This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bibliographies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bibliographies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibliographiesWikipedia:WikiProject BibliographiesTemplate:WikiProject BibliographiesBibliographies articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Atheism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of atheism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AtheismWikipedia:WikiProject AtheismTemplate:WikiProject AtheismAtheism articles
Add Atheism info box to all atheism related talk pages (use {{WikiProject Atheism}} or see info box)
Ensure atheism-related articles are members of Atheism by checking whether [[Category:Atheism]] has been added to atheism-related articles – and, where it hasn't, adding it.
Try to expand stubs. Ideas and theories about life, however, are prone to generating neologisms, so some stubs may be suitable for deletion (see deletion process).
State atheism needs a reassessment of its Importance level, as it has little to do with atheism and is instead an article about anti-theist/anti-religious actions of governments.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
I am removing listings which are unsourced as to whether they actually contain criticism of Christianity and are by non-notable authors. I am leaving in works by authors with articles if I can tell, looking at the article, that the work probably qualifies - although ideally we would want to source each one with a review that mentions its criticism of Christianity.Brianyoumans (talk) 01:47, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This looks alright, thanks. I'm glad you were cautious in these removals. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 07:07, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
To be honest, this is the kind of article that I think should just be deleted - some random person threw up a start on it years ago, it's had a few random additions over the years, but no one is really maintaining it, it doesn't have a clear description or focus, it isn't in any way comprehensive or well-researched. But if I tried to take it to AFD people would say it was a great start, there would be a few token references and additions added, the AFD would fail, and then the article would sit here and molder for another decade, useful only for someone to point to and say, "Look, Wikipedia is full of pointless listcruft like this!" Grump. Well, I think I improved it a bit. Rant off.Brianyoumans (talk) 14:38, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, I actually had not noticed before I wrote the comment above - someone already AFDed it in 2019 and that's exactly what happened!Brianyoumans (talk) 14:40, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The AfD should give sufficient reasons why it was kept and for what purposes. Long story short: it passes WP:LISTN. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 18:14, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Reading through the deletion discussion (what there was of it, it wasn't extensive), there was considerable diversity of opinion as to what the article should look like - only notable books, only notable books and/or notable authors, anything as long as it criticizes Christianity... And what exactly *is* "criticism of Christianity"? Philosophical criticism? Cultural? (Much of what I removed seemed to be Indian works complaining about Christian conversions of Hindus, as far as I can tell.) Negative criticism or constructive criticism? I don't know, it seems vague to me. But I'll leave it alone. If you have experience with similar articles maybe you could improve this one. Brianyoumans (talk) 20:15, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
