Talk:Minuscule 69

Bible Low‑importance

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Greece Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

15th century[edit]

I removed a line that claimed this manuscript was dated to the 15th century.. this can't possibly be correct. -Matt Aufderheide

Yes it is correct. Is it older, or earlier according you? But it is not subject of disputes between scholars, all agreed that codex was written in 15th century. Here is no place for original research. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 04:32, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I screwed up... I assumed this was an early medieval manuscript--my fault. Thanks for correcting me--Matt —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.241.155.174 (talk) 04:05, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Town museum?[edit]

No museum called town museum in Leicester. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.30.112.123 (talk) 16:56, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

5[edit]

The word "fife" on the left twice seems to be a mistake for "five". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.177.54.66 (talk) 17:51, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]