Talk:The Realness (podcast)

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 4 April 2022 by reviewer Toadspike (talk · contribs).

Podcasting Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Podcasting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of notable podcasts and podcast-related information on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PodcastingWikipedia:WikiProject PodcastingTemplate:WikiProject Podcastingpodcasting articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hip hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

African diaspora Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Hematology-oncology / Society Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Hematology-oncology task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Society and Medicine task force (assessed as Low-importance).

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

AfC Source Analysis[edit]

Hello! I am reviewing this draft for AfC and am unsure about what decision to make. Hence, I will write my comments below.

Source analysis
Source	Independent?	Significant?	Reliable?	Counts to GNG?
Uproxx	Likely not	No	Yes	No; seems like an advertisement.
Stereogum	Likely not	No	Yes	No; seems like an advertisement.
Colorlines	No	No	Yes	No. It is written off of press releases and is essientially an advertisement.
RNZ	Likely	Debatable	Yes	Maybe, but it also seems like an advert.
Gothamist	Interviews don't count as independent sources	Yes	Yes	Maybe.
The Root	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes! This is perfect.
Slate	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes, also a good source.
StNewsPress	Yes	Yes	Maybe	No. This is a duplicate of the Slate article.

As a whole, this article is very close, and may even have met the requirements. I will ask for a second opinion. In the meantime, @TipsyElephant:, if you have another source or two, I would appreciate that to make the decision easier. Toadspike (talk) 19:43, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Toadspike: sorry I didn't realize the StNewsPress article and the Slate article were duplicates, I'll make sure to check my sources more thoroughly next time. How about this Andscape article which appears to be a website published by ESPN Enterprise. There is also this 2019 STE award which would contribute to notability per WP:WEBCRIT. TipsyElephant (talk) 20:02, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yep! That's perfect, I'll accept the draft now. No worries about the mistake. Toadspike (talk) 20:04, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just make sure to add those sources. The award is especially worth mentioning. Toadspike (talk) 20:05, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Toadspike: I found a better URL for the award here and I also found a short PBS video, but I'm unable to listen to it right now. Thank you for accepting the draft! TipsyElephant (talk) 20:07, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Always glad to help whittle down the nasty backlog at AfC, especially when the draft is written by a competent and responsive editor like you. I unfortunately also have other commitments at the moment and will not be able to add the citations, but WP:NORUSH is also a thing, so no worries about that. Toadspike (talk) 20:12, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]