User talk:Ca

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Add a topic


Review of Sandbox[edit]

Hello Ca thank you but my draft appears to have been archived from your talk page so I can’t access it to press the button as you describe. I think you have already reviewed it—I was hoping you would edit it guided by our discussions and I would submit your edited version for review? Cresterest (talk) 23:59, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am really really sorry for taking so long - I formatted the text in your sandbox for you: User:Cresterest/sandbox. You can find the original, unformatted text at User_talk:Ca/Archives/2024/February#Section_added_by_Ca. All you need to do is to place the text into the intended places.
There is no need get edits you want reviewed. In fact, it is actually recommended to be bold, then discuss if others disagree. The sources seem reliable to me, but I took out some of the text referring to the external links section. I think the labels on the link in the External Links section are clear enough. Thanks! ♠ Ca talk to me! 10:10, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much! I’m working on it now. Cresterest (talk) 14:16, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK I am preparing to cut and paste but the post mishap photo has a / in the link view that doesn’t show / on the pre mishap photo links?
Should I credit these web linked photos? Cresterest (talk) 15:40, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
this is the version with mysterious /
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3ACresterest%2Fsandbox&redlink=1&preload=Template%3AUser+sandbox%2Fpreload#/editor/all Cresterest (talk) 16:48, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ok I fixed it Ca talk to me! 08:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello world Lfontaine.trust (talk) 03:14, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your review of Mendix page[edit]

Hi! Thank you so much for reviewing my draft of the Mendix page in February. I've taken another look at the facts and sources, particularly at Forbes pieces, and removed some sources and facts were not strong. However, this article looks legit to me as a source based on the explanations given here. As it is said at the top of the article, it's "A series of Forbes Insights profiles" so it's an editorially supervised piece. Plus, it's written by Bruce Rogers who has been at Forbes as Chief Brand Officer, Chief Insights Officer, founder of Forbes Insights and the Forbes CMO Practice and Staff writer. So hopefully it does provide a necessary level of expertise and independency from his side to be used as a reliable source - what do you think?

And more broadly, just wondered if you could please have a look at the updated draft as a whole and let me know what you think about it now. I'd really appreciate that. Thank you! Katherinegoose (talk) 15:31, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Katherinegoose! I will be taking a look at the new updated draft soon. As for the source, you can't get much wrong with a simple interview. I am still concerned why this article has not gone through the regular Forbes editorial cycle and I don't see any issues for simple uncontroversial facts. Ca talk to me! 21:54, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see, thank you for clarifying... Hmm don't really know what the reason for that may be... But in any case will be super helpful to hear your thoughts on the updated draft when you have time. Thank you!! Katherinegoose (talk) 17:24, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Katherinegoose I took a look at the draft and the sourcing is much better. However, they seem to be in the shallow side. Many simply list sterotypical company details example.
As it is common with news coverage on companies, news media likes to simply reprint the company's statements with little analysis example. I would like if you could find more substantial coverage on what this company does.
Also I am not sure if Verdict is reliable. It certainly isn't well known and it has a unclear author. Ca talk to me! 14:48, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive[edit]

New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
  • On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pendulumania[edit]

Information icon Hello, Ca. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pendulumania, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ca&oldid=1222179375"