Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants/Old Requests/2023

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January[edit]

Inactive (Jan.)[edit]

User:Iazyges[edit]

Recently moved to inactive, in part due to general inactivity, but plan to be more active and helpful in the future. Sorry! Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 16:27, 22 January 2023 (UTC) Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 16:27, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 08:47, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:HeinzMaster[edit]

Moved to inactive list but I have been active on Wikipedia during that time, with article creation and other avenues.HeinzMaster (talk) 00:02, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 08:47, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:IntoThinAir[edit]

Was removed from the list awhile back, presumably for inactivity. Have been active for approximately 10 years under three usernames and created hundreds of articles. IntoThinAir (talk) 02:18, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 08:47, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sdkb[edit]

I was moved to the inactive list but remain up to date with the AfC guidelines and would like the ability to review pages to help with my work at the Teahouse and elsewhere. Thanks! {{u|Sdkb}} talk 19:46, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 08:47, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:DannyS712[edit]

Moved to inactive after being on a wikibreak for a while, but I've recently returned and planned to resume helping with AFC DannyS712 (talk) 22:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 08:47, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bluerasberry[edit]

I had rights in the past. Perhaps I was removed from the list for inactivity. I review articles sometimes and would like to have the tools. I read the current criteria and meet them. Thanks for reviewing. Bluerasberry (talk) 22:20, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 11:06, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New (Jan.)[edit]

User:Mattdaviesfsic[edit]

Hi, just wanted to put forward my 'application', if that's the right word, to help with the enormous backlog of AfCs (3 months is a long for someone to check your submission when you make one!). Already familiar with most of the core policies, as well as... other ones (like WP:COLAS!). Happy to be put on probation like some of the others have above, if admin feels that's necessary. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 08:20, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:07, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Eastmain[edit]

Seasoned editor would like to help with AFC. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 20:42, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done; a full half of your talk page is deletion notices and draft decline notices. I am also somewhat concerned that your application was... badly formatted, to put it politely. Primefac (talk) 10:04, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Praseodymium-141[edit]

Hi, I would like to help out pages in AfC, usually chemistry or physics-related, and to cut down the huge backlog of submissions. I am an experienced editor, having an account that is more than a year old and made more than 6500 edits. I have already read the instructions a couple of times. Thanks! 141Pr 13:05, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 20:48, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Enervation[edit]

I would love to help review pages for AfC in order to reduce the accumulating backlog. I have read the reviewing instructions, am familiar with the notability guidelines and deletion policy, and am eager to respond to comments about AfC reviews in a timely manner. My account is 11 years old and I have made over 1,000 live edits. Thanks for considering this request! Enervation (talk) 00:39, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning towards no, mainly due to the lack of AFD experience and just-over-the-minimum edit counts. Primefac (talk) 20:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:GA Melbourne[edit]

Hello, I am seeking to participate as a AfC reviewer. I have experience as a former NPP (permissions were granted temporarily and have since expired). I have read WP:AFC/RI a couple of times in the past week and have gained a good understanding of the process. I am also familiar with the broader WP policies. I also am always sure to provide newcomers with the info to learn to become better editors and not bite them. I am also familiar with the deletion process and have a sense of which article will survive the process and which articles won't. - GA Melbourne (talk) 10:33, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:37, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Eejit43[edit]

Hello! I'd like to request AfC helper script rights in order to help with the big backlog of AfC submissions. I am well versed with the notability guidelines, as well as AfD/CSD/PROD (however mostly have experience with a bunch of speedy deletion requests), and know how to properly check for copyright violations and identify promotional content. I have been editing for over a year, and have 4,000+ edits to articles. I'm also very happy to help respond to questions editors might have. I have fully read WP:AFCR, and if granted, will use the tool responsibly! Thank you! :) ~ Eejit43 (talk) 20:15, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:37, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dawkin Verbier[edit]

I meet all of the eligibity requirements and am an active new page patroller. Dawkin Verbier (talk) 04:35, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:37, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Philipnelson99[edit]

I'd like to help with the AfC backlog. I have some experience with CSD and think I could be useful here as well. Thanks! Philipnelson99 (talk) 01:24, 24 January 2023 (UTC) Philipnelson99 (talk) 01:24, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 21:38, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Misterrrrr[edit]

I'm currently creating Articles since 2 Months, whenever i get time i just start my Laptop and starts editing and Contributing. Before some days, I was editing through my mobile only. I had created articles and 4 articles are drafted because i had made some mistakes in Creating and contributing to those. I'm focusing mainly on History, entertainment, politics and Geography type articles, as you can see. I will focus on these type of articles in future too, because every person has their own Interest. Ending it up here, waiting for your Good Response. Thank You Misterrrrr (talk) 10:02, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 21:38, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac: - now blocked as sockuppet. --CNMall41 (talk) 22:06, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I know, thanks. They are appealing, so I am waiting for the resolution to that before I remove them entirely. Primefac (talk) 09:18, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February[edit]

Inactive (Feb.)[edit]

User:Ahecht[edit]

I've been inactive recently due to real-world responsibilities, but I plan on resuming my reviewing activity. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 16:39, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:12, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Carwil[edit]

Returning to do some AfC review and page rescue (i.e., fixing notable but imperfect drafts) after a time of inactivity. Carwil (talk) 15:26, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:12, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:GoldMiner24[edit]

Would like to be added back to AFC to continue helping after inactivity. GoldMiner24 Talk 20:44, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:12, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:SuperSwift[edit]

I have been inactive for a while due to some academic pursuits but now I'm done with the academic work and now ready to go back to review duties. SuperSwift (talk) 11:18, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Noting Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/SuperSwift and User talk:SuperSwift#Copyright violations: Final warning; removal of AP & NPR. echidnaLives - talk - edits 12:36, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, primarily due to the copyvio concerns, but also because of your AFD record. Primefac (talk) 15:04, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New (Feb.)[edit]

User:AntientNestor[edit]

I've just welcomed a new user who has, as their first edit, prepared a new article for review. There seems to be a backlog and keen, competent new users may find this discouraging. I'll help to cut back the backlog. AntientNestor (talk) 15:03, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 15:04, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ppt91[edit]

I think that I could help substantially reduce AfC backlog on topics related to WP:VISUALARTS, WP:BIOGRAPHY, and WP:HISTORY due to my editing experience (over 2300 edits of which vast majority are main space), familiarity with notability, WP:STYLE, and reliable secondary sources (one GA article and two reviews, in addition to multiple extensive edits in B-class articles), and creating new articles (seven main space, a few of which are already C-class). More broadly, I am actively looking for new ways to utilize my knowledge and experience to improve the quality of content across the platform. Thanks so much. Ppt91 (talk) 01:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 15:04, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Carpimaps[edit]

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights

I am acquainted with Wikipedia's various policies and created articles for Wikipedia. I wish to help out clear the backlog of AfC process. Carpimaps (talk) 02:00, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, fails minimum requirements. Primefac (talk) 15:04, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:StarryNightSky11[edit]

I help out with anti-vandalism, answering queries at the Teahouse and Help Desk and feel I could contribute more by reviewing drafts of new articles before potential submission to the site if the criteria is met. StarryNightSky11 ☎ 02:45, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 15:04, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Excutient[edit]

I would like to help with the backlog of AfC's. I am familiar with most of the core policies. I already have rollback and pending changes user rights. I currently use Redwarn to fight vandalism as well if that helps with your decision. I do not mind probation. Thanks. ExcutientTalk 16:22, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum criteria. Primefac (talk) 14:38, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:InterstellarGamer12321[edit]

I would like to help out with reviewing pages in AfC, as there is currently a huge backlog. I have read the instructions thoroughly and familiarised myself with them. I am also a relatively experienced editor, having made almost 8000 edits. I also regularly participate in RfD. I am fine with probation. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 16:31, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 15:04, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pbritti[edit]

I've been an article creator outside the draft process for a while but have helped other editors' with declined drafts improve to a state where they were approved. I have participated in a few CSDs (something I'm still getting the hang of in edge cases) but I am very familiar with AfDs. In general, I would like to add my experience to the mix. Pbritti (talk) 07:24, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 15:04, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Twinkle1990[edit]

I want to be a part of the team to clear the backlocks, I have read and understood WP:AFCR and I clear all six of WP:AFCR.Twinkle1990 (talk) 13:17, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 15:04, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Wikieditor019[edit]

To help clear the backlog of articles that have been submitted to be accepted, specialising in Geography. I have read the instructions and understand/familiar with them. I also have more than 1,100 active edits on English Wikipedia. I would like to help out the community with my contributions. Wikieditor019 (talk) 15:25, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 15:04, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dicklyon[edit]

Want to be able to help create articles, including sometimes my own that got stuck into the long queue. Dicklyon (talk) 03:41, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Dicklyon, you are not obligated to use the AFC process, and it is strongly discouraged to accept one's own drafts. You can still create articles as well (draft or otherwise) without being an AFC reviewer. Primefac (talk) 14:51, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't generally use the AFC process, but one of my articles in progress got moved to draft and put into the process, and I can't move it back now that it's fleshed out: Draft:MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour, and Development. Maybe you can facilitate. I'd still like to be an AFC reviewer. Dicklyon (talk) 20:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I took care of that one via WP:RMTR. I'd still like to be an AFC reviewer. Dicklyon (talk) 07:08, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac: OK? No immediate need, but I'm tired of this popup error I get for not being on the list now. Dicklyon (talk) 09:14, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:55, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:M.Ashraf333[edit]

Due to my editing expertise, familiarity with notability and secondary sources, ability to produce new articles, and involvement in an active NPP, I believe that I might significantly reduce the AfC backlog on several topics. Thanks M.Ashraf333 (talk) 14:40, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 15:14, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Freedom4U[edit]

I previously submitted an article through AfC, but then realized that it would take 3 months to review and that I had mainspace rights. Three months is really demoralizing and I want to help reduce the queue. I've read all of the AfC instructions and I'm well familiar with Wikipedia's policies on notability and the AfD process. I fulfill all the edit/account related requirements. Freedom4U (talk) 21:25, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:55, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March[edit]

Inactive (Mar)[edit]

User:Joseph2302[edit]

I did have AFC permissions, but they were removed at one point because I was indefinitely blocked (which was not related to AFC). I have been editing without issue, and would like to help clear some of the backlog of sports articles needing review, as I see there's a lot of drafts listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Sports/Article alerts. I am reasonably active on AFD, with a 94.5% correct rate (excluding no consensus votes) on last 200 AFDs according to AFD stats. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:45, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 10:22, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:NotTheFakeJTP[edit]

I was an AFC reviewer for several years before retiring in 2020. I am now looking to get back into it. JTP (talk • contribs) 20:00, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 10:22, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:EDG 543[edit]

Have been generally inactive for many months, but am excited to get back in the swing of things. It's worth mentioning that I was a reviewer prior to my sabbatical. Thanks, EDG 543 (message me) 19:08, 21 March 2023 (UTC) Thanks, EDG 543 (message me) 19:08, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 10:28, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Majash2020[edit]

I would like to be addded back to this after being inactive for some time Majash2020 (talk) 21:27, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done, noting (mainly for my own records) that the previous username was Mjs1991. Primefac (talk) 10:13, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New (Mar)[edit]

User:GMH Melbourne[edit]

Hello, I changed my username from GA Melbourne to GMH Melbourne, could this change be reflected on the participants page. Thank you in advance. - GA Melbourne (talk) 08:29, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:49, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Edward-Woodrow[edit]

I would like to mostly review Redirects and Categories for creation, but I can also help review draft articles. I have over five hundred undeleted edits (Contributions), and understand the reviewing instructions and notability guidelines. I have limited experience at RfD, where I have been active in recent days, and understand Wikipedia's deletion policy. Edward-Woodrow (talk) 20:37, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:16, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nocturnal781[edit]

Hello,

I would love to help out in this project. I've created dozens of articles.

Thank you. Nocturnal781 (talk) 04:47, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:16, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cambalachero[edit]

I want to help. Cambalachero (talk) 14:10, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 10:16, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Newystats[edit]

I am an experienced (10 years) editor, I've helped a few editors improve their drafts following an AFC review. I am aware of the notability guidelines. I have familiarised myself with the reviewing instructions. I anticipate mostly helping out with reviews in Geography, Elections, Mathematics pages. Newystats (talk) 05:55, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 10:16, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mrmctorso[edit]

I'm a longtime on-and-off editor, interested to get more involved in this side of Wikipedia and help where I can. Mrmctorso (talk) 16:55, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:28, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Oltrepier[edit]

I've contributed myself to the steady expansion of the backlog as of late, so I want to make amends for it... All jokes aside, I hope I can help with the reviewing process, having collected over 1.800 edits between en.wiki and it.wiki alone: this record includes over 20 created articles (a few of which were accepted drafts), two GAs and a few DYK nominations. I'm also trying my hand at the AfD process on both the aforementioned Wikis, and I've already reviewed some GA and DYK nominations. For now, my experience is mainly limited to WP:BIOGRAPHY and WP:FOOTBALL, but I'm willing to help with WP:ITALY, WP:WPMUSIC and other topics, as well. I don't mind being put on probation, if needed. Oltrepier (talk) 10:32, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:28, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Anasskoko[edit]

Hello there I hope you are doing well, I’m requesting for active membership after been inactive for six month, I was once an AFC reviewer, reviewing Nigerian related articles, I wish to be more active now in seeing that articles from Nigeria are actively reviewed. Moreover, I participate in AFD and I have shown some number of commitments, looking forward to your feedback. An@ss_koko(speak up) 11:58, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:28, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pangalau[edit]

As of 23 March 2023, I currently have 101 articles published in addition to 6 B-Class rated articles. I am confident in my ability to assist the Wikipedia community in assessing articles and advising new Wikipedians. DuckieWackie (talk) 03:05, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:28, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Longhornsg[edit]

Seasoned creator of new articles, improver of existing articles, and involvement across the editing ecosystem (including DYK). Happy to lend my time and expertise to the AfC backlog. Longhornsg (talk) 23:22, 27 March 2023 (UTC) Longhornsg (talk) 23:22, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:28, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April[edit]

Returning (April)[edit]

User:QuantumRealm[edit]

I'm a former AFC reviewer who lost the status due to inactivity. I'm ready to jump back in and contribute, so could you please reinstate my AFC reviewer privileges? Thanks! QuantumRealm (meow • pawtrack) 16:42, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 07:39, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Noahfgodard[edit]

I was an active AfC reviewer for about a year and a half before becoming less frequently active on Wikipedia, and have been moved to the list of inactive reviewers. I'd like to return to AfC reviewing now. Thanks! Noahfgodard (talk) 02:00, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 07:39, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheSubmarine[edit]

I was previously an active AfC reviewer, but was taken off the list due to inactivity. Could you please reinstate me to the participants list? Thanks! TheSubmarine (talk) 08:20, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 07:36, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:-noah-[edit]

I was a reviewer but I became inactive in 2021. I'm looking to get back into it. Thanks! Noah 💬 22:47, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 07:36, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Asukite[edit]

I was formerly an AFCH user who became inactive, but I've gotten into reviewing new pages again lately and might want participate in AFC some more. ASUKITE 16:39, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 08:35, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Clearfrienda[edit]

Hi. I'd like to reapply for AfC participant status, as I've been inactive for more than 6 months. I was inactive and wasn't editing for almost a year, but now I'm looking into restarting. Would love to help clear some of the backlog. Thanks! Clearfrienda 💬 23:36, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 08:35, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:The-Pope[edit]

Hi. I'd like to was removed as inactive, as I haven't edited much lately, but will be getting back into it over the next few months. The-Pope (talk) 17:37, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 08:35, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Herpetogenesis[edit]

I'm an NPP reviewer (currently still active doing NPP) and was also an AfC reviewer last year, but was inactive for a while since I got quite busy in real life. Re-applying for rights. Highly experienced reviewer. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 03:02, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:48, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:RonaldDuncan[edit]

I have previously helped with afc and would like to help again, since I am active again. RonaldDuncan (talk) 19:02, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 19:12, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New (April)[edit]

User:Uwhoff[edit]

I have seen the wait time for drafts waiting for review increase from 3 to 4 months recently and would like to help to lower that. Uwhoff (talk) 09:12, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. You have had multiple pages either draftified or deleted, and you have no participation in deleted-related activities that I can tell (AFD, CSD, etc). Primefac (talk) 09:15, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Toddst1[edit]

To more easily participate in draft page review. I might have enough experience now as a retired admin. :) Toddst1 (talk) 22:40, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 07:39, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nagol0929[edit]

I would like to review new articles and drafts for spam, vandalism, and promotion among others. Although i have not nor am I interested in creating new articles, i am still interested in reviewing others articles. I also have extensive knowledge in deletion criteria and speedy deletion criteria. Nagol0929 (talk) 13:29, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 17:45, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Leejordan9[edit]

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights:

I would like to be able to participate with reviewing articles and I believe my account meets the criteria listed. If possible, can I become a reviewer of AfCs? Leejordan9 talk
sandbox 20:23, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, fails minimum criteria. Primefac (talk) 07:36, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:AugustusAudax[edit]

Hello, I'm AugustusAudax. I'm an extended confirmed editor with a good history. Eventually, I want to be an administrator, and I think this is a good starting pad. I've rewritten a couple of articles, and I'm familiar with most of the major policies, and am familiar with the manual of style. Now, that's why I think I'd be a good AfC participant. AugustusAudax (talk) 21:31, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum criteria. Primefac (talk) 07:36, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:NP83[edit]

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights so that I can review draft which I think I can according to the policy. NP83 (talk) 02:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion.

User:MainlyTwelve[edit]

I would like to help reduce the backlog at AFC and expand my knowledge of Wikipedia editing. I have done NPP work but never AFC. — Mainly 19:42, 13 April 2023 (UTC) Mainly 19:42, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 07:36, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:JeffUK[edit]

I've decided to do something that requires a little more thought than recent changes reviewing for a while! I've picked out a couple articles I'll be reviewing already but will wait until I can do it properly through the helper script. JeffUK 20:47, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
JeffUK, I see a total of one thread on your talk page where you actually replied to someone asking a question. Is there a reason you did not reply to these talk page messages? Primefac (talk) 07:36, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac I only see one direct question, and that was answered on the other user's talk page. Just after they were blocked for edit warring. What does this have to do with AFC? JeffUK 16:50, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac If the concern is my ability and willingness to respond in a timely manner. Note that "Discussion on the wording of 3RR", "Compound of four tetrahedra", and "Edit warring" were all responded to on the referenced pages or talk pages. The only one I didn't actually 'respond' to in some manner was "Hell Theater article speed (sic) deletion revision", I don't remember why exactly, but probably because I had nothing to add over the speedy deletion nom. The article in question had been in draft, and rejected repeatedly, for nearly 6 years, and the creator had been told throughout that the article lacked proof of notability.
The rest are just notes or FYIs that needed no action.
In terms of AFCs, I'll only review as many as I can handle replying to promptly. JeffUK 20:59, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough.
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 08:35, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:PalauanReich[edit]

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights

Interested in reviewing afc's to help wiki maintenance PalauanReich (talk) 23:23, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, primarily because you thought that this was acceptable to submit for review. Primefac (talk) 08:35, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:The person who loves reading[edit]

I want to help Wikipedia review draft articles. I have already read WP:AFCR, and understand the process of reviewing draft articles. I understand notability guidelines, and I am able to decide whether the subject of the article is notable or not. I have also read other key policies and guidelines, such as WP:NPOV, WP:V, WP:CS, WP:BLP, WP:NOR, etc. I have some experience in article deletions, and correctly tag articles for CSD a few times. I am very active, and I can respond to a message quickly. I plan to work on articles eligible for the quick fall criteria, such as copyright violation, spam, vandalism, attack page, and existing already. The person who loves reading (talk) 04:18, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning towards no, but will have to think about it. Talk page is full of "sorry I made a mistake" self-trouts, and while technically the account has been registered for more than 90 days, the first edit was only 78 days ago. Primefac (talk) 08:35, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done per my previous (minus the tenure issue). Primefac (talk) 14:47, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:RoboCric[edit]

I have around 1500 edits to the mainspace and created 50+ articles. I think I am competent enough and have good understanding of inclusion and exclusion criteria for articles to get the AFC rights. I want to reduce the backlog of AFC submission, especially which are sports-related. Thanks RoboCric (talk) 17:26, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 08:35, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac Hi, thanks for it. Can you tell me when or after how many days I can seek for the full permission. RoboCric (talk) 08:47, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I know this is a snarky response, but... did you read what I wrote? Primefac (talk) 08:50, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, I meant, did I need to reapply for the full rights after a definite period of time. And I understood your previous message. My editing record in AFC will be observed and evaluated in 3 or 6 months. Thank you. RoboCric (talk) 08:57, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You do not need to re-apply unless you have been removed for some reason. Primefac (talk) 09:23, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Marshelec[edit]

I am an active editor, having created around 60 new articles, and undertaken GA reviews on 6 articles (promoting 4 of these to GA). I have made over 9,000 edits in the past 11 years, with 3,400 in the last 12 months. I now want to offer assistance with review of articles for creation. I have read WP:AFCR, and understand the review process. I understand the notability guidelines, and I have also read other key policies and guidelines. Marshelec (talk) 20:50, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 08:35, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Seany91[edit]

Would like to contribute to getting more notable women's sports pages through. Besides ongoing editing, I'm an active participant in discussions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Women's football task force/Article alerts. Seany91 (talk) 13:59, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 08:35, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Superboilles[edit]

Following this discussion here - I am mostly reviewing Switzerland-related entries as listed here Superboilles (talk) 07:21, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum criteria. Primefac (talk) 08:35, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Owen250708[edit]

Would like to help out with the AfC backlog. Most of my experience is with WP:RCP but I've also had experience with AfD and reviewing GA nominations, and I believe I have a good understanding of Wikipedia's policies. Owen250708 (talk) 22:56, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done Sorry, but I'm not seeing enough experience with either deletion processes or content creation to be comfortable granting this right at this time. Reviews like this are not in keeping with the expected standard for GA reviews. Spicy (talk) 09:15, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Licks-rocks[edit]

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights: Not entirely sure if I meet the criteria already, as I don't feel like I've been editing all that long, but I would like to be able to occasionally help out with articles within my native geology space, where I've noticed a few Articles For Creation just sitting around for months with nothing much happening to them. Cheers!--Licks-rocks (talk) 14:28, 25 April 2023 (UTC) --Licks-rocks (talk) 14:28, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done unfortunately you don't meet the criterion of having 500 undeleted mainspace edits - feel free to re-apply in the future. Spicy (talk) 09:18, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Ah! I remembered there being something that stopped me from applying last time I came here. Guess we found it. thanks anyway, and have a nice day! --Licks-rocks (talk) 10:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Styyx[edit]

Don't know if this is the right place, but I'm requesting to be removed from the list. Thanks. ~StyyxTalk? 20:05, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Swaggalicious[edit]

I was looking into one of the wikiprojects that I was a part of and noticed some article creations that were submitted furthermore found out that there is a big backlog of submissions going back over 4 months so I thought why not help out and join you guys in slowly and carefully but at the same time help with reviewing some of the articles that I may have better knowledge with. I have reviewed the rules and guidelines about the position and understood them all. So allow me to join in and help create a space with more accurate and factual information on Wikipedia. Swaggalicious (talk) 01:34, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 14:47, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:DIVINE[edit]

I have effectively helped to reduce the backlog in the past as a former active reviewer with extensive knowledge in reviewing Draft pages.[1] Regrettably, because of disagreements with another editor from WP:ANI, my reviewer rights were taken away. I then took a quick break from the platform. Given the current backlog issue, I am eager to resume the reviewing process. I promise to use this tool appropriately because I recognize its significance and worth. If I need another break, I also assure to ask to have my reviewer position removed. DIVINE (talk) 12:25, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done nothing about this ANI discussion convinces me that you should hold AfC rights. I see little evidence that anything has changed since then, and characterizing this incident - in which you were also blocked for personal attacks - as merely "disagreements with another editor" is, in my view, dishonest. Spicy (talk) 13:16, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Completely understandable. Everyone holds their own unique perspective and opinions. I simply offered to assist with the matter, but it's not a significant concern for me. DIVINE (talk) 18:25, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Aplucas0703[edit]

I look through many of the Articles for Creation pages and occasionally make edits to them. I have written my own articles from scratch. I have an understanding of the criteria for article approval and deletion. Generally, I just want to help with the backlog for articles that are an obvious fail or pass. My account is in good standing, and I also possess the pending changes reviewer right. While I generally do abandon my own drafts, and I did have an embarrassing slip-up recently where I submitted for review an article that already existed, it should be noted that I have created multiple pages that have made it through, and I have rarely ever submitted a draft for review that was rejected. I don't participate much in AfD, but I do understand its rules. aaronneallucas (talk) 02:57, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 14:47, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May[edit]

Inactive (May)[edit]

User:Bingobro[edit]

Had this in the past, I've been largely inactive lately (thanks to off wiki work, which I'm done with now). I look forward to reduce the backlog and also finally complete my NPPS training and asignments. I did read through WP:AFCR again to get back upto speed. Courtsey ping to my NPPS instructor User:Barkeep49. Happy to answer questions and to be on probation. Bingobro (Chat) 08:44, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 14:34, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Barkeep49 but I believe there has been a typo, on checking the list of participants it says "Bingbro". Just a small mistake we all make every now and then. Gooday! Bingobro (Chat) 06:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's very kind of you because "why didn't you check the edit either before or after you did it for a typo?" (maybe with a "you blithering idiot" if one wanted to just put facts on the table) would have been a reasonable reaction. Now fixed. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 16:19, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Obaid Raza[edit]

I have been able to devote very little time to the wiki for a few months, now I am ready to start my work again.Obaid Raza (talk) 13:26, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 08:20, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Josve05a[edit]

Hi all! I wish to get back to reviewing AfC submissions again. Been awhile, but now seems as good of time as any! Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:58, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 09:21, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Drat8sub[edit]

I was a AfC partiiants earlier, but since 2020 I was inactive in Wikipedia for which I am listed in the inactive member of the project. I will like to resume with the AFC reviewer privileges to help with the backlogs and expand my knowledge of editing, I hope I get reinstate as a reviewer. Thank you. Drat8sub (talk) 15:21, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 09:21, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Skarmory[edit]

I had my rights revoked due to inactivity; I've seen that NPPs will get auto-approved soon, but I'm not sure when that'll be, and I'd like to help out now as opposed to waiting for NPPs to be patched into the script. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 17:50, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 08:06, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:LittlePuppers[edit]

I've been active on and off for quite a while; I currently appear to be heading back toward more of an 'on' period than an 'off' period, so I should be able to review some drafts in the coming days/weeks/months. LittlePuppers (talk) 02:29, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 19:44, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:TucsonDavid[edit]

I messed up my request the by mistake due to computer issue. Anyways, I would like to re-request AFC rights as I’ve had this privilege in the past, but it was removed due to inactivity due to issues in real life, I now find myself with more time to contribute to the project. TucsonDavidU.S.A. 05:27, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 19:44, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New (May)[edit]

User:Markmit[edit]

I would like to assist reviewing AfC submissions as there is a large backlog and this is something I believe this is a place I would be able to contribute. Markmit (talk) 22:25, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum criteria. Primefac (talk) 08:11, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Thank for the review - @Primefac. Can you tell me what I need to do to meet the minimum criteria? Markmit (talk) 14:15, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Markmit AfC reviewers must have:
  • a Wikipedia account at least 90 days old.
  • a minimum of 500 undeleted edits to articles (this is not the same as total number of edits).
  • thoroughly read and understood the reviewing instructions.
  • a demonstrated understanding of the policies and guidelines mentioned in the reviewing instructions, including the various notability guidelines.
  • reasonable evidence of understanding the deletion policy(experience in areas such as CSD/AfD/PROD or page curation, while not mandatory, are beneficial).
  • a willingness and ability to respond in a timely manner to questions about their reviews.
- 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 10:36, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Thanks. I thought I had met the requirements.
I have been a member for a while and have a reasonable edit history. I believe I would be a better reviewer than author / editor.
I had reviewed (to refresh myself) and been conversant in the main policies: AfC, reviewing instructions, Deletion (AfD, CDS, PROD).
Maybe my mistake was that I did not declare it in the original post. Markmit (talk) 19:30, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:The Night Watch[edit]

I'm involved with New pages patrol, and I think I may be able to help out with reviewing drafts in my spare time. I have some moderate expertise in video game subjects, and my talents would be best suited to helping out there. The Night Watch (talk) 21:44, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 08:20, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:CurryTime7-24[edit]

I've edited drafts in the past to help get them accepted. Read and familiarized myself with the reviewing instructions and would like to help out further, particularly with articles relating to classical music. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 04:24, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 10:06, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:747pilot[edit]

I would like to help out in reviewing new articles on Wikipedia. Having the script will make this easier for me. Thanks! 747pilot (talk) 02:57, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning towards no on account of the AFD record, but will wait until the most recent dozen are closed before making a final decision. Primefac (talk) 09:25, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Carpimaps[edit]

I wish to help on reducing the current backlog. I have a good understanding of notability and contributed to areas such as Teahouse and AfD. My account is 5 months old and have 2000 edits. Carpimaps (talk) 06:45, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 09:39, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Augend[edit]

Looking to help with the backlogs over several months, primarily to deal with those can be CSDed. Augend (drop a line) 16:55, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Need to mull this one over. AFD stats aren't great, nor are page creation stats, and there isn't much else to go on with only 600 mainspace edits. Primefac (talk) 09:39, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now, per the above. A bit more experience (particularly in the XfD/CSD and article improvement areas). Primefac (talk) 20:19, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:DreamRimmer[edit]

I would be happy if I could assist the reviewers in reviewing the drafts. I have read and understood all necessary policies. I've also taken part in some AfD discussions. DreamRimmer (talk) 09:40, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 09:39, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Illusion Flame[edit]

I would like access to the script so I can review drafts appropriately. I have read the reviewing instructions and I have an account more than 90 days old with more that 500 undeleted edits to the mainspace. I have experience with deletion processes, mainly CSD tagging, but also occasional AFD discussion. I am also very familiar with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines, and I am willing to respond timely about my reviews. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 01:31, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 09:39, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Elkman[edit]

Hi. I'm a long-time Wikipedia editor, though I've been less active in recent years. I'm starting to become more active recently, though. I'm interested in historic places, buildings, and structures, and I'm a member of WP:NRHP. Elkman (Elkspeak) 21:16, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 19:44, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:BeanieFan11[edit]

S0091 had suggested I apply for AfC reviewer rights here. I feel I've got a pretty good grasp of notability (especially for sports) - I've written a total of 790 articles, only two of which (I think) have been deleted. According to this, I've participated in 522 AFDs and have an 89.6% match rate. If granted the permission, I would mainly focus on sports/American football. BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:47, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 19:44, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Apmh[edit]

Hello, I would like to request reviewing rights because I have a good amount of time on Wikipedia and read the reviewing instructions. I also am good with speedy deletion of drafts--Please consider my request. Apmh 14:53, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 20:19, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Wracking[edit]

I believe I meet minimum criteria and I have reviewed Wikipedia's various notability guidelines. On Wikipedia, I'm mainly a copy editor but have been getting involved in discussions about improvements more recently. While I'm fairly new to Wikipedia (about 6 months), I believe I understand the AfD process. I was inspired to apply after seeing Draft:Dylan Fabre, which has been improved by several editors (including myself) and I believe is fit for the mainspace. I'd like to help with the backlog, especially related to sports and LGBTQ people. Thanks! Wracking 💬 20:40, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now. This is primarily because, as you say, your main experience is in copyediting. It is good to see some branching out but I do not think it is quite time yet. Primefac (talk) 20:19, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Gothamk[edit]

Hi All, Please check if i could contribute as an afc reviewer. Thank You. Gothamk (talk) 07:10, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Gothamk: The criteria include 500 edits to articles, not 500 edits total. LittlePuppers (talk) 07:17, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done per the above; fails minimum editing criteria. Primefac (talk) 09:33, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June[edit]

Inactive (June)[edit]

User:Ravenswing[edit]

Good afternoon! I've been a AfC reviewer in the past, dropped off through inactivity, and would like to get back into things (especially with such a large backlog of drafts!). Ravenswing 17:51, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ravenswing, as an NPR you are automatically able to use the tool. Primefac (talk) 13:04, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New (June)[edit]

User:AugustusAudax[edit]

Throwing my hat back into the ring, I think I meet the requirements. Hello, I'm AugustusAudax. I'm an extended confirmed editor with a good history. Eventually, I want to be an administrator, and I think this is a good starting pad. I've rewritten a couple of articles, and I'm familiar with most of the major policies, and am familiar with the manual of style. That's why I think I'd be a good AfC participant. Feel free to ask questions.
 Not done, too many declined drafts. Primefac (talk) 20:19, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac: Is it the number of declined drafts or the number of times a draft was declined? And does this prevent me from becoming an AfC participant forever? Sincerely, --AugustusAudax (talk|contribs) P.S: Aliens exist 14:46, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not forever. If you build a good track record of creating good drafts/articles, good AfD comments, and general understanding of notability, you will get accepted. Carpimaps talk to me! 14:39, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Citadeol[edit]

Hi there, I would like to assist in AFC submissions as there are large backlog and love to review the drafts.

- Do not change anything below this line --> Citadeol (talk) 10:55, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, fails minimum criteria. Primefac (talk) 11:37, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Prime Can i know the reson why you declined and what is the minimum criteria ? cause my account is already 90 days old as per date and also i am mostly active in doing new article reviewing. Citadeol (talk) 17:53, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your account is 60 days old. Primefac (talk) 11:46, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Wpscatter[edit]

Hi there! I've been an editor for almost a year and just hit 1000 mainspace edits. I think I have a good understanding of what constitutes notability by now and would love to help the new articles. I've created one article, Celebrity Jeopardy! (2022 TV series), and my one declined AfC submission was an attempt at creating a redirect, not realizing that that wasn't the correct procedure. If accepted I would spend more time reviewing draft submissions. WPscatter t/c 15:31, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 11:37, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Karnataka[edit]

Hi, I'd like to have AfC as I'd love to contribute to the WikiProject. I believe I meet the requirements, and I have a general understanding of CSD, pages and AfD. Tirishan (talk) 23:04, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, my usurpation request was recently completed - this is my new username Karnataka (talk) 18:45, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 11:37, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Twinkle1990[edit]

Hi @Primefac. Hope everything is all clear. I am applying for AfC reviewer right again after last revoke, having well knowledge about WP:GNG and WP:SNG as well as I am now confident enough about WP:COI and WP:PAID. Hope you would grunt unless my edits are having any issue. I just want to decrease the load on pending AfC requests and I will contact you or seniors whenever I feel a doubt. Twinkle1990 (talk) 14:11, 11 June 2023 (UTC) Twinkle1990 (talk) 14:11, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 11:41, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:FuzzyMagma[edit]

I think I can help with reviewing new articles that falls within my area of expertise which mostly relates to biographies about africans, and materials science. I meet all of the essential criteria and have additionally promoted and participated on couple of CSD/AfD/PROD. I've also edited drafts in the past to help get them accepted. FuzzyMagma (talk) 14:15, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. You have been blocked twice in the last six months, and while a clean block log is not a strict requirement for access, it does greatly concern me. AFD stats are not good. Primefac (talk) 11:37, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac blocked once, not twice. Check the log for the 1st one, it was done by mistake FuzzyMagma (talk) 12:01, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Anyway, your points still stand. Will come bach after 6 months. Thanks FuzzyMagma (talk) 12:06, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:TechnoSquirrel69[edit]

Hey there! As my experience with the project has grown, I am eager to start helping with the backlog of AfC submissions, and hopefully helping out some newer editors in the process. I should meet all of the criteria, and I have some experience with all of the processes and policies listed. I have read the AfC reviewing instructions and will follow them in good faith to the best of my ability. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 17:10, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 11:37, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac: Thanks! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 18:24, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tanbiruzzaman[edit]

I want to review submissions by this script. I know how to review submissions and I also review submissions on Bengali Wikipedia. → Tanbiruzzaman 💬 07:38, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum criteria. Primefac (talk) 11:37, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Extorc[edit]

I believe I can contribute here very well. I see a couple of good drafts and also wish to work here in the long term. >>> Extorc.talk 20:38, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:12, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jalapeño[edit]

I would like to help clear the backlog of AfC submissions by thorougly reviewing submissions and efficiently concluding the reviews. Some of the submissions don't really have much quality either, so I would like to find them and clear them from the backlog, so more submissions of higher quality can be reviewed. The backlog isn't that large at the moment, though, but I feel like I could still be a helping hand. 🌶️Jalapeño🌶️ Don't click this link! 10:03, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum criteria. Primefac (talk) 13:04, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Citadeol[edit]

Hi there, I would like to assist in AFC submissions as there are large backlog and love to review drafts. Citadeol (talk) 17:42, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum requirements. Primefac (talk) 13:12, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Primefac:, Its already 3 months showing on my userpage, Can i know the reason why you declined ? Citadeol (talk) 17:21, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your first edit was on 8 April 2023, and 8 April 2023 to today is 412 days. Primefac (talk) 19:15, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:1TWO3Writer[edit]

I am a recent changes reviewer who meets the minimum requirements. I have read through the instructions and will make sure to do so as I review each new article. 1TWO3Writer (talk) 13:43, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:12, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Khinkali[edit]

I've been wondering where my efforts can make the most impact. The review of new articles in the main space is done more or less quickly, but the themes in Drafts freeze for 3-4 months. I am quite an experienced editor (I've been an administrator on Russian Wikipedia for almost three years and handle the local Incubator-Draft space, among other things). Due to my editing expertise, familiarity with notability, and secondary sources, I might significantly reduce the AfC backlog on several topics. My areas of interest are politics and society, startups, and the post-Soviet space. Khinkali (talk) 16:22, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 08:33, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Al83tito[edit]

I have been editing Wikipedia for over ten years, I have published multiple articles, and have made thousands of edits. Disclosure: I submitted one draft article for review, but of course I will focus on reviewing other article drafted by others. I just would like to help contribute ameliorate the backlog of draft articles submitted and waiting to be reviewed. Thank you. Al83tito (talk) 21:10, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 08:33, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Maliner[edit]

Interested in reducing AFC backlog. Thus requesting script. My CSD log. Maliner (talk) 05:21, 28 June 2023 (UTC) Maliner (talk) 05:21, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 08:33, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Grahaml35[edit]

Hello! I've been steadily active on Wiki for a while now and always looking to help the community. I believe a great way would be to reduce the AFC backlog. Thanks Grahaml35 (talk) 17:57, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, too many concerns about referencing indicated on your talk page, and your AFD stats leave much to be desired. Primefac (talk) 08:33, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Concerns about referencing? Other than the Dan Dernulc article (which I did not create) there no instances of poor referencing on my talk page. Are you referring to Disambiguation links which of course are accidental and quickly changed. Also can you be less cryptic about AFD stats? Not sure what you are referring to here. Grahaml35 (talk) 12:20, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July[edit]

NPR[edit]

User:SunDawn[edit]

I want to assist in AFC, as I heard that it has a huge backlog that needs to be unjammed. I have been active in WP:NPP and vandalism hunting for the past 2 years. I am blocked once because of my foolishness in WP:3RR, it won't happen again. Thank you for considering my request, have a good day to y'all. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:49, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
NPR have automatic access. Primefac (talk) 14:08, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cukie Gherkin[edit]

I am familiar with the relevant policies and guidelines that govern new articles and notability, and would like to assist in the process of helping judge articles and, ideally, helping prospective editors understand areas where their proposed article may be lacking. I used to contribute as User:Abryn, and frequently review good articles. Cukie Gherkin (talk) 15:28, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
NPR have automatic access. Primefac (talk) 19:24, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Returning (July)[edit]

User:Mdaniels5757[edit]

Hi! I'm hoping to help clear the backlog. I'll admit my experience in AFD is a little dated (mostly 2019-2020), when I was more active here on enwiki, but I think I still know my way around notability, the MOS, and other relevant guidelines and policies. Best, — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:45, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 23:40, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sammi Brie[edit]

Inactive reviewer — I did just leave a comment on a draft days ago but that obviously didn't satisfy the 6-month rule. Politely asking for reinstatement. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 01:49, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 08:41, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Noahfgodard[edit]

I was an active reviewer for a couple years before entering semi-retirement. I requested to be moved back to the Active list a few months ago, but suddenly got busy with school and didn't return to reviewing as soon as I had planned to. Didn't expect to be moved back to the inactive list so quickly (it's been <3 months since the request, and I have been active on WP), but I'd love to actually start reviewing again, so I'd appreciate being returned to Active. Thanks! Noahfgodard (talk) 02:01, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 09:02, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dusti[edit]

I was an active reviewer but fell off due to inactivity and a much needed WikiBreak. I've brought coffee and donuts back if you'd like some? Dusti*Let's talk!* 19:12, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 19:24, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Is that a no to donuts? More for me :) Dusti*Let's talk!* 22:36, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I will always take free doughnuts :-) Primefac (talk) 07:28, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Isochrone[edit]

I took a bit of a hiatus but I've got back into Wikipedia recently am am looking to hopefully help clear the backlog. Many thanks – Isochrone (T) 18:22, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 08:00, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New (July)[edit]

User:Cl3phact0[edit]

I recently came across a request from an editor on WiR concerning an article (BLP that looks like it may now be a good candidate for publication) and thought to myself: hmmm, I wonder how one joins the AfC review group? And so, voilà, here I am. I believe that I have probably (just) enough experience under my belt to make myself useful. Hope you'll agree. I'd like to give it a try. Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 06:42, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 08:33, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 08:53, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Fade258[edit]

Hello Administrator. Hope you are doing well. Willing to reduce AFC backlog and I previously granted this rights but somehow access was revoked. So, once again requesting here. This is my CSD log before getting blocked. In General, My blocked was lifted upon my request. Before I got blocked as a sockpuppet on 2 June 2022, till that date I haven't made any disruptive edits on Wikipedia but somehow I made a silly mistake by creating those accounts for vandalic edits where My intention was not to vandal the wikipedia and In my period of AFC access, I haven't misused my AFC rights. So, I think that I should re-added to the project. Thank you! Fade258 (talk) 16:03, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 08:33, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tutwakhamoe[edit]

I wish to help reducing the number of awaiting drafts in the AfC backlog. I have been creating new articles since last September. I also have decent experience in nominating articles for deletion and participating in AfDs. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 20:43, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 08:33, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:CGGCA201[edit]

I aim to reduce the backlog within the AfC. Also actively working on creating well-structured articles and actively participating in AfD discussions. CharlieG (talk) 11:56, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now. I think a little more experience would do you good; while you meet the numerical minimums, your AFD statistics indicate that you might not fully understand our notability criteria yet. Primefac (talk) 09:02, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I will come back with more experience in AFD. Charlie (talk) 01:32, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Capsulecap[edit]

I have recently taken to finding and tagging (for speedy deletion and for improvement) draft pages, primarily ones that are blatant advertisements. I have gotten better at discerning notable and non-notable topics using applicable guidelines since the last time I applied a year or two ago. Being able to use the AfC Helper tool would greatly increase my ability to help with draft articles and the AfC process. Capsulecap (talk • contribs) 21:43, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to add that I do not have the CSD log enabled, so the only way you can see my CSD taggings is through checking my edits to user talk pages for CSD warnings. Capsulecap (talk • contribs) 18:21, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 09:02, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Citadeol[edit]

Hi there, I would like to assist in AFC Submissions as there are large backlog and love to review drafts Citadeol (talk) 11:33, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now. I think a little more experience would do you good; while you meet the numerical minimums, your AFD statistics indicate that you might not fully understand our notability criteria yet. Primefac (talk) 09:02, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Festucalex[edit]

I have the experience necessary to participate in AfC work; I'm active on AfD and fully understand the AfD, CSD, and PROD processes, as well as Wikipedia's notability and BLP guidelines. I've recently joined WP:GOCE and am currently participating in this month's drive. I've created several high-quality articles in addition to >250 redirects. I've read and understood the AfC process instructions and wish to help with the backlog. 〜 Festucalex • talk 15:03, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 09:02, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Brachy0008[edit]

I'd like to request to participate in this WikiProject because I am able to put constructive advice on people's drafts better and decline/accept them much quicker. I have more than 1000 undeleted edits and been around for about three years already. I've also participated in AfD discussions and requests articles for improvements. Brachy08 (Talk)(Contribs) 00:40, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done; your AFD stats leave much to be desired, and while you do have a few accepted drafts you also have a large number that were declined or rejected. Primefac (talk) 12:08, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What can I do? Brachy08 (Talk)(Contribs) 05:48, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep editing Wikipedia, learn and grow as an editor, and if you are still interested in helping out in a few months re-apply. Primefac (talk) 06:47, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
My AfD stats have improved so far. Just letting you know. Brachy08 (Talk) 22:36, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheTranarchist[edit]

Hi! I'd like to become an AFC reviewer to help out the Wikipedia community and help address the backlog, it's been on the back of my mind for a while. Also, due to my own experiences on Wikipedia, I want to provide a welcoming environment for new users submitting their first articles - alerting them to issues and the relevant policy in a collegial way. I've created 13 articles published directly to mainspace and written 4 from pre-existing stubs (see here for list); I'm generally regarded as pretty good with RS, NPOV, and notability guidelines. I'm admittedly not especially well-versed with deletions (I've participated in very few, though one AFD I participated in resulted in me writing the article from a poorly-sourced stub), but I've been reviewing the deletion criteria and AFC reviewer guidelines. My topic areas have usually been niche areas, usually in contentious topics, and I'm hoping to help out Wikipedia more generally outside of those. Best, TheTranarchist ⚧ Ⓐ (talk) 00:09, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 12:25, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:WJ94[edit]

I would like to help out with reviewing AfC drafts. I was an admin from 2012–2015 before being procedurally desysopped for inactivity (see userpage for details) and have been consistently editing again since September. I have a solid knowledge of our notability and deletion policies, in particular through my participation at AfD and (to a lesser extent) CSD, where I have a good track record. I am also an experienced content creator, with a number of recent DYKs and numerous GAs and FAs from my earlier time editing. WJ94 (talk) 15:17, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 12:25, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Voorts[edit]

I have a couple of GANs, AWB access, regularly contribute at 3OR, and participate in GOCE drives and blitzes. I would like to expand my repertoire and start reviewing AfCs as well. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:48, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 12:25, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cric editor[edit]

Good morning, I would like to submit my request for taking the role of AfC reviewer. It would be my pleasure to extend my help in reviewing the Wiki pages with respect to its already laid out guidelines. Cric editor (talk) 06:28, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, meets numerical minimums but no demonstration of notability experience (plus a number of declined drafts). Primefac (talk) 17:02, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Monhiroe[edit]

Hello admin. I am the creator of several articles and have adequate experience on the deletion process. I have thoroughly read the guidelines and procedures for doing AFC reviews. I will be happy to assist Monhiroe (talk) 10:35, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. This is primarily due your declined drafts, as otherwise your stats look okay. Primefac (talk) 08:00, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Charsaddian[edit]

Hi. I am interested in becoming AFC Reviewer. The reason behind this request is that I submitted 2 drafts (1 in March-2023 and 1 in April-2023) which are still waiting to be reviewed. Then I found out that the backlog is very long so that's why I am volunteering for this task and willing to help in reducing the backlog. Please review my request and guide me if I am eligible to become AFC Reviewer or not. I have created 5 pages in the mainspace and I am also involved in the AFD discussions. Thanks Charsaddian (talk) 18:20, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum criteria. Primefac (talk) 08:00, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I fail the criteria due to number of edits? Charsaddian (talk) 11:42, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Correct; when that happens I look no further, so you should still make sure you meet the more subjective criteria as well as the objective numerical criteria. Primefac (talk) 13:37, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the update Charsaddian (talk) 15:51, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Can you please recheck if I am eligible now? Charsaddian (talk) 18:59, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 08:55, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Charsaddian (talk) 20:06, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August[edit]

Inactive (Aug)[edit]

User:Dwaipayanc[edit]

Hello! I used to review articles submitted for AfC. However, I was inactive for several months. Please allow me to start reviewing AfC again. Thanks! Dwaipayan (talk) 04:05, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:16, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Utopes[edit]

Returning after a stretch of inactivity due to school/work/third option. Am looking to get back into reviewing now that my availability is a bit more promising! Utopes (talk / cont) 03:20, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 08:51, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New (Aug)[edit]

User:Milkk7[edit]

Hello, I have been on Wikipedia for a while and have made over 3,000 edits, and would like to work through the large backlog. Milkk7 (talk) 11:08, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 08:54, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:ARandomName123[edit]

Hi, I'd like to become a AFC reviewer to deal with the large backlog of articles. I meet the minimum requirements and I've read through the reviewing instructions. I also have some experience in CSD and AFD. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 01:47, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 08:54, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Notcharizard[edit]

I'm applying because I really like the draft system (all my created articles have been done through AfC). I sometimes look through the new pages feed, I feel there's often a lot in AfC that I feel confident in knowing either is innaproriate, appropriate, or would be appropriate with some edits. Cheers for consideration. -- NotCharizard 🗨 09:57, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 14:07, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:OlifanofmrTennant[edit]

As someone who has had articles waiting in the AfC I understand how someone feels when this occurs. When I work on Wikipedia I often want to take a break an explore new content so I turn to the AfC submissions. I hope that since I am looking at them anyways I could help give feedback and get them on the greater Wikipedia mainspace. OLI 11:34, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 14:07, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Superboilles[edit]

I have twice now come across AfCs relating to Switzerland that had been rejected eventhough they met notability criteria, so I suspect there's both too much volume to spend a decent amount of time poking around available sources, as well as a shortage of people knowing enough French/German to check references and evaluate Switzerland-related content. Fair enough, and that's why I'd like to help (I've read the Criteria and I seem to fit the requirements). Superboilles (talk) 20:28, 9 August 2023 (UTC) Superboilles (talk) 20:28, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 14:07, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jeromeenriquez[edit]

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights Jeromeenriquez (talk) 10:44, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Primefac (talk) 12:20, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:ArcAngel[edit]

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights   ArcAngel   (talk) 01:24, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Primefac (talk) 12:20, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
May I ask why? I was a previous participant at AFC and would like to be again, and the scripts would be helpful.   ArcAngel   (talk) 20:19, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You gave no reason for requesting, so I gave no reason for declining. You have been gone for almost a decade and the guidelines have changed much since you were last an AFC reviewer. I will take a look at your request. Primefac (talk) 09:15, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your response. I believe that the best course of action is for me to brush up on the changes, and then I will make another request when I feel that I am ready.   ArcAngel   (talk) 01:51, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:1971asifintisar[edit]

I recently came across a request from an editor on WBD concerning an Backlog (BLP that looks like it may now be a good candidate for publication) and thought to myself: I wonder how one joins the AfC review group? And here I am. I believe that I have probably (just) enough experience under my belt to make myself useful. Hope you'll agree. I'd like to give it a try. Thanks,

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights 1971asifintisar (talk) 14:44, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, fails minimum criteria. Primefac (talk) 11:53, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:HappyWithWhatYouHaveToBeHappyWith[edit]

I'm looking to help clear up the backlog of articles in fields I'm interested in. I'm familiar with the guidelines for notability, and I've been creating many new articles for the last year or so, mostly focusing on translation of foreign articles. HappyWith (talk) 20:00, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:16, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Qcne[edit]

Hi there - I've been helping out at the AfC Help Desk and the Teahouse for a couple of months now, specifically giving advice to new users on their drafts. I'd now like to help tackle the backlog. I have some experience with XfD and PROD, lots of experience with CSD, and most of my edits are either anti-vandalism or cleanup. Qcne (talk) 20:56, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:16, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:2NumForIce[edit]

I am requesting AfC permissions as I am interested to help clear the (huge) backlog for new articles, helping out Wikipedia (though not necessarily adding content, as I am a "backend" editor), and getting myself ready for NPR/Page Curation. I have participated in XfD and pending changes, and understand the reviewing instructions, WP:notability, deletion guidelines, as well as all other core content rules. Thanks in advance! 2NumForIce (speak|edits) 23:21, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 08:51, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! 2NumForIce (speak|edits) 15:56, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nagol0929[edit]

I was previously a member and I got removed due to not being readded to New page review. It’s been a while since I’ve been on but I’m ready to come back and start editing again. Nagol0929 (talk) 13:11, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to spot-check some of your past reviews, given the concerns listed at your recent declined request for NPR, but I will try to do this as soon as I find time. Primefac (talk) 08:51, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Understandable and I’ll be sure to slow down if I do get afc privileges back. I’ve also made sure to reread policy and guidelines for afc. Nagol0929 (talk) 13:08, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 06:02, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rkieferbaum[edit]

I'm an experienced user and am comfortable with MOS, notability guidelines and other policies and recommendations needed to curate AfCs. Would love to help out around here. Rkieferbaum (talk) 02:43, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 08:51, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sohom Datta[edit]

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights: I've been helping out users in #wikipedia-en-help and find myself editing a few drafts. It would be great if I could be more involved in this area. I don't really have a lot of AFD participation and/or CSD stats like most of the others on the page, however I do believe I have a good grasp on the general notability guidelines and will try to do my best to ask around if I am unfamiliar with the subject matter or such. (My strengths tend to be general software/technology topics and Indian topics).
Also, unsure if this is relevant, but I helped in on-boarding some new developers for this script (circa 2021) Google Summer of Code 2021 was running as part of the contribution period of T279849 :) Sohom (talk) 15:37, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 08:51, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Suitskvarts[edit]

I participate in AFD, but I'd like to diversify my contributions. I have studied WP:AFCR and WP:AFCH. Suitskvarts (talk) 10:51, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 06:02, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Siliconred[edit]

Have previously been an AfC reviewer -- took some time off wiki and hadn't reviewed in a while, but now I'm back! Looking to get back involved in the project. Cheers. SiliconRed (he/him • talk) 17:17, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 06:02, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September[edit]

NPR (Sept)[edit]

User:Ortizesp[edit]

Hey, I'd love to help the project. I'm a fairly prolific editor, and recently was invited to become a page reviewer, and this side piqued my interest. Ortizesp (talk) 22:39, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Ortizesp, as of quite recently, users with the NPR flag automatically have access to AFC. You should be able to enable the script in preferences and start reviewing! Happy editing :D Justiyaya 15:09, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Noted, much appreciated for the info! Ortizesp (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Spinster300[edit]

Dear AfC, I have recently dipped my toes into improving the quality of and helping research and reformat some drafts submitted at AfC. I am a prolific article creator, having created over 400 short/stub articles (biographies, and particularly biographies of women as I am quite active on Women in Red) over the past 5 years I have been on Wikipedia; several of those article have gone on to sprout and become larger articles. I would like to help with the immense backlog this WikiProject has, especially in the area of biographies on women. Unfortunately, it is true that I have never actively participated in AfD (which was a mandatory requirement to enter this project a few years ago but I see now that it is optional), but I have been a thorough spectator over the years – my reluctance in putting my two cents in has been because I naturally tend to avoid heated edit conflicts/arguments that many AfD discussions tend to become. In all other regards, I look forward to any questions any administrators may have about my editing/article creation approach. Thank you for considering me. Kindest regards, Spinster300 (talk) 12:40, 25 September 2023 (UTC).[reply]
Dear Primefac, I would like you to note that Drmies has kindly added me to Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers; thus, given the updated permission for new page reviewers in May 2023, I am now able to make use of the AfC Helper script. However, I will wait for your as-per-protocol go-ahead here before beginning to review any drafts. Thank you and kind regards, Spinster300 (talk) 13:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC).[reply]
Hello, in the past few days, I have come to review two drafts just to test the waters. I have improved many others yet waiting for review. Kind regards, Spinster300 (talk) 18:26, 29 September 2023 (UTC).[reply]
@Spinster300. Thanks for applying for AFC. Now that you're approved for NPR you are automatically approved for AFC. Feel free to consider your AFC application accepted and review as many drafts as you'd like. Just be careful: your autopatrol means your draft accepts skip NPP review, so you are the only set of eyes unless you unpatrol it. Happy editing. –Novem Linguae (talk) 02:21, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Novem Linguae, thank you for your kind message! I have already put some work in after receiving these rights (feel free to check my AFC log). And thank you for keeping me forewarned; I will be sure to reach out to more experienced editors, or mark the page un-patrolled if I think it needs better combing through. Kind regards, Spinster300 (talk) 10:51, 30 October 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Inactive (Sept)[edit]

User:RetroCraft314[edit]

I used to review AFC articles semi-frequently and find myself with a lot of free time in the near future. It would be nice to be re-added to help out again as I get more active on Wikipedia again. <RetroCraft314 /> 16:44, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 10:25, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:StartOkayStop[edit]

I have been a reviewer in the past but was removed after a stretch of inactivity. I would like to be re-added so I can continue to help with AfC again. StartOkayStop (talk) 19:09, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 10:04, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Akevsharma[edit]

I formerly had permanent AFC rights. I was blocked 6 months ago for block evasion. However, I was in good faith at the time of the block. I was one of the top AFC reviewers and spent most of the time at AFC. I was only blocked because of our policy concerns. Now my block has been uplifted. So please give me access to the AFC script again. Thank you Akevsharma (talk) 03:28, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is correct: the block evasion was very minor (to the point that I felt a block was unnecessary) and there was no whiff of UPE, so unless there are other concerns I'd recommend reïnstating. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:13, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 10:22, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kaizenify[edit]

Re-requesting (had lapsed), as i have been inactive. Hope to come back and help out. Kaizenify (talk) 01:26, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 10:22, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Awkwafaba[edit]

I was an active AFC reviewer, and then got purged. May I be reinstated? awkwafaba (📥) 20:05, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 10:22, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Drewmutt[edit]

Wanted to get back into helping out with AfC, after an awfully long break. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 20:26, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Also, get your butt back on IRC. Primefac (talk) 10:22, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:つがる[edit]

Hello!

I used to review articles on AFC, however due to being busy with school had resulted in me being on the inactive list. I am starting to figure out my schedule a bit better, so now I have time again to review some articles at AFC. Would I be able to help out again? Thank you. つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 15:43, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done a bit ago, clearly forgot to mark this one. Primefac (talk) 09:58, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New (Sept)[edit]

User:Snoteleks[edit]

I wish to review drafts being created for WikiProject Protista. —Snoteleks (Talk) 16:57, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 06:02, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cyberwolf434344[edit]

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights

I have been working on taking promotional drafts out and i think this could benefit me •Cyberwolf• 15:09, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, fails minimum editing requirements. Primefac (talk) 07:58, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Citadeol[edit]

I think i have gain experience in reviewing new pages and fixing issues in the pages till now and would like to assist in AFC review as there are many backlogs.Citadeol(talk) 11:12, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion.

User:Toadspike[edit]

I was a probationary reviewer a while back and would like to be re-approved. I reviewed almost twenty drafts without incident while I was active. Toadspike (talk) 11:58, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done (as probationary). Primefac (talk) 10:22, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Brachy0008[edit]

My AfD stats improved since July, and I feel I am good enough to participate in AfC. Brachy08 (Talk) 04:37, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:22, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
How am I doing so far? Brachy08 (Talk) 04:50, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Seawolf35[edit]

I would like to request AFC script rights because I feel I have the appropriate knowledge of policy and I could definitely help out the article backlog. I think I have a ok enough knowledge of deletion policy. Seawolf35 (talk) 23:28, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:22, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dxneo[edit]

I would like to have access to the AFCH script, I lost the rights to review drafts when I had my permissions removed. dxneo (talk) 08:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Primefac (talk) 10:22, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jalapeño[edit]

I would like to help clear the backlog of pending AfC requests (especially in October) and benefit Wikipedia in this way by helping review pages which have been stuck in the process for months.
And yes, my mainspace edit count is over 500, I checked. 🔥Jalapeño🔥 10:39, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:22, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. 🔥Jalapeño🔥 Stupid stuff I did 12:33, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ldm1954[edit]

Interested in AFC for science articles, it seems that there are less people qualified. So far I have a reasonable number of edits, plus one GA -- Triboelectric effect. My main expertise is in Materials Science/Physics and a few other areas -- see more info on my page. Ldm1954 (talk) 17:08, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:22, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:64andtim[edit]

I would like to request access to the AFCH script to help with the draft backlog, whenever possible. I mostly deal with newly made drafts, so this access might help. Signed, 64andtim (any problems?) 05:59, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:22, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kline[edit]

I am requesting AFC rights to help out clear some articles from the backlog, especially with in sports. I have gotten my fair share of experience in page creation and deletion and believe this would be a nice way to help out Wikipedia some more. Kline • talk to me! • contribs 18:12, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 10:25, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Darling[edit]

I'd like to assist with AFC both to help clear up the backlog and help with assisting newer users on article creation. —darling (talk) 14:52, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:25, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Noneate[edit]

I have been patrolling new pages and have been a participant in AFD,. I have also used CSD and PROD to weed out non notable articles. I would like to extend my contribution to AFC reviewing. Thanks. Noneate (talk) 16:55, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:25, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October[edit]

NPR (Oct)[edit]

User:MicrobiologyMarcus[edit]

I'm a big fan of the AfC process for new users and I have a track record of creating high quality AfCs. I would like to assist in clearing the backlog. Presently, I have one article in the AfC draft submission. MicrobiologyMarcus (talk) 16:31, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Procedural  Not done. MicrobiologyMarcus, you currently hold NPR rights, which allows you to use the AFCH script. Spicy (talk) 20:43, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Inactive (Oct)[edit]

User:Wingwatchers[edit]

Would like to reapply for rights due to my right being removed due to inactivity, and also I want to sign up for the backlog.Wingwatchers (talk) 16:38, 29 October 2023 (UTC) Wingwatchers (talk) 16:38, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 17:06, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Lajmmoore[edit]

I feel out of the habit of helping at AfC a while ago, but would like to get back involved, starting with November backlog Lajmmoore (talk) 21:13, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New (Oct)[edit]

User:Nowa[edit]

Looking forward to helping clear the backlog. I'm autopatrolled with 8000+ edits. Nowa (talk) 01:17, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 10:25, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Phuzion[edit]

Hello, I'd like to get access to the AFCH script. I've been helping out in #wikipedia-en-help connect on and off for over a year, and I've got a pretty solid understanding of the policies of enwiki. Phuzion (talk) 02:33, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 10:25, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Yoblyblob[edit]

Have been a member of Wikipedia for a few years, and in the last two years have made over 500 edits. I believe I now have a strong understanding of what is required for notability and an article to be accepted. I have primarily worked on sports-related articles and would prefer to primarily review sports/football-related articles. The primary reason I want to do this is to speed up the rate at which football articles are reviewed to improve the coverage of the sport. Yoblyblob (talk) 13:34, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Yoblyblob All other considerations apart, I would like to see a greater track record at WP:AFD, since AFC and AFD are two sides of the same pancake. This includes offering opinions (mostly) and nominations (necessarily less) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 09:15, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Two pages deleted, three others draftified, with 0% success at AFD, indicates a lack of knowledge of the notability guidelines. Primefac (talk) 14:12, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Saurabhsaha[edit]

I would like to have my name added to the list of active reviewers. I have been actively involved in counter-vandalism, providing assistance in various venues, resolving disputes, and contributing to AFD, all while addressing copyright violations. Saurabh{Talk} 06:22, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 14:12, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Argenti Aertheri[edit]

Hi! I would like to help with the AfC backlog. I usually stick to copy editing and fixing citation errors, but participated in the August GAN drive and rather enjoyed helping people with their articles. ~ Argenti Aertheri(Chat?) 02:53, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Argenti Aertheri All other considerations apart, I would like to see a greater track record at WP:AFD, since AFC and AFD are two sides of the same pancake. This includes offering opinions (mostly) and nominations (necessarily less) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 09:17, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum numeric criteria. Primefac (talk) 14:12, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cyberwolf434344[edit]

I have been working on taking promotional drafts out and i think this could benefit me

Also yes i have the require ments~~ •Cyberwolf• 17:56, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyberwolf434344 All other considerations apart, I would like to see a greater track record at WP:AFD, since AFC and AFD are two sides of the same pancake. This includes offering opinions (mostly) and nominations (necessarily less) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 09:17, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now. While you do have a solid CSD record for a (relatively) new user, G11s are easy to spot and are in some ways the lowest rung of the "notability" ladder. Your lack of AFD participation, plus a few deleted pages, has me concerned you do not have a solid understanding (yet) of the notability policies in a broader sense. Primefac (talk) 14:12, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:FatCat96[edit]

I would like to become a participant so I can help clear out some of the backlog. I have thoroughly read the instructions and over the past six months I have been on Wikipedia, I have read all the notability guidelines. FatCat96 (talk) 04:48, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 14:12, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Somej[edit]

Hello, have previously been an AFC script user, but dropped off for lack of time ... hoping to contribute to new article reviews again. Thanks! Somej (talk) 07:32, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Somej All other considerations apart, I would like to see a greater track record at WP:AFD, since AFC and AFD are two sides of the same pancake. This includes offering opinions (mostly) and nominations (necessarily less) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 09:19, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done (as a probationary reviewer, per the previous request). Primefac (talk) 14:12, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:GraziePrego[edit]

Interested in helping out with this process- I have >3500 edits and some AfD experience :) GraziePrego (talk) 07:50, 8 October 2023 (UTC) GraziePrego (talk) 07:50, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:12, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Great thank you very much- how do I get added to the participant list? GraziePrego (talk) 01:17, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
By making sure I'm actually paying attention when I do requests! Should be sorted now, thanks for the ping. Primefac (talk) 07:53, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:KINGHB190[edit]

Hi, I would like to become an article reviewer on Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation — Preceding unsigned comment added by KINGHB190 (talk • contribs) 12:21, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
All other considerations apart, I would like to see a track record at WP:AFD, since AFC and AFD are two sides of the same pancake. This includes offering opinions (mostly) and nominations (necessarily less) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 12:28, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, so to qualify for the reviewing of articles I need to get involved in discussions about deletion. This is fair enough as it will show my views on what makes an appropriate article. King HB 12:33, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@KINGHB190 I suggest that you don't go a-hunting for articles to nominate, but a solid record of offering relevant opinions that generally match the eventual outcome will hone your skills. New to AfD, you might start with those where others have offered opinions in order to learn. I am not the final arbiter here, just offering my opinion. I'm very happy that you see the need to involve yourself in AfD. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 12:38, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yes, I did not intend to go a-hunting for articles but rather to take a look at nominations in wikiprojects I am part of. King HB 12:42, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:03, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cocobb8[edit]

Hello, I am pleased to put forth my request to become an AfC reviewer. I have some experience in reviewing things, like pending edits, and I have read the guidelines for AfC reviewing. I would love to be able to use my skills to help review drafts created by our amazing newcomer editors. Thank you for the consideration! Cheers, Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 21:03, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Cocobb8 All other considerations apart, I would like to see a track record at WP:AFD, since AFC and AFD are two sides of the same pancake. This includes offering opinions (mostly) and nominations (necessarily less) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 21:09, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good! I will try to get involved there first, and will get back to you! Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 21:11, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Cocobb8 I suggest that you don't go a-hunting for articles to nominate, but a solid record of offering relevant opinions that generally match the eventual outcome will hone your skills. New to AfD, you might start with those where others have offered opinions in order to learn. I am not the final arbiter here, just offering my opinion. I'm very happy that you see the need to involve yourself in AfD. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 21:13, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok! I will go step by step and learn that way ! Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 21:16, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now; you do not have enough evidence of the "soft" criteria (notability, deletion, etc) to join the project at this point in time. Primefac (talk) 10:03, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:QuadriSyedSahab[edit]

I am an Extended confirmed user who is working since this June 14th. I contributed around 3100 edits and created about 95 pages yet. Looking forward for a small recognition by Wikipedia to feel motivated. I hope that i am that eligible to be a AfC reviewer, rest is upon my ideals and old users. Thanks Syed A. Hussain Quadri (talk) 13:14, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done I have numerous concerns about the age of your account, how fast you are moving and that you don't quite understand the purpose of this right. It's not a "recognition" to help you "feel motivated" (see WP:HATCOLLECT). In addition, it's important for AfC reviewers to be able to communicate clearly with new editors and I find some of your talk page comments difficult to understand. For instance, I have no idea what you're trying to express by rest is upon my ideals and old users. Spicy (talk) 20:41, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheInevitables[edit]

Hi there! I've been editing Wikipedia on and off for 3 years, have around 2500 edits, participate consistently in AFDs, created around 15 pages (including one using the AFC process!) and was a former AFC Reviewer under the username "ArsenalGhanaPartey." I would love to get working on the backlog again. TheInevitables (talk) 20:02, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@TheInevitables Forgive me, your user talk page suggest you to be semi-retired from Wikipedia with effect from October 2023?
I find your AfD statistics somewhat confusing, Perhaps your user renaming, assuming that to be what it was, has caused anomalous results? 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 21:15, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, apologies for my mistake. That was a tag that was on my user talk page for around a year that I simply neglected to remove.
My AfD statistics seem to have been altered, yes. They don't seem to be accurate, and I have participated significantly more often in AfD discussions than they seem to suggest. TheInevitables (talk) 22:38, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:44, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:SerAntoniDeMiloni[edit]

I'd quite like to join this wikiproject. I'm auto-patrolled with dozens of created pages and over 2,000 edits. SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 13:22, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@SerAntoniDeMiloni All other considerations apart, I would like to see a track record at WP:AFD, since AFC and AFD are two sides of the same pancake. This includes offering opinions (mostly) and nominations (necessarily less) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:11, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done, concerns about lack of AfD experience and recent draftifications/maintenance taggings. Spicy (talk) 20:23, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Robertus Pius[edit]

Hi! I’ve been on Wikipedia quite awhile and I’ve been looking for something to help out in, and I think I’ve found it. I’ve read the reviewing instructions thoroughly and believe I am capable of reviewing articles for creation! I look forward to hearing back from someone. Kind regards, --✠ Robertus Pius ✠ (Talk • Contribs) 21:51, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Robertus Pius All other considerations apart, I would like to see a track record at WP:AFD, since AFC and AFD are two sides of the same pancake. This includes offering opinions (mostly) and nominations (necessarily less) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:11, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done for now. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, I'm not seeing enough experience with AfD, CSD/PROD or article creation to be confident that you have a strong grasp on the notability criteria. Feel free to re-apply in the future. Spicy (talk) 20:03, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:NotAGenious[edit]

Though I've been involved at CSD, AFD and PROD, reviewing of AFC submissions would probably give me a deeper understanding of more advanced notability criteria, especially on borderline cases. There is a large backlog, but I'll make sure to start with easier reviews. NotAGenious (talk) 08:00, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@NotAGenious:  Done — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 14:30, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kilaseell[edit]

Hello! I'd love to help with the AFC submissions. I have read the instructions and criteria and understood them. Cheers! Kilaseell - Message me! - 23:05, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@KilaseellAll other considerations apart, I would like to see a track record at WP:AFD, since AFC and AFD are two sides of the same pancake. This includes offering opinions (mostly) and nominations (necessarily less) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:12, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:44, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Heavy Grasshopper[edit]

Hi there. I'd like to help at AFC. I have some experience with deletion. Made mistakes here and there, nominated some of my own articles for deletion (after learning ambassadors are not inherently notable), and I think generally it's been positive and the numbers ought to be okayish. I also have some content work including a single GA. Heavy Grasshopper (talk) 11:29, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Heavy Grasshopper:  Done — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 14:37, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Wil540 art[edit]

I would like to help review afc drafts. - Wil540 art (talk) 17:47, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:PaulGamerBoy360[edit]

I want to help approve articles for wikipedia, I have participated in numerus AFD Discussions, I currently have 1,542 live edits(92.8%), Have Created 20 Pages(6 deleted - from my earlier wikipedia contributions), The wikiprojects i am part of can be found here. I currently have a few articles in the AFC waiting for review although that is not the purpose for my requesting. PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 02:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done for now. Based on your low AfD match rate and some recent article creations that were deleted or declined at AfC, I think you could use a bit more experience before applying for this right. Spicy (talk) 19:51, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Is there a tool or something that displays the AFD match rate, if so i would be interested to look at my results. 😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 (talk) 21:09, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Indiacup[edit]

Wanted to get back into helping out with AfC, after an awfully long break. ~ Indiacup 10:01, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: user blocked. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 16:23, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:UndercoverClassicist[edit]

Would like to be able to help out: in particular, have come across Draft:Alessandro Castellani which needs a bit of love, but shouldn't be too far off replacing the current redirect. UndercoverClassicist T·C 09:53, 29 October 2023 (UTC) UndercoverClassicist T·C 09:53, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:SamX[edit]

I'd like to help out with the November backlog drive. I have some experience at AfD and I've interacted extensively with new editors through recent changes patrol and, more recently, CopyPatrol. — SamX [talk · contribs] 17:47, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Fred114[edit]

I would like to help review afc drafts. Fred114 23:56, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
@Fred114: All other considerations apart, I would like to see a track record at WP:AFD, since AFC and AFD are two sides of the same pancake. This includes offering opinions (mostly) and nominations (necessarily less) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 07:48, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Fred114: thanks for your interest in helping out, but unfortunately you don't meet the minimum requirements for this permission at this point.  Not done for now. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 23:40, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Could you identify a couple of things I could focus on to meet the minimum? Fred114 08:26, 3 November 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fred114 (talk • contribs)
You meet neither our numeric minimums (only 436 article edits), nor the subjective minimums (1 AFD, no CSD, declined drafts, deleted pages, etc). Primefac (talk) 13:37, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Reywas92[edit]

I would be interested in participating in the November backlog drive. I have extensive experience at AFD, CS, and Prod. Reywas92Talk 14:15, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Reywas92:  Done — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 23:30, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Novo Tape[edit]

I want to participate in the November 2023 drive so I'm requesting access, at least for a short timeframe. I admit I have limited experience with creating articles and at AfD. However, I feel that my work at the Teahouse, doing recent changes patrol, and on speedy deletion qualifies me for AfC helper. Sincerely, Novo Tape (She/Her)My Talk Page 16:58, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Novo Tape:  Done (probationary) — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 23:26, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Karst[edit]

Gladly help with the backlog especially where is concerns music-related articles. Karst (talk) 17:28, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Karst:  Done — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 23:35, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:KeepItGoingForward[edit]

I believe I meet all the requirements for reviewing articles. I have created numerous articles and learned from my participation in AfD discussions and nominations. I will stick with easier reviews until building more experience. Would it be possible to add me to the list of participants? KeepItGoingForward (talk) 22:59, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:44, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:F.Alexsandr[edit]

I have been editing Wikipedia on and off for around 3 years, but recently have become much more active, creating several artiles. I have noticed several articles in Afc that heavily rely on Russian sources, and I think I can help with clearing that backlog, especially articles about Russian military history. I also would like to take part in November backlog drive. F.Alexsandr (talk) 23:12, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum criteria. Primefac (talk) 10:44, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am confused, can you tell me which criteria? F.Alexsandr (talk) 11:27, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You only have 450 article-space edits. Primefac (talk) 11:54, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, thank you. Where can I see article space edits? I can only see total number of edits in my "User contibutions" tab F.Alexsandr (talk) 12:17, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Use the "xtools" link above. Primefac (talk) 12:19, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:EmeraldRange[edit]

I've been involved in some AfD discussions and made a few of my own articles (mostly about Administrative Divisions of Myanmar) and after helping with some Drafts in WP:MYANMAR recently, want to help clear some of the backlog, especially for Myanmar-related AfC which can often rely on Burmese language sources. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 00:23, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:44, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thank you. KeepItGoingForward (talk) 17:34, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Siagoddess[edit]

I have been on Wikipedia for some time now. I would like to experience reviewing articles on AFC Siagoddess (talk) 18:40, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum criteria. Primefac (talk) 10:44, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November[edit]

NPR (Nov)[edit]

User:Sagotreespirit[edit]

Reapplying for AfC perms after being inactive for a while. I have many months of solid experience reviewing AfC drafts and am also currently active at NPR. — Sagotreespirit (talk) 06:23, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hey @Sagotreespirit, just wanted to let you know that you don't have to go through a separate application process for AfC participation anymore. All new page reviewers are automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing now. – DreamRimmer (talk) 13:14, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New (Nov)[edit]

User:R. S. Shaw[edit]

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights: I think I meet the criteria. I want to investigate a review, and see how the helper works. I'm not sure how many reviews I'll end up doing, but I may do some. R. S. Shaw (talk) 20:05, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
P.S., "Probation" would be fine. -- R. S. Shaw (talk) 20:08, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 15:48, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Micheal Kaluba[edit]

Reasons for requesting afc helper script rights are:
  • I have been contributing to Wikimedia Projects for almost 5 years including but not limited to Wikipedia, Wiki Commons, Wikidata, WikiSource, WikiVoyage etc and for the time I have been involved in Wikimedia activities both national and international, I have not seen a reviewer especially in regions like East And Central Africa and I am applying to contribute to the dissemination of accurate and reliable information to the global audience.
  • I am applying to ensure the regional content is accurately represented and that Local notable topics, culture, history and personalities receive proper recognition on a global platform. Several our fellow Wikimedians' contents from around these regions because people that review some this contents don't have a perspective of this regions topics and editors perspectives.Micheal Kaluba (talk) 07:15, 2 November 2023 (UTC) Micheal Kaluba (talk) 07:15, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
     Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Noting for anyone curious that this is more due to the accepted drafts than anything. Borderline case for me but I am erring on the side of lessons learned. Primefac (talk) 15:48, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:F.Alexsandr[edit]

I have fulfilled the minimum criteria, read and understood the rules, got experience in AfD, and I am ready to contribute to wikipedia review of articles for submission. I would also like to participate in November drive. F.Alexsandr (talk) 22:18, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Lack of AFD experience is somewhat mitigated by the accepted draft count. Primefac (talk) 15:48, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:LEvalyn[edit]

I'm interested in getting involved with AfC, especially for the current backlog drive. I'm experienced with evaluating notability, both at AfD and in creating my own articles. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 23:02, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 15:48, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Styx & Stones[edit]

I wish to take part in the November 2023 Backlog Drive. Styx (talk) 09:10, 4 November 2023 (UTC) Styx (talk) 09:10, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails the minimum criteria (500 mainspace edits).
(Note: this user has since been renamed to Donnchadh4.) LittlePuppers (talk) 23:12, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Lizthegrey[edit]

I have a pending AfC request, and figured that I could help pay things forward with clearing the backlog of other articles by handling some of the easier NN declines & providing feedback, leaving experienced folks more time to deal with things closer to the line. I've been around on and off since 2005, have ECP, occasionally patrol ECP requests, and have participated at AfD before. I am aware that I fall slightly short of the 500 mainspace edits count, so will gracefully accept not being approved yet if it's a hard requirement. lizthegrey (talk) 01:04, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
{{not done}}, fails minimum requirements. Primefac (talk) 09:59, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac I request reconsideration now that I meet numerical requirements. lizthegrey (talk) 20:34, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 15:48, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:S5A-0043[edit]

I believe that I've met the criteria for joining the AFC process. I currently have created 7 articles (4 of which went onto DYK) and I think I'm generally aware of most of the basic guidelines for AFC to help out with reviewing new articles by others. S5A-0043Talk 03:26, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 15:48, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Launchballer[edit]

I've begun starting articles in my userspace as opposed to starting a stub and x5ing it later, and I'd like to publish them and fill out other bits in one. Launchballer 14:10, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, AFCH is not for publishing one's own drafts; AFC is not a requirement and you are welcome to create user sandboxes and move them to article space when they are ready. Primefac (talk) 12:39, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:JacobTheRox[edit]

I have always wanted to work at AfC but thought it was better to become a NPPR instead. It turns out it is the other way round. I have good knowledge of the article creation process. I am a member of the Guild of Copy Editors and the Lead Improvement Team so I know the MOS and lead stuff like the back of my hand. I like working on Articles that need lots of improvement so I think AfC is the perfect place for me! JacobTheRox (talk) 10:55, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum requirements. Primefac (talk) 12:38, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:ToadetteEdit[edit]

Reason for requesting AFC helper script rights: I wanted to help in reviewing articles and creating redirects. I have a good understanding of deletion and reviewing policies (in case of reviewing, instructions) and I understood how a subject would be notable. I tried to use AFCH but it denied access, stating that I have to be in the list of participants, which unfortunately the main page is protected. I am now requesting it to reduce the current backlog in the category. I wish God would bless the administrator(s) who accept/decline my request. Thank you for reading this. From your fellow Wikipedian. Toadette (let's chat together) 07:16, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@ToadetteEdit All other considerations apart, I would like to see a track record at WP:AFD, since AFC and AFD are two sides of the same pancake. This includes offering opinions (mostly) and nominations (necessarily less) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 07:48, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 15:54, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mach61[edit]

I've helped two articles get to mainspace from AFC, (one of which becoming a DYK, and regularly participate in AFD. Please note that it'll take me a bit to learn how to interact with newer users. Mach61 (talk) 14:40, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mach61 AFC is not just technical acceptances and declines. A lot of the work is in seeking to ensure that a new user whose work is declined feels happy to continue. Do you feel you would be comfortable with that? 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 07:45, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Both AFC drafts I improved to mainspace were initially started by someone else Mach61 (talk) 12:21, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mach61 THat's good to hear. Thank you also for your honesty with the comment that created my question. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 14:18, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 15:54, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Aviram7[edit]

I have been an active editor since January 2023, with 5,000+ edits. I have too of experience placing maintenance tags on articles.Thnx ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 08:12, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Primefac (talk) 15:54, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Commemorative1[edit]

I wish to become an AfC reviewer. I've had experience with the queue being long (though in some areas more than others), and since I believe I have a sufficient understanding of Wikipedia policies on deletion, notability, meet the criteria for joining and have read the reviewing instructions, I think I'm ready to. I would love to help out with the project! commemorative (talk) 11:32, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Commemorative1 All other considerations apart, I would like to see a track record at WP:AFD, since AFC and AFD are two sides of the same pancake. This includes offering opinions (mostly) and nominations (necessarily less) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 07:47, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Commemorative1: the minimum requirements include 500 mainspace edits, which you do meet quite yet. LittlePuppers (talk) 16:10, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done per the previous. Primefac (talk) 15:16, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Zippybonzo (alt)[edit]

Alt of Zippybonzo, I don't have my security key all the time and I want to knock a bit off the backlog. My main account has NPR permissions so I should in theory be eligible here :) -- Zippybonzo (alt)| talk to me | he/she/they 08:15, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 11:04, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Crunchydillpickle[edit]

I'd love to help chip away at the AfC backlog! I've been on Wikipedia for two years and I like helping out new editors. Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 07:25, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:54, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:LoomCreek[edit]

AFC review will not be my main focus on Wikipedia, but would like to help out where I can to review articles, particularly in my areas of relative expertise. I meet both the mainspace editing and account age requirements, I've reviewed the criteria and instructions. LoomCreek (talk) 22:41, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@LoomCreek All other considerations apart, I would like to see a track record at WP:AFD, since AFC and AFD are two sides of the same pancake. This includes offering opinions (mostly) and nominations (necessarily less) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 22:49, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:54, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Zoglophie[edit]

I'd like to have this permission to easily review drafts. I think I'm experienced enough to have this permission. zoglophie•talk• 09:31, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:54, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Remsense[edit]

I've been helping out more in the Teahouse and Help Desk lately, I've gone through the process of creating my first full article, I've moved a lot of articles and had some experience with the processes for deleting articles, I feel like I am comfortable enough to start reviewing AfC, and I'm excited to do so! Plus, I decided I needed a bit more time examining these things when I couldn't participate in the last AfC drive, and I don't want to miss the next.Remsense留 18:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done; your AFD statistics indicate that you may not have as good a grasp of our notability policies as would be required to be a reviewer. Primefac (talk) 13:42, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Would I be able to reapply after the AfDs presently pending are resolved? I definitely learned why my first two didn't demonstrate an adequate understanding of notability policy, but they were a bit ago now, and I feel like I've adequately brushed up. Remsense留 16:28, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think you should get more experience in those areas. Primefac (talk) 16:29, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your guidance! Remsense留 16:30, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:DrowssapSMM[edit]

I would like to help with some of the backlog. DrowssapSMM (talk) (contributions) 00:15, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 09:57, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cray04[edit]

  • Cray04 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs (block • csd • prod) · afd) I have been editing for a year and would like to help by reviewing drafts. I have intimate knowledge of WP:GNG SIRS, AfD. Deletion Prod. Requesting probationary period at the least. Cray04 (talk) 07:53, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    (Non-administrator comment) From what I've seen on your talk page, it seems like getting a bit more experience before reviewing drafts could be helpful. – DreamRimmer (talk) 14:36, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Fair, I've just requested again, as I have been diligently reviewing and adhering to guidelines. Believe I have experience necessary to make a positive impact. Cray04 (talk) 07:52, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
     Not done for now; while I appreciate the interest and enthusiasm, from your CSD log you have a lot of declined A7 nominations, which makes me slightly concerned you will be too heavy-handed with the decline option. Your AFD stats aren't terrible but they aren't great either. Primefac (talk) 09:36, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:NoobThreePointOh[edit]

I am interested in helping review articles to see if they are constructive or not. I have worked hard to help revert vandalism on Wikipedia, and if I participate in this, I will be able to check newly submitted pages and try to help improve Wikipedia. I also feel like I have a solid understanding of how the pages work as I have read the criteria and seen what the PROD, XFD, and other buttons do on Twinkle. Reverting vandalism alone is not going to be enough for me, as I do also want to check for any inadequate sources in pages or make sure the pages don't attack editors. Thank you. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 17:25, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 09:57, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December[edit]

Renames (Dec)[edit]

User:Callitropsis[edit]

I'm on the list as SamX, but I was recently renamed. — Callitropsis🌲[formerly SamX · talk · contribs] 17:27, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 12:24, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removals (Dec)[edit]

User:Aviram7 [edit]

Dear @Primefac: Hello, I requested for removal of my name from Active Afc Reviewers list because I no interest to work with Afc at this time, Thank you for given opportunity to Review draft submission. Kind regards ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 15:44, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Red X I withdraw my nomination I decided to remove our afc right but I reconsidered to keep our afc right for long time, so, I withdraw our request and Dear@Primefac, sorry for waste you time :(~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 14:56, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, nothing wasted here. Primefac (talk) 12:24, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Zoglophie[edit]

Thankyou for giving me an opportunity to review drafts in Wikipedia. Please remove my AFCH permission for now, currently I want to take my time off from this task, and I may consider applying for this in future once I start to review the drafts regularly again. zoglophie•talk• 11:01, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Primefac (talk) 12:24, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

NPR (Dec)[edit]

User:Dan Leonard[edit]

I've been editing for nearly fifteen years and am very familiar with Wikipedia's content policies. I am fairly familiar with AfD and have contributed to a discussion or two. I've also recently run a draft through AfC (despite being extended-confirmed) to better familiarize myself with its policies and procedures firsthand. I have interacted well with other users, moved and merged pages, and have received no sanctions in my history. My contributions on Commons, while infrequent, also demonstrate a knowledge of copyright policy, which is useful in reviewing drafts for creation which I'm sure can sometimes be heavily plagiarized or copied from outside sources. Dan ● ✉ 22:58, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Inactive (Dec)[edit]

User:Devopam[edit]

Account reinstated. Shall resume editing / reviewing work. Devopam (talk) 04:17, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 09:57, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:JoelleJay[edit]

Reviewer status lapsed JoelleJay (talk) 02:44, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New (Dec)[edit]

User:KingArti[edit]

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights KingArti (talk) 15:27, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, blank request. Primefac (talk) 09:39, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mastashat[edit]

Looking forward to helping clear the backlog. Thanks so much Mastashat (talk) 07:51, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done, little relevant experience and recent concerns about copyright, poor speedy tagging, etc. Spicy (talk) 12:28, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:PD Slessor[edit]

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights PD Slessor (talk) 23:45, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Want to contribute in reducing the backlog. Very confident in my grasp of the rules, and want to apply my knowledge to the AfC backlog. Very familiar with NPOV, notability, WP:RS, MoS and policy /essays

  •  Not done duplicate request Spicy (talk) 12:27, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:PD Slessor[edit]

Feel very confident in judging suitability for Wikipedia. Have created over 25 BLPs, none of which were deleted, and earned Auto-patroled. I'd like to help lower the backlog, and think I can swiftly make determinations with surgical accuracy as to whether something passes or fails wikipedias guidlines and policies. I believe I can use my grip on the policies of Wikipedia to help efficiently drive the backlog down. PD Slessor (talk) 06:58, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done for largely the same reasons as your declined NPR request. You have been participating in AfD for a total of two days and only began participating after applying for NPR perms. The duplicate request above doesn't inspire confidence either. I think you should focus on improving mainspace content rather than acquiring new user rights for the foreseeable future. Spicy (talk) 12:20, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    ok, should I not apply again? @Spicy PD Slessor (talk) 19:49, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    My line of thinking was that, when wanting to help contribute outside of high standard creations and edits, I could help review. I respect your judgement, but I didn't think AfD participation was a requirement, the requirements only mentioned it was preferred. I have experience in page creation, and sometimes, I get writers block or spend a lot of time looking for places to add value. Although if you feel this is the final answer, I will respect it. Not sure why there was a dual request. Apologies. @Spicy PD Slessor (talk) 20:01, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Randompersonediting[edit]

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights: I think I meet the criteria. I want to investigate a review, and see how the helper works. I have been on wikipedia for a while and created many articles. K-Pop contributor (✍️•📚) 04:21, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure how much CSD has to do with an evaluation for AFC but you just tagged a draft for speedy deletion G13 that was just created a week ago. You'll have to be more up-to-date on your knowledge of speedy deletion criteria and when they apply if you are going to be reviewing drafts. You can't make a mistake like this twice, especially for a new editor who had only made 2 edits. This was not only incorrect it was also bitey. Liz Read! Talk! 05:08, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The draft on the topic already exists so while tagging i tagged another tag K-Pop contributor (✍️•📚) 13:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure what this even means. Are you saying that you placed the wrong CSD tag on this draft? Because I can't think of another speedy deletion criteria that would have been appropriate for Draft:Yeji. Liz Read! Talk! 00:17, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 12:24, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Lewcm[edit]

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights: I've been involved in Wikipedia for 4 years, I've proposed and discussed AFDs and submitted AFCs, as well as being quite active in edit requests as of lately, I'd like to help with the AFC backlog in any way I can, thank you :) Lewcm Talk to me! 20:34, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 14:02, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sungodtemple[edit]

I have a lot of AfD experience; I also have experience with CSD and have learned a lot about AfC through the Teahouse and Help Desk (combined 500+ edits). Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 02:26, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:02, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jaireeodell[edit]

I have read and followed notability policies for article editing. I have participated in AfD. I have read the instructions for AfC and would like to begin participating in AfC. -- Jaireeodell (talk) 17:52, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 14:02, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:KingTheD[edit]

I meet the requirements and have published multiple articles. KingTheD (talk) 01:39, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac KingTheD (talk) 16:02, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, lacks required experience and temperament. Primefac (talk) 12:24, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That’s not very kind KingTheD (talk) 18:14, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly, but it was a succinct way for me to say that you do not meet the non-numeric criteria, and seem to argue with anyone who disagrees with you. Primefac (talk) 23:06, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Vestrian24Bio[edit]

I have been contributing to Wikipedia for almost 18 months now; and I am looking forward to contribute to the AfC to make Wikipedia better everyday. 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 04:50, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum criteria. Primefac (talk) 12:24, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Antonio Vinzaretti[edit]

I'll be honest. I registered for creating a few pages about cryptocurrency industry (TO THE MOON!) and some Ukraine-related fame things. I created a few pages, but some of them was removed even if I disagree. I not insulted, I just lose trust in community where my good faith no appreciated and good work at draft rejected without leaving any comment. In parallel I see Bybit, XDC Network and many other articles which obviosly doing bad things such as promotion, pure COI and any violations. Even when I notice editors that they are violate anything - they enter "Undo" and continue. I feel alone. I want to get right to review for example Draft:XDC Network and and similar articles which I met rarely. I not promise be daily active, Wiki is just my new hobby. Open to suggestions. I meet the requirements and have published multiple articles, and I have read the instructions for AfC and would like to begin participating in AfC.

Antonio Vinzaretti (talk) 11:49, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Antonio Vinzaretti,
Just curious, are you only interested in reviewing articles on certain subjects that you are interested in? Or in the general process of reviewing drafts and helping bring down the backlog? Liz Read! Talk! 04:20, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for question. It's a new tool to me. I think I can be useful only regarding politics and economics. Cryptocurrencies industry just my hobby like videogames to someone, but I think I am expert too on it. So at least I want just do the AfC work properly. So I received exp where reviewers even not want properly review anything. I want to show how it should works. I still believe in the community. Antonio Vinzaretti (talk) 18:53, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You seem more deserving of a CIR block. You come here to complain that you want to push your hobbies and so want permission to override the draft system? Your talk page evinces that you don't understand/ don't care about article requirements, so I oppose you being given any user permissions. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:33, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I not insist. Antonio Vinzaretti (talk) 13:03, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It is not about "helping bring down the backlog?", It is about quality. For example, who reviewed Bybit, which violated many guidelines? I even won't approve anything, just declining draft which close to WP:ONEEVENT and WP:MIL and inform authors by comments to extend articles. It is my style and point of view. If Wiki doesn't need me, I don't care. It was fun. Antonio Vinzaretti (talk) 19:41, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, sock. Primefac (talk) 12:00, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Relativity[edit]

I've wanted to help review drafts for quite some time now and clear the backlog. I've read and reviewed the instructions on how to review, and I have a bit of experience in various aspects of editing Wikipedia. Cheers~ ‍ ‍ Relativity ‍ ‍ 22:29, 20 December 2023 (UTC) ‍ ‍ Relativity ‍ ‍ 22:29, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 12:24, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bsoyka[edit]

Hey! I was previously an AFC reviewer and was removed for inactivity, but I'd love to use my experience with Wikipedia's processes to help out again. Thank you so much in advance for your consideration! Bsoyka (talk) 15:27, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done (as probationary) per your previous request. Primefac (talk) 12:24, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Skyshifter[edit]

I'd like to start reviewing AfC articles to reduce its backlog. I am aware of the deletion process and notability criteria, having created 45 articles, none of which were deleted, and with some AfD participation. Skyshiftertalk 00:42, 29 December 2023 (UTC) Skyshiftertalk 00:42, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 08:45, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Matrix[edit]

I would like to review AfC submissions to improve Wikipedia. I am aware of notability criteria (GNG, SNG), as well as detecting copyright violations with earwig and flagging them with G12. I have a solid understanding of deletion policy (XfD, CSD, PROD) and I have worked extensively at reverting vandalism at recent changes. I will also check for inclusion of reliable sources and prevent attack pages. Cheers, — MATRIX! (a good person!)[citation unneeded] 12:04, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done for now. Unless I'm missing something, you seem to have only contributed to two AfDs and I'm not seeing any experience with article creation that would help to demonstrate your understanding of notability. This discussion doesn't fill me with a ton of confidence either. I would encourage you to gain some more experience before reapplying. Spicy (talk) 15:41, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Don't really understand why you're bringing the Bachelor of Technology thing up, but got it. — MATRIX! (a good person!)[citation unneeded] 18:44, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Participants/Old_Requests/2023&oldid=1201733310"