User talk:TheDragonFire300/Archive 11
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – December 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2022).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- Consensus has been found in an RfC to automatically place RfAs on hold after one week.
- The article creation at scale RfC has been closed.
- An RfC on the banners for the December 2022 fundraising campaign has been closed.
Technical news
- A new preference named "Enable limited width mode" has been added to the Vector 2022 skin. The preference is also shown as a toggle on every page if your monitor is 1600 pixels or wider. When disabled it removes the whitespace added by Vector 2022 on the left and right of the page content. Disabling this preference has the same effect as enabling the wide-vector-2022 gadget. (T319449)
Arbitration
- Eligible users are invited to vote on candidates for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 12, 2022 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen here.
- The proposed decision for the 2021-22 review of the discretionary sanctions system is open.
- The arbitration case Reversal and reinstatement of Athaenara's block has been closed.
- The arbitration case Stephen has been opened and the proposed decision is expected 1 December 2022.
- A motion has modified the procedures for contacting an admin facing Level 2 desysop.
Miscellaneous
- Tech tip: A single IPv6 connection usually has access to a "subnet" of 18 quintillion IPs. Add
/64to the end of an IP in Special:Contributions to see all of a subnet's edits, and consider blocking the whole subnet rather than an IP that may change within a minute.
Administrators' newsletter – January 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2022).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Oversighter changes
Guideline and policy news
- Speedy deletion criterion A5 (transwikied articles) has been repealed following an unopposed proposal.
Arbitration
- Following the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Barkeep49, CaptainEek, GeneralNotability, Guerillero, L235, Moneytrees, Primefac, SilkTork.
- The 2021-22 Discretionary Sanctions Review has concluded with many changes to the discretionary sanctions procedure including a change of the name to "contentious topics". The changes are being implemented over the coming month.
- The arbitration case Stephen has been closed.
Miscellaneous
- Voting for the Sound Logo has closed and the winner is expected to be announced February to April 2023.
- Tech tip: You can view information about IP addresses in a centralised location using bullseye which won the Newcomer award in the recent Coolest Tool Awards.
Your closure at ANI
ImLovinIt101 blocked for sockpuppetry and themselves being a sock puppet of Joe Petty.
Hi, I appreciate your closing the thread, but your comment is strange. I blocked Im as a sock of Joe Petty, as I noted at the bottom of the thread. Why did you add "for sockpuppetry and themselves being"? What did you mean? This is not a big deal, but... Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:48, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Bbb23: I'm not quite sure about the details either in retrospect, but this was probably my understanding of the IP block evasion; for some reason, I decided to simplify it to sockpuppetry, perhaps in an ill-advised attempt to chase the nice-looking line
blocked for sockpuppetry and themselves being a sock puppet
. In retrospect, an incorrect one since IP block evasion is quite different, so if you'd like me to strike that line, I will do so when back on desktop, and I'll
Self-trout myself for this temporary absence of closing judgement. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me | Contributions). 04:57, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
- You can amend the closure if you wish, but I hardly think self-trouting is in order. You were trying to capture something that would have been WP:LOUTSOCK had it not been for Joe Petty already being blocked, in which case it was indeed block evasion. The key point, though, is that I made no determination about the IP as it was unnecessary. BTW, I've blocked our friend WackaDoodleDude below as a sock, too.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:44, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
I just learnt about this sockpuppetry case I am a new editor So I am here to make the best of Wikipedia, But their is something that I don't quite understand.
Why would you block the user for sockpuppetry couldn't you have just blocked the user for a maximum time clearly as he said it was an accident I don't think it is fair.
Yours Truly,
User:WackaDoodleDude — Preceding undated comment added 06:09, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not really sure whether you're connected to the case above, but not only would I not have handled the block, I couldn't have handled the block; if you go to Special:UserRights/TheDragonFire300, you'll find I'm missing the administrator permission required to issue blocks. I have noted that I forgot to mention the actual blocking admin as I usually do, but I only realised this after the close was done, and I did not want to amend it after the fact. That said, admins rarely issue temporary blocks for sockpuppetry, especially if intentional (the "accidental" part is IMO a patent lie). Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me | Contributions). 06:39, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
- And it seems the Bloodhound socks have abandoned all sublety and managed to get this talk page in need of a semi. Quite amusing, if I say so myself. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me | Contributions). 00:56, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Question
Hello 👋 I've got a question, You know those Long-term abuse pages on users, I wanted to create a page for a user, Any help?
Thank You 67.140.236.156 (talk) 02:24, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- It's pretty rare to need to create an LTA page. I would need to know who the user is and why they deserve such a page. Please remember that it might not be best to encourage them to disrupt Wikipedia, or encourage others to follow in their lead. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me | Contributions). 04:31, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- The Eaton Township Weis Markets shooting 'injuries' box keeps getting removed by what I suspect may be the same user.
- The user may need to have a Wikipedia: Long-term abuse page themselves, The user also admitted to having several other sockpuppetry accounts.
- The user keeps also using different IPs, Their vandalism has spanned for at least 2 years.
- Yours Truly,
- Goldmine — Preceding unsigned comment added by GoldMine2000 (talk • contribs) 21:55, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Goldmine2000: I am going to assume that you are the same author as the thread above, just with an account; hence I will merge the two threads together. Is this correct? Obligatory reminder to please remember to sign your posts with four tildes. As for the LTA justification, this could potentially make for a viable LTA case page, but I am not really qualified to speak on the matter. Instead, I will refer you to any of these four helpers, who specialise in the LTA board. They will probably know whether your case justifies an LTA casepage, and if so, can guide you into commissioning the page. Thank you for your response, and good luck. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me | Contributions). 03:54, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, the administrator policy now requires that prior written consent be gained from the Arbitration Committee to mark a block as only appealable to the committee.
- Following a community discussion, consensus has been found to impose the extended-confirmed restriction over the topic areas of Armenia and Azerbaijan and Kurds and Kurdistan.
Technical news
- The Vector 2022 skin has become the default for desktop users of the English Wikipedia.
Arbitration
- The arbitration case Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 has been opened and the proposed decision is expected 24 February 2023.
- In December, the contentious topics procedure was adopted which replaces the former discretionary sanctions system. The contentious topics procedure is now in effect following an initial implementation period. There is a detailed summary of the changes and administrator instructions for the new procedure. The arbitration clerk team are taking suggestions, concerns, and unresolved questions about this new system at their noticeboard.
Miscellaneous
- Voting in the 2023 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- Voting in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey will begin on 10 February 2023 and end on 24 February 2023. You can submit, discuss and revise proposals until 6 February 2023.
- Tech tip: Syntax highlighting is available in both the 2011 and 2017 Wikitext editors. It can help make editing paragraphs with many references or complicated templates easier.