User talk:Simongraham

Welcome!

Hello, Simongraham, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (NBMR-1) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating NBMR-1, Simongraham!

Wikipedia editor Garagepunk66 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I enjoyed reading your article about the NBMR-1. Very well done.

To reply, leave a comment on Garagepunk66's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Simongraham. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Ways to improve Yotchiangrai

Hi, I'm Robvanvee. Simongraham, thanks for creating Yotchiangrai!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The article needs additional references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Robvanvee 18:35, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Parentheses in biological authorities

Hi, the presence or absence of parentheses in biological authorities is meaningful; the parentheses around the author citation indicate that this was not the original taxonomic placement (as explained at Author citation (zoology)). So the parentheses need to be left precisely as they are in the source. Peter coxhead (talk) 11:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Authority links for spiders

Thanks for adding the link to Wanda Wesołowska to some spider articles. If you do find authors for spider taxa not linked, you can check Wikipedia:WikiProject Spiders/List of Arachnologists, and do please add a name if it's not already there.

Personally, I see no reason not to spell Polish names correctly, so I would change "Wesolowska" to "Wesołowska". Peter coxhead (talk) 11:40, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Please consider applying for Autopatrolled

Hi, I've just patrolled an article you created. I only felt the need to add {{WPSpiders}}, a link to the relevant project on the talk page. Having had a look through some of your previous created articles it seems to me that you should apply for the Autopatrolled permission. It would help reduce the backlog at New Page Patrol if articles as good as the ones you've been creating weren't on the list. Regards, Cabayi (talk) 09:38, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Ha, no need to apply, I just gave it to you. Cheers!--Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:43, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brancus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bedford S type

added a link pointing to Leyland

Muhammad Shah III Lashkari

added a link pointing to Orissa

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Polish arachnologists

Hi, I don't know if you are interested in creating articles on any of the other Polish arachnologists listed here, other than Wanda Wesołowska. I've just created a short article on Marek Żabka and am working on a draft for Joanna Gardzińska. One issue I've come across is that many Polish arachnologists have been involved with the Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, but this institution has had different names at different times (see pl:Uniwersytet Przyrodniczo-Humanistyczny w Siedlcach). So I thought you might perhaps be interested in knowing this.

• Wyższa Szkoła Nauczycielska (1969–1974)
• Wyższa Szkoła Pedagogiczna (1974–1977)
• Wyższa Szkoła Rolniczo-Pedagogiczna (1977–1999)
• Akademia Podlaska (1999–2010)
• Uniwersytet Przyrodniczo-Humanistyczny (from 2010)

I made a fix at Wanda Wesołowska based on one of these name changes. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:48, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for this, Peter. I have made start on an article on Barbara Maria Patoleta, who was supervised by Żabka and published with Gardzińska, based on the link. Please feel free to add to that too. Simongraham (talk) 21:01, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Great. I added Patoleta to Wikipedia:WikiProject Spiders/List of Arachnologists; this is useful as a source of wikitext for links. Peter coxhead (talk) 21:55, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barbara Maria Patoleta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HMS Satyr (1916), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Devonport. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Dashes

Hi, MOS:DASHES requires either spaced en-dashes or unspaced em-dashes. One of the many Wikipedia style rules for new editors to learn! In taxon lists, spaced en-dash is normally used for information after the taxon and author. Peter coxhead (talk) 15:45, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. There seems to be a lot of inconsistency as some entries have hyphens, some en-dash and some em-dash across the different lists. I was attempting to introduce some consistency in the section but maybe there is a bigger edit available. Simongraham (talk) 19:10, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Yes, there's a lot of inconsistency over dashes in many articles, not just spiders. It doesn't help that the differences don't show up clearly in some fonts. Peter coxhead (talk) 16:57, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 01:48, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Simongraham. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Encyclopedia of Popular Music of the World

Dear Simongraham,
do you own the book Bloomsbury Encyclopedia of Popular Music of the World, Volume 9, accidentally? I'm asking you because you corrected a formatting, using detailed info on the book. I'm particularly looking for its entry on Rapso.
Kind regards, Grueslayer 09:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of ship launches in 1917, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pembroke (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

List of most successful American submarines in World War II

Were the United States's submarines only active on the pacific front? Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 20:01, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

According to DANFS, there were some active in the Atlantic and Mediterranean including USS Blackfish, which sank the German Patrol Boat No. 408, and USS Herring, which sank the Ville du Havre, both as part of Operation Torch. Neither campaigns seem to be have been as important as the Pacific. Simongraham (talk) 10:14, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Invitation to join WikiProject Military History

Hello, Simongraham, you are hereby invited to join the Military history WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history, theory, and practice. You can add your name to the list of members, browse our showcase, train at the Academy, weigh in at current discussions, assess and review articles, read the news, or find an open task. If you would like to receive the project's monthly newsletter, The Bugle, please add your username here. We hope you will join us! Kges1901 (talk) 23:05, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Engine articles

Great articles Simon. To make things easier for you and to help standardise aviation articles, you might like to use Template:WPAVIATION creator, it makes things so much easier, I personally use the cite tools on the toolbar for applying references, again it is so easy, especially if you have URLs or ISBN numbers.--Petebutt (talk) 08:21, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Simongraham. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Angelika Machinek

Could explain why she meets WP:GNG or WP:BIO, or some other related notability guideline? I just don't see it. Please ping me (by entering {{ping|Arthur Rubin}} or {{u|Arthur Rubin}} if you reply on this page. You're on my watchlist, but perhaps not on a short-watchlist.) — Arthur Rubin (talk) 04:10, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

@Arthur Rubin: Hi Arthur. Thank you for your interest. In terms of the WP:GNG criteria:

• "Significant coverage" Dr Machinek is mentioned in multiple articles, both during her life and subsequently. The article references a biography and the popular press (in German).
• "Reliable" The article includes references to articles in mainstream newspapers and the FAI website.
• "Sources" The sources are all independent, with biographical detail confirmed from multiple sources. The literature is in German as there is a paucity of literature in English on German women's gliding (WP:NONENG).
• "Independent of the subject" The article lists some of her publications but these are not used as source material. The Fund set up as a legacy to her was created after her death.
• "Presumed" She is listed in multiple Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red categories and has a German wikipedia article, which demonstrates wider interest.

In terms of the WP:BIO criteria: "A sportsperson is presumed to be notable if the person has actively participated in a major amateur or professional competition or won a significant honor and so is likely to have received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." There are currently no specific criteria for gliding.

• Dr Machinek is a five times national champion and has held nine world records. She won multiple inaugural races and has received an award from the international body that governs her sport. A fund was set up in her name as a legacy to support the future development of the sport. The article references the popular press and a biography, as well as the governing body.

Simongraham (talk) 05:26, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

The German Wikipedia article isn't linked. Could you give me a pointer? Never mind, I fixed it. The "other Wikipedias" section is now populated by Wikidata, so I fixed it.

At first glance, I can't determine whether gliding is a serious sport. Could you point me to some material (in the English language, preferably, although I probably qualify as reading level de-1.) See also quidditch, which is a real sport with an international governing board, but I don't believe we accept being a world-record-holder in that sport meets WP:NSPORT. My apologies if this should be obvious. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 06:48, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Sources needed for Days of the Year pages

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the content guideline and the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. Please do not add new additions to these pages without direct sources as the burden to provide them is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 21:16, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

HMS Rowena (1916)

You added short references to Johnston 2009 and Colledge & Warlow 2010, those don't match the associated long reference. Could you verify if the years are correct please? Also, you should install User:Svick/HarvErrors.js to get noticed of such issues in articles when making use of short footnotes. If you don't know how to install that, let me know, I'll walk you through it. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:15, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Same for HMS Restless (1916) and possibly others. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:17, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

BTW, you don't need to add |ref=harv anymore. This works just fine now. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 11:14, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Here's another case where having Svick's script installed would have come in handy: [1]. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 12:05, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Article checklists

Hi there,

As you may have gathered :), nearly everything in Wikipedia is negotiable - that includes what is, and what is not, required for B or even A class. Regardless of what other editors (me included) claim.

I write articles for users, so I try to keep them simple, provide graphics etc. I'm always trying to answer 'Why is this interesting to others?' That doesn't make me right - you have to find that balance for yourself.

One other thing; there's tons of information on the web, if you're curious enough. This article, for example, is one I did on Luis de Lacy; if you look at the Sources provided, all of those I found on the web. That's true of all my other articles.

Always happy to help if needed. Robinvp11 (talk) 18:10, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mendoza dersuuzalai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mendoza (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Oscar II

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HSwMS Oscar II you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 04:00, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Oscar II

The article HSwMS Oscar II you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HSwMS Oscar II for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 01:21, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Congrats on your first GA. Once you get the hang of it, it will be a much less painful process! May it be the first of many! Regards, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:16, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of HSwMS Oscar II

Hello! Your submission of HSwMS Oscar II at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Constantine ✍ 16:01, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Laurel (1913)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Laurel (1913) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Parsecboy -- Parsecboy (talk) 14:21, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Laurel (1913)

The article HMS Laurel (1913) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Laurel (1913) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Parsecboy -- Parsecboy (talk) 10:41, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Liberty (1913)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Liberty (1913) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 05:02, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Liberty (1913)

The article HMS Liberty (1913) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HMS Liberty (1913) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 05:01, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Liberty (1913)

The article HMS Liberty (1913) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Liberty (1913) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 22:21, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Japanese submarine I-5

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Japanese submarine I-5 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:02, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

There's a serious problem with the sourcing of the article; explanation on the review page.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:31, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

DYK for HSwMS Oscar II

On 13 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article HSwMS Oscar II, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Swedish warship Oscar II (pictured), the first Swedish vessel named after the ruling monarch since 1824, was autographed by the king shortly after being commissioned in 1907? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/HSwMS Oscar II. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, HSwMS Oscar II), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Japanese submarine I-5

The article Japanese submarine I-5 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Japanese submarine I-5 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:41, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Milk chocolate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cocoa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:35, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Congrats!

G'day Simongraham, congrats on your first Milhist A-Class article. Essentially this means the article is quite to close to FA, and with some additional detail from sources mentioned by other reviewers, I suspect it would be a successful FAC nom. Good luck with it if that is what you decide to do. I will look out for it. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:14, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Linnet (1913)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Linnet (1913) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 03:22, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Linnet (1913)

The article HMS Linnet (1913) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HMS Linnet (1913) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 21:42, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Linnet (1913)

The article HMS Linnet (1913) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Linnet (1913) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 01:22, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of AN/APS-20

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article AN/APS-20 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:43, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Italian nuclear weapons program

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Italian nuclear weapons program you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:02, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Italian nuclear weapons program

The article Italian nuclear weapons program you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Italian nuclear weapons program for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:02, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Lysander (1913)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Lysander (1913) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 18:21, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Lysander (1913)

The article HMS Lysander (1913) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HMS Lysander (1913) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 20:01, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Lysander (1913)

The article HMS Lysander (1913) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Lysander (1913) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 02:01, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of AN/APS-20

The article AN/APS-20 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:AN/APS-20 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 09:01, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HMS Lysander (1913), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Devonport.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Milk chocolate

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Milk chocolate you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 17:01, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Milk chocolate

The article Milk chocolate you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Milk chocolate for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 17:21, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Bditelnyy

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Soviet frigate Bditelnyy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 23:21, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Bditelnyy

The article Soviet frigate Bditelnyy you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Soviet frigate Bditelnyy for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 19:41, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Bditelnyy

The article Soviet frigate Bditelnyy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Soviet frigate Bditelnyy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 02:01, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Milk chocolate

The article Milk chocolate you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Milk chocolate for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 12:21, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet cruiser Admiral Isachenkov

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Soviet cruiser Admiral Isachenkov you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:21, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of AN/APS-20

The article AN/APS-20 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:AN/APS-20 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:41, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet cruiser Admiral Isachenkov

The article Soviet cruiser Admiral Isachenkov you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Soviet cruiser Admiral Isachenkov for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:21, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet cruiser Admiral Isachenkov

The article Soviet cruiser Admiral Isachenkov you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Soviet cruiser Admiral Isachenkov for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:41, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to Project Spaceflight!

		The SPFLT Achievement Patch
		For your GA reviews of SOLRAD 4 and SOLRAD 4B. Neopeius (talk) 15:19, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

If working on those tempts you to join us working on 1960s space probes, I've got plenty of fun projects and cool people to introduce you to... ;) --Neopeius (talk) 15:19, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

I really appreciate your GA reviews, and I'm delighted that they sailed through. :) Always happy to return the favor. Neopeius (talk) 01:43, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SOGIN, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Casaccia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

User Page idea

I notice you have several GAs. Why not use this template I added to your User Page for all your GAs as I have on my user page and make several top green icons on your user page as a start.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 21:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

I've added another top green icon to your User Page so you can get an idea how to do this. I recommend continuing and adding all your Good Articles now as top green icons. See my User Page as an example. Have fun.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 12:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Setter (1916)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Setter (1916) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 18:02, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Setter (1916)

The article HMS Setter (1916) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HMS Setter (1916) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 02:41, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Setter (1916)

The article HMS Setter (1916) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Setter (1916) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 05:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Zadornyy

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Soviet frigate Zadornyy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:41, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Constance Georgina Adams

Hi. I was hoping you might name some plants she collected, particularly if they were type specimens. If they were type specimens, than someone may have named a plant for her. I don't have access to the books you used for your article, so I was hoping you might put in some additions....MargaretRDonald (talk) 22:01, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

I have also put her profile into Bionomia which is website where people attribute particular specimens to particular collectors. That is a hard task. But perhaps someone from one of the herbaria in which her specimens reside, may be interested? MargaretRDonald (talk) 22:01, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Llewellyn (1913)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Llewellyn (1913) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 09:01, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Zadornyy

The article Soviet frigate Zadornyy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Soviet frigate Zadornyy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:01, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Llewellyn (1913)

The article HMS Llewellyn (1913) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Llewellyn (1913) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 10:41, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Razumnyy

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Soviet frigate Razumnyy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:01, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of SOGIN

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SOGIN you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tayi Arajakate -- Tayi Arajakate (talk) 20:01, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Razumnyy

The article Soviet frigate Razumnyy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Soviet frigate Razumnyy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:41, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Soviet frigate Zadornyy

On 11 May 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Soviet frigate Zadornyy, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Soviet frigate Zadornyy was named after the Russian word for "provocative"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Soviet frigate Zadornyy. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Soviet frigate Zadornyy), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Svirepyy

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Soviet frigate Svirepyy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:01, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of SOGIN

The article SOGIN you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:SOGIN for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tayi Arajakate -- Tayi Arajakate (talk) 10:21, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Svirepyy

The article Soviet frigate Svirepyy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Soviet frigate Svirepyy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:43, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021

Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive
July 2021 Backlog Drive: This Thursday, July 1, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age, of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Piaggio Stella P.IX

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Piaggio Stella P.IX you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:01, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Piaggio Stella P.IX

The article Piaggio Stella P.IX you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Piaggio Stella P.IX for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 15:02, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Review

Just wanted to say thanks for tackling Talk:Đakovo internment camp/GA1. If you have any suggestions for further improvement, I'd be happy to take them on. Best, Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 19:08, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Leyland Landtrain

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Leyland Landtrain you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tayi Arajakate -- Tayi Arajakate (talk) 12:22, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Leyland Landtrain

The article Leyland Landtrain you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Leyland Landtrain for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tayi Arajakate -- Tayi Arajakate (talk) 03:22, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA review of Hamilton, Baltimore

Hello again. I'm sure I said this several times already, but I really appreciate your improvements to Hamilton, Baltimore. I wish I could send you a tip or something to repay you but I know that wouldn't be in the spirit of Wikipedia. :) Anyway, thanks for your time and effort. —Monarchjogs (talk) 01:17, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Savage (G20)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Savage (G20) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 21:01, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Savage (G20)

The article HMS Savage (G20) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HMS Savage (G20) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 10:21, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Savage (G20)

The article HMS Savage (G20) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Savage (G20) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 09:21, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

HMS Obdurate (1916) has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, Simongraham. HMS Obdurate (1916), an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed, has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. EnterpriseyBot (talk!) 12:01, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Carel Victor Gerritsen

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Carel Victor Gerritsen you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 13:02, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Carel Victor Gerritsen

The article Carel Victor Gerritsen you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Carel Victor Gerritsen for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 18:41, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Carel Victor Gerritsen

The article Carel Victor Gerritsen you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Carel Victor Gerritsen for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 08:01, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Multiple Good Article Reviewer's Barnstar
		For your valued work in the July 2021 GAN Backlog Drive, which, in a single month, helped to reduce the backlog by nearly 50%. --Usernameunique (talk) 05:14, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

DYK for HMS Obdurate (1916)

On 19 September 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article HMS Obdurate (1916), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that British M-class destroyers such as HMS Obdurate were built to counter German ships that did not exist? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/HMS Obdurate (1916). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, HMS Obdurate (1916)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Ladjane Bandeira moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ladjane Bandeira, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Agnihothri Sharath (talk) 01:07, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Ladjane Bandeira moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ladjane Bandeira, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Agnihothri Sharath (talk) 04:52, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Ladjane Bandeira has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ladjane Bandeira. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:28, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Razyashchiy

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Soviet frigate Razyashchiy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:01, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Razyashchiy

The article Soviet frigate Razyashchiy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Soviet frigate Razyashchiy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:41, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

WiG Editathon Barnstar

		Women in Green GA Editathon — October '21
		Thank you for your excellent contributions to Willy Corsari and Katia Bellillo during our first Women in Green editathon event! Best, Alanna the Brave (talk) 15:48, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

December reviews

It seems like your GAN for Urabe is listed for about a month and I have listed a GAN for Audrey Hepburn at the end of November. If you could do the review for the Audrey Hepburn article then I could offer to do the review for your nomination to try to move the articles forward. What do you think? ErnestKrause (talk) 01:32, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kumeko Urabe

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kumeko Urabe you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ErnestKrause -- ErnestKrause (talk) 19:01, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kumeko Urabe

The article Kumeko Urabe you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kumeko Urabe for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ErnestKrause -- ErnestKrause (talk) 15:41, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Simongraham!

Happy New Year!

Simongraham,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 15:06, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022

Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive
January 2022 Backlog Drive: On New Year's Day, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage.
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Pytlivyy

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Soviet frigate Pytlivyy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Premeditated Chaos -- Premeditated Chaos (talk) 04:02, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Moorsom (1914)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Moorsom (1914) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 02:21, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Moorsom (1914)

The article HMS Moorsom (1914) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Moorsom (1914) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:02, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Pytlivyy

The article Soviet frigate Pytlivyy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Soviet frigate Pytlivyy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Premeditated Chaos -- Premeditated Chaos (talk) 19:21, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Kumeko Urabe

On 22 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kumeko Urabe, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that as well as having a film career spanning 60 years, Kumeko Urabe (pictured) became the oldest debut singer in 1984 with her single Octopus Song? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kumeko Urabe. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Kumeko Urabe), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Thank you for writing Kumeko Urabe and many other good articles! Levivich 21:17, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Alexander

Was Alexander (1807 ship) launched in 1800 or 1807? Asking as you created the article. Mjroots (talk) 18:14, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia Asian Month 2021 Postcard

Dear Participants,

Congratulations!

It's Wikipedia Asian Month's honor to have you all participated in Wikipedia Asian Month 2021, the seventh Wikipedia Asian Month. Your achievements were fabulous, and all the articles you created make the world can know more about Asia in different languages! Here we, the Wikipedia Asian Month International team, would like to say thank you for your contribution also cheer for you that you are eligible for the postcard of Wikipedia Asian Month 2021. Please kindly fill the form, let the postcard can send to you asap!

This form will be closed at March 15.

Cheers!

Thank you and best regards,

Wikipedia Asian Month International Team, 2022.02

The Dreadnought Project

Dear Simon Graham. It would appear that since 2018 at the latest and up to the present time you have been copying fire control information from The Dreadnought Project and incorporating it into Wikipedia articles without attribution, whilst at the same time citing (often inaccurately and incompletely) our primary source references. This practice needs to stop. We don't mind our work being used on this website so long as it is properly attributed to The Dreadnought Project. Nor, for that matter, does WP:MILHIST. Regards, —Simon Harley (Talk | Library). 09:03, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

@Simon Harley: Please WP:AGF as I meant no harm. Thank you for your feedback. I am always learning and appreciate any help. I would be honoured if you would edit the references where I am in the wrong so that they are from the correct verified sources. I hope you enjoy Wikipedia.

A barnstar for you!

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For reviewing at least 15 points worth of articles during the January 2022 GAN Backlog Drive, I hereby present you with this barnstar in my capacity as coordinator. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 03:58, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:27, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Women in Green - July GA Editathon

Hello Simongraham:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Editathon event in July 2022!

Running from July 1 to 31, 2022, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event focused on the topic of women and the environment. Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works during the event period (with an emphasis on environmental links and topics). GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to receive a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Alanna the Brave (talk) 19:17, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Birayma Dyeme-Kumba moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Birayma Dyeme-Kumba, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 02:57, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

WiG Editathon Barnstar

		Women in Green GA Editathon — July '22
		Thank you for your excellent contributions as reviewer to articles Rita Miljo and Evdokia Reshetnik at the WiG "Women and the Environment" editathon event! All the best, Alanna the Brave (talk) 15:52, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

September drive bling

		The Minor Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to Simongraham for copy edits totaling between 1 and 3,999 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE September 2022 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Miniapolis 19:34, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Hymn to St Peter

Thank you for the article! I made a few changes, please revert if you don't agree. I think the lead is a tad to detailed for a summary. Do you plan to take it to DYK? My last Britten piece there was Five Flower Songs. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:54, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt: Thank you for your changes. I feel they really improve the article. Please do more and submit it for DYK if you have the time.

Postwar Stalin bluewater operations

I've just stumbled across this book which might be useful if you want to do anymore post-war Soviet ships: Watson, Bruce. Red Navy At Sea: Soviet Naval Operations On The High Seas, 1956-1980. And should be consulted before sending your latest to FAC. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:07, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Maenad (1915)

The article HMS Maenad (1915) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Maenad (1915) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Maenad (1915)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thehistorianisaac -- Thehistorianisaac (talk) 10:04, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Maenad (1915)

The article HMS Maenad (1915) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:HMS Maenad (1915) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thehistorianisaac -- Thehistorianisaac (talk) 10:04, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Mike Christie, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:38, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Maenad (1915)

The article HMS Maenad (1915) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Maenad (1915) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Maenad (1915)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thehistorianisaac -- Thehistorianisaac (talk) 03:02, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Mystic (1915)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Mystic (1915) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 01:21, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Wrong Sydney award

It looks like you referred to the wrong Sydney here - east bound Atlantic convoys assembled at Sydney, Nova Scotia in both World Wars. At least you didn't buy an airline ticket to the wrong Sydney!Nigel Ish (talk) 10:16, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev

The article Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev for comments about the article, and Talk:Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:23, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Juan López Mella

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Juan López Mella you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 19:20, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Juan López Mella

The article Juan López Mella you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Juan López Mella and Talk:Juan López Mella/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 04:40, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Juan López Mella

The article Juan López Mella you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Juan López Mella for comments about the article, and Talk:Juan López Mella/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 10:01, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Mystic (1915)

The article HMS Mystic (1915) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Mystic (1915) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Mystic (1915)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 19:41, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Marne (1915)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Marne (1915) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 01:21, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Invisible Barnstar
		For reviewing 4 nominations for a total of 4 points during the June 2022 GAN Backlog Drive, I hereby award you this barnstar. Congratulations! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:01, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev

On 21 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev was ordered to sail on 24 December 1976, but its crew refused to comply, causing the removal of its senior officers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 9,503 views (791.9 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2023 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Myngs (1914)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Myngs (1914) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 05:21, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Juan López Mella

On 30 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Juan López Mella, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1991, Juan López Mella was the first Spanish rider to achieve a podium place in the Superbike World Championship? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Juan López Mella. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Juan López Mella), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Sturdy (1919)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Sturdy (1919) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:42, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment

You are receiving this message because you were a Good article reviewer on at least one article that is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 or you signed up for messages. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of Good articles for copyright and other problems, unless a reviewer opens an independent Good article reassessment and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information. A list of the GA reviewers can be found here. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. You can opt in or out of further messages at this page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Myngs (1914)

The article HMS Myngs (1914) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Myngs (1914) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Myngs (1914)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 02:02, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Sturdy (1919)

The article HMS Sturdy (1919) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Sturdy (1919) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Sturdy (1919)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:22, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

GA review for Hummingbird

Hello Simon - your work in guiding Sword-billed hummingbird to GA is much appreciated, as it appears to be the only hummingbird article with this standing. Could you please browse the Hummingbird article for its candidacy as a GA?

If you feel the hummingbird article is worthwhile, please also consider working with me and other editors as the reviewer to bring it to GA. Many thanks. Zefr (talk) 22:52, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Staunch (1910)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Staunch (1910) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:41, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Please note that I've made my comments--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:30, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Congratulations from the Military History Project

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 1 review between October and December 2022. Hawkeye7 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 04:16, 11 March 2023 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

Your GA nomination of HMS Staunch (1910)

The article HMS Staunch (1910) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Staunch (1910) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Staunch (1910)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:42, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wanda Wesołowska

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Wanda Wesołowska you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 01:23, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Congratulations from the Military History Project

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 1 review between January and March 2023. Hawkeye7 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 19:46, 3 April 2023 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

Your GA nomination of HMS Martin (1910)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Martin (1910) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:24, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wanda Wesołowska

The article Wanda Wesołowska you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Wanda Wesołowska and Talk:Wanda Wesołowska/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 07:23, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Martin (1910)

The article HMS Martin (1910) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Martin (1910) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Martin (1910)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 11:42, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wanda Wesołowska

The article Wanda Wesołowska you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Wanda Wesołowska for comments about the article, and Talk:Wanda Wesołowska/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 06:41, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stenaelurillus guttiger

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Stenaelurillus guttiger you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 20:22, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stenaelurillus guttiger

The article Stenaelurillus guttiger you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Stenaelurillus guttiger and Talk:Stenaelurillus guttiger/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 19:41, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stenaelurillus guttiger

The article Stenaelurillus guttiger you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Stenaelurillus guttiger for comments about the article, and Talk:Stenaelurillus guttiger/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 19:43, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Maurice Suckling

Hi, you were kind enough to do an image review for Maurice Suckling when the article was first up for ACR. My absence from the site led that nomination to be archived, but it's back now and I wondered whether you'd be willing to reiterate your support, considering the images have not changed? Thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:41, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

DYK for HMS Martin (1910)

On 30 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article HMS Martin (1910), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that HMS Martin was part of the Grand Fleet of the Royal Navy in the First World War, but after the war was sold to be broken up? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/HMS Martin (1910). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, HMS Martin (1910)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Wanda Wesołowska

On 3 May 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Wanda Wesołowska, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Wanda Wesołowska has named 40 genera and 572 species of animals? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wanda Wesołowska. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Wanda Wesołowska), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Congratulations from the Military History Project

		The Military history A-Class medal
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the A-Class medal for HSwMS Oscar II, Soviet cruiser Admiral Isachenkov, and Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev. Gog the Mild (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:30, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Penn (1916)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Penn (1916) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:02, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Ruby (1910)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Ruby (1910) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 10:00, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023 Military History Project Contest Entries

I have checked and confirmed five of your entries. I have taken the initiative to delete what appears to be a duplicate Talk:Wattignies-class cruiser entry. I have not confirmed Fleurus because the talk page shows it unrated as of this time. I have not confirmed Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev because I read the talk page to show a change from GA to A, 15 points, rather than B to A, 18 points. If I have made any mistakes in this review, please let me know so that I can change or add an assessment as necessary. If I am slow to respond, a closing coordinator may correct any mistake that I have made or you may wish to ask a co-ordinator to check on it if the mistake is not first reverted by another reviewer or the closing coordinator. Thanks for all your hard work on these articles. Donner60 (talk) 07:21, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

@Donner60: I think you are correct in all these so have amended the entries. Thank you for all your work on this contest. I have only just found it but it looks quite inspiring. simongraham 05:42, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. I have not had a contest entry yet but I may have one or more in the future. I thought I could help the project in a small way by checking the entries so that those entering the contest would not have to take that on as well. I have worked on several articles recently and have a few in draft but the work has been mainly small or offline and not yet posted. I have not written any new articles for a few years, however. I was right to be cautious by suggesting checking my review. I obviously made an error in the number of points for Vasily Chapayev by not reading the scoring table carefully enough for that one. Thanks for correcting that. Donner60 (talk) 08:19, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

HMS Fury (1911) contest entry

The talk page shows that the assessment for this article was on May 1. I think this can be properly entered into the May Military History Project contest. You may wish to double check with a coordinator if my opinion appears to be mistaken or to reject the suggestion if you are aware that it is in fact mistaken. Donner60 (talk) 07:38, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

@Donner60: Happy to make the change. simongraham 05:42, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Penn (1916)

The article HMS Penn (1916) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Penn (1916) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Penn (1916)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 08:24, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Munster

The article HMS Munster you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Munster for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Munster/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jack4576 -- Jack4576 (talk) 13:23, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Ruby (1910)

The article HMS Ruby (1910) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Ruby (1910) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Ruby (1910)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 10:02, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Congratulations - May 2023 MilHist Article Writing Contest

		The WikiChevrons
		On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, I (belatedly) hereby award you the WikiChevrons for placing first in the May 2023 Military History Article Writing Contest, achieving 43 points from 7 articles. Congratulations! Zawed (talk) 08:56, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Congratulations - June 2023 MilHist Article Writing Contest

		The WikiChevrons
		On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, I (in a much more timely manner) hereby award you the WikiChevrons for placing first in the June 2023 Military History Article Writing Contest, achieving 60 points from 10 articles. Another fantastic effort! Zawed (talk) 08:56, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Scout (1918)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Scout (1918) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:20, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Milbrook (1915)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Milbrook (1915) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 11:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Milbrook (1915)

The article HMS Milbrook (1915) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HMS Milbrook (1915) and Talk:HMS Milbrook (1915)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 11:43, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Scout (1918)

The article HMS Scout (1918) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Scout (1918) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Scout (1918)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:41, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Milbrook (1915)

The article HMS Milbrook (1915) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Milbrook (1915) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Milbrook (1915)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 04:20, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Lookout (1914)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Lookout (1914) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:42, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Searcher (1918)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Searcher (1918) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 08:43, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Searcher (1918)

The article HMS Searcher (1918) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HMS Searcher (1918) and Talk:HMS Searcher (1918)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 09:21, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

WiG Editathon Barnstar

		Women in Green Editathon June '23
		Thank you for your excellent contributions to the GA review for Ida Mett at the latest WiG Wildcard Edition editathon! Best, Alanna the Brave (talk) 23:03, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Searcher (1918)

The article HMS Searcher (1918) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Searcher (1918) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Searcher (1918)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 06:23, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Lookout (1914)

The article HMS Lookout (1914) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Lookout (1914) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Lookout (1914)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:22, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Tapperheten (1901)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HSwMS Tapperheten (1901) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:42, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023 Military History Writing Contest

		The WikiChevrons
		On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, I hereby award you the WikiChevrons, for placing first in the July 2023 Military History Article Writing Contest, achieving 68 points from 11 articles. Congratulations, Hog Farm Talk 22:43, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Nasta Rojc

I admit I am not remotely technical, but I never got a formal bot notice that the GA had passed and the page still shows it is being reviewed? Sorry to trouble you. For the record, I did research Alexandrina Onslow, but on my side of the pond I could not find enough to write about her. I know she must have had a fascinating life. Both parents died by 1881, raised by her aunt, Udea Onslow (weird that her dad is sort of crossed out), Udea died in 1883, her husband Astley Thompson died in 1887 and rest of the family moved to Australia. It seems likely to me that she joined them there because her military records show her first service was in a hospital corps for the Australian diaspora. In 1911 (aged 46] she was living at the Crofton Grange School run by Mary Alice Lyster. How she came to own a yacht, join the Scottish Women's Hospitals, etc. is all a mystery. obit 15 Feb 1950 SusunW (talk) 16:53, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Italian frigate Alpino (F 580)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Italian frigate Alpino (F 580) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 08:43, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Tapperheten (1901)

The article HSwMS Tapperheten (1901) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HSwMS Tapperheten (1901) for comments about the article, and Talk:HSwMS Tapperheten (1901)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:22, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Tourmaline (1875)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Tourmaline (1875) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 13:24, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Tourmaline (1875)

The article HMS Tourmaline (1875) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Tourmaline (1875) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Tourmaline (1875)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 04:00, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Italian frigate Alpino (F 580)

The article Italian frigate Alpino (F 580) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Italian frigate Alpino (F 580) and Talk:Italian frigate Alpino (F 580)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:41, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Italian frigate Alpino (F 580)

The article Italian frigate Alpino (F 580) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Italian frigate Alpino (F 580) for comments about the article, and Talk:Italian frigate Alpino (F 580)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:23, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

HSwMS Tapperheten (1901)

I have confirmed your recent contest entries except for the captioned one. My opinion is that you should be able to claim "none" for the start rating. That is based on the sequence of ratings: no ratings, you ask for GA, WP Ships rates as B but WP Ships is not a task force of the Military History Project, Military History Bot rates C while GA is on review, then GA is approved for the Military History Project rating. I am sure the WP Ships rating does not apply for the contest. I also think the Bot rating that comes after the GA request should not apply for the contest. I have seen at least one other such rating recently and gave an opinion that since the GA request was made before the bot rating, the Military History Project class rating at the time the GA request was made should be used as the entry rating for the contest. Since this sequence of assessments appears likely to occur from time to time, I have asked for confirmation of my opinion on the Military History co-ordinators talk page and have pinged you about that posting. Donner60 (talk) 03:31, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

If I had been paying full attention to this, I would have seen that you had already claimed the lower rating in July. Sturmvogel66 has now confirmed the August rating. He is more experienced in the contest and I will not disturb his rating and I do not see a reason to pose a question about it. In total you are getting the full credit for your improvements which was my intended starting point. It also appears I did not pose the exact scenario on the co-ordinator talk page but I have been given some guidance for similar situations. I am glad Sturmvogel66 stepped up and handled this. Sorry for the bother. I have had a few learning experiences with confirmations. As long as I continue to do them, and get them right eventually, it is good to have some guidance about entries which do not seem to be covered specifically by the contest rules. Thanks for your numerous great contributions to the project. Donner60 (talk) 07:51, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Talk:Epsom riot has an RFC

Talk:Epsom riot has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Polyamorph (talk) 13:12, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Mansfield (1914)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Mansfield (1914) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 04:42, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in the August 2023 GAN backlog drive

		The Reviewer Barnstar
		We really appreciate that you reviewed several GANs during the drive. Due in part to your efforts, the backlog of unreviewed nominations was reduced by 440 articles, an astonishing 69 percent.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:09, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Contest?

Hello, I noticed you've been working a lot on Tree of Life related articles in the past month; maybe you'd like to note your contributions at the Tree of Life Contest? AryKun (talk) 15:30, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

@AryKun: Thank you. That looks really interesting. I will see what I can do to sign up. simongraham (talk) 04:56, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Saladin (1919)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Saladin (1919) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:24, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Mansfield (1914)

The article HMS Mansfield (1914) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Mansfield (1914) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Mansfield (1914)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 08:01, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Saladin (1919)

The article HMS Saladin (1919) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Saladin (1919) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Saladin (1919)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:20, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Tree of Life Contest

		Barn Owl Barnstar
		It gives me great pleasure to award you this barnstar for winning the inaugural edition of the WikiProject Tree of Life Monthly Contest! Great work improving all of those articles on spiders from less studied parts of the world, especially improving them to be pretty comprehensive instead of a bare start; it is much appreciated. AryKun (talk) 14:53, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Congratulations from the Military History Project

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 3 reviews between April and June 2023. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 06:07, 3 October 2023 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

Congratulations from the Military History Project

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 2 reviews between July and September 2023. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 06:21, 3 October 2023 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

HSwMS Manligheten

After the alterations, the hull was 90.2 m (296 ft) long at the waterline and 35 tonnes (34 long tons) tonnes in displacement.

It may be strong opinion, but I dont think that is possible. Something is missing there. PMG (talk) 15:00, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Pylades (1854)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Pylades (1854) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 10:22, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Reminder

Hey, just wanted to remind you to note your contributions at the ToL Contest if you want to, since I noticed you haven't yet. AryKun (talk) 08:18, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Pylades (1854)

The article HMS Pylades (1854) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Pylades (1854) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Pylades (1854)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:43, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Nemesis (1910)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Nemesis (1910) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Djmaschek -- Djmaschek (talk) 21:01, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Nemesis (1910)

The article HMS Nemesis (1910) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HMS Nemesis (1910) and Talk:HMS Nemesis (1910)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Djmaschek -- Djmaschek (talk) 22:01, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

October 2023 Military History Writing Contest

		The Writers Barnstar
		On behalf of the Wikiproject Military History coordinators, I am pleased to reward your sterling performance - 5 articles and 35 points - and second place finish in October with this award of the Writers Barnstar. Congratulations, Donner60 (talk) 03:58, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Nemesis (1910)

The article HMS Nemesis (1910) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Nemesis (1910) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Nemesis (1910)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Djmaschek -- Djmaschek (talk) 05:01, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Editor experience invitation

Hi Simongraham :) I'm looking to interview people here, feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 21:05, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Minion (1915)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Minion (1915) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 11:24, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Minion (1915)

The article HMS Minion (1915) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HMS Minion (1915) and Talk:HMS Minion (1915)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 12:21, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Seasons Greetings!

Hello there, thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia! Wishing you a Very Merry Christmas and here's to a happy and productive 2024! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:14, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Minion (1915)

The article HMS Minion (1915) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Minion (1915) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Minion (1915)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 11:23, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Mosquito (1910)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Mosquito (1910) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 22:42, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Sirdar (1918)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Sirdar (1918) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:03, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Tree of Life Contest

		Barn Owl Barnstar
		Congratulations on winning the December Tree of Life Monthly Contest! Very impressive work and much appreciated by everyone who likes learning about spiders on this site. AryKun (talk) 10:19, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Tree of Life Contest, again

		The Tree of Life Barnstar
		Amazing work on Tree of Life articles this year; thanks for consistently writing high-quality articles throughout the year. You are the winner of the 2023 Tree of Life Contest! AryKun (talk) 10:28, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Simongraham. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
• Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
• Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:49, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Mosquito (1910)

The article HMS Mosquito (1910) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Mosquito (1910) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Mosquito (1910)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 03:24, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Sirdar (1918)

The article HMS Sirdar (1918) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Sirdar (1918) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Sirdar (1918)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet cruiser Vitse-Admiral Drozd

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Soviet cruiser Vitse-Admiral Drozd you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:42, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Racoon (1910)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Racoon (1910) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:44, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Menemerus animatus

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Menemerus animatus you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Esculenta -- Esculenta (talk) 17:01, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Menemerus animatus

The article Menemerus animatus you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Menemerus animatus for comments about the article, and Talk:Menemerus animatus/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Esculenta -- Esculenta (talk) 21:02, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

HSwMS Äran

Working to add at least one reference to the MilHist unreferenced articles, I copied the design and development para from your HSwMS Tapperheten article over to Äran. Unless there are significant differences between the sisters, all you need to do is work on its career for an easy GA. Just let me know whenever you do that and I'll do the review. Speaking of those, I'll respond your changes on Racoon later today. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:03, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Äran

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HSwMS Äran you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:21, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Rattlesnake (1910)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Rattlesnake (1910) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Racoon (1910)

The article HMS Racoon (1910) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Racoon (1910) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Racoon (1910)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Congratulations - January 2024 MilHist Article Writing Contest

		The WikiChevrons
		On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, I hereby award you the WikiChevrons for placing first in the January 2024 Military History Article Writing Contest, achieving 33 points from 3 articles, all started at GA class. Well done. Donner60 (talk) 01:30, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Äran

The article HSwMS Äran you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HSwMS Äran for comments about the article, and Talk:HSwMS Äran/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 06:44, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet cruiser Vitse-Admiral Drozd

The article Soviet cruiser Vitse-Admiral Drozd you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Soviet cruiser Vitse-Admiral Drozd for comments about the article, and Talk:Soviet cruiser Vitse-Admiral Drozd/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:44, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

January 2024 NPP backlog drive – Points award

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to Simongraham for collecting at least 25 points during the January 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 16,070 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 22:40, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Wasa (1901)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HSwMS Wasa (1901) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:24, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Rattlesnake (1910)

The article HMS Rattlesnake (1910) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Rattlesnake (1910) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Rattlesnake (1910)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:42, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Afraflacilla braunsi

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Afraflacilla braunsi you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grungaloo -- Grungaloo (talk) 22:42, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Afraflacilla braunsi

The article Afraflacilla braunsi you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Afraflacilla braunsi for comments about the article, and Talk:Afraflacilla braunsi/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grungaloo -- Grungaloo (talk) 16:04, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Clas Fleming

I've finished with everything I could find on the ship. Harris, my primary source, is self-contradictory in places so feel free to change whatever doesn't match your Swedish sources. And you want to change my cites to sfn or whatever, I'm OK with that. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:02, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Do you read Swedish yourself or do you use a translation program? I ask because I was building a topic box of all the Swedish DDs and found more than a few Swedish-language titles of interest. Some of these are not readily available from libraries like Jagare: med Svenska flottans jagare under 80 år, but are available for not too much money. The article on HSwMS Nordenskjöld has other books that look to be helpful for our little project.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:13, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

@Sturmvogel 66: That does look a useful list. Thank you. Good luck tracking them down. It does take me a bit of time to process the text as I have more experience of Norwegian than Swedish, but non-English sources can provide valuable insights lacking in the English literature so I feel it is worth it. I find translation programs helpful, particularly for languages I have less experience of like Polish, but I am wary of trusting in them alone. simongraham (talk) 01:41, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Agreed, my French isn't very good, but it's good enough to validate/correct the translation programs.

The editor who did Nordenskjöld had done a bunch of other DDs as well. They all need some work, including a proper description, but could pretty easily be cleaned up for a GAN. I dunno how much your readily available Swedish sources can add, but it might be worth inviting him to our little scheme since he has access to books that neither one of us have. No reason why we can't have triple nominators, after all. What do you think?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 10:37, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Sounds reasonable. simongraham (talk) 12:29, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Wasa (1901)

The article HSwMS Wasa (1901) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HSwMS Wasa (1901) for comments about the article, and Talk:HSwMS Wasa (1901)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:41, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

HSwMS Wrangel (25)

I've added everything I could and rewritten the article. Hopefully you can dig up more from your Swedish sources; the info on her activities is far sparser than I'd prefer. Even a general statement that she did neutrality patrols and convoy escort missions during the war would be better than what's there now.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 11:50, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

@Sturmvogel 66: There is not much in the literature I have access to either but I have added a couple of newspaper reports. simongraham (talk)

A citation barnstar for you

		The Citation Barnstar
		For good work during WP: FEB24 drive! Davidindia (talk) 15:49, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Congratulations - February 2024 MilHist Article Writing Contest

		The WikiChevrons
		On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, I hereby award you the WikiChevrons for placing first in the February 2024 Military History Article Writing Contest, achieving 27 points from 3 articles, 1 promoted to and 2 started at GA class. Well done. Donner60 (talk) 05:40, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

February 2024 WikiProject Unreferenced articles backlog drive – award

		Citation Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to Simongraham for collecting more than 200 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's FEB24 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing 14,300 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – – DreamRimmer (talk) 18:48, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Phintella parva

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Phintella parva you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 15:22, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Manligheten

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HSwMS Manligheten you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:04, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Manligheten

The article HSwMS Manligheten you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HSwMS Manligheten and Talk:HSwMS Manligheten/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:46, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Still a couple of quibbles to deal with.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:30, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Lake Chad

Hello, I just corrected some obvious issues you pointed out, but I still have a few questions. I hope you can answer them:

1. I think Leblanc et al 2006 still have value in being used in this article, as the research is based on geological evidence. Do you think the problem can be solved by reducing the length of relevant paragraphs?

I agree that Leclanc et al 2006 is very useful. I suggest seeing if there are other writings that can be added for balance rather than reducing the content that is there currently.

2. I think the relevant parts of the Ancient Rome can be directly deleted or summarized more concisely with other sources. I don't know how you think about this issue?

That seems reasonable. If there are no sources for the statements they should be replaced by something that is reliably sourced.

3. You pointed out potential copyright issues, does this mean that I should reduce some content based on the Encyclopedia Britannica? I have already made some reduce. Do you think I should continue to reduce the length of related content?

Excellent work; Earwig now gives a 23.7% similarity, which is a substantial improvement.

4. You have provided many supplementary sources, thank you very much. I will use these sources to further improve. However, you mentioned that the article lacks a description of the history of pre European periods. But I completely do not understand Hausa language. Would you be willing to provide some sources?

I am really glad to be of help. There are plenty on the various Hausa Kingdoms in the area and the Kanem–Bornu Empire in English too. A relatively recent book on the Empire is A History of Borno: Trans-Saharan African Empire to Failing Nigerian State[[2]]. Lange's Ancient Kingdoms of West Africa[[3]] may also be useful, not least because the studies in its tend to be more Africa-centric than many other sources. Saulawa's 2016 paper on Leo Africanus[[4]] may also be helpful.

Thank you very much for your help. Newbamboo (talk) 13:04, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

@Newbamboo: Thank you for your work on this. Answers above. I suggest we continue this discussion on the GA review talk page. simongraham (talk) 18:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

May I ask if you can check now? Thank you. Newbamboo (talk) 23:52, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

I have completed it. Do you have any other comments? Thank you. Newbamboo (talk) 16:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Plexippoides regius

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Plexippoides regius you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grungaloo -- Grungaloo (talk) 01:44, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

3 volume history of the Swedish Navy

I found links to pdf of the above at User:Saftgurka's home page. Hopefully there's some stuff there about the wartime activities of the various ships as well as background info on procurement decisions in volume III. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 10:57, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Plexippoides regius

The article Plexippoides regius you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Plexippoides regius for comments about the article, and Talk:Plexippoides regius/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grungaloo -- Grungaloo (talk) 23:23, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Manligheten

The article HSwMS Manligheten you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HSwMS Manligheten for comments about the article, and Talk:HSwMS Manligheten/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 09:01, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Niord

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HSwMS Niord you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:03, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024

Hello Simongraham,

New Page Review queue January to March 2024

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Supermarine Spiteful GAN

Hi there, I have now acquired a copy of Morgan and Shacklady, which has a whole chapter on the Spiteful that I have not had access to before, and I would like to expand the article using this resource. Also, a couple of editors have recently done work on the article without discussing it on the talk or review pages first. As both of these issues imo make the article/nomination rather unstable, I would like a week before checking their work and adding more myself. Is that OK? Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 11:51, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

@Amitchell125: That seems very reasonable. I look forward to seeing your enhancements to the article. simongraham (talk) 13:07, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Oden

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HSwMS Oden you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 21:23, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Spiteful

Hi, I now think I have gone as far as I can with the article, apologies for the delay. Amitchell125 (talk) 11:05, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Renard (1909)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Renard (1909) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:22, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Niord

The article HSwMS Niord you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HSwMS Niord for comments about the article, and Talk:HSwMS Niord/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 18:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

GAN backlog drive barnstar

		The Reviewer Barnstar
		Thank you for participating in the March 2024 backlog drive. Your contribution (12 points total) helped reduce the backlog by more than 250 articles! Here's a token of our appreciation.

asilvering (talk) 21:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Oden

The article HSwMS Oden you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HSwMS Oden for comments about the article, and Talk:HSwMS Oden/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 11:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Tetrarch (1917)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Tetrarch (1917) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Tetrarch (1917)

The article HMS Tetrarch (1917) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Tetrarch (1917) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Tetrarch (1917)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)