Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Loituma Girl/1

Result: Delist. Geometry guy 21:11, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article fails:

Criteria 1: much of the Commercialization section is about the song, not the animation

Criteria 2: many facts are unsourced

For these reasons, I believe this article should be delisted. --Jedravent (talk) 15:51, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps it should all just be merged into Ievan Polkka?--SeizureDog (talk) 13:20, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's survived a deletion attempt. But it does not seem to be of GA quality. --Jedravent (talk) 00:45, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The AfD was no consensus, so you could still try merging, as long as you leave a redirect. Geometry guy 12:56, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delist. The article's lead is deficient as it doesn't summarize all of the article's main topics. However, I'm more concerned with the lack of citations. Majoreditor (talk) 13:17, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Inadequate lead, background section addressing “Ievan Polkka” and “Bleach anime” is needed for proper readability and article is under-sourced (numerous cite tags). Ɛƚƈơƅƅơƚɑ _talk 23:17, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delist: per all the above. There are far too many citation needed tags, a copyedit is needed, I spotted a few MoS violations, and the focus, coverage and lead are problematic. EyeSerene^TALK 12:00, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delist. I agree with the above, and don't have any further comments. Geometry guy 12:56, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]