Talk:Foo Fighters/GA1
GA Review[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I feel that, while this article does have a decent amount of development, it would need a very large amount of work before meeting the GA criteria.
- The pronouns shift between singular and plural. Singular should be used to correspond with American English usage of singular pronouns in reference to bands.
- Sources 1, 2, 6, 8, 10, 11 and 20 should all have page numbers and ISSNs.
- Sources 13, 16, 17, 18 and 23 are all bare URLs, and #23 is malformatted.
- What makes this site or this reliable? The latter is only two sentences; surely a more substantial source could be used instead.
- No critical reception given for any of the albums. What did Allmusic, Entertainment Weekly, Rolling Stone or any other professional reviewers think of the albums?
- Large numbers of unsourced statements. I have tagged most of these accordingly.
- There were a number of YouTube links and another unreliable source that I weeded out, including this fansite, setlist.fm, which is a wiki, and songfacts.com, which is largely user-submitted.
Reviewer: Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:31, 31 March 2010 (UTC)