Talk:Destroying angel (Bible)

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bible Low‑importance

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Expanding the Stub[edit]

What do fellow Wikipedians think about moving this stub to "Angels of Punishment"? It could cover much more, than just the few references to "angels of destruction" in the Bible, if we do so. It could also merge with the Zabaniyya article (hell angels or demons in Islam, also called angels of punishment). It seems both have their origins in the "satans" of 1 Enoch. If we do so, it could be extented with a "bible" section, a "Judaism" section and an "Islam" section (with corresponding subsections) and added to the "angels in abrahamic religions" template.--VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 21:01, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The section "The Islamic view" is problematic[edit]

It is problematic because a section like this could be attached to ANY topic... anytime, anywhere...

This is a Jewish story... in the Torah...

A chapter called Islamic or Christian reference could be totally okay...

But adding the Islamic View (of the Jewish Torah) has no relevance in terms of history and science and culture....

Let's no play religious games! :)

Let's focus on knowledge, and history, as it happened...

with respect,

--peter.josvai (talk) 17:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]