This is an archive of past discussions. Please do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, you can do so on the current talk page.
This is an index of all past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. A full list of talk page archives can be found here.
You reverted a change I made, stating neutrality, and accused me of vandalism. Yet the change I made deleted an unreferenced, biased sentence and added a factual statement describing an actual event. You, sir, are the vandal. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.170.7.202 (talk • contribs) 06:02, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Edit: Reading the above comments, it seems you have a history of vandalism. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.170.7.202 (talk • contribs) 06:04, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
I don't understand what's wrong with my Red Ranger picture. Can you please explain to me why it's bad to have it on any page in Wikipedia? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RAMistheMAN (talk • contribs) 07:02, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
All I know to say right now is that you can't remove speedy deletion tags from things. If an admin comes by and decides it should not be speedily deleted, the tag will be removed for you. If you would like to contest the tag, use the {{holdon}} tag as prescribed in the tag's banner. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 07:03, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hey you
WTF? Why do you kill my edits in "God"? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.50.41.158 (talk • contribs) 07:56, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi! I'm Omicronpersei8, not "you". Your edits (if memory serves) added "imaginary being" and "supernatural being" to the article, the first of which is not NPOV, and the second of which is both unnecessary and a probable misnomer. I hope this is an adequate enough explanation -- let me know if you have any more questions, and WP:NPOV, by the way, is a good page to read if you're just starting out at Wikipedia. Thanks! -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 07:58, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Christine Dolce
Hi there. I was joking at first about the fake tits. Turns out I was right. I'm not good enough at HTML to link to the FAQ on her home page.
All you had to do was put in the last edit you made ("Real bust = no" or whatever the template parameter is). Regardless of whether it's true or not, the other edits were unacceptable here, just so you know. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 08:10, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. It would be nice to put a source in, though. If you need help with putting the link in question on the page, let me know. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 11:43, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Howdy
I see you doing Vandal patrol usually when I'm on as well. Just wanted to drop a friendly "Hello". Have a great weekend! Rsm99833 20:07, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
yeh that france thing was funny tho........and true —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.4.174.177 (talk • contribs) 20:51, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
A little help?
151.202.237.10 is going spam-wild. Has been reported. Rsm99833 21:21, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for injecting a humorous quasi-bot revert into the disturbed Wikigaming over on the Wikiality article. However, given that some disturbing user keeps reverting, editing has become more difficult, especially after running into an edit conflicts, like when you joined the disturbing editor's Wikigames.
Not sure how you can possibly make so many edits in so short of a time frame, but i guess i happen to know all too well the consequences of such situations: when you are dealing with mentally short circuited shit disturbers all the time, your counterattacks will tend to mirror the disturbances of their preemptive attacks.
Respectfully yours, Ombudsman 21:04, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Change it back
My addition to the Jack Thompson artical is a key part of it. It shows how many people feel about him and is critical to understanding the enigma that is Jack Thompson. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ifiveyearsold2 (talk • contribs) 02:18, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Babylonian Brotherhood Exposed!!!
I know you are a member. I am exposing you in public. Go back to Draco! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.140.99.70 (talk • contribs) 02:29, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Illuminati are scum!!! In this war you are with us or against us. Which are you?86.140.99.70 02:34, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, come on. The Illuminati aren't that bad. We do all kinds of neat things, like monthly picnics! — AquinasProtocol 02:41, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
question
i had to sign in, but when i did it said i typed my screen name wrong, but i didnt, and now when i made my new acount, it signs in as my old name, what happened? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pomadeguy (talk • contribs) 03:42, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
I was merely putting a better and more accurate picture, and I do not believe it should have been removed. Please revert, I am merely trying to improve this encyclopedia. MasterEagle 03:58, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I was not attacking him
I was merely using swear words, are you too conservative to handle a few "bad words" ? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.189.97.150 (talk • contribs) 04:01, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks again for reverting the vandalism on my user page. That particular one got rather obsessed with me after I warned him. -- Gogo Dodo 04:49, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your support in my not-so-recent RfA, which was successful with a an overwhelmingly flattering and deeply humbling total of 138/2/2 (putting me #10 on the RfA WP:100). I guess infinite monkey theorem has been officially proven. Chimps really can get somewhere on Wikipedia.
With new buttons come great responsibility, and I'll try my best to live up to your expectations. If you need assistance with something, don't hesitate to swing by my talk page or email me (trust me, I do respond :)). The same goes for any complaints or comments in regard to my administrative actions. Remember, I'm here for you.
I've blocked quite a few of your vandals. Thus far I've really been impressed with your judgment. Keep 'em coming, and don't hesitate to remove that no-admin flag from your userpage (seriously). Regards, alphaChimplaudare 05:28, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I removed User talk:WallyFromColumbia from AIV, a review of their contributions does not appear that they are even close to being a "vandlism only account", please correct me if I am wrong, or check to see if you listed the right person. Thank you, — xaosfluxTalk 01:53, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't the person who made the report, actually. I agree with your assessment, though, and I'm not sure that person even deserves a {{test1}}. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 01:54, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, okay, Fine, Sorry. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.34.18.151 (talk • contribs) 04:03, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Barnstar Defender of Kevin Federline
The individual (Federline's wife) was indeed bloated, which was understandable given the circumstances. If you felt the usage was pejorative (it wasn't), you could have just as easily edited the passage to make it more readable. Leaving pregnant in the line twice was redundant, stylistically clumsy, and obviously less descriptive. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.239.36.244 (talk • contribs) 12:54, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
I'm not sure what this message's subject is supposed to imply, but "bloated" is neither NPOV nor stylistically attractive. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 12:55, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Bloated is NPOV, but that's a matter of opinion. You may wish to read Strunk & White if you think the following sentence is stylistically attractive: "After being introduced by his pregnant wife (who was eight-months pregnant at the time) Federline performed his first "official" single titled "Lose Control" as the final act of the 2006 Teen Choice Awards on August 20th." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.239.36.244 (talk • contribs) 13:14, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
I didn't write that sentence, and I'm only watching recent changes for nonsensical, libellous, and non-neutral edits, not serving as a grammar cop. I'm not going to rewrite every bad sentence I see. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 13:19, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
In other words, you edit without regard to grammar, as incorporating proper grammar requires effort. Some readers may find this ironic, in that we're discussing a Kevin Federline article. Could you please cite where the word "bloated" violates the Wikipedia NPOV? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.239.36.244 (talk • contribs) 14:43, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
The usage of "bloated" does not constitute a weasel word, or fall within the Wiki guidelines of Weasel. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.239.36.244 (talk • contribs) 14:57, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
I have a good reason for editing 11th millennium
I am adding the 12th 13th 14th 15th 16th 17th 18th 19th and 20th millennium articles so they are more spread out you should be smarter then reverting something back right away —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.196.67.73 (talk • contribs) 13:04, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
But you shouldn't just blank pages without explanation. I think I may have addressed this on your talk page before you finished typing this up, so see that. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 13:06, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I was impressed to find that the Steve Irwin page is not protected this morning. Looking at the history, it seems that is due mainly to your vigilance. Nicely done. --Doradus 13:58, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I haven't really been policing it for all that long, to be honest – looks like I'll need some help in the form of protection or otherwise sooner or later, as the edits to it are pretty constant, it seems. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 13:59, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
you are such a nerd
When was the last time you saw sunlight? (this is for a scientific study) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.119.232.70 (talk • contribs) 14:04, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Let's not be patronizing.
I wasn't testing a damn thing. Stingrays are assholes, and you know it. That's a fact. You could look it up in an encyclopedia, but it was REMOVED due to what I'm sure is some aquatic agenda backed by the Communists. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.52.142.106 (talk • contribs) 14:11, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
YOU NASTY A Bear is Satanic Creature that is a Godless Killing Machine that steals are Pic-A-nic Baskets and are honey jars.
Hey you fool, I was stating a fucking truth, stephen Colbert does state that 'A Bear is Satanic Creature that is a Godless Killing Machine that steals are Pic-A-nic Baskets and are honey jars.' You can go check his myspace blog if you dont believe me, bitch. (Link deleted)
Copy and paste it into your browser. I HATE YOU>. LOOK WHAT YOU'VE DONE. Your wikiality saddens me. Bitch. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.135.215.92 (talk • contribs) 14:21, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
The last 3 comments
I don't know how you put up with it, I really don't. I mean, 3 comments like that in a row... :) Don't people ever learn? --Alex(talk here) 14:27, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Steve Irwin
Sorry, mate, it's getting a bit hard to revert to the proper version with all of the new edits. Shadow1 14:28, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No problem! Thank you for helping out. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 14:29, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Great work managing Steve Irwin! You seem to have a good handle on it. Jasonid 15:27, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks so much! I really hope it gets protected soon, as I am somewhat keeping up on the reverts but at the price of accidentally reverting good stuff from time to time. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 15:28, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep up the good work the loss of occassional good stuff is a small price to pay, besides when things settle down the missed good stuff will be returned. Gnangarra 15:37, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, don't associate me with those idiots.
Just because I hate goddamn stingrays (like all red-blooded patriots should), doesn't put me on the same level as those morons.
Hey, I was looking at your contribs (I was trying to make a case to get Stingray protected) and I saw that it said you reverted one of my edits on Steve Irwin[1].
Now, I don't know if this is a really big deal or anything, but maybe that could be a bug with the program?
Hi -- the way it works is it gives the name of the editor before the revision I changed it to. I actually did revert you intentionally here, to get rid of some nonsense that another editor put in. Sorry, I know how confusing it is when the edits are so constant as is the case in hot topic main page articles. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 16:30, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Millennia Foundation
Hi - just wondering why you edited (deleted half) of our Foundation page, including the scholarship information.
Sorry, but I'm going to need to be pointed to the article name and/or edit in question. I see no Millennia Foundation or The Millennia Foundation, so I don't know what this is in reference to. Wild guess: it was either an unencyclopedic/advertisement-like addition or a copyright violation from a website. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 01:22, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
5 Sep 06: Odd, today the article is completely missing. Gone. No trace. The Millennia Foundation is a non-profit benevolent organization focused on social justice, resources sustainabilty, and post-foundational education. The short entry has been on Wikipedia since June 06. Are small NPO's not considered encyclopedic? Shouldn't NPO's be included? Who removed it? And why? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.82.9.91 (talk • contribs) 13:41, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, I just found the relevant deletion log: [2]. Sorry, but it looks like it fell under criterion A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion and was deleted. I honestly don't remember editing the page, but my guess is that the addition I reverted may have been too ad-like or may have looked like a copyright violation (i.e. a copy-and-paste job from another website). The page was deleted because at least one administrator agreed with the person who tagged it for deletion in that it did not assert notability and thus appeared to be a "vanity" entry. If you disagree with this assessment, you are welcome to either recreate the article and add statements that strongly and clearly state the subject's reason for being in an encyclopedia, or you may make inquiries at the deletion review project page in order to establish why it was deleted and whether this decision was a just one. Please let me know if you have any more questions. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 14:14, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you
Thanks for the barnstar the other day. See you at AIV. Regards, DVD+ R/W 00:12, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you
Thank you so very much for catching the vandalism of 168.9.42.206.TonyCrew 15:06, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Trollcruft
I didn't mind it being removed. If I ever want a laugh, I'll just visit the history. PrometheusX303 15:13, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks
For the revert. I have blocked the anon user. --Guinnog 17:11, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
And thanks for reverting me as well. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 17:11, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Possible sock-puppetry
If it's not too much problem, could you check out user Dead-kennedys [3] and user RobertW [4]. It appears that he's sock-puppeting himself. Have a good week Rsm99833 04:45, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've got both user/talk pages watchlisted. Looks like a possible WP:RS or even WP:BLP problem. I'll try to keep tabs; you have a good week too. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 07:41, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry to involve you on this one. But can you look over the above-mentioned's edits. He's forcing me into an edit war. I could really use another neutral 3rd party on this one. Rsm99833 01:26, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You tagged this with a db as author request when in fact the request came from an anonymous IP editor, not the owner. If you think this person is using their userpage as a free webhost, please bring it to MfD. - Mgm|(talk) 07:58, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, my mistake. That user account was abandoned for another sock (User:JERALD SANTANA), actually, which was probably the user logging out in order to create a new account, but I just happened to miss that it was an IP for some reason. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 08:01, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks
Thanks for the block on 212.248.233.1. Im new around here and Im gonna try to help out with reverts. I was going to revert the vandalism to the My Chemical Romance article myself, but you beat me to it. Good job.Lamentingvampire09 08:56, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm actually not an admin, so I can't block, but I will help keep nonsense out of that article where I can. Have a good stay, and let me know if you need any help in the future. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 08:57, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Administrator intervention against vandalism
Hi, you removed my request for admin intervention against vandalism for User:203.129.36.199 who has been vandalising Alex Rafalowicz by removing images. If you aren't going to handle my request what should I do next? Catchpole 13:28, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If you haven't already, you really need to hold a discussion with this guy. If he removes the image a fourth time, you can try to get him blocked for violation of WP:3RR if you wish. Here are some other dispute resolution steps, though they might be overkill in this situation: WP:DR -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 13:29, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have left warnings on his talk page, explained my edits via my edit summaries and the talk page of the article. I do not want to replace the picture as I would break 3RR. Catchpole 13:34, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I just re-added it for you. I'll watch him and let you know if he removes it again and you can deal with him as you wish. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 13:35, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
OK, cheers. Catchpole 13:36, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
As someone who has edited the Ben Best page recently, you may have been aware of the allegations of sock puppetry. As this has continued for six weeks now, I have started the appropriate Wikipedia handling process. If you wish to make a contribution, please go to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/CRANdieter and add your views to the Comments section. Nunquam Dormio 13:48, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks as usual
Many thanks for the fast revert of the vandalism to my userpage. Much appreciated, Gwernol 14:35, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, you don't have to thank me for that. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 14:36, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
perhaps, but I do have to ask: why aren't you an admin yet? Are you interested? Your work here is excellent. If you are interested, drop me a note as I'd like to discuss nominating you. Best, Gwernol 14:40, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Alex Raf's page is entirely unnotable comedy, and should be removed as it is plainly him and several friends stroking his ego. However, that aside, the photo really is a step too far. Actually notable people have no photos, there is no reason why the equivalent of "the girl who was a stunt double for Shirly Temple on August 15th" should have one. Delete, or alternatively make the farce complete and expand it with multiple photographs. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 220.236.244.105 (talk • contribs) 16:51, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Then propose the article's deletion or give a good reason to remove the image that doesn't involve simple disapproval of the subject. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 17:31, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
hi
Thank you for your welcome message. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Outsid3r (talk • contribs) 23:04, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Michael Savage (commentator) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 04:23, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Earlier today I even saw one bot warn another bot. I wish I could remember the diff. :-) Antandrus (talk) 04:25, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I was so dumbfounded by this that I brought it up at IRC. If you find that diff, I'd love to see it. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:26, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Those crazy robots! Always malfunctioning! Also, I came here with the primary intention on congratulating you on having Asperger syndrome named after you! It doesn't make much sense as far as naming conventions go, but hey, who cares about those measley things? :P --Dreaded Walrus 04:56, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! I used the edit summary "I'm touched" for the revert on that. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:56, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I noticed. Probably the most flattering piece of intentional vandalism I've seen in a long time. --Dreaded Walrus 05:04, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I admit it: I put him up to it. I don't have Asperger's, I just wanted my name dropped in a completely random, inexplicable context. I think he did the job! -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 05:07, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks yet again...
...for undoing the vandalism on my user page (I'm beginning to sound like a broken record). I reported the IP on WP:ANI and he was blocked. Just came out of nowhere with his first edit. On a side note, you seem to be slowing down a little, I've been able to catch vandalism while you're patrolling. =) Just teasing you. =) -- Gogo Dodo 05:22, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, I need to stop holding conversations while on patrol. In my defense, it seems like it might be quieting down. Somewhat. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 05:24, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
And you're by no means indebted to thanking me for reverting your user page, it's just part of being on patrol. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 05:24, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps, but it's the right thing to do to let you know that I appreciate it. -- Gogo Dodo 05:43, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
WHASSAUP MAN STOP CHANIGING MY EDIOTS TO PATRIKCAS SWAYZE,R I LIKE HIM A LOT AND GOFST IF MY FAVE MOVIE EVERRRRR, I REALLY LIKE THE XSCENE WITH DEMIMO MOREE AND THE POTS, IT'S RYMATNIC, RTITE ON! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.206.230.233 (talk • contribs) 06:06, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Confucious said, "There has never been anyone who came with as little a present as dried meat that I have refused to teach him something." — AquinasProtocol 07:58, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
AIV
I reverted your entry on AIV because I already blocked that vandal. Sorry about that. I was just trying to remove it faster. Academic Challenger 07:13, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry -- I did check the IP first before I reverted, but I guess the blocked status took a moment to show up. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 07:24, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Faulty sprotect tag?
On the Rockhurst High School article, Omicronpersei8 deleted the sprotect tag, (anti-vandalism.) I am still not fully aquainted with all the tags at wikipedia and am not sure why my use of sprotect was faulty. If you could explain it on my usertalk page (Rockhurst Singer) I would sincerely appreciate it.
Rockhurst Singer
P.S. I couldn't find any description of it on wikipedia, but like I said, I'm sort of a newbie, so I didn't really know where to look —The preceding comment was added by Rockhurst singer (talk • contribs) 15:49, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
After Post - thanks for replying :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rockhurst singer (talk • contribs) 19:36, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Warnings
Hey Omicronpersei8, it's me again, Rockhurst_singer. I was just wondering if regular users are allowed to warn other users or other anonymous users. You can reply on this or on my talk page again.
Thanks :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rockhurst singer (talk • contribs) 20:50, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Hey there. Anyone can warn users, yes. --Alex(talk here) 20:56, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
OI
Oi i got to the college and my edits are of playful and merely trivial facts- which you cannot dispute unless you go to the college...
Basically- leave the page as it is - i will change the category once more ok- to make it clear what is fact and what is trivial :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.206.249.36 (talk • contribs) 09:26, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Woman article
Why are you disrespecting my beliefs and why are you allowed to revert me, but I get into trouble if I revert you? Wikipedia must not publish offensive material. It will cause outrage among any Muslim and many other religious people who see offensive pictures. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.93.21.134 (talk • contribs) 16:06, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Formality aside, I really don't think Muslims consider a generic informative photo of a nude woman as "offensive". Either way, I've addressed this on your talk page. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 16:07, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Are you a Muslim? Do you know anything about Islam? I can strongly assure you that these pictures are deeply offensive. A woman's body should only be seen by her husband. It does not matter what the context. Wikipedia is disrespecting our beliefs. You appear very ignorant of Islam from your comments above. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.93.21.134 (talk • contribs) 16:11, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Nope – guess my stupidity is showing. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 16:20, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure if you switched IPs or what, but: Actually, you're only at two reverts. Still: Thank you for your attempts to improve Wikipedia. However, I would like to remind you that Wikipedia is not censored for minors, not even for profanity or pornography. You are welcome to remove clearly offensive material or inappropriate obscenities if they were added as vandalism, but please do not remove/censor profanities or remove/disclaim sexually explicit material or links that are relevant to the article. In the meantime, please be bold and continue contributing to Wikipedia. Thank you! Also, we do have a policy that instructs that editing to push a point of view is known as disruption, just for your information. Thank you for making good faith edits, though. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 16:13, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If Anon finds the human body offensive, surely that is Islam's problem rather than an issue with Wikipedia. Wikipedia does not tailor its content to appease religious groups but to provide encyclopedic information. -Neural 16:18, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is what the trouble is. You should respect our beliefs. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.93.21.134 (talk • contribs) 16:24, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Why can't you respect the beliefs of Wikipedians? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 16:25, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It is offensive to me that you find the human body offensive. Which belief or offense is valid? All that matters here is Wikipedia policy. Simply deleting info you find disagreeable is considered a form of vandalism, I believe. If the article upsets you so much, don't look at it. -Neural 16:29, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It isn't just "disagreeable" but grossly offensive to Muslims and probably many others. Your beliefs are based upon falible human or humanistic philosophies but my beliefs are based on the words of God who is unfallible. So which is more important? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.93.21.134 (talk • contribs) 16:35, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Please go read the wikipedia:General disclaimer, and remember that wikipedia is an international, multifaith community, that strives for impartiality. LinaMishima 16:39, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Remember that Wikipedia is not only multifaith but also includes many secular people who feel extremely strongly that these relative beliefs are in no way important enough to justify censorship - which many of us find just as offensive as a religious person might find the nude human form. I am offended when people to describe the human body as "indecent", etc, yet I refraim from vandalizing pages about religious groups who advocate censorship of the human body. -Neural 17:06, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, looks like that pretty much establishes how winnable/worthwhile this argument is. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 16:36, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've replied to them on their talk page about this. We do respect beliefs, but also the need to ensure that all useful information of value is made availible. Sometimes compromises must be made. LinaMishima 16:39, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
"We do respect beliefs" - speak for yourself. :) -Neural 16:43, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
At it again
The user switched IPs again and resumed attacking the Woman page. Can you please block him/her? -Neural 17:21, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not an admin, but that user's been blocked. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 17:22, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, sorry about that - I'm bugging the wrong person. Thankfully they're blocked anyway then. -Neural 17:27, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No, it's cool -- I'm a countervandal so you're certainly not bugging the wrong person (I did put in the/a report about this user to AIV, by the way). -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 17:28, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hello
I added it simply as an educational source for I feel that site helps users to learn German. There is a lot of free useful information there. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Learngermanwords (talk • contribs) 17:39, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
No offense, but it helps to have a username that's not taken from the address of the link in question when making this claim. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 17:41, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Site
I won't keep doing it then. I thought of it as a wonderful way to give my site some links because I have put alot of time into creating the site. Yes it does sell some products but the vast majority is free information. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Learngermanwords (talk • contribs) 17:45, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi
I wanted to add new sub-title "Invitation to Islam" and was just going to add more informative and related sites under it.
i'm not doing Spam/Vandalism.
Kind Regards, —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ColdFire (talk • contribs) 17:44, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Blocking this IP
hi,
Just to let you know, this IP is from a public terminal at Walter Library on the University of Minnesota campus, so I imagine blocking it won't do much good in stopping the abuser you are after. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.101.29.11 (talk • contribs) 19:39, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks!
Just wanted to thank you for all the reverting you've been doing over at Masada College. You've beaten me a couple of times, but at least the page is semi-protected now. Lets hope he gives up! -- benzo? ♠♠ 03:19, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
VandalSnipe
Your VS doesn't work very effectively, it keeps reverting constructive edits of mine that are far from vandalism. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 205.188.116.70 (talk • contribs) 05:42, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
I'm sorry, you're right
Of course, I'm angry. I was attacked by a sock puppet of Sceptre for responding to an attack he made on me. His clique and/or sock puppets are trying to prevent me from documenting the case, and I'm fairly upset about that. 70.5.174.56 06:49, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
At least you can recognize when you might need to calm down. Honestly, though, I've found that the more level-headed the assertions, the more credibility they tend to gather. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 06:50, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You see? This is the stuff I'm talking about (check the histories if it's not obvious.) 70.5.174.56, 206.124.31.24, Nlu. Waiting for the lock to expire or for someone with some reason to step in (there seem signs of that, between you and a couple other admins.) 68.246.76.187 16:27, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Could I just say that this user is not an administrator, as you put it. Thanks. --Alex(talk here) 17:32, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
What, specifically, are you trying to say? Who are you talking about? 70.5.51.142 19:09, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Omicronpersei8. You said "there seem signs of that, between you and a couple other admins" inferring him to be another admin, which he is not. --Alex(talk here) 19:12, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks guy
Always glad there's an ally in this ongoing battle against vandals. Especially the ones that try to bully their edits :D. Rsm99833 08:29, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You might try flinging WP:LAWYER at him/her next time he/she tries to squeeze past policy. (Sorry for intruding on your talk page conversations, by the way.) -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 08:30, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No problem whatsover. I have your page on my watch list as well. Rsm99833 08:32, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and just so you know, our buddy is doing redirects as well. I smell sockpuppet. Rsm99833 08:37, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
User:64.12.117.9 whom you have warned is making exactly the same edits as User:141.149.54.179 Who has been already blocked for various reasons. I suspect they are one and the same person. --Blue Tie 08:48, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the report. Looks like that IP was just blocked. If he/she does it anymore, I'll bring it up in the CV IRC channel. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 08:54, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Seriously, you're only making it worse. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.12.117.10 (talk • contribs) 09:04, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
No, it's the idiots in this world that screw up all the good things for everyone else that are making it worse. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 09:07, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I actually agree with you. The problem is, you don't realize *you're* one of those idiots. An even-handed account of O'Reilly *is* good for the world, no matter how much your agitprop tendencies tell you otherwise. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.12.117.10 (talk • contribs) 09:35, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Ouch, seriously. But anyway, I've looked at your edits to that article, and they really don't add much in the way of being "even-handed". They're all restatements or POV "touch-ups" of existing material. Adding your opinion to an encyclopedia article isn't good for the world, because it just causes people to either become more misinformed or in the worst case will make them give up on Wikipedia as a semi-accurate source. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 09:47, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
See, that's just stupid. For instance, allowing the harassment lawsuit in the title at all--not to mention first--really skews the nature of what was going on. O'Reilly filed an anticipatory suit as all the media acknowledged then. You heavily slant the article by presenting it in the way you do. Thus, you're a hack, and you make Wiki a worse place. You're incapacle of following those same guidelines you keep accusing others of violating. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.12.117.10 (talk • contribs) 09:55, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Hey, if I had your IQ, I wouldn't attempt to formulate an "argument" either. I am SOOOO looking forward to your attempt to try to explain how "flung" legal principles apply here. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.12.117.10 (talk • contribs) 09:59, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
You seem more of a "duh" guy than a "wut" guy. Or maybe just a flabby, girlfriend-less D&D type. Be monosyllabic if I'm getting warmer. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.12.117.10 (talk • contribs) 11:30, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
And you're a petulant child who resorts to personal attacks whenever he doesn't get what he wants (no matter how pointless and insignificant). Further attacks from you will be reverted, and you will be reported to administrators, so that you may go off and sit by yourself in the bubble of self-righteousness you appear to have created. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 11:40, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Tip: As a rule of thumb, when everyone else is against you and you get cast out over and over again, it's usually not because they're all idiots and you're the light of truth. You might try to learn a little about humility and self-evaluation -- you might make it to old age that way. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 11:47, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
About New York City
Hi! I removed the section about Further Reading into its own article called Books on New York City, I discussed that on the talk page. Also, I added architecture into Geography because it works better there, since the arhictecture is somewhat irrelevant to the article. Hope that pretty mcuh explains it all. Do-do 09:34, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
New York City edits
Thankyou for you’re reply. Yeah, I think the edits that I made should stay, but apart from that the article is looking fine. Cheers :). Do-do 09:37, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Edit Conflicts
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For your endless edit conflicts with me :) Alex(talk here) 10:18, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Recent Changes
Do you live in Australia? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Broodycaveman (talk • contribs) 10:24, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
My talk page
Thank you for reverting my talk page - I am going to revert back however, as I want to keep an archive of every message left, be it nice or not nice. You could help by adding in any unsigned signatures. Thanks. --Alex(talk here) 11:05, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, you got it. I go by pretty much the same principles on my talk page. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 11:06, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
yeah can you change it back or does it stay that way? i was just experimenting —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ohmygodimonfire (talk • contribs) 11:28, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
my friend showed the page to me and i thought he had made it or something because he had written some of it, but it seems he had just edited a part of it —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ohmygodimonfire (talk • contribs) 11:31, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Hello.
"Since 17 May 2006, I have screwed up while doing RC patrol at least 15 times, according to this talk page. (Sorry.) Click here to inform me of another error."
Here is one more. No big deal, but you reverted to the wrong version. There were three edits all of which were vandalism and you only reverted over the most recent of the three.
Dude get a friggin life he asks us to change it mind your own business don't you have a stamp collection that needs your attention —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ghost Who Walks (talk • contribs) 09:49, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
I intentionally removed the content as it was copyrighted, trademarked, trade-secret protected intellectual property. Please remove the content immediately as it violates both trade secret laws and the ethics of the magic industry. Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.58.170.107 (talk • contribs) 11:37, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
I see no legally sustainable theory under which you can claim it to be "copyrighted, trademarked, trade-secret protected intellectual property," but even if it is, the proper way to have it removed as such is to prove that it is protected intellectual property. Do you have any proof that it is? (I am not saying that you have made an improper legal threat yet, but please see WP:NLT on what is appropriate and what is inappropriate.) --Nlu (talk) 11:55, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
test meee
You forgot to give me test1 warning, shame on you!--212.219.63.226 14:15, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I noticed this entry in AIAV, but I'd like to point out that although this IP made edits after the final warning, these edits were constructive, so it looks like at least some (and the lastest) of the edits coming off of this IP are not vandalism. Just thought you'd like to know. -- Deville (Talk) 15:03, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
i am sorry. i am oh so sorry. it is my mistake, oh my own mistake.
i want to talk, talk to the universe, and the letters i write come from my soul, down in the basement of my soul, where the dog masturbates against the walls, and ocassionaly, when he it has the chance and the correct body temperature, it masturbates with grandma´s corpse. that, usually happens on christmas time.
however, i am sorry, dont block me dear wikipolis, you are so clever and i am so clever too, that i believe we can sit and talk, and talk for hours and drink tee and coffee and eat sugar and build sculptures made out of mustache´s wastes.
i love you all, dear wikipolis,
ese oaxaco, who is deeply sorry. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ese oaxaco (talk • contribs) 16:31, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
I notice from your grammar boxes that you support gender neutral language but do not like singular "they"; how do you refer to a single person in a neutral fashion?
--Lucifer 16:53, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I either try to avoid referring to gender or just say "he or she". It's quite roundabout, but it's just another quirk of mine that I'm used to by now. Of course, I don't always approach this area of grammar correctly. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 16:56, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the reply. Either option does look a bit ugly.--Lucifer 17:01, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, as are most of my sentence constructions, to be honest. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 17:01, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
stop
If u get rid o' my shit one more time i will come to your house and slit ur fukin throat bitch. i am going to change an article about george bush next. Ifou change it I WILL EAT YOUR SPLEEN! I am NOT KIDDIBG!!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.35.198.75 (talk • contribs) 17:56, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
I WILL FUK UR GRANDMA!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.35.198.75 (talk • contribs) 17:58, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
This anonymous user's inappropriate comments, personal attacks, and death threats have resulted in a one week block against the IP address. --Yamla 18:03, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's something to do with Safari. Sometimes I forget it does that when I use pop-ups, and even though I backed up as soon as I saw what it was going to do, it still makes the change, and then I can't even revert it back. --Maxamegalon2000 20:19, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weird! Anyway, it's all good. Thanks for being understanding of me bugging you about that. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 20:20, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hold on Ill give u places where this say this. Zionism is bad and I want my own perspective. Is there any way I can put a place where there are people saying that they do this at all? You can list it as conspiracy theory i could care less i just want people to know this. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.111.107.78 (talk • contribs) 20:45, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
I don't think there would be a problem if you just put it on the article's talk page, but no promises about whether it stays or not. I also can't say how the admins will react. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 20:47, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
on sharapova's height
Just a quick aside on your edit comment about the hidden comment I added re: Sharapova's height. You wrote: "The thought of a six-foot-two girl having a growth spurt of one inch amuses me." It was actually a six-foot-zero girl going to six-foot-three. There was a minor edit war going on between advocates of 6' 0" (which is listed many places), 6' 2" (which is from reports earlier this year), and 6' 3" (which is from reports at the US Open Final). My comment may have been a bit unclear, but at least it ended the war! :) Anyway, this is all truly trivial, but I just wanted to address your amusement. Keep up the good work! -- Xtifr 00:55, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting. I have this weird little thing about memorizing celebrity heights (admittedly usually disregarding the credibility of the sources I get the numbers from), so that actually is of interest to me. Thanks for taking the time to fill me in. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 22:27, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
And, of course, right after posting this, I noticed another anon had changed it back to 6'2" and removed the warning comment. Love that careful fact checking so common of Internet John Doe. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 22:33, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
what?
I DIDN'T DO ANYTHING TO ANYONES PAGE OR WHATEVER YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT I DONT EVEN KNOW HOW TO DO THAT,THE ONLY REASON I HAVE ANACCOUNT IS BECAUSE PEOPLE WERE WRITING VERY ,VERY UNTRUE THINGS ABOUT THE STATE OF ALABAMA SO WHATEVER HAPPENED I ASSURE YOU IT WASN'T ME SO PLEASE STOP TRYING TO BLOCK ME. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 205.188.116.70 (talk • contribs) 00:57, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Uhh, which article are you talking about exactly? Note that your ISP is the notorious AOL, so it probably wasn't you. Also, please STOP SHOUTING. MER-C 08:53, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think it would be nice if AOL users clicking "save page" were sent to a confirmation dialog with big red letters reading, "WASN'T YOU? THEN DON'T WORRY ABOUT IT." To be helpful, not pithy. Seriously. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 22:38, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks
For reverting vandalism to my user page again. MER-C 08:53, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
IchessU
Hi!
I saw that you removed IchessU.com from learning chess sites. IchessU is first real international chess universtity. We are very serious organization, specializes on giving live audio and video chess lessons. IchessU.com was also the company covered exclusively Blitz World Championsip, took place recently in Israel.
We are very famous and serious education organization and not spammers. Please don't remove our links in the future.
Thanks in advance —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ichessu (talk • contribs) 16:41, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Reverted change ?
Hello,
Can you please tell me why you reverted the change I made to the DJ disambiguation page ?
Hi, I did that because I don't think an acronym for a school can be counted as a nickname, and since its popularity has not been established, it would seem that this could conceivably be done for every school with these initials, and that would lead to an inordinately long list. That's my rationale; I hope you can understand where I'm coming from. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 15:09, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, thanks for the explanation, I understand your reasoning. :) However, my friend made the same change again, probably you should remove that too ! Thanks ! -RohanDhruva
Sure, if you think it's warranted. Thanks for understanding. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 15:18, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, now that I understand, I request you to remove the new entry made by my friend on DJ page, and on the same note, I thank you for reverting my edit on the SP disambiguation page too ! :-) --RohanDhruva 15:20, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Out of context quote
Hey, remember when you said "Not everyone likes WP:BALLS and WP:DICK either"? Yeah, that was funny. Just thought I'd remind you :) BigNate37(T) 15:26, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
But everyone loves WP:HAM. (I'm glad that turned out to be a valid link.) -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 15:28, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for welcoming me to wikipedia ! :)
I wish alert people like you help me learn the wikipedia conventions, like the DJ one you just informed me of ! --RohanDhruva 15:29, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You're more than welcome to ask me if you have a question. There are some links on the welcome message you might check out for some more info, too. I'll try to respond to your comments, but lately I might be too busy to be here as much as usual. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 15:30, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You are right. Thanks for going to the trouble to help me fix that! New link: [7] (And it's the edit closer to the bottom that I mistook.) -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 15:50, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm changing that link to this more precise one: [8] -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 20:12, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Collapse of the two towers
Yep, i know, that there is one GIGGG mistake,so... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.61.128.51 (talk • contribs) 16:06, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
(link snip)
Do you think, that many experts are just stupid?? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.61.128.51 (talk • contribs) 16:23, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting vandalism of my userpage --BostonMA 17:41, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Steve Irwins death.
I want to tell Terri Irwin and the children, Bindi and Bob how sorry I am about his death. This has really hurt me deeply. He was "in my home" every chance I got to watch his show.
I will miss him so much.
I told my husband it should have been me instead, he had a passion for life that I have never found. I will regret his death always.
We are watching his show all day today. I am so sorry.
Amanda Smith, Indiana, USA 68.249.96.247 17:52, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Guess I missed this when it first came up, I've had a python script which obtains the tor list directly and can list out which ones are unblocked, guess I could have saved your some work. (Doesn't do the check for warnings though). One thing to be aware of is that there are several tor nodes which are on dynamic addresses and change address on regularly. In fact I've been capturing the data since 15th August, at time of writing 309 nodes are active but my database which is refreshed every hour and works out the IP address/node availability over time has 10106 entries on it... (That's not to say that they've used 10106 distinct IPs). I've also got scripts to use the tor control interface to allow selection of a single tor out proxy and then retrieve data through it, it needs some work but could be used to demonstrate that the IPs are in fact correct --pgk 19:45, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I didn't know there was anything that already did that here (and it would seem the OP project members I've talked with didn't either). I've actually gotten busy lately unexpectedly, so you have in fact saved me some work. That script sounds a lot like what I've got, the main differences being that Cronbot in its final form can also report unblock requests (a tentative that isn't necessary but given that it there is a section for it on WP:OP I suppose it might as well), it will do periodic checks to see which nodes have been blocked indefinitely, and it uses the PGP verification to certify it's the bot posting through the IPs. When you say "selection of a single tor out proxy", are you talking about dynamic/"anonymous" ones without names on public lists, or do you have a way to filter through IPs too? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 20:07, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Talking about the named, you can't specify the outproxy by IP. Obtaining the list directly from tor gives you the IP for all the out bound nodes. --pgk 20:18, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, that's what I thought. About the list, is this one populated from the same kind of script that the Harvard link Cronbot reads uses? Because in my experience the online lists never seem to catch all the exit nodes, meaning there are open ones only findable by going through Tor itself (even if this is a temporary discrepancy between the actual network and what is listed). -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 20:22, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well the tor program itself gets the list by connecting to the directory servers which gives details of the server nodes available within tor and the capabilites (such as inbound, outbound restrictions on ports etc.). Servers dynamically register with these servers. By default there are 3 listed (or at least in the source I built from config.c - add_default_trusted_dirservers), my code only queries one of these servers, if you wanted certainty of getting everything I guess you'd want to query all three and any others you know of. --pgk 20:34, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'll add that this is a known weakness with TOR so it won't stay this way forever... --pgk 20:37, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, then you certainly have a much more robust way of finding nodes than my way, which was just connecting by restarting the local service and then using torify wget to see what the current IP was via Special:Mytalk. Then I guess the only real question left is whether your script is equipped to post to somewhere like WP:OP. That seems to be the main use remaining for this bot (although I'm not sure I couldn't find some use for the PGP stuff). -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 20:39, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well it was only partially done, I was more looking at proof of concept than as a practical use on wikipedia. --pgk 21:00, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I accidently reverted your revert while nabbing other vandalism. It ends up the same way either way but still sorry about that. Agne 22:00, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No problem at all, it looked like you took care of everything to me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 22:01, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Userpage vandalism revert
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page twice! Cheers --AbsolutDan(talk) 22:19, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
...And thanks again for another 4 reverts! Maybe it's time to request a page protect. --AbsolutDan(talk) 01:27, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That might be a good idea. At any rate, I'll keep watching your page while I'm on. --
Ok I appreciate it! Page has been protected. --AbsolutDan(talk) 22:06, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies
I'm sorry,my kids were messing around with the computer.I wont let it happen again. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.23.67.86 (talk • contribs) 01:38, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
No problem. Thank you for the reply. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 01:39, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Who do you think you are, the popes defender? Where do you get off making all these reverts, and then apologizing for them?
Pope Benedict said he was sorry his islamic frienss were offended by his remarks in early September. This is a classic non-apology apology. Please alloe others to interpret the truth before you hit the revert button.
In September, 2006, Pope Benecict the sixteenth, after quoting an ancient text critical of Islam, made a similar non-apology. Rather than regret his intemperate remarks, the pope stated that "he was sorry he caused offense", rather than retract his statements.Hank chapot 01:44, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
what's the deal with the tooth fairy message? don't bother people with nonsense. i reverted the page back to where it had erroneously claimed the page didn't exist. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.16.15.150 (talk • contribs) 02:24, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
and looking at your page, everyone is apologizing to you, who do you think you are? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.16.15.150 (talk • contribs) 02:26, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Cheers
Thanks for cleaning up that trolling, but I prefer to keep comments like that on the talk page unless they're particularly malicious, slanderous, or rude. Fortunately my ego isn't so fragile that being accused of a lack of a sense of humour is going to irreparably damage it :) All the best, Ziggurat 04:08, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For your continued opposition to vandalism, particularly elephant/colbert vandals. -- malo(tlk)(cntrbtns) 04:19, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Any Chance?
...of going up for RfA? I'd feel a lot better about the level of vandalism on enWiki if you were a sysop. I know you have posted messages saying that you don't want it, but I really think that you would be a great addition, and would do a wonderful job. alphaChimp(talk) 06:23, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You are too kind, sir, too kind. Even if I did want to, some things have come up lately and I wouldn't be around enough. It looks like you're doing a pretty swell job yourself, anyway, so what do they need me for? By the way, how's the mop going? Has it made you cynical and aloof yet, or are you still working on that? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 06:27, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the offer will remain open for whenever you'd like to go for it. I'll check in every once in a while to see how it's going. As for the main reason why we need you-- in a word: convenience. It'd be a heck of a lot better if you didn't have to report vandal (I've seen your reports sit there for a while). Someone with your technical expertise could probably figure out a lot of cool ways to use the sysop tools (it might also help some with Cronbot and the open proxy issue). I've just been consistently impressed with everything I've seen from you. I'm not saying that you're perfect, but you have the courage to admit mistakes and to apply them towards your future editing (all this would go in the nom, btw). We could always use more sysops like that.
As for me, it's really gratifying to think I'm helping out the 'pedia. I've been doing a lot of NPP (the tools really help for that). It can be stressful and time consuming, but it's about the same as vandal fighting. As for being cynical and aloof...I won't even stoop so low as to respond to that. alphaChimp(talk) 06:55, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
As always, I really appreciate that, and I didn't mean it if my above joke(s) seemed dismissive. It's true that AIV isn't always constantly policed (and not to point fingers, but thank you for not making "make me an admin because no one is ever at AIV!" a focal part of your RFA, as I've seen a few admins get into office on this argument and then vanish from the CV front), but I feel like that's okay as long as I can keep tabs on who the vandal of the moment is. Like you, I didn't start editing here with the plan of becoming an admin someday, and since all I really do is RC patrol, I don't really feel tempted by the ability to block. I'm moreso afraid of instating bad blocks, and I'm quite aware that I don't have a firm grasp on all the important policies yet (mainly regarding images, many of which I really, really wish I could just delete on sight, like with the "Goatse" image uploaded earlier today for the sole purpose of vandalism). On top of that, I'm really not eager to see how my calling someone a "petulant child" a short while back would go over at RFA, admitting mistakes or not. Also, it's really funny when a vandal occasionally accuses me of being in "the cabal". But anyway, if I do decide to get off my high horse about adminship, you'll be the first person I beg for an RFA from. For now, I kind of think there are enough admins up and about most of the time and I'm not so sure if I would have the time or patience to learn how to use blocking powers artfully. I'm kind of starting to hate this username, too, so I don't know how that would factor in if I were to become an admin. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 07:18, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
For clearing my user page of "insightful" personal attacks left by vandals. Cheers. Canadian-Bacontce 05:25, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks
As I've wandered around Wikipedia, reading for knowledge, editting where needed, and reverting when necessary, I have often come across you reverting vandalism. Granted, you probably stand out because of your A+ choice for a username, but I just figured I'd pass along a "Thanks" from the community. JPG-GR 05:32, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate that (both of those sentiments)! Thanks so much. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 05:33, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
BIG thanks!
I have no idea what I did to torque off that user, but I thank you for watching my back. I owe ya one. Or two. - Lucky 6.9 07:23, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
why did you edit niallstown?
you said you deleted "nonsense"
what nonsense. i live in ireland and ive been there.
the place is pretty much a bog but all the information was true.
repair it —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.71.73.101 (talk • contribs) 19:19, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Its greatest leader Niall, who the town is named after due to his exceptional skills in charisma and leadership during the harsh times of the great Ebola Virus (a Deadly virus that kills 9/10 people) it was a terrifying time, but Niall took no heed and went there to rescue his family and friends in doin so he contracted the deadly virus and nearly died but his will to live and his love of his family and friends gave him the neccessary strength to carry on and bring them to safety. His 5 most trusted companions Mark the wise, Luke the empowered, Eoin the Barbarian , Kevin the sly and Colm the ox.
Fine, be a bureaucrat. An admin would have totally deleted it though. Now you're just gonna let it hang around for a few days for no good reason. Desertsky85451 22:31, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. If that user is not blocked for that now, I will report him the next time I see him pop up on my watchlist with more ads. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 23:22, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your revert on this page had the most hilarious edit summary I've seen in a while. Good job. --Wafulz 02:14, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Gotta squeeze in the humor where you can, right? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 02:14, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
And it might as well be from a fellow Futurama fan. --Wafulz 02:16, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It didn't occur to me to make a Bender reference. Missed opportunity! (Or maybe a really bad joke narrowly avoided.) -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 02:17, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Edit on Michael Savage
First off, thanks for taking RC patrol. You're the first line of defense against vandals. That said, I've tried to edit the Michael Savage page a couple of times to clarify a wiki link, in the MSNBC section, where Savage's quote says "...eat a sausage, I hope you choke on it" (or something to that effect.)
The word sausage is a wiki link to the article for real sausages, but it is almost certainly NOT what Michael "I Hate Gay People" Savage meant in this context. Readers may be confused by the reference and, when following the wiki link for clarification, be all the more confused.
I tried to change the link twice, first to "Penis" and then to "Fellatio", which you may agree is more correct in context. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.226.170.248 (talk • contribs) 02:27, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for being a good sport about my silly edit summary, first of all. I think the best thing to do here is to delink "sausage" altogether. While Savage may dislike gays (I personally don't know a thing about him, including who he even is), it really just seems like an assumption to conclude that the use of "sausage" here is a phallic reference. Sorry if you think that sounds naive, but, again, I don't really see why this word needs to be wikilinked at all, especially considering that it may only serve to generate controversy. Thank you for the kind sentiments, by the way. I appreciate it. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 02:34, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Now that I think about it, removing the link probably is the best solution; to do otherwise would make an inference that doesn't really belong here. And your unexpected edit summary scares me. I give it a C+; okay, but not great. :) futurama will rise again! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.226.170.248 (talk • contribs) 02:48, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
C+? Why are you grading it so highly? (Totally agreed on your evaluation.) Seriously though, thanks for helping improve the article. I'll go ahead and proceed as discussed and remove the link if that's okay. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 02:51, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Love your work with Ed Kavalee wiki
Also love your wiki name! Good Futurama reference..
--Mikecraig 03:19, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This user has messed with my user page several times today. RobJ1981 00:06, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I will watch him for a while. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 00:07, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
MY DELETION
I posted that because that user had deleted my article which he had no reason to. My God! I have people deleting webpages with no problem no profanity, but an opinion slightly in it... I have people deleting my webpages for absolutely no reason at all, and now I have people deleting my opinion about someones opinion. I SWEAR WIKIPEDIA'S ARTICLE CREATING IS SO MESSED UP IT'S AS IF THE SITE IS USELESS! I mean why should I bother creating an artcle because it'll most likely be deleted because it has the word "the" in it... If you don't see the problems in it then you must be blind because wikipedia is about teaching, and I'm not even being allowed to teach... It's a wonder articles get created like "mastrubation" but an article talking about a school speech class is deleted... WHERE'S THE EQUALITY WIKIPEDIA???!!!!!!! Sincerely,
--Josiah1107 00:10, 21 September 2006 (UTC)Josiah[reply]
User Josiah1107 messed with my user page once again today. Just thought I would point that out. I'm getting sick of reverting. RobJ1981 18:47, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again
I will never get tired of saying it. Thank you! Thank you for catching the vandalism of DaveShaw508 and 24.10.29.154. in the Langston Hughes article. It's nice to know there are good guys at Wiki like you who are making a difference with your diligent efforts to fight vandalism. Again, thank you so very much.TonyCrew 01:31, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, you're more than welcome. I'll try to keep watching that article. Thank you for the kind words, and thanks for helping out with the counter-vandalism to that article as well; now that I look at the article history, it looks like you should be mainly thanking yourself for keeping that article in good shape. Kudos. (I'm going offline for now, by the way, so sorry in advance if I miss any more vandalism in the meantime.) -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 02:06, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not revert CrazyComputers Talk Page to previous edit.
My identity, including photographs and private information has been posted against my will on the site, including crazycomputers talk page. Please re-delete this information. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by MntnClimbr (talk • contribs) 03:59, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
With all due respect, your editing of the Al Qaeda article is unnecessary. Adding the word "alleged" does NOT inflict my bias on the subject. I was implying that it may or may not have definately been Al Qaeda responsible. I did not say it was, nor did I say the converse. That's the epitome of neutrality. It may very well be Al Qaeda that was behind the attacks, but, if you look at the handful of books and documentaries that contest this (from all around the world) you can see that it is FAR from confirmed, as many people do not believe they had anything to do with it. Again, this is not my personal opinion, but to more than claim, but to INSIST that they were behind the attacks, with little evidence and much less than a unanimous agreement, is violating the neutrality policy. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by All5Horizons (talk • contribs) 04:30, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
I'm not quite sure that that applies, as you yourself told me to contact you if I had any disagreements, and so I did. Thaaaanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by All5Horizons (talk • contribs) 06:10, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
greetings
thank you for explaining me why i got blocked.
it seems i added too many times my link to may pages. yes indeed i added a link in pages that actually didnt have any links like in the majority of pages about mauritania for example. which means that, they are not good pages in terms of content. i do think i was enriching the content of the page while addind a link to my photo archive page in the section of mauritania.
so how come this is considered to be bad? i mean links are good as they result on a external way of getting more stuff from a specific place.
while surfing in the other pages i was trying to add my link, i notice other link to photos, and i have to say mine is indeed quite aucrate and with good information. i don't consider it to be my site, or my personal website. my personal website is www.joaoleitaofoto.com which i never related it to anything.
strange to see how in this case spam cops (hehe sorry about the name) were not accurate. sorry bt i do not agree.
Sorry, but i'm not actually an administrator, the blocking admin was User:Raul365 he may be able to help you though, or you could try #wikipedia on freenode, hope that helps . thanks/Fenton, MatthewLexic Dark52278 Alpha 771 07:55, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I saw my error and removed it from your talk page. Hope that's alright – sorry for the holdup. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 07:56, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
{{hangon}}
The information contained in entry "Sean Reed" is accurate. Reed is both an acclaimed author and the frontman for the band Poster Child. This information is verifiable. I have been contacted by various people who are perturbed that this article has been declared unworthy of submission to Wikipedia. Please reverse your decision. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Yankees4364 (talk • contribs) 09:02, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
vandalising
I have no idea whats going on i havent been to wikipedia in a while i believe someone is farudulently doing this —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 152.163.101.10 (talk • contribs) 23:19, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
Reverting weblinks
Concerning your comments below;
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. M100 10:20, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did in Triumph Herald, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 22:53, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Goodmorning,
The "FISC EuroTour" external link has been unnecessarily removed. Should you check the eligibility page of our website at http://fisc-europe.org/Eligible_Cars_EMC.php , you will recognize that the Triumph Herald is listed and welcome to race with us at some of the great historic F1 circuits.
I totally disagree with the link spamming you've been engaged in. In a similar manner a spark plug manufacturer or tyre manufacturer, or a nut and bolt supplier, or an auto electrician, or a mobile mechanic, an upholsterer, a spray shop, a roll cage manufacturer or just about anyone remotely connected to the vehicle that is the subject of an article could put a link to their website on every page referring to a vehicle they could provide services for. You'd get the articles on cities full of links for every holiday company, airline and cruise line that went there, links to every car hire company on every page for a city and town that had a car hire depot nearby. Wikipedia is not a link farm and hopefully never will be. Hell I even own a car that is on your eligibility list which I drive regularly in Europe, I follow historic racing and rallying yet I still can't condone the link spamming / backdoor free internet promotion you were trying to achieve. It just isn't the way things are done here! M100 17:10, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Zeus page revert, 09/26/2006
Omi,
I visited the Zeus page shortly after your revert today, and found some minor vandalism still present - it was introduced in one of the early edits on 9/25. I fixed this up manually and documented the vandal on the Talk page for that article. Just dropping an FYI in case you wonder why I edited the page you reverted. Keep up the good work. :) Wingchild 17:55, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Whoops – thanks for catching that. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 20:55, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry
yeah sorry about what I did, I wont vandalise any more —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.44.58.220 (talk • contribs) 21:56, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
I reverted the recent changes (before yours) to Precious Williams because it seems like the editor actually stripped out a lot of content. I was about to replace the prod with an AfD but I see you beat me to it. I see you also reverted my reversion, though. I'll leave it as it currently is but you may want to check out the diffs to see if content really hasn't been lost. --Yamla 22:16, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, okay. I'll go back to your version and keep the AFD tag on, then. Thanks. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 22:17, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Wrongful accusation
Dear Omicronpersei8,
I recieved a message about supposed vandalism. I don't know why, but you got the wrong person and I wish for an explaination or an apology as to why I have been wrongfully accused of vandalising the article in question- I didn't even know that that article exsisted.
MALCOLM POOLE IS MY TEACHER AND IS A VERY GOOD FRIEND OF MINE...IF YOU BE SO KIND NOT TO DELETE THE CONTENT I AM ADDING ABOUT HIM AS HE WILL FIND IT VERY HUMEROUS...
I CAN GIVE YOU HIS EMAIL IF YOU WOULD LIKE MPOOLE@WESLEY.WA.EDU.AU
I CAN ASSURE YOU THAT HE WILL NOT BE HAPPY WITH YOU. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 139.168.244.233 (talk • contribs) 09:23, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
I chose not to remove the comment above, but I've warned the user. --Nlu (talk) 09:27, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ummm, i didnt vandalise anything mate. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 58.107.102.96 (talk • contribs) 10:07, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Your Edits to the Dell Article
Its interesting to me that you think you know more about Dell than i do. I am sure that you have worked for Dell for years since you beleive that what i put into the article was false, or even vandalism. The store in the mall in Dallas was just recently opened and everything i wrote was factual. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 143.166.255.40 (talk • contribs) 14:13, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
He doesn't tell the truth about Dick Cheney and John Stossel. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Frazierhockey03 (talk • contribs) 01:55, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for blocking Frazierhockey03 because of his vandalism. --JHP 07:31, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Darn it!
14:11, September 28, 2006 King of Hearts (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "74.70.39.175" - didnt get to add my block summary: dont attack my mates :( Glen 02:14, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ya got too many sysops watching ya back thats all hehe Glen 02:14, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oh don't worry, you'll have another opportunity soon, my friend. Very soon. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 02:15, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
no doubt - just have to be quick round here these days! (or maybe Im just getting old!) Goes without saying but; Keep up the great work Glen 02:18, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oh oh been meaning to ask you for days; what was the name of the linux program link you gave me that would allow me to partition my harddrive to run VS? At the time I only was getting may 100-200 kbs downloads and the 700Mb was just too frustrating. Now doing like 5 times that speed so would like to try again! Glen 02:23, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Knoppix? And actually, you won't need to partition your hard drive -- it should run in RAM. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 02:24, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry.
Sorry for vandalism. Honestly, I didn't think you could trace me. Stupid of me, won't happen again. I'm justa YTMND member and I did it for kicks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.177.212.117 (talk • contribs) 02:57, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Get This
Totally agree about this article and it's blatent vandalism...does not help when the radio hosts of this show make fun and light of the vandalism and help "fuel" further hijinks to the wiki --Mikecraig 03:13, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Have requsted semi protection at this stage...lets see what happens --Mikecraig 00:54, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ann Coulter
I was testing the integrity of wikipedia. You are very quick on your feet! I tip my hat to you sir. --Storyteller15 03:14, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Defender
You sir, are a defender of the wiki barnstar. You should be very proud. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.84.49.52 (talk • contribs) 05:30, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Yes, readers, he/she was being sarcastic. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:36, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Autism edit
Dear Sir,
I finally looked at the message about editing the Autism page. Honestly, I don't think it was me personally, as I have only edited one page in my time using Wiki. That was the page of the Wisconsin men's hockey team with regard to their conference affiliation. I changed it from CCHA to WCHA, which is factually accurate.
This is a work computer so I'm not sure if others share this IP. I believe I have been to the Autism page at one time quite some time ago, but I don't think I edited it for anything. I really value the Wiki and take any attempt at editing very seriously, which is why I've only done it once.
I'm sorry if it was my fault. I think I will be creating an account to avoid this anonymity problem from now on. I hope you were able to recover any lost content from my or anyone else's mistake.
---I did create an account, piojohnnybutt... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Piojohnnybutt (talk • contribs) 16:16, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
If wasn't your fault, don't worry about it. It probably is the case that you're using a shared IP. Thanks for the constructive edits. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 16:29, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep an eye on this user... it appears his reign of terror only lasted on the night of the 14th, but he might come back for more. He kept posting "haced_la_red_de_Rad" and "haker killer" everywhere. I commented on his talk page, and looked for his IP in the Block Logs and didn't see it.
Just a heads up!
Thanks // 164.106.159.18 18:29, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Actuary
It is a fact that an actuary is a bookmaker to an insurance or assurance company insofar as they are both interested in the probabilities of an outcome. Please state why my edit is not factual and why i should not restore it. Tayana 23:54, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to replace it, I won't fight you on it, but it looks like original research and conjecture. Could you please maybe clarify in the article how you came to that conclusion, perhaps even providing a source? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 00:00, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
revert
why revert without explanation? --84.30.90.199 00:30, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You know what you can just shut up.
Oh and by the way I HATE Steve Irwin and I am glad he died.
He was a bad parent and an idiot! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mxrider714 (talk • contribs) 00:36, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
This link i added to bob and tom o@a Rover the site is a fan site for the shows if you look you will see fans talking about the shows on the forums —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.10.136.118 (talk • contribs) 00:47, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Global Warming
Change the Revision back. Global Warming Doesn't exist.
If you think I'm wrong, go to <snip>.
And read State of Fear, by Michael Crichton. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.111.182.89 (talk • contribs) 00:51, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
I own roversarmy.com
why did you take the link off the site rover's morning glory WTF —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.10.136.118 (talk • contribs) 00:52, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Another Self Appointed Small Minded Bureaucrat
It doesnt matter that you just blindly reverted something I wrote and silenced my opinion on a talk page. What matters is by your own descriptions of yourself you represent everything thats wrong with Wikipedia. Self appointed bureaucrats like yourself are as bad as the people who cancel out edits to forward their own moral agenda. Wikipedia rewards jerks like you who put in so much "effort" even though by your own admission you are an expert on nothing. And since I know you are sensitive to criticism, let me say "go die in a fire". —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 211.10.18.77 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
I don't know what you're talking about and I'm sure no one else does either. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 01:29, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That guy is right. Listen to him. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jadura450 (talk • contribs) 01:30, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
And I'm not talking about you, whatever your name is. I mean the guy who said you are a "Another Self Appointed Small Minded Bureaucrat".
Don't use what people say to your advantage. It's cruel. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jadura450 (talk • contribs) 01:33, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Jadura450, You do realize That your I.P. number is viewable, and matches your previous anonymous posts (not to mention your writing style). Rsm99833 01:36, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Omicronpersei8 don't let all this get you down...you are doing good work! --Mikecraig 02:08, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, sir. Don't worry, trolls are only good for laughs. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 02:08, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Userpage vandalism and personal attack revert
Thank you for reverting a vandal's childish personal attack on my talk page. Have a nice day. Sensi.fr
I know I'm doing my job when vandals mess up my page. They get blocked...I just revert. Or in this case, you reverted it. Thanks for watching my back. - Lucky 6.9 02:38, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I'm new to this. Not wikipedia, but editing/contributing on it. The problem is that Solution-Soft has had a copyright on a software application, Time Machine, for a decade now. Apple may have a slight problem if they actually release their software under this name as it is somewhat similar in descriptions. Basically both allow applications to move forward in date or time. The original posting for the Apple "Time Machine" negatively affects SolutionSoft by causing confusion in the market place. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Michaelmorrison (talk • contribs) 05:17, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
But even if we were to dedicate this article name to the non-Apple "Time Machine", where would the Apple product go? It would just show up on another page with a similar and equivalent name. If you want, you can start a new article about the SolutionSoft program and use the {{for}} template to link to it discreetly on the current page. Deleting the entry on the Apple product just isn't a viable solution, though. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 05:31, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
torstuff
I've responded on the bot approval page. But yes you should be able to get every node from the tor directory, the client selects it's routing based on the directory, so if it isn't in the directory it'll never be routed that way.
Regarding signing, it wasn't a probem I thought to deeply about I guess I took a view that if someone did that, tough. The problem with signing is it relies on people checking the validity of the signature, something I believe won't happen (or at least not as often as it should), that said there is clearly no harm in doing the signing.
On the pywiki front, my code doesn't use that to do the updating. If you want copies of my stuff to see if it's of any use to you, then email me and I'll send it you. (Includes objects to get the tor node list, a urllib2 opener for socks4a proxies, and very basic stuff for updating WP) --pgk 09:03, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have reported User:69.255.0.91 for violating the 3RR. You might want to add a comment on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR since I see you've been battling it out with them as well. Thanks for helping keep the article clean! - antiuser 21:32, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've never heard of the kid before, but if you look over the press clippings here, the Matthew Savage with a Wikipedia bio seems pretty notable (certainly more than a lot of the cruft that builds up on those day-of-the-year pages). But that Matthew Savage was born in New Hampshire on May 9, 1992. -- Jim Douglas(talk)(contribs) 22:44, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archive of past discussions. Please do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, you can do so on the current talk page.
. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 07:55, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
