User talk:RannXXV
Welcome to the Wikipedia, RannXXV! And thanks for contributing to the Vaccine article.
Here are some perfunctory tips to hasten your acculturation into the Wikipedia experience:
- Take a look at the Wikipedia Tutorial and The five pillars of Wikipedia.
- When you have time, take a look at Manual of Style, and assume good faith, but keep in mind the unique style you brought to the Wiki!
- Always keep the notion of NPOV in mind, be respectful of others' POV, and remember your unique perspective on the meaning of neutrality is invaluable!
- If you need any help, post your question at the Help Desk.
- Explore, be bold in editing, and, above all else, have fun!
And some odds and ends:
Boilerplate text, Brilliant prose, Cite your sources, Civility, Conflict resolution, How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Pages needing attention, Peer review, Policy Library, Utilities, Verifiability, Village pump, Wikiquette
Hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
You can sign your name on any page by typing 4 tildes: ~~~~.
Best of luck, RannXXV, and have fun! Ombudsman 03:56, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
AfD/Alpha Earth[edit]
Again, all I did was draw attention to the edit histories of your friends, which are publicly available for all to see. This is evidence, not assumption. Anyways, I have reverted, but if you revert again, I'll not do aything to avoid an edit war. The admins are smart enough to check. -- Saikiri~ 11:50, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
- You still assume that I have some sort of personal vendetta against you and your site. (But I am quite honored to be called a "defender of the Wiki". Thanks!) Oh well - nice knowing you. -- Saikiri~ 20:47, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
Spurlock and 8BJ[edit]
Hey, thanks for the help so far in the spurlock talk page. Let me ask a huuuuge favor - at this point, we're not getting anywhere with him, and I'd much rather let him sink himself so I can get an RfC of some kind in place and get moving on other things. I know he's been rude and stuff, but can I request, as someone absolutely no better than you are here, to not goad him with any more attacks or anything like that? I feel like if we stoop to his level on this nonsense, we'll get nowhere in getting him dealt with later. Thanks. --badlydrawnjeff 13:58, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
- I know I shouldn't, guess I have a conditioned knee-jerk response to his ilk. Have you checked out his contribution history? He seems to have a very odd definition of what's NPOV and what belongs on Wikipedia in general, not just for Spurlock. -RannXXV 18:44, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
- Yup. It's really absurd, and I'm just waiting for him to piss off someone else so I can get an RfC started. Any help you might be able to give me in those other places he's wrecking would be wonderful. --badlydrawnjeff 19:01, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
How about we don't call people idiots and dumbasses? You've been warned about WP:NPA before. Try not to break the rule again. Gamaliel 09:40, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
- Oh fuck you, you partisan asshole. You never step forward unless it's someone on the opposite side from you doing it. You sit there silently while people defending Moore and bashing everything that's not a Leftist view snark, sneer, and throw around off-topic bullshit and insults, and then as soon as someone who's NOT on your side responds in kind, suddenly it's warnings and quoting NPA and all that crap. You're a pathetic, useless excuse for a moderator, and I spit in your worthless, virtual face. You can ban me if you like, but all it will do is prove the partisanship and hypocrisy of the wikipedia administration staff. Dickhead. -RannXXV 20:27, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
- The rule says "no personal attacks", not "personal attacks are allowed if I think people on the left are meanies on this page". It's pretty clear. I don't see anyone else on that page from either side of the political fence calling someone else an "idiot" or a "dumbass", and if I missed it, please point it out to me so I can have a chat with them as well. If you feel that someone else has broken the rule, report them to me or another administrator, don't escalate matters by attacking them. You've been quite rude on that page for a long time, and you don't get a free pass to call people names because you imagine yourself a political marytr. Think about that during your absence from Wikipedia. Gamaliel 20:38, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, wah boohoo. Say, weren't you already put on probation once for banning someone you were involved in a conflict with yourself? -RannXXV 20:55, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
- Out of curiosity, Gamaliel, did you specify any end-date for this personal grudge banning, or is it until I abase myself before you? 'Cause that isn't gonna happen. -RannXXV 04:19, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- That doesn't particularly interest me. I'm unblocking you early as long as you play nice with others. You will be blocked again should you engage in any personal attacks on me or any other editor. Gamaliel 05:11, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
I just want to know if you would release your contributions to this page into the Public Domain. Please let me know on my talk page. Thanks, Gerard Foley 17:14, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
You are invited to vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rationales to impeach George W. Bush (2nd nomination). All this is is ramblings/blog/rants about Bush. Not encyclopedic, should've been deleted long ago. Happy editing! Morton devonshire 20:25, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Vashar[edit]
An article that you have been involved in editing, Vashar, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vashar. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 20:16, 4 March 2008 (UTC)