User talk:Blunatic28

Welcome![edit]

Hi Blunatic28! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:16, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thanks so much for the welcome message and the info, it's great to be able to contribute, and perhaps add info on underrepresented topics! 216.241.151.191 (talk) 18:32, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Blunatic28. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Christina Georgiou, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:17, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the additional information, I will disclose the COI tomorrow. I will make sure the citations are all valid and acceptable and the info is accurate and not embellished. The COI regulations are very reasonable, though in cases where there is COI but the article is well documented, they do potentially exclude people, organizations etc originating from smaller or underrepresented communities from being listed on wikipedia. 216.241.151.191 (talk) 18:48, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The COI regulations are not there to exclude anyone or anything. They are there to require you to disclose your COI, and once you've done that, the AfC procedures are then there to help you get your article published, where possible.

BTW, please remember to log into your account when editing, including when commenting on talk pages. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:55, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, I have declared the COI on the Talk panel of the draft, I do hope I have done it correctly. Thank you again for your time. Wishing you a lovely weekend! Blunatic28 (talk) 17:07, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christina Georgiou (December 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Christina Georgiou and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spinster300 (talk) 16:59, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Blunatic28! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spinster300 (talk) 16:59, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christina Georgiou (December 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

While her films have won awards, in terms of the sourcing, they are very lacking.

This is a simple interview of Georgiou for her advice in buying pets, and does not contain much info about this person.

The Madame Figaro piece is decent, but we need more than one source of information to justify a biography to be made about someone. Otherwise, anyone wanting to look for who Georgiu is can just look at the non-Wikipedia article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Christina Georgiou and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 15:19, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Christina Georgiou[edit]

Hello, Blunatic28. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Christina Georgiou, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]