User talk:Rhain/2019 January–June
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
List of Doctor Who Christmas and New Year's specials listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for List of Doctor Who Christmas and New Year's specials to be moved to List of Doctor Who specials. As a participant in an earlier related discussion, you may wish to participate in the discussion here. This move request covers the scope and intention of the article in question, and could do with some objective eyes from outside the Doctor Who project. Please do take a look if interested, and consider the draft changes at User:U-Mos/sandbox also. U-Mos (talk) 22:50, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Apologies for this edit [1]. I actually looked through the article and didn't see any other glaring indicators of Australian usage (although I now see "characterisation", albeit in a quote), which is why I made the change. That said, it's an Australian company, so using an Australian spelling makes sense. Sorry for not thinking through those changes while doing the other copyedits. Grandpallama (talk) 11:02, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Grandpallama: Not an issue at all. It's not too clear on the article, so it's an easy mistake to make. I appreciate the message. – Rhain ☔ 11:18, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
February 2019
Hello, I'm 211.27.115.246. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to My Kitchen Rules (series 10) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks.211.27.115.246 (talk) 10:30, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- @211.27.115.246: Please provide a proper explanation when reverting edits—WP:CRYSTALBALL does not apply here. – Rhain ☔ 10:37, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- There was no source or something else to show this. Sorry about the revert.211.27.115.246 (talk) 10:49, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- Also what do you mean by proper explanation?211.27.115.246 (talk) 10:49, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- You did not provide an explanation when reverting my edits, which is what I was seeking. When reverting edits, you should try to elaborate with your reasoning, otherwise the reversion makes little sense to the original editor. – Rhain ☔ 10:51, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- Well I'm sorry anyways (1). 2.That edit I made was reverting someone else, too (120.154.97.170). Please note that there is pretty much only the instant restaurant info on the article (I should've put it in the edit summary).211.27.115.246 (talk) 10:54, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- You also reverted my edit, and left a note on my talk page, so referring to the other edit is irrelevant—it's possible to revert another user without affecting my edit. Also, I am aware that the Instant Restaurant round was the only information on the article; that's specifically what my edit was addressing. – Rhain ☔ 11:13, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- Not anymore.211.27.115.246 (talk) 11:20, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, I know. I added it. – Rhain ☔ 11:24, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- Do you accept my apology?211.27.115.246 (talk) 11:30, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, I know. I added it. – Rhain ☔ 11:24, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- Not anymore.211.27.115.246 (talk) 11:20, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- You also reverted my edit, and left a note on my talk page, so referring to the other edit is irrelevant—it's possible to revert another user without affecting my edit. Also, I am aware that the Instant Restaurant round was the only information on the article; that's specifically what my edit was addressing. – Rhain ☔ 11:13, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- Well I'm sorry anyways (1). 2.That edit I made was reverting someone else, too (120.154.97.170). Please note that there is pretty much only the instant restaurant info on the article (I should've put it in the edit summary).211.27.115.246 (talk) 10:54, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- You did not provide an explanation when reverting my edits, which is what I was seeking. When reverting edits, you should try to elaborate with your reasoning, otherwise the reversion makes little sense to the original editor. – Rhain ☔ 10:51, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- Also what do you mean by proper explanation?211.27.115.246 (talk) 10:49, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- There was no source or something else to show this. Sorry about the revert.211.27.115.246 (talk) 10:49, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Ellie in The Last of Us.png
Thanks for uploading File:Ellie in The Last of Us.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:53, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Jedi Fallen Order
Hey Rhain,
Why did you undo my changes? My changes gave the correct information. Jason de Heras is not the programmer, he is the lead combat designer https://twitter.com/jasondeheras?lang=en
He works hand in hand with Jeff Magers who is the lead level designer: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jeffmagers
Jiesang Song is the programmer: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jiesang-song-5680081b/
We should get the correct staff on the page. No reason to spread misinformation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Knotar (talk • contribs) 00:34, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Knotar: None of this information has been confirmed by a reliable, secondary source, so it cannot be included in the article for now. – Rhain ☔ 22:37, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
OK then. Can correct it once credits are released.
Hello. I made a semi-protected edit request on the talk page of Grand Theft Auto. An editor named Lordtobi said that they implemented the requested changes by typing "done", but what they did wasn't what I requested...like at all. Will you please do them? Thank you.
Category:L.A. Noire has been nominated for discussion
Category:L.A. Noire, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 15:35, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Category:Red Dead Redemption has been nominated for discussion
Category:Red Dead Redemption, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 23:54, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Images for Telling Lies
Opps, I realized I messaged you on commons page, but let me repeat here: It looks like you had helped get Sam Barlow to release some images for Her Story in the CC, and as Telling Lies (video game) is getting close, I was wondering if you could reach out to him again to see if similar can be done for that game. We'd not need them now - we'd want final game images , but would be good to see about getting the ball rolling. --Masem (t) 20:57, 17 June 2019 (UTC)