Talk:Lesser magistrate

Christianity: Lutheranism / Reformed Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Lutheranism (assessed as Low-importance).
	Reformed Christianity portal This article is supported by WikiProject Reformed Christianity (assessed as Low-importance).

Philosophy: Social and political / Religion / Medieval Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Social and political philosophy
	Philosophy of religion
	Medieval philosophy

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Lack of Objectivity in this article[edit]

Just now, I removed a few lines from the article and made changes to the last header. The previous version mentioned "Presumed obsolescence of the concept." The "presumed" part is, in my view, an opinion. I changed it to be "Later development of the concept" instead, which I argue is far more neutral in tone.

Further, there was a line at the end saying something along the lines of "time will tell" who was right. Again, this is not acceptable language in a neutral encyclopedia. Finally, I removed a line referencing contemporary examples, but which did so without providing proof or context of whatever examples the previous author may have been thinking of.

I am worried that this article will be changed back, and was originally in the state that it was in, because of ideological reasons. Samuelboland (talk) 16:26, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]