User talk:Missvain/Archive 20

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 15

←

Archive 18

Archive 19

Archive 20

List of works by Arnold Wathen Robinson

Hi Sarah, I hope you're doing well! Love your drama llama!

Hey, you put a tag on List of works by Arnold Wathen Robinson - and while it's still a work in progress, the information has been: 1) organized into a table, 2) had a preliminary edit to remove side comments that were interesting but not relevant to the artist's work and 3) it's now 40%-50% the size it was when you put the tag on. What are your thoughts about where it's heading?

There's still more: copy editing to do and citations to find - but we should be a good step ahead now, if you agree.--CaroleHenson (talk) 11:31, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

FYI: list for tracking a group of articles being copyedited, formatted, etc. - including Arnold Wathen Robinson--CaroleHenson (talk) 11:40, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi Carole! I'm doing okay :) Hope you are doing great too. The table looks great, which makes it way easier to digest :) Looks great so far (aka no input from me!). Thanks for creating this article, it's really great. SarahStierch (talk) 16:47, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for watching out for needed improvements! In all fairness, I didn't create the article, but pulled information from a long biographical article - so the material was already their ready to be sifted through. Take care!--!!!!

Feedback and coordination

Hey, sorry I've been so busy. I will get to things and get back to you. KSRolph (talk) 15:18, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

No rush KS! SarahStierch (talk) 00:04, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Fixing link

Hope you don't mind, but I fixed the link to the John Graham AfD discussion on Markshak's talk page.

Take care. =) Kurtis (talk) 15:36, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi Kurtis! Thanks for fixing that. I have been using the new Special:NewPagesFeed and it's been doing some interesting things with links. I've put some bugs in, so we'll see what happens. Thanks for keeping an eye out! SarahStierch (talk) 16:45, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Not a problem, glad to help. =) Kurtis (talk) 16:48, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your comments on article creation, "Ken Sibanda." Do you mind taking a shot at editing the article down. This article has been rejected many times, this is the first time that a rejecting editor has offered constructive criticism. I think the point is --- Ken Sibanda is one of the first from Africa.....

In all fairness, he is a contributor to black science fiction.

Thanks a million --- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mziboy (talk • contribs) 17:59, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi there! Ok, I did a major edit of the article. A few things:

I removed any uncited content from the article. This is especially important regarding personal facts and promo style content.
I condensed things down. So many of the sections were short we really don't need them.
I also removed any content for things that aren't completed or haven't started yet - i.e. filming of movies. Without citations it's really not worth keeping. And the citations that were being used were from his website, or non-reliable websites or press releases - anything created by him or organizations he works for aren't reliable.

Looks like it's ready for submission again. Good luck! SarahStierch (talk) 23:52, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

p.s. for further help it's probably best to stop by the Teahouse! Thanks again! SarahStierch (talk) 23:53, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Dropping by to add a few comments about the state of the article. Mziboy, I know you're not a fan of seeing me show up near your work, but please consider these suggestions, because the errors I'm pointing out detract from what you want your article to be:

IMDB and Filmaka both consist of user-submitted content. These aren't reliable sources.
This looks like it might be a blog post/blurb based on self-submitted information. If so, that's also not a reliable source.
This needs a more direct link if at all possible. Readers need to be able to find where, in which issue, on which date, this article was published, but the citation right now just links to whatever the current issue is.
This doesn't support the graduation date it's supporting in the article. It also looks like it might be a scan of an advertisement flyer. The date thing is a minor issue, but it would be better if you can find a source that explicitly backs up the graduation date. If it's an ad flyer, that's more of a problem, because advertisements aren't reliable sources.
This is an alumni newsletter, publishing a subject-submitted blurb. Not a reliable source.
This is a sales site. Really not a good source, and probably needs to be removed for being promotional.
This appears to be a dead link. This is the only version I can find that links to something usable, albeit an abstract.
This is a blog post. It may be an authoritative blog, but it doesn't look like one. Blog posts are generally not considered reliable sources for anything except the opinions of the blog's writer(s), unless the blogs are independently considered authoritative.
This appears to be a dead link. Replace with this.
I cannot verify the existence of an article called "A Conquistador from Harvard" existing on Olivenews.com. This appears to be the only article they have about Sibanda. Consider fixing your link.

A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 00:36, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Fluff. I figured me tearing apart the article was enough for him to deal with before breaking it to him about the sources. - What Fluff says is the truth. The sources aren't reliable and could have the article be declined. (but, at least now it's a bit easy to examine!) SarahStierch (talk) 00:42, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

AFC Backlog

Articles for Creation urgently needs YOUR help!

Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 2447 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk.

Do you have what it takes?

Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
Are you autoconfirmed?
Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.

PS: we have a great AFC helper script at User:Timotheus Canens/afchelper4.js which helps in reviewing in just few edits easily!

We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just 2 or 3 reviews, it would be extremely beneficial.
On behalf of the Articles for Creation project,
TheSpecialUser ^TSU

Ha, I'm sitting here doing it right now :) SarahStierch (talk) 06:20, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks again, points are taken, let me continue with it

Mziboy (talk) 23:56, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Ping

Emailed you about a suggestion that might help editor retention and one of our basic problem areas. Dougweller (talk) 11:45, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Doug. I appreciate you reaching out. My focus area is women (i.e. I co-developed Teahouse and I'm working on another project that is actually specific towards women), and I am a fellow, so I don't have any major institutional influence at this time. Some good people to perhaps ping would maybe be at Wikipedia:Editor engagement. While you might see my face come up (because I worked on the Teahouse) I am not on the Editor Engagement team. Also, I encourage people who have great ideas for projects or outreach areas like this to apply for fellowship projects, too. I am a member of the WikiProject for editor retention I'm just pretty swamped with my own work and my own "personal time" on Wikipedia that I don't engage that might right now in the project (I work full time doing work about this, so it's a bit tiring to come home and also volunteer for it no matter how passionate I am about it!). Thanks for reaching out, and I'll also forward your email onto some folks at WMF! SarahStierch (talk) 17:27, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

ARUN

Hello Sarah I am ARUN KUMAR SHARMA.I am from India. I am new at WIKIPEDIA.I want to contribute it by become a active user. I want to join the TEAHOUSE and I Choose you as my tutor.Will you help me to become a experienced user like YOU.How can I register for Teahouse and how will you taught me about editing ? Thank You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arun sharma 101 (talk • contribs) 13:53, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi there Arun, welcome to Wikipedia. I regret to say this but, I do am not involve in mentorship projects on Wikipedia. However, you might be able to find someone through our adoption program. I'm glad you'd like to visit the Teahouse, you do not have to register, just simply stop by and visit the calls to action - you can make a profile or ask a question. Just stop by the Teahouse today and be bold! See you there! SarahStierch (talk) 17:43, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

WikiWomenCamp

Hi. Some one mentioned to me that you had co-opted the name of WikiWomenCamp with out talking to the community behind this. This... has irked a few people because it looks like a female driven community effort is being dismissed, our work dismissed, our efforts dismissed by some one who doesn't engage that community and point blank refuses to engage them. Given the general knowledge about attempts to co-opt RecentChangesCamp and do similar things, this adds more negative to this backdrop. It would be fantastic if the female global leadership inside the movement that exists outside the formal WMF heirarchy could have a better working relationship with you. Can you please get in touch with us through our mailing list and explain the name re-use? --LauraHale (talk) 22:01, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

How do we contact you for the Bay Area Photo Hunt ?

Sarah, I've been a Wikipedian for a while, have had an account for only a couple of year, but all I've ever done is edit; I don't know how to contact another user. So I'm sure that what I'm doing here is totally wrong, but I can't discover any other way of contacting you.

I'm interested in participating in the Bay Area Photo Hunt, but you don't have a page set up yet, so far as I can tell. How can people join in? (I live in Berkeley.)

Thanks!

LMorland@gmail.com LauraMorland (talk) 07:03, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Me too! I could be bold and just create the Wikipedia:Wikipedia Takes America/San Francisco page... but the template wants me to pick a specific date and place and so on. I suspect that inertia will make it hard to change whatever gets written down first, so I'd prefer that someone who knows what they're doing (meatspace-wise) be the one to choose the details. Anyway, if someone would ping my talk page when the event page has been created, I'll probably join in. --Quuxplusone (talk) 17:40, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi there folks. Yes, I had to remove myself as the contact, as I am out of the country for a while during September and I'm a bit burnt out planning events (I'm often the person who does so, and well, I get a little burnt out!). Being out of town for two weeks of the month doesn't help. Perhaps folks should also ping User:Almonroth as he's been active in co-planning the national conference with me. I'm in the process of making the Califoria Historical Landmarks into tables, so that's my big contributions. I do encourage people to be bold - plan things in specific areas (we did an unofficial one in downtown Berkeley recently), road trips, etc. Sorry I can't help more :( If I'm lucky to attend one that someone else plans, awesome, though! SarahStierch (talk) 18:15, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

No kittens

I am terribly sorry you're getting so much negative feedback on the Rfc. It is a request, you'd think the editors responding would appreciate that their input is being sought, but unfortunately several of them have been a little rude about it. This is unexpected to me - I expected opposes to the idea of the link, but not hostility that there is an Rfc! I did not anticipate you would be being put through this sort of hostility, and I am very sorry you are. You are handling it beautifully, though. KillerChihuahua^?!? 07:52, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks KC. I had to remove the page from my watchlist just to keep my blood pressure down! I guess that is what I get for being too passionate about all of this. Thanks for making the effort to do this - it was a really nice surprise, and I'm sorry that it's turned into some sour grapes situation. :( SarahStierch (talk) 20:38, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Oh, that's worse than I feared! Please do not let a few rude people distress you. :-( After all, its just a few people who are being rude, and most of them make it clear by their posts they don't understand what is going on. Please do keep pointing them at me. I have no problem explaining the situation to them. KillerChihuahua^?!? 23:03, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Please Guide me to remove the Unreliable links

Hi Sarah,

Greetings!

Please guide me to remove the unreliable links or you yourself directly remove the unreliable sources on your own so that at least it can be published first. Whereas, in future, i will keep on adding more on it time to time.

Regards Nitin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guitarmonk (talk • contribs) 11:22, 19 August 2012 (UTC) Done SarahStierch (talk) 18:39, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Womanpower logo deletion

Sooo, I may have accidentally triggered a deletion discussion about the image used in the {{feminism sidebar}} template :-/ I'm getting Feminism in Russia reviewed for GAN, and, predictably, it's images that are holding it up. Anyway, I defer to your Commons expertise on this – if you can help save the image or add a new one to the (quite handy) navbar, that would be awesome. Thanks so much in advance! Accedie^{talk to me} 19:10, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Hey! Ok, I'm going to ping Kaldari, I think he might be a bit better to take this up (I'm strong in some areas of Commons-stuff, this one might not be one of those areas :) We'll get this sorted out! SarahStierch (talk) 19:17, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! (and Kaldari!) Accedie^{talk to me} 19:29, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Your close of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dmitri Condariuc

I'm assuming this was just an oversight, but it looks like you forgot Andrei Novikov when you closed this afd. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:26, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi there Sputnik! Thanks for coming by my talk page. Yes, it was a mere oversight. Thanks for bringing it to my attention, it's been taken care of! Have a great day. SarahStierch (talk) 20:28, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Helpful script for New page patrol

If you add the following code to your javascript file, it will place a link to the new pages feed in your toolbox. (It was created by Gadget850) Ryan Vesey 20:37, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

importScript('User:Ryan Vesey/sidebar.js');

On an unrelated note, thanks for this. My mind must've wandered. Ryan Vesey 20:39, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	I'm sure you've been told this thousands of times before, but you're work at the Teahouse is beyond amazing. There's no doubt in my mind that Wikipedia wouldn't be the same without you! Electric Catfish 20:37, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you so much. After the week I have had this is beyond appreciated. I am so grateful! And thank you for the work you do at the Teahouse - without the community this can't happen, nor can the Teahouse sustain itself! SarahStierch (talk) 20:39, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! I was voting and relisting at AfD and I saw your name several times, and I couldn't help but express my feelings. Thanks again, Electric Catfish 20:41, 19 August 2012 (UTC).

Sorry to hear you haven't had a great week. We just had two wiki-births. Hopefully that will chear you up. See User talk:Drmies#Human baby and User talk:Kiefer.Wolfowitz#Congratulations!. Ryan Vesey 20:42, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Page deletion

OPPOSE. Your deletion of my page without allowing sufficeint time to move or contest the proposed deletion was not appreceited! Useddenim (talk) 21:00, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Sarah, can you restore that at User:Useddenim/Highway? Useddenim, it was a mistake, sometimes it is better to just point out the mistake rather than getting flustered. Ryan Vesey 21:04, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

As another note, in the future, you can easily get your page restored by going to WP:REFUND. Ryan Vesey 21:05, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Oy vey. Thanks Ryan for handling this (yes, I do leave the house some days :) ) Looks like the page has been reinstated. Oh the perils of Speedy...sorry about that! SarahStierch (talk) 22:55, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Request for Fellows

Hi Sarah, gratz on the broom and mop. I've just left a request at Meta that Fellows might want to consider, here ... but I don't know Meta very well, so if there's a better place for that request, I'll be happy to move it. Thanks! See you at the Smithsonian soon, probably. - Dank (push to talk) 21:20, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Dank, I replied on meta. I actually haven't lived in Washington, DC, since May; I left the Smithsonian then. So, you won't see me there :) SarahStierch (talk) 23:02, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

I'm so behind the times. - Dank (push to talk) 23:33, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

re Review of Rethink Perfect

Hi Sarah I will see what I can do about getting some notable references. In the mean time can you look at the page and tell my how to remove that huge image on the page. It was not part of my original editing.

Done SarahStierch (talk) 03:26, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Strathmore University RFC

I just wanted to chat with you a bit on this one. I'm unsure of it's notability because there are a number of things that conflict with my American view of sports. I'd certainly say that an American University rugby team is generally not notable, but in this case, the team plays in the Kenya Cup which is the highest level of rugby in the country. It isn't professional though. So what do you think, is a non-professional team notable if it is the highest level of sport in the country? Ryan Vesey 03:37, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, sure. Anyone can remove a PROD - it's nothing I feel that strongly about, but it's a good way to get attention for people ot improve things. It surely needs reliable sources, which would surely help with the notability situation. SarahStierch (talk) 03:39, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

The league in itself is covered in Wikipedia with a whole article and the same case applies to the other teams that participate in that league. But if Wikipedia admins and other Wikipedia users still think that the topic is not notable by itself then I think it is wise for this article to seek refuge in the article on Strathmore University under sports. But IMO I think it should be a stand alone article. ₫ӓ₩₳ _{Talk to Me.} _{Email Me.} 04:32, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

What works for the community :) Probably best to have this conversation on the talk page of the article! (but I already took it off my watchlist ;D) SarahStierch (talk) 04:34, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Ways to improve 1982 Speedway National League

Thanks for creating 1982 Speedway National League, Rcclh!

Wikipedia editor SarahStierch has tagged the page as having some issues to fix. In addition, they wrote this note for you:

   There is no lead, meaning the article has little to no context. What is this contest for?

The tags on the page can be removed by you or another editor when the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on SarahStierch's talk page.

Hello. I am attempting to fill in all the gaps with regard to British speedway history - some of the years were missing completely so i've just filled in the tables to start off. If you check my editing history you will see i am currently adding lead sections to pages that have none - i am up to 1956 - so i will eventually get around to writing one for 1982. thanks ... Rcclh (talk) 10:09, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Propose merging Category:Women academics to Category:Female academics

Hi,

I am not sure if I am at the right address (and hope this is not considered canvassing), but hope the following discussion is of interest to you and other Wikipedians whom you may know: Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2012_August_6#Category:Women_academics.

It appears that there is a large group of Wikipedians who do not see a negative undertone when attaching the word "female" (or "male" for that matter) to an occupation. Ottawahitech (talk) 19:42, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! The latter part of your post is more canvas like - next time just state "there is a discussion taking place that might interest you about...(insert subject here) take a look here (link). I did chime in, and I shared it on a few WikiProjects. SarahStierch (talk) 19:49, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Dacor (kitchen appliances)

Hello, this is a response to your review of my article http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Dacor_(kitchen_appliances)&action=history

You stated the following "All sources appear to be unreliable. We need reliable sources - content from magazines, newspapers, television, etc., that isn't created by Dacor "

I understand now that the official website should not be referenced no matter how trivial the information is, so I've changed the two references which were 'created by Dacor' to other references. What other sources are 'unreliable' and why?

Also, I understand http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS , but I wonder why these pages have been accepted when they are dealing with the same issues, along with even less valid references:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolf_(brand)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermador
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viking_Range
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jenn-Air
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miele

All of the above pages have been accepted yet have the same issue. Now that this issue is fixed for Dacor, shouldn't the other pages be flagged? McGrupp (talk) 22:23, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi there! First, thanks for bringing those articles to my attention. I have tagged them appropriately and even removed some content from them. Second, they were created after the WP:Articles for Creation project was created, or I assure you, they would have went through the same process as your article. Third, resources that use content created specifically by Dacor still aren't reliable (i.e. say your products are carried by Best Buy, and you cite the Best Buy "online shop" that sells your product - that is not reliable because it uses information provided by Dacor to Best Buy). If you do chose to use Dacor websites, you have to use it sparingly and in an extremely boring neutral manner that does not promote the product. If your product is notable enough, there is more likely press coverage of your products outside of your website. Also, blogs, Wikipedia - any website which the content is created by everyday consumers without citations generally is unreliable.

Again, I assure you, if those websites had went through the same process yours had, they'd be right where you are. Also, it's highly frowned upon for staff members to write their own articles, so please take that to note! Thanks again for contributing to Wikipedia, and I also encourage you to visit the Teahouse for further assistance! SarahStierch (talk) 22:33, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for the quick response. I have made another change to what I believe should be a reliable site for both of the changes I made earlier (reference to the president of the company and the appliances Dacor makes). Can you please re-review, or let me know what other references might be holding this back from creation? McGrupp (talk) 22:49, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Do you mind if I go in and make a few edits? I have some concerns about the language (a bit promotional in some areas). Let me know! p.s. do be sure to provide edit summaries - even when writing on talk pages :) Sometimes it allows people to avoid wasting time seeing what certain edits are (i.e. "did they make just a simple spelling fix or did they rewrite the whole article?) SarahStierch (talk) 23:06, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Please, be my guest. McGrupp (talk) 23:16, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

I'm still getting used to editing. Sorry about that. Just added some < br >'s earlier to the links because it was hard to read. McGrupp (talk) 23:18, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your help with this. I just have a couple more questions, if you don't mind.

Why can't I find the article using the search feature?
Why don't the 'external' links show up? McGrupp (talk) 23:55, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi McGrupp. You can find the article here Dacor (kitchen appliances) - I have added it to the disambiguation page for Dacor, too. (You have to put (kitchen appliances) after the name Dacor in the search box to find it). It'll take a few days for it to show up via Google, btw. The external links were being hidden by a template problem, I fixed it! Congrats :) (Do I get a free appliance now ;) hehehe..) SarahStierch (talk) 00:00, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Dacor offers some product giveaways through their facebook page, though this is information that can't be on their wiki page, is that right? I suppose it would have to be talked about from a reliable source... Thanks for those changes! McGrupp (talk) 00:06, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Coal scrip neutrality

Hey there, the article coal scrip contains no original research. Its cited in Edkiins Coal Scrip Catalog. The monopoly was immeduate as a coal town typically is so remote, there were no other stores. So, I do not believe it to be a huge leap of logic to assert, they store, issuing the scrip, had a monopoly. Esspecially since, there were no other stores...Coal town guy (talk) 00:46, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Park Inn Prague

(I presume that's what you're referring to). Yes, that's how the policy has always been enforced. Daniel Case (talk) 04:24, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Actually, in this case, it was because of the edits. I would have left it alone if it had been editing articles about, say, gardening or particle physics or anything with nothing to do with the Park Inn Hotel Prague. Daniel Case (talk) 04:28, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Article deletion

I will appreciate if you could advise on why my proposed article on how to play the social game “Realm of Empires” was deleted... I understand it was a very basic article, but I think it is on a particular matter that may interest other readers of this publication. I still understand it won't win a Pulitzer, it has no reference since it is a primary source, and that the topic may seem shallow for some editors. Nevertheless, maybe the point of consideration may not be any of the ones listed above, but the fact that it is a novel article that addresses a topic that certain stratus of the reading population may be interested on. As well as the fact that Wikipedia is a publication originally intended to contain all sort of knowledge on all sort of things in life: both grave and simple.

Artos888 (talk) 13:12, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Pussy Riot

OK, will do. I generally let section edits default to the supplied summary, just out of laziness, but I see your point. Hgrosser (talk) 19:05, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Have you considered installing the Popup gadget (from the Gadgets page of your user preferences)? If you do, you just have to hover your mouse over the "(last)" link in an article's history to see what changes were made by this edit. Hgrosser (talk) 03:20, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Feel better soon.

I heard through The Teahouse chat that you've been feeling ill. I hope you are better soon! I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 06:07, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Jethrobot! I am feeling pretty terrible and have for the past few days. Thank you for the tea! SarahStierch (talk) 17:53, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	This barnstar is awarded to recognize particularly fine contributions to Wikipedia Kirananils (talk) 13:53, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

New AfC reviewer

Hi there!

I'm new to the AfC Review process, but I'm plunging boldly forward into the work (since it seems to be so heavily backlogged!) Would you be so kind as to review some of my AfC comments and decisions, or point me in the right direction as to where to get some more pointers?

I did read the help section, including "When to decline an article" and "how to accept one..." anyway, any thoughts you might have would be appreciated.

Thanks! Jsharpminor (talk) 18:46, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Nicolas Jean-Baptiste

You mean on College section? I can put more reliable sources. 24.227.93.118 (talk) 19:18, 21 August 2012 (UTC) I have added some sources. I hope it's good enough. 24.227.93.118 (talk) 23:42, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Trolleybus demography

I have two notes regarding your acceptance of this AfC submission. (1) The article was uncategorised, an applicable category would have been Category:Trolleybuses. (2) You may not have seen this but the article contained two mislabeled references as shown here. One reference contained an orphan ref name tag with "Janes2010" (none of the main ref name tags were titled as such) rather than the correct "Janes2009" (you'll notice that there was a main ref name tag with this title). The second reference was also caused by a mislabeled ref name tag, rather than "murray-p65", all the references simply contained "murray". These errors were obviously not caused by you but I simply wanted to notify you. No worries, I have corrected these errors for you. It is essential that we scan AfC submissions thoroughly before accepting. Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 04:37, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Ken Sibanda re-edited

Please check the aforementioned page and see if they are other contentious issues. It has undergone extensive rewrite!

Thanks, M — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mziboy (talk • contribs) 04:57, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Businessofcinema.com Notability Links

Hi Sarah

I just noticed you deleted the page I created for Businessofcinema.com for lack of notability sources.

Here's a link to a few notable sources that I have been able to gather. If they are alright with you then I'll go back and recreate the page. Thanks!

http://pastebin.com/wMtTR6Qa — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bollyman (talk • contribs) 19:31, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Your Credo Reference account is approved

Good news! You are approved for access to 350 high quality reference resources through Credo Reference.

Fill out the survey with your username and an email address where your sign-up information can be sent.
If you need assistance, ask User:Ocaasi.
A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Credo article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Credo pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Credo accounts/Citations.
Credo would love to hear feedback at WP:Credo accounts/Experiences
Show off your Credo access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Credo_userbox}} on your userpage
If you decide you no longer can or want to make use of your account, donate it back by adding your name here

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 17:22, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Did you

get my email? Dougweller (talk) 18:11, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Yup, I replied here User_talk:SarahStierch#Ping (I must have failed to provide a talkback, sorry, I have been sick so I blame my spaciness on my sickness), and forwarded your email to the appropriate staff members who will know how to handle the situations at hand - I was told that WMF has limited engagement in those areas for legal reasons, but it's above my head. I'm just a fellow who is focusing on one specific thing (women) and my fellowship is up in December...so perhaps I'm the wrong WMF person to ask! SarahStierch (talk) 18:14, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Ok, that's great, should have looked earlier. I can't think how what I had in mind could be problematical legally though. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 18:17, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Stub tags and page triage

Hi Sarah here you added {{stub}} to an article which already had a specific stub tag. I was surprised to see it was done by an experienced editor like yourself, but we all have our moments. I've suggested on the Page Curation talk page that it would be good if the software could help people to avoid doing this! PamD 09:52, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Singh_Rashmi

All the sources are genuine.

It's taken from Economic Times too then why?

Rrashmissingh (talk) 11:22, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

National Competition Policy (India)

This page has been tagged (by you) for copyright violation. But the link you are referring to is related to Europe and in no way related to the article (A policy of India) let alone having same text. The article has been created based on the references cited in the page. -- Aravind V R (talk) 04:44, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

	Turkish Rice Pudding: Take it as a cake with candles
	Congratulations and jubilations (music :-) With my best wishes... E4024 (talk) 08:46, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Hey Sarah - Please guide me...

Hi Sarah-

I saw that you recently nominated an article I started about Robert Loughan for deletion. I actually wasn't planning on moving it to the live Wiki site because I wanted to add more content; I think I messed up when when i thought I was moving it to a save for me to keep working on from my sandbox.

One of my teachers turned me on to Rob Loughan and I was sad to not find a wiki for him so I started it. I would love to continue working on it in my sandbox in order to really prove that he is an appropriate subject of an article. What he does in business is very news and noteworthy.

Anyway... I would be grateful if you could guide me as to how to move it back to my sandbox and then when I really have a piece that I'm proud of and does him justice, show it to you before trying to make it live again.

Can you guide me?? I am trying hard to be a welcome member of Wiki world and I try and focus on subjects I admire and I know other people appreciate as well

-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.82.182.253 (talk) 19:22, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

So I've been taking a look and I'm finding a decent number of sources that mention Rob Loughan, but they are normally talking about Dexterra. Perhaps it would be better to create an article on the company. Ryan Vesey 19:33, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you Ryan! Only thing is, what interested me about Loughan was the sale of Octane which from what I could find was among the biggest in the history of software companies like that (3.2 billion) and that he created BaldFace, which sounds like coolest place ever. I think it is what he's done since that makes the article relevant to readers. BUT I am here to learn and grow. Can you explain a bit more on how best to approach my goal of honoring a innovative and inspirational business person? — Preceding unsigned comment added by CharlesleChien (talk • contribs) 21:44, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Hey CharlesleChien, sorry for the slow reply. I've got one for you, but I'm waiting on a bit of a clarification from another editor first. She appears to be off for the night, but I should be able to get back to you within 24 hours. Ryan Vesey 23:47, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Ryan! You rock! — Preceding unsigned comment added by CharlesleChien (talk • contribs) 00:07, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi again. So here's what I've been thinking. Wikipedia specifically based its notability requirements in a manner that makes sure Wikipedia doesn't need to determine notability. Wikipedia waits for other organizations to write about the person to show that he or she is notable. However, you can still write an article on him on Wikia.com. In this case, you could just copy the current content and provide a list of contributors on the Wikia page. Ryan Vesey 20:43, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

CHL at Commons

File:Wlm lolcat test2012.jpg

example image ;-)

Hi Sarah, just to inform you, I've just created the Template:US-CHL at Commons to tag the CHLs with their IDs, mainly for use in the respective WLM upload Wizard campaign. Regards, --elya (talk) 17:10, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

PS: yeah, and Happy birthday!

THANK YOU!! (For both the well wishes and the awesome template) SarahStierch (talk) 17:22, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Teahouse Aspiring hosts

There are A number of aspiring hosts on the Teahouse Hosts page...Ebe123 and I found out through chat you were the one to make those decisions. Of course, if you think it to be too soon to add us and would like to see us to continue to interact with new users for the sake of experience, I can appreciate that. Just wanted to let you know there is some interest among us in becoming hosts. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 02:22, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

From what i gather, the process for becoming a host was too complicated, so heatherawalls created a new simple system at Wikipedia:Teahouse/Hosts temp (click on the box which says "Become a host"). This way editors won't have to wait to be hosts, Sarah won't have to "approve" them, and also means anyone can join. I think the "hosts temp" page will be moved into the main hosts page soon, then all will be in order again (More here).

So please try the new system! I'll ping Ebe too. benzband (talk) 08:51, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you so much! It's good to be a part of this team. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 09:28, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing Steam Bandits: Outpost

Thanks again for your time and efforts on reviewing the article I created. I was wondering though: will it be troublesome if I continue to submit other articles to AfC in the future? I understand that AfC gets flooded by many many submissions pretty much all the time. I'm still a pretty new user of Wikipedia though (in terms of article editing and creation) and a firm believer in peer review. If there are alternative and/or more relevant places to submit drafts or have them checked by others before being put into main space I would definitely be interested in learning about them.

Best,

Reynhart (talk) 02:21, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi Reynhart. AfC is the best place, it just takes time, especially when we have over 500 articles to review! So patience is good :) Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! SarahStierch (talk) 02:40, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Elena Oana Hreapca page

== Hi! I've created the page about Elena Oana Hreapca (deleted by you) trying yo respect the standard of some other pages of similar topics: English is not my first language, but I've chosen English wiki because there is a rich list about female bodybuilders to which I thought to link Elena Oana's page. May you help me to enrich the page in a more appropriate language? Thanks! --151.64.29.94 (talk) 17:29, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

An invitation for you!


	Hello, SarahStierch. We are in the early stages of initiating a project to plan, gain consensus on, and coordinate adding a feature to the main page wherein an article will be listed daily for collaborative improvement. If you're interested in participating, please add your name to the list of members.

Happy editing! AutomaticStrikeout 21:07, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Shiv Nadar University

hello Sarah you are in some way right about the article. But in all fairness that's all the info that's available as of now. I am in no way related to SNU. In one of my moments of looking for articles that I know of and have not already been written I found no article on SNU. When I started the article the info poped up that the previous one had been deleted. In writing the same article with mayhap the same info was because I hoped that those who had joined the Univ would fill in parts. I will do my best in finding more info. But in what way was the article advertising? Those are the bare verified facts from newspapers.That is why I typed them in in that order. Regards Sathya dyan (talk) 10:02, 26 August 2012 (UTC)Sathya dyan

Hey

Will you please review my article.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Abdul_Wali_Khan_University_Mardan ...!ARK (talk) 11:25, 27 August 2012 (UTC) Done Sadly it has copyrighted content on it. SarahStierch (talk) 18:53, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

hm.

Worm? Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 20:00, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

RE: Don't forget to make your new host profile!

Hello. You have a new message at foxj's talk page. — foxj 21:56, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Abdullah Al Saidi

I'm a little puzzled you declined it. The official sources prove his position, and Ministers of national governments such as he are always considered notable. More sources would help, but they are not really necessary. I consequently accepted it. AfD if you like, but in my opinion it will be about 99% certain to pass. I think the consensus position that if it is good enough to pass AfD, it's good enough to be accepted at AfC . DGG ( talk ) 22:37, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

I'm even more surprised you declined Fredrik Logevall. Holders of named chairms at major research universities are always notable by WP:PROF, and if that is shown, nothing more in the way of evidence is necessary. This is explicitly an alternative to the GNG, and has very wide consensus.

Of course, the article has been much improved since you declined it, with the addition of reviews of his books and other 3rd party sources, but it could equally well have been improved after acceptance. In this case, I am 101% certain the original version would have passed AfD.

You & I usually do better in coordinating when we talk to each other Perhaps we need to do it again. Offline is certainly possible, email or skype, or phone. Let me know. DGG ( talk ) 22:48, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Feedback requested at the Village Pump

Hi Sarah, welcome back from vacay. I have a proposal at the village pump about introducing a color scheme to the text editor so it is easier for newer editors to differentiate between different kinds of syntax, particularly references. I'd welcome your feedback at the village pump whenever you have some time. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 03:51, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Tyler Moore (Powerlifter)

I reviewed your feedback on this page wanted to bring up a few points. Yes, Tyler's records are posted at his organization (Colorado Powerlifting) but there are refs from ADFPA, NAPF, IPF and USAPL; all organizations that are over his own. The sport of powerlifting ranks fairly low on public appearences but Tyler competes at the same level as any other olympic athlete. The koaa ref was an interview for his making of the world team. I can try to find more refs out there but everything notable is ref'ed in the page. I review other athletes in more popular sports that had way fewer stats than Tyler yet they have pages. The sport of powerlifting is growing and we need to get our world team recognized. I also resubmitted the article. Please take another look at it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coloradopowerlifting (talk • contribs) 05:16, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Hey Sarah I have tried to make some general changes according to your feedback...

...to the following article you had reviewed:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Sridhar_Lagadapati

Really appreciate you took the time to review this article - I may have been slightly confused where exactly to make changes to make it objective in presentation, but I still tried and made those changes. Thanks a ton!

meetzia Meetzia (talk) 06:27, 28 August 2012 (UTC)== Belated congratulations on your successful RfA! ==

I can't believe I missed your RfA! I haven't been around much lately and I'm so sorry that I wasn't there to support you. Not that you needed it: 217 support vs. 0 oppose votes is pretty impressive. Belated congratulations! --Sonicyouth86 (talk) 17:15, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Edit summary

Hey Sarah. I just deleted Rupesh Kumar (filmmaker), which you PRODed, but I noticed that your edit summary simply noted that you were "adding tags". It looks like you may have been using the new NPP thing that the WMF is developing, so maybe that was the default edit summary, but in future I think it would be best to clearly note in the edit summary that the article is up for deletion, like Twinkle currently does. I would have left this comment for the WMF people, but I'm not too sure who or where they should be contacted, so hopefully you will be able to pass this on to someone. Best, Jenks24 (talk) 07:49, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Ugh. This is the second time this has happened to me and I did file a bug a while back. The project has been developed by the Wikipedia:Editor engagement folks. Sorry for the problems this has caused. I've been using Twinkle for my deletions recently because of this problem. Thanks! SarahStierch (talk) 07:51, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, I meant to say this is not a huge deal, just something you might want to be aware of. Thanks for the link, I'll drop a note about this on someone's talk page. Cheers, Jenks24 (talk) 07:59, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know of this discussion, Jenks :). Yeah, we're aware of the problem - there should (hopefully) be a fix in the next deployment that makes these things a lot more clear. Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 08:06, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

That's great. Thanks. Jenks24 (talk) 08:56, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A Splendid Exchange, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page World trade (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, Missvain. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 15:04, 29 August 2012 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Nolelover ^Talk^·^Contribs 15:04, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Minority (Gigi Gryce song)

Thank you for taking the time to review my article submission Minority_(Gigi_Gryce_song). The Real Book has been like a bible to Jazz musicians since it was first (illegally) created. Inclusion in that book is a big part of what it means to be a Jazz Standard as evidenced by the references on List of post-1950 jazz standards. Of course, I only own the legal 6th edition, not the illegal 5th edition and have updated the reference to reflect that.

On a totally unrelated note, it seems that Amazon shows the index page of various books so that you can get the index and page numbers and often read a single specific page to cite a reference without buying the book.--GlenPeterson (talk) 15:46, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Missvain/Archive 20. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by benzband (talk) 16:21, 29 August 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Washington Women's History Consortium

Sarah, this one might interest you. I've tagged if for refimprove, as it's sources are a bit thin and lacking in coverage. NtheP (talk) 21:10, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Missvain/Archive 20. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Ryan Vesey 04:43, 30 August 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Missvain/Archive 20. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Ryan Vesey 04:59, 30 August 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

List of Awesomeness

Just saw your new mondo landmark list go live--WOW!!! --Jgmikulay (talk) 13:54, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

WT:TH Editnotice

How about an editnotice for the Teahouse talkpage (see Wikipedia talk:Teahouse#Editnotice)?

Heather has already put {{notice|This page is not to ask questions about Wikipedia. please direct all questions to the general questions page, located here.}} at the top of the page, but for it to display during editing the editnotice must be located at Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia talk:Teahouse. But for that we need someone who has the right permissions. benzband (talk) 19:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

I'm fine with that happening. I don't have sysop or account creation abilities (or I don't think I do ;) ) and I'm not sure who does off the top of my head. I'm also pretty happy with the team being bold and making supported changes like this. It's rare we have questions asked there, but, it's best to inform people "don't ask questions here! duhhh!!!!" :) SarahStierch (talk) 19:39, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

sysop = admin :) benzband (talk) 19:40, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

lolz. OK, did I do it? I added that template to that link you provided. SarahStierch (talk) 19:43, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Yes, thanks! see here

benzband (talk) 19:44, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

And i forgot to surround [[Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions|here]] in nowiki tags when i asked, which means it says "here" but without the link. If you could fix it that'd be grand. benzband (talk) 19:46, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Doh, I failed to notice that myself. That's what I get for doing adminny things with a sandwich in one hand and gchat blowing up in another window :) Thanks for helping me out!! SarahStierch (talk) 19:48, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

This should wash the sandwich down. benzband (talk) 19:51, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

The Lady Magazine

I send an email asking the editor whether they would like to have an article on female Wikipedia editors. Is that the sort of thing you want me to do in promotion? Or shall I wait till you come up with a list of contacts and template we can send out. This is the website[1], did I target the right kind? -- RexRowan Talk 10:33, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi Rex! Thanks for the ping. WWC is undergoing a few changes, about our focus point for phase one - so we're not ready yet to start pinging and calls to action through media, but, I'll let you know for sure when we are, and yes, organizations and websites and magazines like that are totally up our alley! So keep a list going :) SarahStierch (talk) 16:06, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Ok, will actively be on the look out! :D -- RexRowan Talk 16:45, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Guttmacher Institute; Feminism in the United States; Feminist Formations; Efua Dorkenoo; Kyriarchy; Sniffin' Glue; Middle Class (band); International Day of Zero Tolerance to Female Genital Mutilation; Spare Rib; Woman at Point Zero; Sexual Politics; Feminist constructivism; Hecate (journal); Stinky Toys; Feminism Unmodified; Desert Flower; Inter-African Committee on Traditional Practices Affecting the Health of Women and Children; Kikuyu Central Association; Mihaela Miroiu

Cleanup: Beverage can; Ecofeminism; Feminist theory in composition studies
Merge: Jura wine; Winemaker; Women in computing
Add Sources: Gerwani; Transfeminism; Feminist school of criminology
Wikify: Women's liberation movement; National Science Library & Resource Centre – Sri Lanka; Postmodernism
Expand: Women's history; Feminist views on prostitution; Glossary of viticulture terms

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:11, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For spending two months splitting List of California Historical Landmarks and converting all the 1000+ entries into a table format by hand. Zzyzx11 (talk) 00:55, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

She's a tough one, this Ms. Stierch! :)

Binksternet (talk) 01:16, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Re: Sorcha Faal

Hello Sarah, can you please review Sorcha Faal as User talk:IRWolfie- and I are not agreeing on how to best improve this entry? The Sorcha Faal entry falls well within the guidlines of Wikipedia:WikiProject Alternative Views and even though this "entity" is known, and written about, the world over, it is perplexing, at best, as to how best to document same. Thank you.Arzk02587k (talk) 01:10, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

SarahStierch, Thank you for inviting my students to the Tea House for new Wikipedians! I'll explain more about Tea House in my class. You're doing excellent work in the Wikimedia universe. By the way, we have met at Wikimania 2012 in D.C. and we also interacted with each other through Wikinews. Enjoy your kitten, Chad

Crtew (talk) 20:41, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Translation notification: Wikimedia Highlights, July 2012

Hello SarahStierch,

You are receiving this notification because you signed up as a translator to Simple English on Meta. The page Wikimedia Highlights, July 2012 is available for translation. You can translate it here:

translate to Simple English

The priority of this page is medium.

Note: This time, the "Wikimedia Foundation highlights" section does not include the usual coverage of the most notable work of Foundation staff during that month. Instead, it contains a list of talks given by Foundation staff at Wikimania, summarizing their most important work the year over. It looks like a lot of text, but only the talk titles will need to be translated. The intention is that these titles alone can already give readers a good overview of what the Foundation is working on in general.

You are receiving this message because you signed up to the new translation notification system. Questions about this system can be asked at [2], and you can manage your subscription at [3].

Your help is greatly appreciated. Translators like you help Meta to function as a truly multilingual community.

Thank you!

Meta translation coordinators‎, 00:22, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Project Bolo page submission

Dear Sarah, Thanks you for reviewing my submission "Creating Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Project Bolo" I have received a notice that my submission has been rejected because of copyright materials being used. I am unable to understand which part of the text was copyrighted. I would like to review and redit my submission to remove any copyrighted material. Could you guide me where I can find the article I submitted to edit and correct it, instead of creating a new one. The link above gives a blank page and does not have any of the text, links and references I put in. can you please advise at the earliest. Thanks and regards Sridhar Rangayan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sridhar Rangayan (talk • contribs) 08:10, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

A Puppy for you! :)

TheGeneralUser has given you a puppy! Puppies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Your puppy must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a puppy, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Spread the goodness of puppies by adding {{subst:Puppy}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message.

Thanks a lot being a Faithful Companion and a Good Wikifriend :) TheGeneralUser (talk) 10:10, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Hello SarahStierch I do not understand why this article submission was declined.Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/William E. Ingram, Jr. The sources that are used are official government sources. There are many other articles about General Officers just like this one, citing almost identical official government sources.

Why are these government sources not creditable enough? I've added more sources, but they are again mostly government sources. I'm not sure what kind of sources I could provide that would be more official or crediable.

Please advise. Thank you for your time. --Okanos (talk) 14:54, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Ben Meiklejohn

Hi there, could you userify Ben Meiklejohn to my talk page? I did not even know the article was up for deletion and I'd like to add more sources to provide for notability. Thanks!--TM 20:22, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Done I put it here. SarahStierch (talk) 20:26, 4 September 2012 (UTC)