User talk:SpaceDude777

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

SpaceDude777, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi SpaceDude777! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Welcome![edit]

Hello, SpaceDude777, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as NGC 777, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! LinkDirectory5000 (talk) 17:27, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (NGC 403) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating NGC 403, SpaceDude777!

Wikipedia editor Meatsgains just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice work on NGC 403! Are you going to expand?

To reply, leave a comment on Meatsgains's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hello, SpaceDude777. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, VY Orionis, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Lithopsian (talk) 21:40, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just to expand. The WP:PROD process is a simple and easy way to ditch an article. It is also very simple and easy to block that process. I suggest reading the relevant policies carefully before doing so, because if it goes to the long tedious deletion process it is going to get deleted anyway. The only hope is to come up with some special thing about the star that would make it meet WP:NASTRO, the guidelines for notability of astronomical objects. I couldn't find anything, certainly there is nothing in the article at the moment. Did they find a planet with actual little green men in orbit? Lithopsian (talk) 21:45, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about VY Orionis[edit]

Hello, SpaceDude777,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether VY Orionis should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VY Orionis .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Lithopsian (talk) 22:06, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about UDF 7[edit]

Hello, SpaceDude777,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether UDF 7 should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UDF 7 .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Lithopsian (talk) 19:21, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Déjà vu?[edit]

Are you Tetra quark? Curious, Isambard Kingdom (talk) 05:24, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. SpaceDude777 (talk) 05:13, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

  1. ^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. ^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

UGC 12158[edit]

@SpaceDude777:

Hi. As a courtesy notice, I just updated your significant contribution with UGC 12158, fixing references and did some cleanup. I did appreciate the comment found on the Milky Way mimic, that helped me elsewhere. Please do feel free to correct any of my own silly mistakes here. Thank you for earlier addition of this page. Arianewiki1 (talk) 16:29, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, SpaceDude777. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, SpaceDude777. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]