Talk:True Church of Jesus Christ (Cutlerite)

Christianity: Latter Day Saints Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Latter Day Saints portal This article is supported by WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement (assessed as Low-importance).

Minnesota Low‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fletcher Merge discussion[edit]

I find that most small "sect" in the Latter Day Saint Movement do not have individual pages for both the Sect and the founder, unless the person is somehow notable besides being the founder. For examples see all the small sects in the "Pre-schism dissenting bodies" section of List of sects in the Latter Day Saint movement except William law who was notable for other reason. Ether the page for the founder redirect to the Church or the Church redirect to the founder.

I see no reason to keep a Stub article with the exact same information on the same person who is not notable for any other reason. Since True Church of Jesus Christ (Cutlerite) is larger, Clyde Fletcher should be merged into this page.--ARTEST4ECHO (^talk/_contribs) 13:12, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WEAK OPPOSE - I don't necessarily agree, but then again, since I'm the one who created the article in the first place, I'd probably be expected to say that. If other contributors to this discussion believe it should be merged, I won't oppose it. - Ecjmartin (talk) 00:19, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to withdraw this as "No Consensus"--ARTEST4ECHO (^talk/_contribs) 16:25, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]