Talk:Lancelot Andrewes

Christianity: Saints / Anglicanism / Arminianism Mid‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Saints portal This article is supported by WikiProject Saints (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Arminianism (assessed as Mid-importance).

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Saint?[edit]

The Anglican Communion has no mechanism for identifying saints. Is infobox Saint really an appropriate template?Peterkingiron (talk) 22:52, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strictly there is no process of canonisation, he is however commemorated in the latest lectionary, and regarded as one of the great Anlgican divines, so it's not too bad a fit. David Underdown (talk) 15:42, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Most Anglicans do not venerate saints in the way that Catholics do. I think there is an appropriate info box for bishops and other clerics etc, but I am not sure what it is: I do not habitually set these up, on;ly succession boxes. Peterkingiron (talk) 23:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Those don't have the option to display his "day", he has a Lesser Festival, so the saint box is useful so far as it goes. Obviously there's a far wider variation int eh understnading of waht veneration means, and maybe there needs to be an improvement to the infobox on that front. David Underdown (talk) 18:28, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is indeed an Anglican "mechanism for identifying saints". Inclusion in the calendar is standard. There is no canonisation process as you find in the Roman Catholic Church. -- Secisek (talk) 19:23, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, there is a canonisation process similar to the Roman Catholic kind, but it has only ever been used once after the Protestant Reformation, to declare King Charles I of England a Saint (Now St. Charles Stuart or King Charles the Martyr). The rest of Anglican "minor" saints are not canonized, but are included in the Anglican Calendar of Saints, so they are, indeed, Saints. Veneration is also practiced within the Communion's High Church and Anglo-Catholic parishes. Some Anglicans even pray the Anglican Rosary and use votive candles. The Angelic Salutation (Hail Mary), Patron saint prayers, and others are used in parts of the Anglican Communion. --Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 14:05, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New image[edit]

I recently uploaded a higher-resolution of Lancelot Andrewes (right), an engraving by Wenceslas Hollar, but it's significantly different so it's up to you whether to use it or not. Dcoetzee 23:29, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Was Andrewes at the Synod of Dort?[edit]

This list of delegates does not include him, and Urban Tigner Holmes in A history of Christian spirituality: an analytical introduction (p. 116) says that Andrewes "was opposed to Calvinism, refusing to be in the Anglican delegation to the Synod of Dort." But the Classic Encyclopedia says he "attended" the Synod - could he have attended, but not as a delegate? StAnselm (talk) 04:53, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the claim. St Anselm (talk) 11:25, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for article expansion[edit]

"Lancelot Andrewes" in the Encyclopædia Britannica, 9th ed., Vol. II, p. 20 f.

— $Llywelyn II$ 01:37, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lancelot Andrewes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060627073746/http://www.english.umd.edu/englfac/WPeterson/ELR/bibliographies/documents/16.html to http://www.english.umd.edu/englfac/WPeterson/ELR/bibliographies/documents/16.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:55, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]