Talk:Lupus of Troyes

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Christianity: Saints Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Saints portal This article is supported by WikiProject Saints (assessed as Low-importance).

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Image removed[edit]

I'm removing the image File:Attila and Saint Loup de Troyes.jpg from this article, finding it to be of poor quality, ahistoric and of no information value. This is a low-quality pastiche work by a modern illustrator, who has taken the overall composition of a 16th-century print (depicting not Attila at Troyes, but Alexander the Great at Jerusalem, found here: [1]), and just exchanged the figure of the 16th-century fantasy "Alexander" with a modern-style, more "realistic" and more Asian-looking drawing. Both the original 16th-century work and its modern adaptation are without any historical value, and the modern pastiche is esthetically horrible in its grotesque style mix. There is also a possible copyright issue, as it was uploaded as "taken from the archives of Grigorij V. Tomskij" and released by him into the public domain, but we have neither an OTRS clearance from the uploader, nor a confirmation that Tomskij is really the artist here (he's the author of a book on Attila, apparently.) Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]