User talk:TipsyElephant/2022

Willis Tower Lunchbox Entrance Draft

Hi, remember me, im the one working on that draft of the "Willis Tower Lunchbox Entrance". i have an idea. what if i retitled it, or just made a new draft with new name but same stuff, and its just like the History of Renovations on the Willis Tower, or Willis Tower Renovations. would that be more likely to be approved since thats also what it has kinda become that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChiserYT (talk • contribs) 17:21, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

@ChiserYT: it still seems like it would be a better idea to simply contribute to Willis Tower instead. There's an entire section dedicated to the history of the tower, which currently includes planning, construction, and damages to the building. Perhaps a subsection dedicated to renovations would be a good idea. If you're 100% dedicated to creating a separate page then feel free to rename the article (click on the "move" button located under "more" on the top right of the page) and resubmit the draft and then wait and see if another reviewer will publish it for you. TipsyElephant (talk) 17:33, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

CBC Radio

Hi – I finally got around to removing the duplicate WikiProject Media category on the Talk:CBC Radio page. I removed it very easily and saved it. I don’t know what might have created the duplicate entry. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 22:23, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Free Shakespeare on the Radio has been accepted

Free Shakespeare on the Radio, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 05:43, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tell them I am.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tell them I am.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alba Salix, Royal Physician has been accepted

Alba Salix, Royal Physician, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 13:33, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: What’s Good Games (January 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:What’s Good Games and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:What’s Good Games, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 22:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Bon Appétit Foodcast.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bon Appétit Foodcast.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 01:54, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Archive 81 (podcast) has been accepted

Archive 81 (podcast), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

2pou (talk) 19:31, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adulting (podcast) has been accepted

Adulting (podcast), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 20:30, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Request on 04:32:25, 29 January 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Joel Cosgrove

• Joel Cosgrove (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:American Snippets (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, regarding the references, they were listed in regards to the founder's history, which the links coincide with the founder. Should the page be created for the founder? There has been lots of radio mentions of the podcast, but the radio programs do not have links to their stories. I did find one, but before adding it, I wanted to inquire regarding the current links, since they are only attributed to the founder, and they make sense in the context in which they are placed. Please advise. Thank you.

Joel Cosgrove (talk) 04:32, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

@Joel Cosgrove: I haven't read the sources as thoroughly as you or as recently as you. You would have a better idea of whether the sources actually support the sentences where they are referenced, but my guess is that any statements about the podcast itself are not supported by any of the sources considering the podcast is not mentioned in any of the sources. I would recommend cutting most of the current sources, but I suppose you could leave some to explain the history and inspiration for the show. What you really need is a review of the podcast or "best podcasts of <insert year>" where the show is addressed directly rather than a WP:TRIVIALMENTION or name checking. Radio sources are fine, but they are harder to cite (you might find the audio on the web archive) and harder for reviewers to evaluate. I would definitely trim out the promotional wording so the article has a more WP:NPOV and less WP:PUFFERY. I would also recommend removing a lot of the WP:WIKILINKS. TipsyElephant (talk) 12:47, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: QCODE has been accepted

QCODE, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 22:41, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of religion and spirituality podcasts has been accepted

List of religion and spirituality podcasts, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~Kvng (talk) 21:14, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Australian podcasts has been accepted

List of Australian podcasts, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~Kvng (talk) 21:41, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Preach (podcast) has been accepted

Preach (podcast), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 22:08, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of British podcasts has been accepted

List of British podcasts, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

2pou (talk) 00:19, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi TipsyElephant! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Draft and mainspace duplicates, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alibi (podcast) has been accepted

Alibi (podcast), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BuySomeApples (talk) 21:27, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Join the Party (February 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Join the Party and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Join the Party, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 09:46, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kalila Stormfire's Economical Magick Services (February 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Modussiccandi was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kalila Stormfire's Economical Magick Services and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kalila Stormfire's Economical Magick Services, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Modussiccandi (talk) 19:29, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello, TipsyElephant! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Modussiccandi (talk) 19:29, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew Liptak (February 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andrew Liptak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Andrew Liptak, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 18:21, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: OMGWTFBible has been accepted

OMGWTFBible, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 04:38, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

WP:AFC Helper News

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

• AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
• The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of podcasts about racism has been accepted

List of podcasts about racism, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 05:10, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of video game podcasts has been accepted

List of video game podcasts, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 05:32, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: What's Good Games (February 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:What's Good Games and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:What's Good Games, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 10:27, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of film and television podcasts has been accepted

List of film and television podcasts, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BuySomeApples (talk) 02:37, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Harrowing of Hell (comic book) has been accepted

The Harrowing of Hell (comic book), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 04:01, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Judas (comic book) has been accepted

Judas (comic book), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 04:44, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Cross and the Lynching Tree has been accepted

The Cross and the Lynching Tree, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 03:48, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kings of the Wyld (March 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kings of the Wyld and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kings of the Wyld, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 02:34, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello, TipsyElephant! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! asilvering (talk) 02:34, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kings of the Wyld has been accepted

Kings of the Wyld, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– robertsky (talk) 23:39, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bloody Rose has been accepted

Bloody Rose, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CNMall41 (talk) 20:53, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi TipsyElephant! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Workgroups, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Podcast / actual play drafts

There are a number of podcast / actual play articles in draft space, are any of them worth working on?

• Draft:Join the Party - D&D podcast created by Multitude Productions
• Draft:Mythic Thunderlute - fantasy podcast and musical based on D&D
• Draft:Rivals of Waterdeep (podcast) - actual play podcast
• Draft:The Broadswords (podcast) - actual play, fantasy podcast hosted by an all-women and non-binary cast

BOZ (talk) 01:58, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

@BOZ: personally I think the first three are potentials, but I don't think The Broadswords will ever pass WP:N. Were you asking because you want to work on them or you want me to work on them? Or are you asking so they can be deleted? TipsyElephant (talk) 11:15, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Any or all of the above. ;) I don't know how much work I would put into them, but they are there if you would like to look into them, and of course if no one works on them they will be deleted. BOZ (talk) 13:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

LOL, now I feel silly... I had not looked at the edit histories, and it looks like you wrote all four of them! LOL Well, hopefully they all get published. :) BOZ (talk) 13:44, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

@BOZ: no worries. I was trying to find any D&D podcasts other than The Adventure Zone or Critical Role that might be notable and these were the only four I could find any sources on. I'm not sure if any of them will actually make it to mainspace because even these have pretty borderline coverage, but I thought I'd give it a go and see what happens. I appreciate that you thought to let me know about some articles I might be interested in and I'd also appreciate any contributions you make to the articles.

Maybe you can answer a question for me. Do you know what to do if I've created a draft like Draft:The Broadswords (podcast) that I don't believe will ever pass WP:N? Should I just leave it alone until it gets deleted or maybe use G6/G7 speedy deletion? Or is there a totally different process for requesting the deletion of a draft? TipsyElephant (talk) 17:52, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

If you truly believe it has no future on Wikipedia, I am sure there is a process to request a speedy deletion of your own draft, although if you want to give it more time just in case then you can wait the six months and it will be deleted at that time. BOZ (talk) 17:55, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

A Rivals of Waterdeep article was just published today - I don't know if you want to do a history merge with your draft and then merge in your sources? It might be best to work that out with the creator User:Sariel Xilo. BOZ (talk) 23:00, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Rivals already had an article (created June 2020) - it was a redirect so I updated that page directly. Feel free to merge and improve; I don't have time to build out all 12 seasons of episode tables which might be a good starting point. I want to flag that Rivals is a web series that has a podcast adaptation & not a podcast first. The biggest issue I've had is finding broadcast dates. It looks like it was simultaneously streamed for initial seasons on the D&D YouTube & Twitch channels before it moved over to Rivals of Waterdeep's dedicated channels. That's when you start to get broadcast dates that are all over the place as it was inconsistently ported over to YouTube & podcast channels after the Twitch broadcast. I grabbed the Twitch broadcast links and popped them into Wikipedia's auto-citation to pull the dates (Twitch only lists dates such as "a year ago" or "five months ago" but the citation bot can translate that into something usable). Sariel Xilo (talk) 00:41, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of psychology and self-help podcasts has been accepted

List of psychology and self-help podcasts, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 04:22, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Canadian podcasts has been accepted

List of Canadian podcasts, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 04:23, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rivals of Waterdeep (podcast) has been accepted

Rivals of Waterdeep (podcast), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 04:50, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi TipsyElephant! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Group collaborations, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi TipsyElephant! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Archiving Bot, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi TipsyElephant! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Redirects for URLs, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Voyage to the Stars has been accepted

Voyage to the Stars, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Numberguy6 (talk) 19:28, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Bibliography of minjung theology

Hello, TipsyElephant. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bibliography of minjung theology, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:50, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi TipsyElephant! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, List versus table, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Native American podcasts has been accepted

List of Native American podcasts, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 16:07, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Consider This (podcast) has been accepted

Consider This (podcast), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

2pou (talk) 16:51, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi TipsyElephant! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Subtitles, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Rise and Fall of Mars Hill has been accepted

The Rise and Fall of Mars Hill, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Numberguy6 (talk) 17:04, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of environmental podcasts (March 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Artem.G was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of environmental podcasts and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of environmental podcasts, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Artem.G (talk) 19:36, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello, TipsyElephant! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Artem.G (talk) 19:36, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Luminary

Sure, but you unnecessarily removed a lot of perfectly fine references in the process. We went from everything referenced in that section to just a single reference (for Guy Raz). --77.162.8.57 (talk) 16:21, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

WP:CSC states that "Short, complete lists of every item that is verifiably a member of the group" is an appropriate use of a list and WP:MINREF states that inline citations are only required for direct quotes, statements that are likely to be challenged, or contentious material. I don't believe anything in the table requires a citation, but you could add a references column if you feel it is necessary for the table. I did not feel it was necessary to have two references for each and every non-controversial claim that someone was associated with the network. Personally, I would have declined the draft based on the WP:REFBOMBing. I would recommend re-integrating the sources into the article and using the sources to beef up the prose rather than simply citing them in the table. TipsyElephant (talk) 17:22, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

If you have further suggestions for the article you can always comment on the talk page: Talk:Luminary_(podcast_network). TipsyElephant (talk) 17:25, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of environmental podcasts has been accepted

List of environmental podcasts, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Artem.G (talk) 18:36, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi TipsyElephant! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Duplicate external links, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Treyf (podcast) has been accepted

Treyf (podcast), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Numberguy6 (talk) 00:09, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Indian podcasts has been accepted

List of Indian podcasts, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 02:11, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Flyest Fables has been accepted

Flyest Fables, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 02:16, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shoutin' in the Fire: An American Epistle has been accepted

Shoutin' in the Fire: An American Epistle, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 03:22, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Come Through with Rebecca Carroll has been accepted

Come Through with Rebecca Carroll, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 12:37, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Sin of Certainty has been accepted

The Sin of Certainty, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 17:10, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Floodlines has been accepted

Floodlines, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

>>> Ingenuity.talk(); 17:36, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Once and Future Nerd has been accepted

The Once and Future Nerd, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Toadspike (talk) 19:13, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Realness (podcast) has been accepted

The Realness (podcast), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Toadspike (talk) 20:04, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:All Things Comedy Live Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:All Things Comedy Live Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Only Human (podcast) has been accepted

Only Human (podcast), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Numberguy6 (talk) 19:02, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boomtown (podcast) has been accepted

Boomtown (podcast), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 19:26, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Forest 404 has been accepted

Forest 404, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:01, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Timber Wars has been accepted

Timber Wars, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 00:00, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Quanah Style

Hello, TipsyElephant. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Quanah Style, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:00, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Join the Party (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Join the Party and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Join the Party, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 09:30, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Your help desk question

Did you find the answer to this question? Have you tried WP:VPT (if that's appropriate)?— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:06, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

@Vchimpanzee: I have not found an answer to my question and I cancelled the batch of pages I was hoping to archive because it was taking way too long and I could do them faster one at a time. I could try WP:VPT, thanks for the suggestion. TipsyElephant (talk) 00:38, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bookworm (radio show) has been accepted

Bookworm (radio show), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

AmericanAir88^(talk) 01:59, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi TipsyElephant! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Kickstarter and other fundraising websites, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:All Things Comedy Live Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:All Things Comedy Live Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Black Jack Justice Cover.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Black Jack Justice Cover.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi TipsyElephant! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Internet archive, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Old Gods of Appalachia has been accepted

Old Gods of Appalachia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— The Most Comfortable Chair 17:52, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Folk Singers and the Bureau has been accepted

The Folk Singers and the Bureau, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 19:01, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Sanny Rudravajhala

Hello - I’m new to how the discussions work, so I put this below your comment on three sources. But not sure if you’d then see it - so have added below too. Thanks!

Sorry for the late reply and thanks for the message. I’ll do a range of different types with a couple of articles and links:

Noteworthy - Daily Mirror article on him having a new baby in strange circumstances:

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/weird-news/radio-presenter-learns-wife-labour-26309550

Out of Our League - on BBC Sounds - this is a documentary series permanently available that was national and internationally nominated - which he co-presented and co-produced: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/brand/p08q9nr2 + newspaper article on series:

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/new-bbc-podcast-charts-bury-18918505

And he presents a national programme here - although this is weekly updated during the football season which has now finished and the episodes stay for 30 days each:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/brand/p099jr69

He is quoted here with equal prominence as an a ex-England footballer and sky sports pundit: https://www.footballfancast.com/west-brom-transfer-rumours/west-brom-steve-bruce-scott-twine-championship-latest-news-transfer-rumours-gossip-wba-hawthorns-baggies

And finally I don’t know if this counts but I saw he put a showreel out which is obviously all tv clips and radio do you can see it at least here: https://twitter.com/sannyr1985/status/1528838109366042624?s=21&t=sfbTJhZKUshLLvjRsKMafA Radiogeek2019 (talk) 09:45, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello Radiogeek2019, if you'd like to make sure the person you respond to gets notified when you respond try using Template:Reply to or Template:User link. I'll respond to your message at Draft talk:Sanny Rudravajhala rather than my talk page so others can see the discussion. TipsyElephant (talk) 16:38, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Unlocking Us has been accepted

Unlocking Us, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 22:27, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Terrestrial (podcast) (May 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Femkemilene was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Terrestrial (podcast) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Terrestrial (podcast), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Femke (talk) 20:06, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, TipsyElephant! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Femke (talk) 20:06, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

For anyone looking through my talk page history you can find some of the content from this draft at KUOW-FM where I merged content after the draft was declined. I also made a redirect so Terrestrial (podcast) will take you to the relevant section. TipsyElephant (talk) 02:13, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:All Day Breakfast Show Podcast Cover.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:All Day Breakfast Show Podcast Cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 12:54, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Accident Hash Podcast Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Accident Hash Podcast Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi TipsyElephant! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Multiple infoboxes, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Request on 21:19:30, 12 June 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Wicontrib22

• Wicontrib22 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Ali bin Samikh Al Marri (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you TipsyElephant for your feedback. Please clarify concretely what is needed. I checked the references and footnotes and everything seems correct. Wicontrib22 (talk) 21:19, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello Wicontrib22, I declined your draft for a couple reasons. First of all, you haven't addressed the previous commenter's concerns that the education and career sections are unsourced. In addition, the entire blockade section is unsourced, and the rest of the sections contain lists of claims about the person that are unsourced as well. WP:BLPs generally adhere to the WP:MINREF guidelines more strictly than other articles. Personally, I would simply remove the lists and replace them with prose supported by reliable sources and remove any material that can't be supported by reliable sources. If you want more info on lists you could give WP:LISTDD a quick read. TipsyElephant (talk) 01:22, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello TipsyElephant, Many thanks for your clarification. I will fix this. Wicontrib22 (talk) 21:04, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

David E. Olson Draft

Hi TipsyElephant,

When you have the time, could you please take a look at the updated draft for Draft:David_E._Olson? I tried to address all your original comments for declining the submission.

Thank you in advance for your time. --HHA LTP (talk) 21:52, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

@HHA LTP: I'll take a look at it right now and let you know what I think. TipsyElephant (talk) 12:18, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

@HHA LTP: the draft definitely looks better than it did, but before proceeding you'll need to disclose any conflicts of interest on the talk page. TipsyElephant (talk) 13:01, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for taking a look and providing this feedback. If you have the time, would you mind sharing a few examples of similar Wikipedia articles to reference to help with writing such a section?

--- HHA LTP (talk) 16:24, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

@HHA LTP: I'm not entirely sure what you mean by "writing such a section". I need you to go to Draft talk:David E. Olson and respond to the questions I asked regarding your connection to David E. Olson and the status of your current account so that we can assess how to proceed with your drafts. TipsyElephant (talk) 17:16, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi @TipsyElephant. I tried my best to respond to your various concerns on my talk page at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft_talk:David_E._Olson. Hopefully I didn't miss anything and that it helps to clarify. Thanks, HHA LTP (talk) 02:25, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi TipsyElephant! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Capitalizing qualifiers, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi TipsyElephant! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Barnstar, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi TipsyElephant! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Stacking userboxes, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, TipsyElephant

Thank you for creating American Fiasco.

User:Pyrrho the Skipper, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia by creating an article. Note: The infobox says 11 episodes and the lead says "twelve-part".

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Pyrrho the Skipper}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Pyrrho the Skipper (talk) 16:06, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

No conflict of interest

I have no connection to Crime Writers On other than the fact that I listen to the podcast, follow on social media, and drafted this Wikipedia article. This was the first and only Wikipedia article I ever made because it took a long time, and it was the only one I felt like making. 97.68.62.130 (talk) 18:45, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello Bobbydesmond (or at least I assume this is Bobbydesmond), I'm glad to hear that you don't have a conflict of interest. I was looking over the article and I hope you aren't too discouraged by some of my edits. I review articles at article for creation and personally I would have declined this draft for being promotional and not having a neutral point of view. I think it's very possible that the subject is notable and that's probably why the draft was originally accepted, but it needs some work. I was particularly concerned with the number of sources that you cited which is considered reference bombing or citation overkill. It'd be best if the sources were pared down to only the reliable sources that are independent of the podcast and hosts. It would also be best to remove any sources that don't contain any more than a trivial mention of the podcast. For instance, if it doesn't contain at least a paragraph about the podcast it's probably not worth keeping. Feel free to ping me or leave a message here on my talk page for assistance or ask questions at the teahouse. TipsyElephant (talk) 19:01, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

@Bobbydesmond: it be best if you responded to my question on the talk page Talk:Crime_Writers_On so that when others work on the page they know you don't have a conflict of interest. TipsyElephant (talk) 12:32, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Talk pages

Sorry, I'm new to this and find all these different talk pages very confusing. I click reply on your comments, it doesn't automatically post my replies to the talk page of my draft? Ehmg (talk) 03:27, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello Ehmg, this is the talk page associated with my user page. It looks like you replied to a discussion I was having with another user regarding a different page so I've split this into a new section. If you want the help page discussing talk pages you can read WP:TALKPAGE, but the gist of it is that every page on Wikipedia has a corresponding talk page where editors can discuss how to best improve the article. For instance, Draft:Iman Maghsoudi is the regular Wikipedia page that you're working on and we can discuss how to improve the page on the corresponding talk page: Draft_talk:Iman_Maghsoudi. My user page, User:TipsyElephant, is where you can learn about what conflicts of interest I have, what WikiProjects I'm a member of, editing preferences and abilities such as the languages I speak or the version of English I use, my personal beliefs or background, pages I've worked on, and whatever else I might want to include. Your user page, User:Ehmg, is currently blank and that's okay but feel free to add stuff there if you'd like (just make sure you don't violate guidelines on what User Pages are not). User talk pages are typically for various notifications and discussions specific to the user. For instance, your user page, User talk:Ehmg, includes a notification letting you know that I declined your draft and includes an invitation to ask questions at the teahouse. TipsyElephant (talk) 13:34, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

More Perfect

I have moved it. More Perfect is available for the page move. Jay (talk) 15:34, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Developing Radio Partners Draft + Citations

Hello TipsyElephant, I am new to using Wikipedia, and was trying to create an article for the organization Developing Radio Partners. I saw that you had rejected it for a lack of significant sources, and I am having trouble finding a clear answer on what would be considered a "significant" amount of sources. I know that I should focus on sources that focus primarily on the subject, and as of now, I have included a RadioWorld article and a Reuters article that I would say primarily focus on Developing Radio Partners. I am wondering if there is a specific amount of sources that would be sufficient? Or is there a better place to reach out to ask this question? Thanks. Gedirem (talk) 19:10, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello Gedirem, I declined (rejecting a draft means you don't get the option to resubmit) your draft because I did not believe that it passed the requirements of WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. It does appear that the Radio World source is a decent one, but the Reuters source doesn't say much about the company itself. To clearly demonstrate notability I would expect to see three sources that are reliable and independent with more than a trivial mention of the company. If the source does not have an absolute minimum of 100 words specifically dedicated to the subject, in this case DRP, then it's probably a trivial mention. Wikipedia's notability guidelines for organizations is particularly stringent (see WP:CORPDEPTH) so it'd be best if you could provide four or five decent sources. Personally, I would recommend contributing to Bill_Siemering#Developing_Radio_Partners instead of creating a new page. If you have more questions consider asking them at the teahouse. TipsyElephant (talk) 19:57, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Alan Barnard (draft)

Hi @TipsyElephant. Thank you for your tips.

I made your suggested changes. References are down from 50 to 16. The most significant ones are references 1, 8, and 16, from TOCICO, Forbes list, and Marquis who's who.

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards @Karini.goosen Karini.goosen (talk) 08:32, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Mirko Manzoni (draft)

Hi @TipsyElephant. Thank you for your tips on improving the article, which have now been taking into account. I would appreciate if you can review the text and if there are suggestions for improvements. 197.249.39.91 (talk) 10:09, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi TipsyElephant! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Maintenance templates, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi TipsyElephant! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Unclear publication date, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Podcasting ideas

With the ENNIE Awards concluding last night I realized that they have had a Best Podcast category for a while, and most of those winners (maybe all of them) do not have articles. If there are any that you would feel confident enough to spearhead an article(s) on, here is a list of possible candidates:

2007: Gold winner Have Games, Will Travel, Silver winner Yog Radio

2009: Gold All Games Considered, Silver Order 66 (podcast)

2010: Gold Atomic Array, Silver - All Games Considered

2011: Gold Yog-Sothoth (podcast), Silver Chronicles: Pathfinder Podcast

2012: Gold Role Playing Public Radio, Silver Haste – The Official Obsidian Portal Podcast

2013: Gold TableTop: Dragon Age, Silver - Haste: The Official Obsidian Portal Podcast

2014: Gold Ken and Robin Talk About Stuff, Silver Numenera: The Signal

2015: Gold - Ken and Robin Talk About Stuff, Silver Miskatonic University Podcast

2016: Gold - Ken and Robin Talk About Stuff, Silver Role Playing Public Radio

2017: Gold - Ken and Robin Talk About Stuff, Silver Spellburn

2018: Gold Miskatonic University Podcast, Silver Fear of a Black Dragon

2019: Gold - Ken and Robin Talk About Stuff, Silver Red Moon Roleplaying

2020: Gold Asians Represent!, Silver - Red Moon Roleplaying

2021: Gold - Asians Represent!, Silver The Letters Page – The Sentinel Comics Podcast

2022: Gold Ain't Slayed Nobody, Silver Role to Cast

Anything worth doing, go for it. :) User:Sariel Xilo might be someone good to partner with on this? I didn't see articles for any of these, although it is possible the names are slightly off. BOZ (talk) 13:02, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

@BOZ: unfortunately I don't think any of these have received significant coverage in reliable sources. Was there one in particular that you may have noticed some coverage for? Sariel Xilo were you interested in working on any of these? TipsyElephant (talk) 18:10, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Christopher Hoffman (draft)

Hello TipsyElephant Would you please reconsider this article on cellist Christopher Hoffman ? I understand that the early life segment wasn't supported with cites but I have removed any hyperbole. The subjects notability is established to provide music #4 by the New York Times review.

4. Has received important coverage in a reliable source of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country

6. Is a group which has two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a member of two or more independently notable groups.

7. Has become one of the most important representatives of a notable style or the most important of the local scene of a city; note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards.

Thank you Mistephake (talk) 16:29, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

I've read your recent suggestions to improve the draft. Thank you for your suggestions. However, as you said, if the cites we both agree are enough to est notability and the fault in the article is a few uncited refs, wouldn't it be possible to remove that content and accept the article? I plan to make updates as the subjects career continues to evolve. Mistephake (talk) 15:10, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

@Mistephake: there is a lot of unnecessary and unverifiable content in the draft. Guidelines concerning inline citations and verifiability are more strict for a BLP, and the fact that you're being paid means that greater care should be taken to follow guidelines. I also said that those sources "probably" demonstrate notability and recommended finding more sources. I'll take another look in a while and see what I can do. TipsyElephant (talk) 19:59, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

I will not be paid for this article so I have removed the paid contributions clause. Thank you for your comments. I will resubmit now that the article has been trimmed down. I can verify that All About Jazz is probably the largest reliable contributor to jazz journalism than any other website on earth. In NYC we also have several small monthly publications with independent contributors ie New York Jazz Record that artists rely on to support and promote their work. In the last decade I've noticed that major news publications like the NY Times rarely cover the artform. Reviews are extremely rare and the journals, ie Downbeat, rarely make it out to shows. This ongoing trend of neglect limits any access to references for verification to a very select number of resources. Mostly relying on album reviews. ```` Mistephake (talk) 15:19, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

@Mistephake: you can read Wikipedia:Reliable sources for an explanation of how the Wikipedia community determines whether a source is considered reliable and if you believe that All About Jazz is in fact reliable then you can open a discussion at WP:RSN where other Wikipedia editors will come to a WP:CONSENSUS on whether or not the source is reliable enough to help demonstrate notability. I should note that significant coverage in reliable sources is required to demonstrate notability. That means that trivial mentions in a source (i.e. the subject is only listed with other names or briefly mentioned in a sentence or two) do not contribute to notability. The source doesn't have to be a full length book and the subject of the source doesn't have to be explicitly focused on the subject of the Wikipedia article, but it does need to dedicate at least a paragraph or two to the discussion of the subject of the Wikipedia article. I'm aware that some topics do not get very much coverage in reliable sources, but that is not an excuse for allowing a page to be published on Wikipedia. For instance, Wikipedia is not everything that exists so Hoffman's existence does not confer notability, Wikipedia is not a means of promotion or advertising so making a page for someone you're connected to doesn't look great, and Wikipedia is not a social media website or place for a resume so writing every little detail of Hoffman's career is not appropriate. Perhaps it would be better to write a page about Hoffman's album Discretionary considering you have a couple reviews of the album. TipsyElephant (talk) 17:23, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Great to receive this info! thanks again Mistephake (talk) 17:51, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

I often contribute to Wikipedia pages about podcasts, which until about 2019 did not receive much news coverage. That's about 15 years of podcasts with little to no sources available. Making Wikipedia pages for podcasts during that time extremely difficult or impossible. In fact, I have helped delete dozens of old pages about podcasts. Just because they existed doesn't mean they are notable by Wikipedia standards. TipsyElephant (talk) 17:27, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

@Mistephake: you said you removed the paid editing templates from the page. Your user page says that "This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by Christopher Hoffman for their contributions to Wikipedia." Is this statement not true? You added the statement yourself. TipsyElephant (talk) 18:08, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

I added that template before creating the article foreseeing payment. However at the time i submitted the article i was not paid and i forgot to remove the disclosure. I realize now I should not added the template until payment has been met. Mistephake (talk) 18:31, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

to clarify: at the time i created the article i was expecting payment. In the future i will not add the template unless i am actually paid. In this case many months have passed and i neglected to remove the template. I am always trying to comply with wiki's paid contributions requirements. Mistephake (talk) 18:34, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Entitled Opinions Podcast.png

The file File:Entitled Opinions Podcast.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:DECORATIVE use of non-free cover art in Robert Pogue Harrison#Entitled Opinions which fails WP:NFCC#8. Non-free cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about the works they represent when the cover art is used for primary identification purposes at the top of the article or in the main infobox, but its use in other articles or in other ways is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8 is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular cover art anywhere in the article, and the rationale provided for the file's use is no longer valid since the original target article Entitled Opinions now redirects to the article about the host of the podcast.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:17, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

AfC Barnstar

Hello there, I have seen you around quite a few times at AfC, so I figured I'd look you up. Lo and behold, you've done hundreds of reviews despite registering just three years ago! Have a star.

		The Articles for Creation Barnstar
		For the many reviews you have done. Toadspike (talk) 01:52, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Thank you Toadspike, I really appreciate it! This is the first barnstar I've ever received and it's nice to know someone has noticed the stuff I've been doing on Wikipedia. TipsyElephant (talk) 15:34, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:A VerySpatial Podcast Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:A VerySpatial Podcast Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:44, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Barnstar of Diligence

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For your extraordinary diligence in analyzing notability (even though I may not agree with some of your opinions). Cheers! Thinker78 (talk) 15:33, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Thank you, I really appreciate it! TipsyElephant (talk) 15:41, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nicholas Quah

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nicholas Quah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Quah. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PICKLEDICAE🥒 18:52, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, TipsyElephant. Thank you for creating Bring the War Home. User:VickKiang, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for this article! The refs are good and the topic is notable, with multiple in-depth refs. The article could be expanded and the lede is a bit short, but given the article's length it probably isn't necessary.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|VickKiang}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

VickKiang (talk) 05:52, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of documentary podcasts

Hello, TipsyElephant. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of documentary podcasts, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:As It Occurs To Me Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:As It Occurs To Me Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Feedback on draft

Hello. I saw you’re a member of WikiProject Books, and was hoping you could provide feedback on the latest draft. User:Jc702bxg/sandbox. This is my first article. The book is entitled Wanting: The Power of Mimetic Desire in Everyday Life. Do you think it meets WP: Notability (books)? I have a COI as someone who knows Burgis. Thank you for your help. Jc702bxg (talk) 19:38, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello Jc702bxg, your draft was very good compared to many of the drafts I've reviewed. I've decided to make it clearer that you have a conflict of interest and accept the draft to mainspace. Congratulations on getting your first article published! I hope you continue to contribute to Wikipedia and perhaps work on subjects with which you have no COI. If you need anything let me know or if you have questions feel free to ask at the WP:TEAHOUSE. TipsyElephant (talk) 11:41, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Slowdown

Hello, TipsyElephant. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Slowdown, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:04, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Bundyville

Hello, TipsyElephant,

Thank you for creating Bundyville.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

At two sentences, the lede is too short and doesn't summarise the article adequately. Some of the refs lean on the shorter side, but others are SIGCOV and notability is definitely met, so thanks for the article!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|VickKiang}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

VickKiang (talk) 07:05, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Draft

Hi there! :) Do you have anything to help with Draft:Friends at the Table? BOZ (talk) 17:25, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

@BOZ: it looks like it's unlikely to be notable, but I'll see if I can scrounge up any good sources. TipsyElephant (talk) 18:13, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

That's fair. :) BOZ (talk) 18:20, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

@BOZ: it also may be a few days. I've been pretty busy this week, but I'll definitely give it a look when I get a chance. TipsyElephant (talk) 18:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

@BOZ: I was wrong. I had some time this evening and I think it probably is notable. I worked on it a bit, but it definitely needs more work. I've found quite a few sources, but I'll keep looking. Thanks for letting me know about this draft. TipsyElephant (talk) 00:12, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Awesome, thanks! :) BOZ (talk) 00:32, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Climate Cast

Hello, TipsyElephant. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Climate Cast".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:46, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Buried Truths

Hello, TipsyElephant. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Buried Truths".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 20:27, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Review requested for your warning label

Looks like after 3 weeks there are no takers for doing the edit requests I made in response to your request to improve Talk:Wanting: The Power of Mimetic Desire in Everyday Life in order to get rid of the warning template I believe you placed. You had said you might consider doing it yourself if no one responded in a week or so. I really appreciate the help you’ve provided in doing the initial review and thanks too for giving me the links to the policies. Might you review the requests to improve the article and get rid of the tag? 20:23, 2 November 2022 (UTC) Jc702bxg (talk) 20:23, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

@Jc702bxg: I'll give it a go sometime in the next couple of days. I'll want to read a few policies and guidelines first to make sure I do it properly. TipsyElephant (talk) 20:32, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

@Jc702bxg: I've completed the edit requests to the best of my ability, congratulations on the new page and completed edit requests! TipsyElephant (talk) 13:07, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Quanah Style

Hello, TipsyElephant,

Just a note to tell you that this draft is due to be deleted tomorrow. Firefly Bot only sends out one reminder notice so I just thought I'd let you know because you probably won't receive a notice when it is deleted. Thanks! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:15, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

@Liz: thank you! I honestly forgot about this draft. I was waiting for better sources to be published. Maybe I'll do another search soon. TipsyElephant (talk) 11:05, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Guy Blomberg

The article Guy Blomberg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article does not meet the criteria listed in Wikipedia:Notability (people).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. OrganicMatterDevourer (talk) 13:49, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Alt.Latino Podcast Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alt.Latino Podcast Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Australian Gamer Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Australian Gamer Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Jaackmaate

Hey TipsyElephant,

I saw that you had declined this draft of Jaackmaate for consisting of too many unreliable sources like YouTube, Twitter, Spotify and Metro. After your decline I saw that the draft was submitted once again, which mainly consisted of... well, sources like YouTube, Twitter, Spotify and Metro. So I took the liberty of removing those sources and adding new ones that provide stronger evidence of notability. I found local newspaper sources like Eastern Daily Press and Norwich Evening News, articles from TenEighty Magazine (which I think is decently reliable for internet news), and an extra ITV News source. Not only that, but I found he was listed at #88 on a list of the most influential UK content creators from reliable outlet The Sunday Times. Overall, I think this should be enough for him to pass GNG. If you wish to review the draft again, here's this heads up. Thanks, PantheonRadiance (talk) 23:00, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Newscast.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Newscast.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

BOZ (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. Feel free to take a "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" if you prefer.  :) BOZ (talk) 23:21, 22 December 2022 (UTC)