User talk:SSHammond

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Michael Pocalyko, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 14:44, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Cover of THE NAVIGATOR by Michael Pocalyko.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Cover of THE NAVIGATOR by Michael Pocalyko.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:05, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Cover of THE NAVIGATOR by Michael Pocalyko.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Cover of THE NAVIGATOR by Michael Pocalyko.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:50, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC The Navigator (Pocalyko novel) was accepted[edit]

The Navigator (Pocalyko novel), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Arthur goes shopping (talk) 11:36, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

question[edit]

I have noticed that you have written articles both for Pocalyko,(a reasonable successful businessman and midlevel naval officer, whose main additional elements of notability are a failed political campaign, and a single novel) and for the novel, (which has received fairly routine reviews and is in only 300 libraries). As both articles appeared to me to be extensively promotional, full of minor information, I've begun (but not finished removing it--non-promotional articles are stronger and more appropriate. (Promotionalism is what the subject would like to say to the public, while encyclopedic writing is what the general public coming across the name might want to know)

While doing this, it occurred to me that combining the two would make a much stronger and more impressive article--at least until another successful novel is published. The question is, which way to go: an article on the book, with a fairly long section about the author, or an article on the person, with a reasonable section about the book. My inclination , as it usually is in such cases, is to merge under the authors name with a redirect for the book, as the author may write other books and so the article can be expanded, while the book article has little expansion potential. I propose to do this; I'm mentioning it here so you will not be surprised. Without doing it, I think on the basis of my many years here working with articles on authors and books that it would be possible that both articles might end up deleted, especially if the promotionalism is restored DGG ( talk ) 02:29, 27 April 2014 (UTC) reply[reply]

Thank you for your interest. I took an interest in Mike since he and I attended Muhlenberg College. I am an amateur historian, so this all came together at one place. I am a neophyte to the Wikiworld, so it is a learning process. The original article combined both of these subjects, but at the suggestion of multiple Wikiadmins I chose to split them. The significance of the book has proven me out on this. Furthermore, political "vandalism" drove the process of creating two subject. I appreciate your suggestions and we will attempt to incorporate them as we go forward and the update entries.

96.244.252.119 (talk) 18:27, 27 April 2014 (UTC)SSHammond[reply]