User talk:Rose Palmer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hi Rose,

Welcome to Wikipedia! Please take a look at the new user tutorial and an overview of the policies and guidelines on Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions so far and if you have any questions, please feel free to leave a message on my talk page

-Blackjack48 23:46, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, I am a part of the Wikipedia Welcoming Committee but I hope to become an administrator someday :) Blackjack48 02:28, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello there! I see you're new to Wikipedia so welcome!

I saw you're comment in the Hubert Schiffer talk page. You're right about the article - it is rather confusing, having a description of the event and then a few contraditions in the subsequent section. I added some more to it, but it's good that you're going to try to improve it. By the way, how did you come across the article? It's a rather obscure topic.

Since you're new, you might want to see this list of things that need to be done, as when I was new I found some interesting articles that needed improving there.

--Grimhelm 19:52, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Three Came Home[edit]

Nope, the article is still a stub. It's a stub article until it gets more detailed information and becomes longer. If you want an idea of a start class article, take a look at an article in Category:Start-Class film articles and at: Category:Film articles by quality. The quality category gives a detailed explanation of what makes an article a certain class. If you have any other questions, feel free to ask. I will get back to you as soon as I can. RobJ1981 02:34, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Charlie Chaplin[edit]

Yes but all of his films were produced in the US, which would make him an American actor, Greta Garbo wasn't a US citizen during her film career but she was still credited as one. Gemini86_618 07:42, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This sounded strange to me, but although Encarta describes him as English the Britannica Concise Online describes him as "British-U.S." The main Britannica article says he was a "British comedian, producer, writer, director, and composer". The case of Greta Garbo is more complicated because, after her retirement from film, she was naturalised. There are even more confusing cases, Albert Einstein for instance was born German, and at various different times in his life was German, stateless, Swiss, Swiss-German, and finally possessed dual Swiss-US nationality [1]. But I think Chaplin held British nationality and no other nationality all his life. Rosejpalmer 06:42, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unwanted Pages[edit]

I'm glad you like it here! I agree with you about the Lee Crompton article, and have put up a tag on the article page requesting deletion. If you find another article that you also think is non-notable, you can add the {{notability}} template to the top of the page; or if you think the article needs to be deleted, add {{db|(reason for deletion)}} .

--Grimhelm 10:31, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. It looks as if somebody decided to hold a vote on it. I've investigated and made some comments that should help people to make their minds up. Rosejpalmer 18:43, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rename[edit]

As requested, I have renamed you as User:Rose Palmer. You should now move your userpages to the new name. Warofdreams talk 16:15, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Rose Palmer 05:43, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Military history WikiProject![edit]

Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—and wherever—you'd like:

  • Starting some new articles? Our article structure guidelines outline some things to include.
  • Interested in working on a more complete article? The military history peer review and collaboration departments would welcome your help!
  • Working on featured-level articles? We have some advice for nominators, and an A-Class review process to help check high-quality articles.
  • Want to help with specific requests for assistance? Our requests page has extensive lists of requested articles, images, maps, and translations.
  • Interested in a particular area of military history? We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, or periods.
  • Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every military history article in Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Kirill Lokshin 11:15, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Battle of Borneo[edit]

Looks to be off to a good start. The main thing to keep in mind is inline citation, as it's much easier to put in when you're first writing the article and have all the books readily available. Thanks! Kirill Lokshin 11:17, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'm working on sources but this will take time, working from a provincial public library. Perhaps I'll pop down to the British Library and register as a researcher; they seem to be giving those once-coveted library cards away to anyone these days. It's good to get a thumbs-up signal this early, so I'm very glad that you took the trouble to check that everything is ship-shape.
I've seen those inline references in some articles, and must say that I find them very intimidating. I wish I could think of a better way of doing it, and one more suited to the kind of synthesis one must perform in writing a history (where the facts are usually easy enough to verify from the standard texts which can be listed at the end of the article, Britannica-style). I can see why the academic essay-style of writing has found favour on an open wiki, but I cannot help thinking that it's a little overkill for this subject matter andthis style of writing. We're not performing original research, so citing primary sources should be unnecessary. Anything that doesn't match the cited secondary sources, of that is contradicted in other sources, can be omitted or qualified (for instance: "the US official naval history reports that USS. Atlantis sailed from Guantanamo Bay on 12 April, 1923, but it is generally accepted by historians that, owing to bad weather, she did not leave port until 13th.")
Well this is all a bit abstract, and no doubt future generations will appreciate our over-researching at this stage in the project. I do worry that the war of the Dutch East Indies and associated British protectorates is, even after five years of this project, not very well covered. Perhaps the bias of the project has been towards the Pacific war and in particular to allied victories. I suppose I'm doing a little to rectify this lacuna in our coverage. Rose Palmer 13:27, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VIII - October 2006[edit]

The October 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:24, 25 October 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Re: Unsolicited notice[edit]

Hello,

By default, the MILHIST newsletter is delivered to every member who put his name in the members list. It was always done this way, albeit it is now done automatically.

If you wish to not receive the newsletter, go to the Outreach page and put your name under No delivery heading if you don't wish to recieve the newsletter on your talk page.

Cheers, Grafikm (AutoGRAF) 16:08, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue IX - November 2006[edit]

The November 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 23:08, 26 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue X - December 2006[edit]

The December 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 23:14, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XI - January 2007[edit]

The January 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 21:24, 23 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

WP:MILHIST Coordinator Elections[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 11!

Delivered by grafikbot 11:24, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military History elections[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by February 25!

Delivered by grafikbot 14:41, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XII - February 2007[edit]

The February 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 16:19, 1 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Aviation Newsletter delivery[edit]

The March 2007 issue of the Aviation WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 17:22, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIII - March 2007[edit]

The March 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 19:52, 30 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

An exciting opportunity to get involved![edit]

As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis contribs 05:08, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:54, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:13, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010[edit]



To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here. BrownBot (talk) 21:37, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 16:38, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:39, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 04:35, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:34, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011[edit]

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:26, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:McCarthyism[edit]

Category:McCarthyism, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Student7 (talk) 13:35, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011[edit]

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:53, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011[edit]

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:01, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Military Historian of the Year[edit]

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.[reply]

Military history coordinator election[edit]

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 09:48, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election[edit]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:16, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election[edit]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:22, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User group for Military Historians[edit]

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive[edit]

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:24, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Video on demand series has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Video on demand series has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --SM7--talk-- 20:23, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rose_Palmer&oldid=1183744086"