I'm practically drooling over the prospect of using CUP book and journal sources to flesh out law articles, especially international law articles. I think my contribs history speaks for itself. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 02:58, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Mendaliv: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. K.e.coffman (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) – I am interested in improving Wikipedia content on World War II history, specifically as it relates to the Eastern Front and the personalities of Nazi Germany. Much new historiography has been developed in the last 20 years, so having access to these sources would be great. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:27, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @K.e.coffman: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Tonton_Bernardo (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) - Working on insect systematics. Many publication descriptions of insecta from the colonial period are only available at Cambridge University Press. Tonton_Bernardo I'm so tired (talk) 04:19, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Tonton Bernardo: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Glavkos (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) - It would be a great help to have access to Cambridge University Press in order to extend or create new articles in the field of my interests, but mostly about Russian history, linguistics, political philosophy and social theory of the 19th & 20th century. --Γλαύκος message 04:34, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Glavkos: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Dmartyn80 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)). I create about 30 Featured articles, especially academic painting, Chinese philosophy and ancient book culture. I need access to Cambridge Univ. Press for the continuation of my work.--Dmartyn80 (talk) 05:56, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Dmartyn80: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Meloe (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I´m editing mostly in biological and ecological articles and some Cambridge journals such as Canadian Entomologist, Environmental Conservation and Bulletin of Entomological Research are useful sources for my work (since the 25 aren´t full yet ...).--Meloe (talk) 08:34, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Meloe: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Einsamer Schütze (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am an active user on german Wikipedia since 2006 and wrote several hundred articles mostly about egyptology and european prehistory. Access to Cambridge University Press would be of great use for my work. --Einsamer Schütze (talk) 11:28, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Einsamer Schütze: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. SusunW (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I edit on a wide variety of subjects related to women on English Wikipedia. As primarily a content writer, I have written over 550 start-class or above articles, as well as participated in 14 successful GAs. Access to Cambridge University Press would useful for my work on women in the Caribbean as well as international women's conferences. As where I live there are virtually no English Language sources, having scholarly works available which I can access is crucial to continuing to expand the historic contributions of the other half of the sky. SusunW (talk) 15:30, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @SusunW: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Homoatrox (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) — I have over 22,000 edits and 13 FA on ru-wiki with a focus on Ancient Rome. CUP publishes numerous journals and books on this subject, and access to their collections would be very useful to create new articles and expand the old ones. — Homoatrox (talk). 17:20, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Homoatrox: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. willemienH (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I edit and make new geometry and related pages, I would like access to the mathematics ebooks of Cambridge University press. WillemienH (talk) 21:40, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @WillemienH: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. StAnselm (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Over 100,000 edits and hundreds of articles created, specialising in religious studies. StAnselm (talk) 23:00, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @StAnselm: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. BushelCandle (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I edit widely but especially articles relating to Singapore, the Philippines and travel documents and emigration. BushelCandle (talk) 21:48, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
     Pending next round. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for the update, Nikkimaria. I'll be waiting with baited breath... BushelCandle (talk) 07:51, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @BushelCandle: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:09, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    User did not respond. Nikkimaria (talk) 11:52, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Fredericknoronha (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Would help me enhance the quality of my edits on the English wikipedia. Am mostly interested in Goa and India-related content.fredericknoronha (talk) 06:18, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Andrew Dalby (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I work across the wikis, English, French and Latin, improving referencing and bibliographies: history, anthropology, literature etc. CUP is a wall on which I often bash my head. Andrew Dalby 09:32, 18 March 2016 (UTC) I think some others here need it even more than I do![reply]
  4. Ciridae (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I've been on Wikipedia for over 7 months now. I'm currently concentrating on fiction literature and other novel articles but I also perform gnomish tasks all around the place. Ciridae (talk) 10:18, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  5. First Light (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) My editing is mostly in various religion articles, including several new articles, one GA, and DYKs in that area. I've also edited many plant articles in the past. Approx. 21,000 edits at English Wikipedia. I have no access to a library of any kind.
    Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  6. WarKosign (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I'm mostly editing articles related to Israel's history and politics, and good sources are always needed. CUP has a lot of material I can use. “WarKosign” 14:52, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @WarKosign: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 11:52, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Tomwsulcer (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Been at Wikipedia about 7 years, edit all kinds of articles, science, politics, language, biographies; some articles I've revamped are here. I have over 100+million pageviews from articles and images.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 17:24, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Gilgamesh (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) i am an active editor in the field of history with numerous articles on this subject. some of my articles are featured articles in the hebrew wikipedia. i use academically based research papers to enrich my articles with good quality material and i will use the access granted to me for this purpose. Gilgamesh (talk) 06:42, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Andreas Werle (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Active editor in the german Wikipedia since 10 years, mainly in the field of Medicine and Literature (Shakespeare). CUP is one of my main sources for work about Shakespeare (New Cambridge-Edition). I would appreciate to have an account. -- Andreas Werle (talk) 08:40, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Johnbod (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)</nowiki> I often encounter this paywall, writing mostly about art history, history, and sometimes medicine. Over 150 K edits, 15 FAs etc. Johnbod (talk) 06:13, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Farrtj (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Hi I often encounter this paywall regarding literature and business topics Tom (talk) 14:48, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Onel5969 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) - 85k or so edits... I've written a couple of hundred articles, have a few GA and FA articles, and have recently become interested in saving abandoned or AfD articles. Do a fair bit of bio work, focusing mainly on US cinema folks, as well as on film articles in general. Also do a fair amount of work on geographical articles. Would love to get more into history articles. Feel this could be a very helpful tool. I currently use newspapers.com a fair bit, and think this would be a nice academic complement to that. Onel5969 TT me 23:59, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  13. MarshalN20 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)) - Three featured articles, one good article. Mostly focus on Latin American history, but I am currently working on a project about the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World. Access to this resource would be very helpful with this and other future works I plan to complete for Wikipedia. Thanks!--MarshalN20 Talk 02:03, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)) It would be phenomonally useful for my work expanding our coverage of late-medieval English gentry and nobility. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 16:10, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Xender Lourdes (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I will find this access useful as I am a content creator on varied topics. This would help me cite and develop articles to GA FA status. I have created 26 articles with one GA and 5 DYKs. I've started upgrading my articles to FAs. One FA nom is pending. I am an auto reviewer too. Thank you. Xender Lourdes (talk) 00:26, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Davidbena (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have been active on Wikipedia for 3 years, and have written more than 20 articles, as well as contributed to many others (with nearly 12,000 edits), mostly in the fields of historical-research, as also biographies on important personages, and on Jewish customs. I have the utmost respect for academic journals and the articles they contain, and always strive to cite reliable sources whenever writing about a given topic. Having access to this venue will greatly improve my ability to cite reliable sources and to help make Wikipedia a more credible knowledge base.Davidbena (talk) 23:32, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Jfhutson (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I edit religious articles which CUP has lots of great resources for. I have already made significant use of my OUP account. --JFH (talk) 13:37, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Smallchief (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). I've been a wikipedia contributor since 2010 and I have created about 100 articles and edited more than 1,000 articles. I am a content creator, focusing on the history and archaeology of North America, military history, especially Vietnam, agriculture, and protected areas. Access to the Cambridge University Press would give me access to a great number of excellent sources related to my interests. Smallchief (talk 21:52, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Coretheapple (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). Active in articles on popular culture and beginning to improve articles on the Third Reich such as Schutzstaffel and Ideology of the SS. Access to the Cambridge University Press would help greatly in work on these areas. Coretheapple (talk) 00:27, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Wasted Time R (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). Contributor since 2005, over 67,000 edits, 130 FA/GA/DYK articles. Many of my recent activities have focused on historical, political, economic, and academic subjects that the free online world has poor representation of, and having access to the books and journals of Cambridge University Press would be quite valuable. Wasted Time R (talk) 00:27, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Mhhossein (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). I've created some dozens of articles and have promoted two articles to GA level. My main interest, as shown by my contributions, are political and religious issues. Having access to "Cambridge University Press" would be excellent and will enable me to enhance the quality of those articles I edit. Mhhossein (talk) 07:25, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Apuldram (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Recently I have several times needed to check references to CU Press books summarised on-line, but have been unable to get into the detail as my local library doesn't subscribe. Apuldram (talk) 10:51, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Apuldram: Please enable email. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Done. Apuldram (talk) 21:49, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  23. TnoXX (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I see that it's almost impossible to get an access, but it's not a crime to try. I'm active in Ukr-Wiki (5 GA, 4 FA, 12 FL). My main work field is medicine and biology. Thank you!--TnoXX (talk) 11:17, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Amqui (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I wrote several GA on the French Wikipedia and I contribute in a wide variety of topics covered by this resource that would be very helpful to me. More details can be provided if needed. Thank you, Amqui (talk) 14:50, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Queeste (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I'm active on the Dutch Wikipedia since 2009 - more than 15.000 edits. Very interested in psychology, psychiatry, history and religion. --Queeste (talk) 17:01, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Melly42 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I'm active on the German and English Wikipedia since 2005 - more than 15.000 edits. Very interested in biology and zoology. Would be also great to have access to archived issues of journals (e.g. The Oryx from the 1950s and 1960s).
    Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Xover (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Both Cambridge Books and Journals would be highly relevant for maintaining and verifying references, and creating and expanding articles, within the scope of WikiProject Shakespeare (e.g. my current long term project: Edmond Malone). --Xover (talk) 07:50, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Daniele.tampieri (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I contribute to Wikipedia by mainly editing entries on engineering, mathematics and physics topics and I currently have been granted access to other similar sources by The Wikipedia Library: even for this important resource, I think I meet all the requirements for applying and that my edits will benefit from access to the Cambridge University Press online resources. Daniele.tampieri (talk) 13:02, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Cambridge/Approved&oldid=1138385011"