Talk:Criticism of the historical Catholic Church

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Criticism of the historical Catholic Church redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Religion: Interfaith Low‑importance

	Religion portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism Low‑importance

Criticism of the historical Catholic Church is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Philosophy Low‑importance

	Philosophy portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Criticism of the Catholic Church was copied or moved into Interfaith controversies involving the Catholic Church. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

The content was not all copied from the above article, rather much of it was transcluded from other articles, and may have unrelated content. SandyGeorgia (Talk)

Title written with italic letters[edit]

Why is the title written in italic letters? I can't seem to change this. lovkal (talk) 18:13, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It was transcluding the italic template from Postremo mense, but not anymore because I switched from the #section-h: type template to the #section: type template. The latter only transcludes material placed between tags on the other article, the former transcludes the whole section carte blanche. If no section is given, it transcludes the lead and whatever comes before it, such as the italic title template.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 21:27, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic[edit]

This article was created via a problematic split from Criticism of the Catholic Church; see Talk:Criticism of the Catholic Church#Other side of the same coin and the sections above that section. Most of the transclusions may need to be removed, as they appear to have been added with little care as to to reviewing the content to determine if there was actually reliably sourced criticism in the transcluded content. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 04:03, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This page was only created after a consensus decided to split the page at Talk:Criticism of the Catholic Church.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 04:19, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There was only you & one other person specifically in favour of your proposal. Apart from that, the way you did it, which was not covered in any detail, is very problemmatic. Johnbod (talk) 04:36, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Query[edit]

How exactly do you get "citation needed" tags from January 2019 in an article that wasn't created until April 2019? Mannanan51 (talk) 16:36, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]