Talk:Albrecht Ritschl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Theology section inappropriately labeled[edit]

This is far too critical to be considered simply description of Ritschl's theology. Some of this criticism should be relocated to a new section of the article and the theology section should be reworked.

Pfsoupy (talk) 06:32, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Albrecht Ritschl/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Aside from a phrase from the Catholic Encyclopaedia, it is mostly based on Britannica and needs information from another source. It needs an infobox. It has a portrait and is well linked and classified. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 22:41, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 22:41, 7 February 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 07:07, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

frank foster[edit]

"In 1909 Duhm, who had been a pupil and follower of Ritschl, declared to the writer that there were no longer any Ritschlians there." Frank Hugh Foster, The Modern Movement in American Theology, 1935, p. 186