Talk:Movement for the Restoration of the Ten Commandments of God

GA Fail

I have failed the GA nomination for this article. In particular, this article has a strong voice of bias against the subject matter and has several uses of weasel words, even in the lead sentence ("widely referred to as a doomsday cult"). I'm not saying it's not, but to state this, you need a "wide" spectrum of response to substantiate this (i.e. people frm several other religions whose opinion bears notation, and with rock solid and verifiable references). Otherwise you need to articulate who considers it to be a doomsday cult. For this reason, the article fails both on WP:NPOV, on WP:BLP and also on the criteria for an article to be well written. There are several other issues with the article, such as the abuse of the term "killing", which is a coloquial term and, though it can be used once or twice, it's inappropriate to use it this many times. I would suggest having this article broadly looked over by editors who have experience in rewriting articles into factual and non-biased bodies of work. As this article stands, it reads like an anti-MR10CG pamphlet, with some encyclopedic prose. This article needs a good few weeks worth of re-writes before I'd even consider putting it up for GA again. It would possibly be appropriate to submit for peer review or even to the league of copyeditors to get some other opinions of, and assistance with, the article's quality. --lincalinca 04:14, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. I got sick of it and wanted some fresh eyes. Media reports were harsher than this though. --arkalochori ^|talk| 04:16, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Alright I changed the "widely referred" part to "In their coverage of that event, BBC News and the New York Times referred to the Movement as a doomsday cult.[2][3]"

You're definitely heading in the right direction then, but interdispersed throughout the article, there are still areas of NPOV concern. If you feel that it's worthy of GA at any opint, let me know and I'll give you a friendly once over review and let you know what I think, but if you go with this, then I can't give you the GA review, simply the go-ahead as to whether I think it's ready for GA. --lincalinca 05:02, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

External links

Added {{No more links}} to EL sect. Cirt (talk) 14:48, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Movement for the Restoration of the Ten Commandments of God. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120503071914/http://www.richardvokes.net/kanungu.shtml to http://www.richardvokes.net/kanungu.shtml
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071105144411/http://religiousmovements.lib.virginia.edu/nrms/mrtcg.html to http://religiousmovements.lib.virginia.edu/nrms/mrtcg.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC)