User talk:Omicronpersei8/Archive 4

This is an archive of past discussions. Please do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, you can do so on the current talk page.

← Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 →

Archives index
May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 (175 KB) August 2006 (244 KB) September 2006 (126 KB) October 2006 (135 KB) November 2006 (82 KB)

August 2006

Re: Sorry

No problem. No harm done. :) G.He 01:24, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

User:24.130.47.131

I added links to websites that are informational in regards to the subject matter I was editing. Hope that's okay. It was not for advertising purposes but for information that I felt would be useful to the community that is interested in the subjects I edited. Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.130.47.131 (talk • contribs) 01:48, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

sorry

sorry for the vandalism. especially for the "OH NOES" on dust bunny. was my friend Mike's idea. He does it all the time. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.160.87.38 (talk • contribs) 05:57, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

also sorry for the cat thing —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.160.87.38 (talk • contribs) 05:58, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

No worries, apology accepted. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.25.29.30 (talk • contribs) 06:56, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

I'll speak for myself, thank you very much. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 06:57, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Kiss me Kate. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.25.29.30 (talk • contribs) 07:04, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Why do you think my edits should be reversed? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.25.29.30 (talk • contribs) 07:10, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Ban me, I want to see what the screen looks like. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.25.29.30 (talk • contribs) 07:18, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Justinmorris

Please do not revert my edits to my own talk pages about files I have made.... Thanks, Justin —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Justinmorris (talk • contribs) 07:19, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Okay, but please log in or I don't know if this is someone vandalizing your signature or not. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 07:25, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Gee, he's rude isn't he? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.25.29.30 (talk • contribs) 07:26, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Talking point and Dean Koontz

Hello. Just dropping by to let you know that the IP 70.238.118.198 is doing the same thing 75.0.104.180 and 71.156.72.52 did. I'd deal with it now but I just got back from a 9 hour plane ride and am a little delusional (and I need a nap). Just letting you know in case you want to deal with it before I wake up. Oh, and while i'm here:

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For your wondeful work at watching IP addresses! omtay38 12:35, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Mistake warning

You mistakingly gave me a warning on my talk page [1]. I reverted a vandal in my edit. Don't see why that's wrong. See [2]. I deleted hundreds of File:Jimmy Wales. jpg, which aren't actually images. And that's all I did. Please remove this warning when you realize you made a mistake. Maybe you meant to warn 63.23.90.249 who put all those non-existent images in the article. Thanks. -67.175.191.238 22:42, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Response -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 23:09, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

User:65.87.134.91

Quit reverting my edits. As it stands, the album lapped the sales of their first effort three times, so why was it removed? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.87.134.91 (talk • contribs) 02:07, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

This is why. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 02:08, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

George W Bush not "nonsense"

The Police State is a serious issue, and your contributing to it is not appreciated. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 206.124.6.4 (talk • contribs) 05:43, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Oh, sorry, I didn't know it was your article. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 05:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Apparently, it is your Police State. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 206.124.6.4 (talk • contribs) 05:45, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism

I received a Wikipedia message accusing me of vandalism re: Gaarfield High School in Seattle. This is absurd! I've not done so, nor do I know how to do so. I've never looked up this subject. Most of my lookups are for info only and usually pertain to gardening and my hometown in Wisconsin. I have been threatened with being blocked from editing information on Wikipedia and, though I have NEVER edited an article, I feel this threat is unwarranted and slanders me. cobi@aol.com —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 205.188.116.70 (talk • contribs) 17:24, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Roman Catholic category on Jimbo Wales userpage

About that category, I recently added it, and afterwards Jimbo left a message on my talk page asking me why I had put him in that category, please talk with Jimbo before restoring it. Thanks.--The Count of Monte Cristo ^Parley 21:14, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

For catching vandalism on my userpage! Logical2u 22:02, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

About Shamkhals Site

Qazikumuq is the Land of Caucasian Laks. Tarki Qumuq are Qypchaq Turks. Non-qaziqumuq, non-Qumuq Turks were "elite dominance" or "power" ih Daghestan.--80.237.35.135 22:45, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

so —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.220.106.116 (talk • contribs) 00:31, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

WAR ON WIKI

ME AND MY FELLOW COMRADS WILL CONTINE THE GREAT WAR AGINST WIKI WITH PAGE VANDALISMS, SPAM, AND OTHER NIGGA SHIT. WE HAVE 100 MEMBERS U WILL NEVER DEFEAT US!!!!!!!!!!!! WE WILL CONTINUE UNTIL THE WIKIPEDIA SITE IS SHUT DOWN YOU WILL NEVER SEE THE END OF THE WIKI REVOLUTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TheLoon (talk • contribs) 02:03, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

huh wat u say sumfin -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 02:03, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

my opinion

you suck. i was just telling the truth about chloe coz she is so cool but clearly you're stupid and you dont know that you're a loser LOSER! i hate you. you have stopped me from expressing my opion you BIATCH! goodbye! kisses! xoxoxoxoxoxo love, ME! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chloeiseffinhot (talk • contribs) 02:30, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the rv. That was probably the most intelligent thing the anon had ever written. Cheers! Anger22 02:59, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

User:64.231.76.64

I have added some information to the Wikipedia article, commenting that it mirrors the ideology of anarchist communism. A minute later you reverted my changes. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.231.76.64 (talk • contribs) 03:56, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Sorry if that caused you trouble or alarm. The problem I had with it was mainly that it was unsourced and apparently a statement of opinion. The verbiage is also a bit strong/objectionable. If you can provide some academic sources to back up your claims, it would really help with my skepticism on this topic. Thanks -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:00, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Warning about Ryulong

This person is vandalsing the Jeremy Clarkson page with INCESTUAL remarks... sex with cousins etc... this is vandalism.. he is reverting it back to the vandalisim and will not stip sending me messages... can you send him a messgae to stop pestering me instead turning the tables... thanks very much. --86.29.117.118 03:58, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Yeh yeh... 55 warnings... very clever... did you look at what you were reverting yet?

--86.29.117.118 04:01, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

What? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:01, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

I am not vandalizing the article. This user was Wikistalking another user and had his original account blocked because he reverted a good portion of another user's edits based off of one quote posted at Jeremy Clarkson in which it states that Jeremy Clarkson said "When you buy an American car, you have to have sex with your cousin" which I do not doubt that this British commentator has said. Ryūlóng 04:06, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I read that. I just don't get where "55 warnings" comes from. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:06, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

I think he just doesn't know the WP:NPA policies. I'm tired of undoing vandalism through the IRC channel and getting results like this. Ryūlóng 04:08, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

You, sir, are fighting the good fight. When this user gets reported (and he will), I'll be either the referrer or a supporter of his block, as well as a congratulatory hand towards your good work. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:10, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Danke, Omicronpersei8. Frankly, I think this guy made this quote on a television show, and I can't find a transcript to prove either person wrong. However, the quote is in the right place. Ryūlóng 04:11, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

You know... maybe it's me... you are either the 4th or 5th person to turn this on me. The guy put "when you buy an American car, you must afterwards have sex with your cousin, because that's what [Americans] do." I took it off... the guy came back with a sockpuppet (its all on the Jeremy Clarkson talk page...) then I got blocked for a week for reverting the guys vandalism and the incest remark was put back.,.. its not some thing I dont agree with.. its vandalism.. ? you cant say something like that with no source?? I could put that on ANY page with no source...!! It's clear cut vandalism... the first half of the sentence is an actual quote.. but he's spiced it up with some incest.. and I've now been blocked once nearly twice by you for taking it off... and 'Ryulong' thinks im talking about something else and is sending me smug emails so i told him to get lost and he wouldnt so i told him to F.O... thats life...

I said 55 messages because everytime I do anything now I get a YELLOW messgae over and over.

So what about this incest... you are the last guy to put it on there now... how do you feel?

Ryulong, you are so desperate to have the article say that Americans have sex with their cousins why dont YOU provide the source right here and now... I've looked on GOOGLE... you got something else up your sleeve?

-- 86.29.117.118 04:08, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

All I know is that you have been obsessed with deleting that segment out of the article without proof that it isn't authentic, and have also been firing off personal attacks at people. Ryulong isn't the one teetering on the edge of being blocked at this moment. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:14, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

WHEN THIS USER GETS REPORTED??? ohh man... you people couldnt be more non-thorough...

"I dont doubt that zis Englishman says zis".......... PROOVE IT!!! SOURCE?!!!

You are a German guy deciding what is represented as fact on Wikipedia by your doubts?

A good fight?

OMG... --86.29.117.118 04:14, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Who's German? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:18, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Oh, because he said "danke". Wow. You amaze me, 86.29.117.118. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:19, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

I'll bet milk amazes you you thick asshole... now block this IP quick you dumb mother fucker!! cos we gonna play some games!! This is one of the weirdest experiences I have EVER had. There is some blatant INCESTUOUS vandalstic remarks and they have been put their by a guy who I proved has 2 sock puppets at least and how he left the remark with one and then reverted it with the other... and nothing..? the worlds dumbest detectives basically... "ze good fight"... I'll tell you what. I'll bet that it's the other way around.. I'll bet that if you claim that someone said something, YOU have to back it up, not that the whole universe has to prove that they didn't say something... how does one prove that another person DIDN't say something anyway?? The truth,,.. you guys are german teens ja? I have amillion IPs so do what you want you incest boys! --86.29.117.118 04:22, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Like I said: "wow". -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:23, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Wow... You want to be blocked, again, don't you? Just because I said one word in German, and because I'm the one who reverted your blanking of one user's contributions, makes us the bad guys? The quote, whether truthful or not, is in the right section, and I frankly have more faith in the other editor than you, right about now. You will be blocked for personal attacks now, YourCousin. Ryūlóng 04:25, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

See how I predicted that? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:26, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

I couldnt give a crap what you dumb asshole kids think. If the guy said it you would be able to prove it. It is vandalism and you guys are abusing the encyclopedia. This is why YOU Ryulong DELETED my discussion about it. Because you don't want anyone to know the truth. You are a WIKI bully and all around thicky!! I WILL see this page corrected.. trouble making pervert!! (ooh he probably said it)... sheer genius!! --86.29.116.217 04:32, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Do you really want to get your entire range blocked? I've asked the question on the talk page, and I will not revert your edits, yet. Your disscussion was removed because you are personally attacking those who do not agree with you. Ryūlóng

I don't have an entire range.. you do your best thicky... I WILL see the page corrected.. no keystone dumbasses are gonna change anything... you cant make up stuff like that without a source.. dont be a clown..like I said... you can fuck off.. I'm tired of you stalking me and undogin my reverts and trying to erase my discussions... its simply not on... you kids should wrao it up now... big kids stuff.. night night... --86.29.115.239 04:41, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Omicronpersei8: he's had his final warning. There are now 4 /24 range blocks for 31 hours. Ryūlóng 04:43, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

They're in effect now? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:44, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

ugh.... ugh............. yeh ..... ugh... they're in effect now... ugh... I can't feel my cousin,, ugh,,, f-f-ffading.. ooh.. der Krankenhaus,,, (YourCousin)--86.29.113.57 04:48, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Are you about to become more powerful than I can possibly imagine? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:49, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Since I know he's going to come back here, the quote is gone. It is not going to be added back tonight. Now stop making personal attacks, against myself, Kevin Breiterstein, Omicronperseii8, or Chico-whatever-the-rest-of-his-username-is. If someone says "Yes, Jeremy Clarkson did say that 'When you buy an American car, you have to have sex with your cousin because that is what [Americans] do'", then the quote will be added back. If you continue to make vandalous remarks on any of us, you may find yourself unable to edit Wikipedia, ever. Ryūlóng 04:57, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

-- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 05:02, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Travis Hafner

Me and my friends call him "Reach-around" all the time —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sfair (talk • contribs) 05:21, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

dude i wasn't even kidding

i read in the 2006 guiness book of world records that a man named jake larson actually had the smallest penis recorded. It's all fact. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.216.107.158 (talk • contribs) 05:45, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

User:140.247.153.114

thanks. very fair and sensible answer. good luck and you win. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 140.247.153.114 (talk • contribs) 05:49, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Something Awful

The Thorpe thing was a mistake, but I fail to see how that bit on Malak is unencylcopedic. Every article he's written has been in the style of a stereotypical gaming nerd. It's not POV or analysis or anything like that. That, very simply, is his character on Something Awful. Stilgar135 05:50, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Okay, I can agree with that. I just thought it was rather POV looking, and the sentence fragment also included in the edit made me think it was a "bad" edit. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 05:52, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

I had been meaning to cite the claim about Thorpe's message board post and actually wrote half the thing before realizing that someone had taken it out. Anyway, I got bored and moved to greener pastures. Thanks for understanding. Stilgar135 05:56, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Oh, sorry if I "dashed your plans," etc. If you want to put it back in, you don't have to worry about me reverting it. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 05:57, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Changes

I deleted all the old content because it is mostly out of date. I was going to add in all the new content. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.42.165.24 (talk • contribs) 06:09, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Could you please do it in a more incremental, one-section-at-a-time manner? Other people may want to read what is already in the article while you're working on it. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 06:10, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

User:69.139.151.232

Stop vandalizing the changes I made to the Zionist page. You need to do review your history. The Torah says Abraham came from Ur of Chaldea. Genesis 11:31. This is now known as modern day Iraq. His Grandson, Jacob, had come from Syria. Deut. 26:5. They both proclaimed, kind of like the Aryan Nations does today, that they are Yahweh's chosen people and that G-d, as some sort of mega real estate broker, gave them some land on the one small condition that they slaughter every living thing that occupied the territory in order to receive this divine "gift." This history is straight out of the Torah and is not subject to serious dispute even amongst Jews

As the UN General Assembly Resolution 3379 so succinctly stated, "Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination." This resolution stood for many years based upon evidence of early Zionist terrorist campaigns, such as the Sabra and Shatila massacre, among many others, used by Zionist Jews to rid the land that they covet so badly of its native population.

Thus, my alteration to the Zionism page to the effect that Zionism advocates the slaughter of indigenous Arab peoples in the region of Palestine is indeed factually and historically correct. I bet you must be either Jewish or a conservative Christian. Stop pawning off your religious indoctrination as historical fact.

I've reinstated the changes. Leave them alone until you educate yourself on the topic at which point we might perhaps discuss the matter. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.139.151.232 (talk • contribs) 06:27, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

WP:NPOV / WP:NPA / WP:CIVIL / WP:WEASEL -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 06:29, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

FYI...

You've got an orphan page somebody decided to make for you: User_talk:Omicronpersei8/RC -- Gogo Dodo 07:41, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Oh, that is just adorable. Thanks for pointing that out. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 07:42, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Thought you might find that interesting. =) You can probably get that speedy deleted for vandalism or some such other reason. -- Gogo Dodo 07:48, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Please stop reverting my San Carlos addition

Stop changing that, it is a helpful addition as it is a well known term amongst locals, the cities around it such as Redwood City have negative names associated with them on Wikipedia. On Redwood City, Deadwood City remains yet my addition of a famous local name for San Carlos doesnt? please stop removing it —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.5.7.87 (talk • contribs) 07:55, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

I really question the notability of local jargon like that. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 07:59, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Surrey Girls

;-) Saw your concern tag and then its removal...yeah, it's notable; it's part of local culture in the Lower Mainland of British Columbia and, well, pretty unique. It'll take a while before the definition that's there approaches the mean; Surrey's a special place, and Surrey girls aren't just slutty; it's a whole mentality/mode/lifestyle/fashion sense. Ever seen Trailer Park Boys? Something along those lines, only "uniquely Surrey" in a way that's one day going to produce some books/films and who knows what (I don't mean by me); it's "our Brooklyn" or "our Bronx"; a certain kind of personality; and this endless slew of harsh jokes which, though borrowed/transferred into other milieux, could only have been coined about Surrey girls....Skookum1 08:39, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Colin Powell

Why was my edit of the Colin Powell page reverted? He is Carribean-American, and not African-American. Thanks, and I love wiki. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.71.171.248 (talk • contribs) 12:31, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Colbert

Stevin Colbert stated on the Colbert Report that African Elephant population has tripled —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.18.134.50 (talk • contribs) 16:39, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Fidel Castro changes

In response to your accusation of vandalism on my part to the "Fidel Castro" article, I believe you are sorely mistaken and should do a better job of ensuring that the real vandals are reprimanded. The picture currently on the article at the top can also be found under the "Personal" section of the page. I used this photo to replace another photo which was on the sidebar, one depicting a circumcised and an uncircumcised penis. Therefore, I believe that not only did I not vandalize anything, I fixed vandalism that someone else had contributed. Do not accuse me of vandalism when I am helping the website. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.169.136.7 (talk • contribs) 17:31, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

You are right. Sorry, that was meant for another guy. I will try to do a better job. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 20:15, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

No harm done. In any case, thanks for helping keep Wikipedia clean! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.169.136.7 (talk • contribs) 00:09, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Good Charlotte

Omicronpersei8, as a result of the discussion to merge "pop punk revival" into "pop punk" (see: Talk:Pop punk (revival)) we are no longer adovacting the use of "pop punk revival" 17 users voiced their opinion with 15 for the merger. The term "pop punk revival" seems to be a neologism specific to wikipedia. There was little references to support the use of the term by critics and artists. As a result please use this information in regards to the Good Charlotte article. Xsxex 18:16, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

User talk:Stephencolbert

Howdy! Just a heads up, I posted a quick summary at WP:AN#User_talk:Stephencolbert. Regards, CHAIRBOY (☎) 20:11, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Mistake made on article Zoom about the film to come out

Trivia was added to trivia section, user requested source source was given Omicronpersei8 simply deleated the edit Omicronpersei8 is known to revert all edits made by none registered users because he distrusts their edits this edit was not vandalism, however. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.176.87.25 (talk • contribs) 22:46, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

I even knew Tim Allen was arrested on drug charges, but they don't belong in the "Zoom" movie article. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 22:47, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Your edit was Vandalism. Your quest to stop vandalism somehow leads to your vandalizing articles. A drug user and amoral person staring in a children's film? I believe that is trivia worthy of the film, Zoom's, article. 24.176.87.25 22:50, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

But it isn't, so let's just leave things as they are. Anyone who wants to know about Tim Allen can read all about him in his own article. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 22:54, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

So, it's not worthy because you say it isn't worthy? That's cool, King wiki. You really are a Vandal. 24.176.87.25 23:03, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks...as usual

I thank you too much lol. Nice tutorial post. I noticed your not admin box. You sure? I was thinking of nominating you in a month or two. Regards, alphaChimp ^laudare 02:01, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

You are too kind. Regarding the admin thing, I'm not sure I'm responsible or level-headed enough, but I'm just fine with being a peon. I think I'd rather leave the administrative stuff up to the experienced guys with good track records like yourself. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 02:05, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Oh, wow, someone just nominated you for adminship? I'm gonna keep watching that page until you accept, so get to it. I'm gonna be so annoyed if I'm not the first vote (I can't leave comments before you accept, can I?). -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 02:16, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

haha. August 11th, 2006. Maybe the 10th if I'm feeling lucky. I can tell you just before it goes live if you would like. =D alphaChimp ^laudare 02:32, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Why does ur thing keep telling me to stop vandalizing?

When i edit a page with actual facts??? WTF!?!?!? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.19.8.253 (talk • contribs) 04:05, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi

Ur a FUCKING IDIOT U SOB. Y do u say edit page when PEOPLE REALLY CAN'T edit SHIT!!!! What the fuck is wrong with this dumbass bitchass site???? I try and provide literal facts about the truths regarding some of the articles. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.19.8.253 (talk • contribs) 04:08, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

recent addition to elephants

Why is my comment inappropriate for the Pop Culture column of the elephant page? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Deepthoughts13 (talk • contribs) 05:08, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

There has actually been an ongoing debate on the talk page, where it was decided (for the most part) that additions such as this do not relate to elephants and thus would not be appropriate for the elephant article. If you go into edit mode for the whole article, there's a message at the top about it. I know it's easy to miss if you click on a section edit link. Sorry, I don't know how to make it more of an obvious warning. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 05:10, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Reversion?

The disruptive IP you just reverted at 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict reverted you. Could you revert again? Tewfik^Talk 06:07, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Okay, I'll watch him/her for a while. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 06:08, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

VDN

Hi Omicronpersei8. You reverted my vandalism of the VDN page. I think that is OK, but what I was trying to do was point out the fact that the page is a big ad. I have highlighted the phrases that support that claim in the VDN section. I am not sure how I am supposed to report such a page (though I suppose that vandalism is probably not the way) :-). Anyway if you have a suggestion I am all ears. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 204.17.26.4 (talk • contribs) 06:48, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

I have to say, out of all the vandalism I've seen here, yours is some of the most benign. I didn't really consider it vandalism when I saw it -- more like "enhancements gone wrong".
Anyway, I agree that this article has a terrible marketing slant. In lieu of simply deleting the bulk of the content, how about we start with putting {{advert}} at the top for now? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 06:54, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Ah, sounds good. I didn't know how to do that. Now I do! -- wwheeler 10:13, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Alfredosolis

Hi this is AlfredoSolis the guy of the vandalism contest.Thank you for unblocking me I will never vandalize again.Once again Im sorry. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Alfredosolis (talk • contribs) 07:04, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

You should really be thanking User:Firsfron. If anything you should be mad at me for reporting you, but I'm glad you decided not to vandalize. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 07:06, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi Im Alfredosolis and thanks for the welcome sign.Alfredosolis —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Alfredosolis (talk • contribs) 07:12, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

And who the hack are the guys that are making the WAR On WIKI? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Alfredosolis (talk • contribs) 07:18, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Ah, don't worry about that. It's just some guy with nothing better to do than cause trouble. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 07:20, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Someone vandalize my artticle about Len Maxwell. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Alfredosolis (talk • contribs) 21:15, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for placing the welcome template on Alfredo's page, Omicron. I should have thought to do that. Thanks for reporting the incident, keeping a level head, and welcoming Alfredo to the encyclopedia. Despite his rocky start, I hope he will become a good user. Thanks for all your help. Here's one RC Patrol I think you did exactly right. Happy editing! :) --Firsfron of Ronchester 07:22, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks to you too. I probably jumped the gun a little bit, but all's well that ends well, I guess. Maybe sooner or later I'll get this counter-vandalism thing right! -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 07:24, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

I don't feel you jumped the gun at all, Omicron. Vandalism, coupled with two notices that the user intends to make a contest to see how many pages can be vandalized should set alarm bells off. Keep up the good work. --Firsfron of Ronchester 07:31, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Kudos

You are quite a prolific editor. Good job! --Mr. Billion 08:05, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you! Good job to you as well, for the many edits you've put forth in protecting the integrity of popular articles. I see your name pop up a lot in my watchlist. Keep up the good work! -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 08:17, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Alfredo

User 68.103.120.13 vandalize my article about Len Maxwell by changing Stone Cold Steve Austin for Stone Cold Poop Austin. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Alfredosolis (talk • contribs) 21:16, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

I have reverted his change. You can always fix it when someone vandalizes a page by clicking on the history link at the top, selecting the last good edit, clicking the edit link at the top of that revision's page, and then saving the page over the vandal's version. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 22:20, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the changes on Len Maxwell and Nick Diamond. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Alfredosolis (talk • contribs) 23:44, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Well done

Great edit of the Bob Marley article. --Ezeu 02:35, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you! -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 02:36, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Wikiality!

To answer your question to me, Wikiality! If enough people say it's true, it's true! The foundation of Wikipedia! No actual experts, just a bunch of Dungeon and Dragon's misfits pretenting to run a real knowledge-base.

Wikiality! Wikiality! Wikiality! I was reading about it http://www.colbertnation.com ! :-) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.115.28.78 (talk • contribs) 07:00, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Hey, did you know that the population of elephants has tripled in the last six months? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 07:01, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

my talk page

It wasn't vandalism. I'm a senior now, but I guess I forgot to log in. Thanks for the heads up. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 198.214.229.233 (talk • contribs) 07:07, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

The wikiality of the elephant population.

Yes! I heard that somewhere. Soon it will be true! Unless you unleash the almighty power of the STOP! hand. lol. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.115.28.78 (talk • contribs) 07:09, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

-- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 07:10, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank You

Thanks for warning 24.115.28.78 about his personal attacks against me but I already reported him to WP:PAIN. Also do you think it would be ok if I remove the comments that he left on my talk page?--1568 08:10, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for this revert of my user talk. :) Kimchi.sg 12:48, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Keep it up

I've seen you beat me to the punch many times while patrolling the recent changes. Right on. --Daniel Olsen 09:59, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Sorry about that! I know the feeling. Gotta be fast with all these vandals, right? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 10:00, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

I mirror the feelings above - so much so that I just rolled back a rv of yours! Closed vandalproof before it could give you an unfounded warning though. Viridae^Talk 10:27, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, and it's cool -- I probably need a warning now and then to keep me grounded! -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 10:28, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

DUDE WTF!?!?!?!

King Henry the VIII DID found Linksys. Why did you change my revision. Look it up, its science. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.155.104.254 (talk • contribs) 12:06, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

You again? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 12:07, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Haha! Viridae^Talk 12:41, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Hamas

Might want to take another look at my revert there; I'd have reverted with popups, but it didn't seem to be blatant vandalism. I'm pretty sure you didn't mean to VS my revert, though; I was reverting a small but significant change in the PoV of the article. --Emufarmers^(T/C) 12:47, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

I thought the version I reverted to looked more NPOV. No? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 12:49, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

It's a highly political issue, so it's hard to say; what you reverted to was a significant change in the message of that paragraph: It significantly moves the PoV from the Israeli side to the Palestinian side. It doesn't appear to have been called for by the article's talk page, so it seems like PoV pushing to me. "[F]ighting the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories" has a distinctly different tone than "its suicide bombings." At this point I won't say which is "right"; just that there may be PoV pushing going on here. --Emufarmers^(T/C) 13:08, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Your viewpoint is certainly in the right, so I won't fight you on the issue; what I was concerned about (and I honestly didn't spend a lot of time deliberating over it) was the change of "attacking ... civilians" to "attacks directed against Israeli civilians". I also felt "resistance" sounded less loaded than "violence", but I now think I may have that backwards. I agree with your point about the first modification.
Isn't it a pain to think that these sections will probably in time be edited right back into POV Land, no matter what we do at the present moment? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 13:19, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

I noticed the part about civilians too, and it made me pause for a moment; but to my knowledge, Hamas does deliberately target civilians, moreso than military targets (because civilians are easier to target), but that may just be my background talking. I'll revert it for now, citing this talk page; if someone wishes to contest it further, I'm sure he or she will. --Emufarmers^(T/C) 13:25, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Way to beat me to it. :) --Emufarmers^(T/C) 13:25, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Truce

My words were not meant to be annoying. There is an error in his user page. You shouldn't just jump to conclusions because you have some sort of bizarre internet power.

Read below and please ensure you understand it prior to commenting further.

In working on Wikipedia, you may occasionally get into a dispute with another person. That person may seem like a troll or a hothead to you, but it's usually best to assume that you are dealing with a reasonable person who is simply confused on a particular issue or has a POV different from your own. No matter what the problem is, flaming is not going to solve it. Try to reach a truce. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.115.28.78 (talk • contribs) 21:39, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

There's a big difference between a "dispute" and trolling a person over and over with words like "Why does your user page still display inaccurate information, Ghandi?" I know I must come off as an idiot, but I know what you're doing, and you know what you're doing. Disputes don't occur over a number on a person's user page being wrong. That's just you trying to harass somebody. Keep it up, and there most definitely will be administrator intervention. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 22:45, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

amide

why did u edit tha damn page? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.19.26.96 (talk • contribs) 00:43, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Because you were vandalizing it. You got any more questions you'd like to ask me right now? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 00:45, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm very sorry, I just blocked that IP, so I'm afraid you will have to wait for your answer. Sorry about that :-) Gwernol 00:52, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Aww man! -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 00:53, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

amide

man fuck you and your truce. this si war muthafucker! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.19.26.96 (talk • contribs) 00:44, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Oh -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 00:45, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

RL edits

Can you point to the diff for me? I was being extrememly careful not to do that, but 1 or 2 may have slipped through. If you can point it out I'd appreciate that. -- I@n 01:40, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. I'm vetting then closely, but that one must have slipped through. Its reverted now. -- I@n 01:45, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

It's my bad for bugging you about this -- I was just afraid you were running a bot that might be mass-replacing indiscriminately. I also followed this up on your talk page. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 01:46, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Please let me know if you see any others. Cheers -- I@n 01:49, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Merlin Storm

Sorry, I was not aware that I was not logged in. Please correct my userpage. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Merlin Storm (talk • contribs) 02:17, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Done. Sorry for the inconvenience! -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 02:18, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

That's alright! Thanks!Merlin Storm 02:19, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Declawing cats

Rather than do a second revert, it's now up on Talk:cat for discussion. If no body has any objections, it may well be added again at some later point. Thought I'd let you know LinaMishima 03:00, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

That's perfectly fine with me, thank you. I hate to point out my bias on the issue, but check the contributions of the person who added those sentences. While this may just seem like me assuming bad faith, I think it's pretty good support for the opinion that said person hasn't thought out his or her additions all that well. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 03:02, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

NUMBER ONE THREAT TO AMERICA?

BEARS! THEY'RE GODLESS KILLING MACHINES AND MUST BE STOPPED! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SWTA (talk • contribs) 03:28, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to last year's joke -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 03:28, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

For reverting the vandalism to my user page ! -- No Guru 03:31, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

And thank you for blocking the above vandal. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 03:37, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

manboobs reverts

Why are you reverting my links? The subject was .... MANBOOBS! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.114.93.6 (talk • contribs) 03:59, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

This bastard is attacking me. If your reversts are so legit, then why don't you even answer my question? What's there to hide? 66.114.93.6 04:28, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting that odd comment on my talk page the other day. -- Gogo Dodo 06:00, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

User:69.173.149.172

hi--I was trying to add content and accidentally deleted it. How can I restore it? Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.173.149.172 (talk • contribs) 19:35, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

I already restored it for you. Happy editing -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 19:36, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Spacefed

We could add Unification Wars to the afd. I've speedied the other article. --Sloane 20:37, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

• Go ahead. --Sloane 20:42, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Nevermind, I already listed it under the afd myself. Hope I did right though.--Sloane 20:46, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Ah ok, I see what you did there. --Sloane 20:47, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Dinosaurs

Please could you help me clean up the disgraceful Dinosaurs article? They are still printing the same lies as before. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.93.21.134 (talk • contribs) 13:29, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Award

		Defender of the Bears award
		I hereby award you the Defender of the Bears award for cleaning up the frequent Colberrorisms at Bear. Those of us trying to make an encyclopedia appreciate it! Ziggurat 22:57, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

No probs, it's well deserved :) I only just discovered the Template:Joke, and have been using it liberally. Damn you Colbert! *shakes fist* Ziggurat 23:41, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

My talk page

Thanks for spotting that :) User was an impersonator (and quite a poor one!) of User:Karmak. - FrancisTyers · 23:04, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Rlevse

It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed content from Ed Snider. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Rlevse 23:07, 7 August 2006 (UTC)...was not Omnicron, was a same-time reversion.Rlevse 01:12, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Please, check the link above. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 23:08, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Joyce Cheng, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Rlevse 23:40, 7 August 2006 (UTC)Rlevse 23:48, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

For Snide, some of the paragraph is okay but is calling women babes and "The thought disgusts me." appropriate for an encyclopedia? another topic...Agree Cheng was an honest error on my part. Sorry about that one, I'll undo it. Rlevse 23:46, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Ed has been married three times; his marriages appear to occur in his stages of life. Ed divorced his first wife to marry a trophy wife that was about the age of his son Jay. (I wonder if Jay called this babe mom?) When this babe got too old for him, he dumped her for another trophy wife (Christine) that was about the age of his grandson. One wonders what will happen if Ed lives long enough to have great-grandchildren. The thought disgusts me.

No offense, but what part of that paragraph is "okay"? And even if I'm in the wrong, I don't feel as though I deserve vandalism warnings for it. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 23:51, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

"Ed has been married three times; his marriages appear to occur in his stages of life. Ed divorced his first wife to marry a .... wife that was about the age of his son Jay."...babe, dumped, too old, trophy wife, one wonders, lives long enough, one wonders, disgusts me, all have non-encyclopedic tone and looked like an attempt to smear him, though that seems to not have been your intention.Rlevse 23:58, 7 August 2006 (UTC)...will check back later, have to go now.Rlevse 23:59, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

I removed that. It was written by User:69.144.200.202, a vandal I'd been tracking and had reverted several times. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 00:00, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

ARGH. I see what happened, you and I must have looked at it a few seconds apart (though one time stamp is :08 and the other :09. I've actually had this happen before...two of us trying to revert at about the same time and the one a bit behind the other catches the first reverter rather than the vandal. I meant to revert the same thing you did and thought that's what I did, but you see what actually occurred. My revert of you was not intentional but still sorry for the trouble. Someone else has already put it the way both of us want.Rlevse 01:12, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

It's cool, God knows I've made my share of mistakes, many of which were completely in my control. I just didn't want to come off looking like a vandal, you know? Happy editing to you, and thanks for helping out as one of the RC patrol brethren. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 01:15, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Great, we're wiki buddies now and let's fight vandals and improve articles! Rlevse 01:19, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Physics Article WIP proposal

Hello, as an editor who has previously added to the Physics article and taken part in discussions on its talk page I thought a current proposal may be of interest to you. Over the past few months the article has suffered from a lack of focus and direction. Unfortunately the article is now judged by a number of editors to be in a relatively poor state. There is currently a proposal to start a full consensus based review of the article. That review and consensus process has been proposed here, your thoughts on the proposal and participation in the WIP review of the article would be much appreciated. It disappoints me that an article on one of the fundamental sciences here at wikipedia is in such a relatively poor state, and I hope you can have a browse by the page to offer your views and hopefully participate. Thanks, SFC9394 22:01, 7 August 2006 (UTC) -- passed on by --Michael C. Price ^talk 23:27, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Contact

Could you enable user emails or come on IRC? There's a private matter I'd like to speak to you regarding. --Emufarmers^(T/C) 19:24, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Why can't you post it here, though? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 22:30, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

It was a matter I thought might be better discussed privately, but as you wish: If I nominated you for adminship, would you accept? (Your user page does not indicate that you are privy to the idea, but from what I have seen, you certainly seem like a good candidate.) --Emufarmers^(T/C) 22:33, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

VS is not enough for my user talk

I think you already can tell by how many times you've been VSing my user talk to remove vandalism... rctxtreme 10:07, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

I have added your talk page to my watchlist, so maybe it will be enough now. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 10:08, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

How 'bout the pornographic links? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rctxtreme (talk • contribs) 10:23, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Well, yeah, I'll take care of those too if I see them. Again, I may not be on much longer, though. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 10:24, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks :) rctxtreme 10:27, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Quote from user page: "Everyone keeps bullying me thats why i throw chairs" by Jack1994 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rctxtreme (talk • contribs) 10:46, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for catching that vandal on my userpage, and for updating the count! :) — FireFox ^(talk) _{12:59, 9 August '06}

Al Gore

Any reason you are reverting an image on Al Gore that has been accepted for quite a while with no argument, and any reason you give no reason for your edit? The image shows an example of Al Gore in the media, nothing more or less. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.167.255.231 (talk • contribs) 13:03, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Because its licensing status is dubious, it is arguably unencyclopedic and probably inappropriate, and because it's being put on every Al Gore-related page. I did not give an edit summary because I am lazy and let my rollback tool do that for me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 13:05, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

It is on some Al Gore pages because it is about Al Gore, but I will respect your decision until your concerns can be addressed. Thank you --63.167.255.231 13:12, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Okay, I will check what pages they're on and respond back here. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 13:12, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

After my reverts, the image in question only seems to be on the following pages:

• Satire
• South Park
• List of South Park episodes
• Political satire
• Manbearpig
• User:Manbearpigs

Of course, this doesn't automatically mean it doesn't belong on the pages where I reverted it. You're welcome to a second opinion, and if you want to reinsert the images, I won't revert you again. I still feel, however, that they are out of place on said pages. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 13:17, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Prostitution article

Your revert of this following vandalism followed two other people's reverts and removed some genuine changes by, ok, me :)

If you wanted to remove those changes, can you tell me why on prostitution:talk? Lovingboth 16:32, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, but which revert are we talking about? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 20:01, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Hey there

It WAS vandalism. I didn't write that. How do I put in a good word for you as an administrator? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.31.100.170 (talk • contribs) 18:24, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Rumsfeld

No, your revert is fine. I will read on how to revert and think I know how to make the edit I want now. Minutiaman 20:42, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

But do you know how to get Rumsfeld's infobox to be formatted like his predecessors'? I tried but the image was lost. Minutiaman 20:53, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Would Template talk:Infobox be of help to you? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 20:55, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. The page you showed me may help for reference, but today I have been creating several infoboxes for former department secretaries, and noticed Rumsfeld's should conform better to the standard for such people. I think the problem was just that I typed in "image" twice accidentally in the editing, at least the second time. The first time I may have used an image incompatible with the format, if there is such a thing. Incidentally, is there a rule of thumb for avoiding unnecessary blank space (because of image placement) on articles? I am trying to fix this on Donald Evan's article now, after I added an infobox.Minutiaman 21:55, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Ah, I fixed that too. I think it is a matter of editing in the image name at the earliest possible place. Minutiaman 21:57, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Yeah; I'm not aware of any such rule of thumb. You might want to refer to the style guide, as I'm still relatively new and do more counter-vandalism than content edits. I guess in a lot of cases it all comes down to taste and aesthetics and all that. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 21:59, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Reverting vandal

Thanks a lot for helping to stop that anon user (actually a reincarnation of Alienus, who claims to have left). Do you know how to have people blocked for sockpuppetry? LaszloWalrus 21:05, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Sure, just report them to WP:AIV. You may also want to use the {{sockpuppet}} template on the vandal's user page. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 21:06, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for restoring the Buddhism page. Addhoc 21:39, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

scientology

sorry, they should've been there. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.7.154.206 (talk • contribs) 22:18, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the user page revert. Not sure where that one came from. Probably some vandal coming back with another username. -- Gogo Dodo 23:43, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

User:198.104.64.238

Help me! The aliens have taken control of my body. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 198.104.64.238 (talk • contribs) 00:22, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for helping me keep an eye on and reporting 24.14.151.87. Nothing is worse than high school kids in your own home town whom through their own vandalism, seem to have nothing else to do.... --JohnDBuell 00:37, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Would you please walk over to his school and give him a good whack in the back of the head for me? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 00:38, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

vandal counter

i didn't think such an edit was vandalism, but i guess he was just looking for another excuse to update his "vandal counter". Fabulousknot 02:27, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Joking

Look, I was just having fun. I won't do it anymore then —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.31.100.170 (talk • contribs) 10:43, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Dog the Bounty Hunter

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dog_the_Bounty_Hunter&diff=68761636&oldid=68679812

If you look here, you removed my "Dog the Bouny Hunter's daughter died" paragraph with no reason as to why. I'd like an explanation, thanks.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/05/23/ap/entertainment/mainD8HP6SKO0.shtml - Here's a link to the story from CBS News. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.141.64.79 (talk • contribs) 16:53, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

It was actually removed by 68.13.173.40 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • block user • block log) at 05:11, 10 August 2006. If you go back in history, you can see that my two recent edits to that article were removing deliberate vandalism by another user:

Revision as of 20:15, 9 August 2006

Revision as of 20:16, 9 August 2006

The previous version is on the left, and the new one is on the right, so the person to question about your paragraph's removal would be User:68.13.173.40. If you'd like, you're free to put the paragraph back in. Here it is for convenience (and I included a link to the news story as an inline reference):

It was revealed on August 8th, 2006 (during the airing of the show of Dog's wedding), that his daughter had been killed in a car accident [http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/05/23/ap/entertainment/mainD8HP6SKO0.shtml]. She lived with her mother in Alaska.

-- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 18:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Ah, I'm sorry! I must've misread the history page. Sorry about that :)--72.141.64.79 18:54, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

VandalWatch

My own name. It isn't a program. Click here to go there, and you'll see my records of vandalism in and outside wikipedia rctxtreme 21:13, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

moveon.org

i'm not testing, i'm openly vandalizing. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.2.236.216 (talk • contribs) 23:41, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Block me

I really don't care. I'm already an admin and can get in whenever and wherever i want. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.2.236.216 (talk • contribs) 23:43, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Of course you are. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 23:44, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Revs

Sorry, I just removed your Vandalsnipe - because I already blocked the Rev Will B Dunn. DS 01:16, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Totally cool, as long as he's gone. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 01:17, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: Helpme

Seems that way [3][4] G.He 02:07, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Awesome, thanks. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 02:08, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Sorry for my newbie edit on the hillary page

I think I have it down now. Was my first real edit and I was just rying to remove a bad link and format one. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Druac Blaise (talk • contribs) 02:28, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Article: HasanDiwan

It is no more self-promotion than the AurenHoffman article. In fact, the prior-mentioned article includes confirmed half-truths, suspected untruths and outright lies, some of which are listed in the article. I don't understand why you, as editors, favour one over the other. HasanDiwan 05:15, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Potato(e) Page

I believe the proper spelling is in fact potatoe. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jimmybeanjr (talk • contribs) 02:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

And I believe you are knowingly vandalizing. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 02:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

And I beleeve that is the propr speelling assfuck. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jimmybeanjr (talk • contribs) 02:52, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Hey, I wonder if you could run and check a dictionary before you get blocked. I'll start the timer! -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 02:54, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Ben Wheeler

That is my name and I am gay. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jimmybeanjr (talk • contribs) 02:52, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

User:190.10.4.55

you do not seem to understand what commercial means. kindly review the definition. and while at it, you might want to try and find out how closely related vandalism and taking information out of WP are. 190.10.4.55 03:28, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Iron Maiden

Hello, yes, I did remove it intentionally, I was talking on the user page about it, I just didn't specify I was deleting it "again" since my "cleaning" was made "invalid" by an angry user. I'll revert it agian and mention it on the talk. 201.19.176.32 03:30, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Osama bin Laden

As you seem to have realized w/ your revert, Boof's statements in her autobiography only sound like what a Wiki vandal would dream up. They're real and reprinted in the new edition of Harper's (unfortunately not online). Clearly the lady is an insane publicity fiend (and apparently she even uses Wiki, look at the mess that is her own page), and down the road this part of the article should be much reduced, with only a brief notice of what she said and the general derision with which she was eventually met from all sides... Wareh 03:34, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I might have been a little too revert-happy. I did realize it was feasible, though, and put it back. Thanks for clearing things up. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 03:36, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Nicole Scherzinger

I hope you can help in the current edit wars. --Design 03:46, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Error on Rv. Christianity Article (w/VS)

Since it took less than a minute for my edit to be reversed, I assume you didn't have time to look at the linked page in which I was editing the link to. Many people (possibly you included) don't know that naturism has to do with nudism. This is why I made the edit. Please considering restoring my edit -- it's not vandalism. Thanks. MDEY 04:07, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I thought I might've been wrong in that. (Admission is a good thing... right?) I don't remember a link, though. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:07, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Whoops, yeah. I checked the wikilink. I'll chalk that error up. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:09, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Live

You asked that I notify you when my rfa went live. This isn't campaigning =), but you're welcome to "voice your opinion". Regards (and keep up the vandal fighting), alphaChimp ^laudare 04:11, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Yay! -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:12, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

I beat you to the revert!!! Ahahahaha. (but you got the warning). Sorry, I'm a little nervous right now. alphaChimp ^laudare 04:19, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Just for that, I put in a very surly "oppose" vote at your RFA, if you haven't noticed. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:20, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Error.

I was recently warned "that if i continue to vandalise, i will be blocked from editing". I was simply adding onto the page. Possibly because i am not a registered user, my IP address was confused with another user. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 144.137.45.177 (talk • contribs) 04:34, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

If you aren't vandalizing, I assure you, you have nothing to worry about. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:35, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

db-bio's

Why slow down? I looked at the guidelines for notability here, a list of stubs here, and put 2 and 2 together. Many of these articles are unencyclopedic, and they should be deleted. How are they asserting notability "X is considered one of the hottest Y's?" That's not notable. I'm not deleting ones that meet the criteria on the notability page (unless I make a mistake, which is certainly possible.) -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 04:44, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

It is a little hard to believe that you're correctly judging all of the articles you're tagging. I requested you slow down mainly because of the work these tags are going to cause admins. Why not just use {{prod}}s? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:48, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

YO

lets face it "Omicronpersei8", wikipedia is looked at as one of the first websites to go onto for up to date info in cases of terrorist attacks, natural and man made disasters and any other crap when something bad happends.

i think it would be very prudent if we set up some kind of agreemebt/policy of what wikipedia should do to help (primarily provide information). i think it would be very beneficial if we encourage editors to write down phone numbers which can be useful to family members and so on, for example. i know that this happens to a large extent anyway but we need to have a discussion on this on how we can organize our efforts to produce best results, that is how we can organize the "someone blew up a part of a city/a big wave kills millions" articles to reflect the needs of the people on the ground.

i know that you are against this because you think that wikipedia is just a encyclopida but lets face it because of it up to date nature it is not just a dead set of facts and info.

any ideas on how we can improve the wikipedia policies?--Greg.loutsenko 12:29, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

kidnapping adventure

too bad i know the original poster, and he cares about as much as i do that it get vandalized. i can't find the suggest for deletion link, so i guess i'm the asshole. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.41.227.251 (talk • contribs) 22:52, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism of Ben Best article

There is a pattern emerging here. CRANdieter/Freezer Man (identities created for the primary purpose of hacking the Ben Best page or links to it) makes bad faith edits. Administrators notice that the article is stupid looking and unencyclopedic, and sometimes correct it. Freezer Man improves his behavior the day the Admin visits, appearing to be reasonable, almost reaching consensus. Shortly thereafter Freezer Man reverts Admin edits, and makes more bad faith edits containing deliberately misleading information to make the article a joke on Ben Best rather than an encyclopdedia article. As a contributor and maintainer of articles pertaining to cryonics and related subjects, I will make no more compromises with this individual, who is deliberately hostile to the interests of a serious encyclopedia, and basically doing as much damage as he thinks he can get away with. A version of this article without the snide remarks and references should be locked. I don't know if you have the power or inclination to do so, but thanks for your attention anyway. Cryobiologist 18:55, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for helping keep Wikipedia as it should be! Cryobiologist 05:19, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

"probably not make a good admin"??

Why do you have a UBX that says that bud? I was just thinking to myself 'I wonder if this man would accept a nom for adminship' and then spotted that on your page! Thanks :) - Glen 21:47, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

I really appreciate your vote of confidence, and it honestly means a lot coming from you. I just wanted to let that be known right away; I'd be happy to explain that userbox in a short while, if you'd really like my reasons (seems to be quite a bit of vandalism going on at the moment). -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 21:51, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

I was also thinking of nominating you. And then I saw the userbox. DS 23:22, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Many thanks to you too, DS. The reasons for my not wanting to be an admin currently center around the fact that I'm intolerant, lazy, error-prone, and inexperienced. I also don't think I could stand the anxiety and discouragement of an RFA, which would certainly air out all of my bad traits and editing mistakes. I really appreciate you guys' kind regards, but I'm not ready to be an admin and probably never will be. Also, the folks at AIV seem to be doing a pretty good job lately anyway. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 00:46, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Topic: Hal Anderson

Good day!

I think maybe something which was marked as vandalism shouldn't have been:

Although I don't necessarily agree with the original inflammatory nature of the original description of Hal Anderson, I do share the same opinion. Hal Anderson, has clearly contributed little to nothing to the betterment of Canada. The fact that he was voted 34th "greatest Canadian" is an embarrassment.

Leading the people to believe that an individual who spends a good portion of his time sitting on the radio, eating, and organizing whip cream wrestling events at local pubs, is one of Canada’s most cherished individuals is an insult to all Canadians.

Therefore, some variant of the following paragraph (which was previously removed) should be restored:

"The fact that a radio jockey who has contributed little or nothing to the betterment of Canada as a whole can be voted as "greater" than many historical figures, is a prime example of some of the failures of direct democracy. It shows how easily it can be twisted to suit the needs of an organized group, with or without regard for the purpose of the vote itself."

Kind regards! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 142.161.171.154 (talk • contribs) 03:15, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

If you can find a neutral, factual way to phrase that, by all means, put it in the article. As it stands, that paragraph is completely a statement of opinion. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 03:18, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

User:70.209.50.57

I am new to Wiki, and I don't know if you can read this, as I am not sure if it is a message to you, but I hope you do, and I hoe you understand that all the time you seem to waste in editing and re-editing other peoples changes to wiki are nothing more than censorship. You are wrong, and probably young and gullible to believe the media biased of national networks. you'll find out as the world will the control of people like you is destroying america. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.209.50.57 (talk • contribs) 03:16, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Uh huh -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 03:18, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

A rebuttal

I think the glorification of a local media celebrity is an excellent thing in this day and age. It shows we have gone beyond the worship of mere gods, statesmen, and false institutional icons like marriage, nations, and professional sports: this is the popular voice, raised in response to the existence of a real, human, close, and approchable hero. I mean, sure, he's a radio host for a small station in a secondary market in the geographical center of the continent, almost exactly twelve hundred kilometers away from any *real* social, economical, or academic center -- but what else would one expect to find in such a petri dish of human experience? Nothing but the concentrated will of the populace, that's what. Let's make our heroes more human, people! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.79.87.235 (talk • contribs) 03:35, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Assuming you are the same person who posted to Hal Anderson, I am pleased to see you have thought out your position, but this is an encyclopedia, not a place for commentary. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 03:36, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Edit to Talk:EBaum's World

I was gonna archive that section of the talk on my own page, but I looked at the archive policy and decided not to. So I was suprised to see someone reverted it so fast. Eh. Just a tip, don't revert talk page edits unless you know what the conversation is about. Now I'll just move that onto my talk page. And don't think about reverting that, I've made up my mind now. Machchunk 03:49, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

I just wanted to make sure

	Someone here needs to think before they talk shit.
—Machchunk 03:40, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

didn't go unnoticed by any interested third parties. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 03:50, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Well then they'll see it on my page. But they better actually think before turning any of their usual excuses on me.

Anyway. Was just off to remove the eBaum's World talk page version. If anyone wants to say anything further, just go to my talk page. Machchunk 03:55, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

I did leave a comment where I (maybe too subtly) requested that you chill out a little with the inflammatory remarks. You're welcome to remove it if you feel I'm butting into the conversation, but please, no more of that, okay? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 03:56, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Um. Okay. Whatever.

I'm just feeling REALLY bored right now so excuse me if it sounds like I don't care. Machchunk 03:58, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Are personal attacks your solution for boredom? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 03:58, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Dude, wtf. I've already dealt with that excuse. Machchunk 04:03, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For reverting and reporting vandalism quickly Æon Insane Ward 04:39, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

No Prob! I raised the DEFCON for a while since this might be a possible tCv. Hopefully it is only isolated. Æon ^{Insane Ward} 04:41, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. I'm going to pretend like I know what that means so I don't feel embarrassed by my own newbie-ness and keep a sharp lookout for the next little while. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:43, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Ohhh, WP:TCV. Right, gotcha. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:45, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Yep that is the one. Æon ^{Insane Ward} 04:47, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

And since your page was hit. Æon ^{Insane Ward} 04:47, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

I Aeon present you with the Purple Barnstar for having your userpage wounded by enemy (vandals) fire. Æon ^{Insane Ward} 04:47, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Haha, great! Thank you again. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:49, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Gee, I'm kind of late here, well... really late, but thanks for the revert on my userpage! tmopkisn ^tlka 05:20, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

You're very welcome. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 05:21, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Ukcatz12

Why did you delete my edit. Everyone knows that Al Gore is a fag. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ukcatz12 (talk • contribs) 05:24, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

STOP

I AM NOT SAYING ANYTHING THAT IS NOT TRUE ABOUT AL GORE AND I THINK YOU NEED TO STOP> —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ukcatz12 (talk • contribs) 05:34, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Ok reveted most of the link spaming

OK I got most of 59.176.27.101 link spaming....that was annoying. Æon ^{Insane Ward} 05:36, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Oh, sorry, I didn't know I missed more of his links. I might be requesting a block for him shortly if he isn't blocked/on his way already. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 05:37, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

I would recomend it check this page to see how many page had to be reverted. User:Aeon1006/AntiVandal Should give you a clear picture. Æon ^{Insane Ward} 05:55, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

User:59.167.130.236

Piss off from my page, you overbearing wanker. If I want to edit MY OWN PAGE, I will! Fuckwit. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.167.130.236 (talk • contribs) 05:56, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

You don't know how to ban me, do you, fuckwit? BUAHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAA —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.167.130.236 (talk • contribs) 06:00, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Purple Barnstar again

For the Personal Attack that was direcrted at youÆon ^{Insane Ward} 06:03, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

I Aeon present you with the Purple Barnstar for having a personal attack posted on your userspace. Keep your chin up! Æon ^{Insane Ward} 06:03, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you again! It's cool, I'm used to it. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 06:05, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

The Star is the PA is not lol Æon ^{Insane Ward} 06:09, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

What did i do

what did i vandalise —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Liam healy123 (talk • contribs) 08:45, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Ah, this and this and this and also this. Daniel.Bryant 09:08, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

That's not even counting all the nonsense articles he created that were quickly deleted. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 09:09, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my talk page! Cheers! hoopydink^{Conas tá tú?} 10:03, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting vandalism from my user page and many other pages related to me .You may like to have a look here too[5].Holy|Warrior 14:07, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Revert

Do not remove my message to another editor, it's considered vandalism, thanks. 70.48.251.229 01:59, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

		Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For your sheer speed of reverting vandalism, I present you this anti-vandalism barnstar. :) G.He 02:18, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi.

Hi, Omicronpersei. I noticed that you reverted vandal so fast. I mean you revert all vandals much much faster than mine. Emm, I usually use Vandal Proof to revert vandal, and by my hand without using any tools. So, What kinds of tool do you use when you revert all vandals? Just curious. Anyways, cheers! *~Daniel~* ☎ 02:23, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: Thanks

No problem. :) G.He 02:34, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

I Found a Barnstar You Didn't Have...

...so I had to give it to you. Omicron, you have more edits than my bot. (or just about as many)

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		is awarded to Omicronpersei8 for his incredible and ceaseless counter-vandalism efforts. Keep up the incredible work, and don't forget to sleep. alphaChimp laudare 02:35, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the message on my talk. By the way, I found this tonight. Since it took so long for me to load, I figured I'd go ahead and post it to save you the effort.

Total edits	15419
Main:	7973
Talk:	178
User:	415
User talk:	6219
Wikipedia:	576
Wikipedia talk:	11
Image:	10
Image talk:	1
Mediawiki:	0
Mediawiki talk:	1
Template:	18
Template talk:	1
Help:	0
Help talk:	0
Category:	9
Category talk:	1
Portal:	6
Portal talk:	0

Regards, alphaChimp ^laudare 02:35, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Haha, thanks so much bud. I'll display it proudly. alphaChimp ^laudare 02:54, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Sorry it's not a better image. I didn't really look for a new one. Maybe I can find you something better later on if you care for it. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 02:55, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Nah, it's OK. I like the new one. I see the vandalism on your page has been heating up a bit. You must be doing something right. alphaChimp ^laudare 03:11, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

lol :P G.He 03:15, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Well, I hope so. (P.S. I hate to obsess (although that's kind of my thing), but I didn't really consider that I might be forcing you to add something you might consider silly to your user page, so you're welcome to remove it if you want.) -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 03:24, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

No, it's OK. Any star is an awesome one, and will be posted. The next 4 days are going to be sort of tense for me, and I appreciate anything that breaks the tension. alphaChimp ^laudare 03:27, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

whats the problem

i hate you, ive done nothing wrong and you say i have vandalized stuff? you truly suck. you and this site can kiss my ass. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Forwestmail (talk • contribs) 03:26, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

User:82.112.144.156

Hey originally I was responsibly adding information but kept getting it reverted despite the fact that I was adding relevant information .

The 911 page is biased because it doesnt mention that the amrican government exploited the attacks for their personal gain . —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.112.144.156 (talk • contribs) 11:45, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

You were notified of the rules and warned five times. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 11:48, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

not vandalism

hey I wanted to let you know that I am new but I was trying to contribute to the Colbert Reports' section on The Word. I have compiled a list of all the words in order. You can check any one by going to http://www.tv.com/the-colbert-report/show/45593/episode_listings.html?season=0&tag=nav_bar;all thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Billinboston (talk • contribs) 20:40, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for clearing that up. I believe you in that it's not vandalism, but I'm still not sure if it's really appropriate, because I think it might be in violation of the policy that reads, "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information".

Yeah maybe. That sort of depends on your definition of indiscriminate. Should only the words that have a major impact be recorded (ie wikiality/truthiness). I dont think its that indiscriminate but its all cool. Just sleep on it will ya. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Billinboston (talk • contribs) 20:51, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Sure, alright. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 20:52, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

See my comment RE: The Colbert Report recurring elements on his talk page. - CobaltBlueTony 20:57, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

• P.S. LOVE the user name! - CobaltBlueTony

Thank you! -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 21:02, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

thanks

for the save/revert. good eye.

I had to google for the username reference -- when I've seen you around, I always thought it was just a reference to the star, which is pretty unassuming on my star atlas. I get it now! best, bikeable (talk) 21:28, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

You know, when I picked the name, I thought no one would get it, but I was very wrong. It's even got an article here, as it turns out. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 21:35, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

what? i didn vandalize

Im afraid im not sure whathtis is about —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.57.144.19 (talk • contribs) 22:15, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Don't worry, it's probably not for you, but for the person previously using your IP address. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 22:17, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

db-author

You're right, sorry, I didn't check to see if he had blanked it, just saw it wasn't him tagging. Looks unlikely to survive a prod at any rate, and he blanked again after I removed it, so I have now deleted it. Thanks for pointing that out. -Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 23:58, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the revert

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my userpage. Much appreciated, Gwernol 00:00, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

And thanks again. Much as I enjoyed being an airport for a moment, its nice to be back to being a person again. Best, Gwernol 01:51, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Tomblob03

My comment about punk fashion should not have been removed as i know many punks who disagree with the word fashion being used with the word punk, and i think they know best —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tomblob03 (talk • contribs) 00:01, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

omg no offence but if all u do is counter vandalism on wikipedia, then thats pretty sad —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tomblob03 (talk • contribs) 00:13, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

What's sadder than that is me right now. I have feelings too. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 00:14, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

dude can u put my punk article back or at least put it in tiny weeny letters at the bottom saying its wat i think —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tomblob03 (talk • contribs) 00:16, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

I'd ask you to apologize first, but you're... well... on your way out anyway. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 00:18, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Universe

Hi, thanks for the help on universe. ... Kenosis 00:33, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

No problem -- I'll keep watching it. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 00:34, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Hey Omicron

This is Alphachimp. I'm actually using AOL =/... Thanks for warning me =). Regards, 205.188.116.70 01:23, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

By the way, I'm at somebody else's house. I really hate aol. 205.188.116.70 01:23, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Haha! {{TEST4IM}} -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 01:24, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

LOL. By the way, AOL is completely retarded. I mean, I was just browsing wikipedia and I get tons and tons of warnings. What a stupid system. I'm back to normal now. alphaChimp ^laudare 01:52, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm really glad I ignored my friend's suggestion and went for the local dialup ISP when I first got on the Internet. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 01:55, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

page regarding nigger

Actually, it was a fact and not my own personal analysis. Most people would consider it a fact that ignorant racist people use the word nigger. Someone who wouldn't agree is probably a racist. I believe it should stay and I also don't feel I was doing anything wrong whatsoever Tonetare 01:54, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

I disagree, because despite the pervasiveness of human bias, most people know the difference between fact and opinion. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 01:56, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Tonetare complained to me about the article and I suggested he edit it. While his edit may leave something to be desired in its exact phraseology, I feel it moves towards including an element that is currently lacking from the anodyne first sentence, as it now stands:

"Nigger is a term used to refer to dark-skinned peoples

The problem with this as an initial definition is particularly in the present tense, which gives no indication that it is a pejorative term, now regarded with horror by many people because of its associations. You have stated that most people know the difference between a fact and an opinion. HIs edit changed the opening to:

Nigger is a term used by ignorant racist people used unacceptably to show their hate against dark-skinned peoples

This seems to me to be a fact, stated rather baldly, but nevertheless encapsulating something that needs to be there from the outset in the examination of this word. It could do with refining, but, at least in the UK, given the choice of the two versions, I think most people would feel more comfortable with Tonetare's.

Which of the key points in his edit do you think not factual?:

• 1) ignorant
• 2) racist
• 3) used unacceptably
• 4) show their hate

No. 4 is a generalisation that does not always apply, as the word can be used simply out of ignorance rather than specific malice.

Regardless of that, I have to speak on his behalf to say that it was a good faith edit, which did not merit a vandal warning, nor was it correctly reverted as such, without an explanation, so I would ask you to remove that warning from his talk page.

Tyrenius 02:17, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

That's a mild, mostly unassuming warning for people who "add commentary or [their] own personal analysis" to articles, which is what Tonetare did. Surely he or she is not the first person to hold these opinions or think of placing them in an article; there's a reason it's not there already. The first two words are weasel words at best, the third is (although I agree with its assertion) a statement of opinion, and the fourth is a trite and not always true statement. For the time being, I have compromised and allowed "very offensive" to slip in under the radar. I am simply trying to keep things neutral, not promote my opinion, although Tonetare seems to regard my edits differently. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 02:23, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

not at all. thank you for leaving offensive term in there. My original phraseology was wrong as you stated Tonetare 02:38, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Oh, I thought you were an administrator. Well in that case, you little... :P no j/k. All is good. As I said, you were absolutely right when you said my phraseology was wrong as I looked in the dictionary. Just because you use the term you can call someone ignorant. It's ignorant TOO use it but whatever. offensive is good. Not angry at you. Thanx Tonetare 02:43, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm glad to see Tonetare has been able to see your intervention in a constructive way, and I must congratulate you on your efficiency. I'm sure you're doing a lot of good work. I found a reference which I've added and which actually used the exact phrase he settled on. I'd accept 1) as weasel, though not 2) as, for a start, it's now a term used in UK law and can lead to prosecution. 3) is intrinsic to the fact that it's "very offensive". However, I'm not interested in pursuing that further, though I'm sure it wouldn't be too hard to find sources for those assertions.

However, I must take issue with the warning. The "test" series are stages of vandalism warning, starting with no. 1 intended for minor stuff or new editors who are literally testing. They are definitely not intended for good faith edits, even if those edits are a bit off-beam. Clearly Tonetare was editing in good faith, trying to correct what he saw as a deficiency in the article, and, now that he has modified his entry, hopefully that goal has been achieved. I understand that on first sight you saw his edit differently, but I wonder if, now the circumstances are apparent, you would be prepared to withdraw it. I feel it is even more unfair, as the only reason he venture to make the edit was after my encouragement. Tyrenius 03:20, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind words. I understand that you are trying to show me that his edits were essentially good-natured and legitimate, but they still have an opinionated slant to them. They're unnecessary and unencyclopedic, and I believe people reading that page would be more interested in a neutral, explanatory passage than in one decrying the usage of the word. As you said on Tonetare's talk page, it would probably be reverted somewhere down the road anyway.

As for his warning, it's not a {{test}} template, it's a {{npov}} template. It doesn't imply that I thought he was editing in bad faith, only that I was requesting him to rethink his actions. Really, it's not like I threatened to get him blocked or anything. I think it's best for me to just say that if he were to remove the warning from his talk page right now, I probably wouldn't bother to do anything about it. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 03:27, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

You might like to check out material I archived for him to give him a clean slate! My bad, as they say, re. exact template — of course it does end in the same way. As I do feel responsible for encouraging him, I shall do the job, with your tacit, or at least Nelsonian, permission (I trust). :) Tyrenius 04:17, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Noticing for the first time that you're an administrator and could have crushed me like a bug at any moment during this ordeal -- why, yes, I think I will "grant you the permission". Now I feel pretty silly for "explaining" the difference between templates to someone who certainly already knew. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 06:49, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Lol. I'm glad to be in the clear over permission anyway! I had no wish to usurp your work, and you probably know these templates in more detail than me if you're doing vandal patrol, but they are just variants of each other, and I would make the point they are not meant for the editor who is making a good faith edit with that intent (even if it's a bad edit, it still counts as an edit and not vandalism). The templates should be kept for people that are patently not attempting to make a good faith edit, but are either experimenting or doing a deliberate act of vandalism. Admin rollback should likewise only be used for the latter two conditions. Sometimes I'm not sure about an edit, so the thing to do is AGF and manual revert with an edit summary of "rv", which is neutral. There's plenty of protocol to say that's how it should be done. If you want someone to rethink an edit because you disagree with it (which was quite correct in the case under discussion) then this is normal editing and should follow normal editing procedures by changing it and either explaining in the edit summary or on the talk page. Anyway, keep up with the good work, and if you need any backup, you know where I am. Tyrenius 13:41, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For reverting the Lude Vandal about a dozen times (What I call him) I award you this star Æon Insane Ward 04:10, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

You got it, On Vandal Proof right new and about to go over the 350th revert mark. Æon ^{Insane Ward} 04:12, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Congrats! Getting sick of it yet? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:12, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks.

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page. Much appreciated. Daniel's page ☎ 06:08, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for reverting my userpage. I also forgot to thank you for reverting it the other day too. DVD+ R/W 21:00, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

No problem, no need to. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 21:00, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

hot dogs in Arizona

I notice you keep removing my edit of the Arizona hot dog variation. Have you ever been to arizona? My post is rightgeous. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.231.163.130 (talk • contribs) 02:52, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks mate

For adding the {{unsigned}} templates to my talk page, appreciated :) - Glen 03:17, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Universe Spam

You and Canadian-Bacon seemed to have been slightly confused in wether or not to revert 203.10.59.63 on Universe. I can almost assuredly tell you that it is spam. See Category:Wikipedia:Sock_puppets_of_Universe_Daily for many of the spam URLs that User:Universe Daily's socks and proxies like to use. Visit a few. You'll find they're an almost identical forum that has been repeatedly spammed. I doubt the list is definitive anymore, but keep an eye out for it. Kevin_b_er 03:33, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I actually realized that after reverting myself, and then went back to remove it, but I think I got edit conflicted or something. At any rate, I removed the user's other postings of that link. Thanks for clearing things up and letting me know about this puppet master. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 03:34, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Rfrisbie/Userboxes/Political Parties

If you go to the bottom of the page listed above you will see a link for Democrats but not for Republicans. Im trying to help you out. John R G 05:33, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Lets see if you go to the bottom of the page that is listed above and click on the DEM for the democratic party you will see what I am trying to do. They have a link for the Democrats but there is no link for REP in the Repbulican party. I hope that helps. John R G 05:42, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Do what you need to do im just trying to help. Im going to work on the Constitution party. John R G 05:46, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Okay, sorry about bugging you. I'll stop. Thanks for helping out and thank you for being easy-going. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 05:48, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

You havent given me any problems. Can you delete the category I made about the republican party since you wont be using it. John R G 05:50, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Sure, I'd be happy to help with that. Again, sorry to be nitpicky -- I do appreciate your help, and even though I guess we won't be keeping your category, I'm glad you pointed out these problems so they can be fixed. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 05:52, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Category:Constitution Party Wikipedians

Take a look at the link above. I hope it will work. John R G 05:58, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Looks fine to me. The problem I have here is the same problem I had with the other category: you've put it on an article page, but it's meant to be on user pages. Would it be alright if I removed it from the Constitution Party (United States) article? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 06:00, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

I fixed the "GOP" template up to mirror the Democratic userbox, by the way:

GOP	This user supports the U.S. Republican Party.

Hope that's alright. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 06:10, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

I was wondering why you removed the information about the Constitution Party. There was nothing about people listed so I made one up. John R G 06:23, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

If the category has "Wikipedians" in it, then it's only meant to be used on user pages. On the Republican Party article, for example, there's already a template for articles related to the Republican party. The Constitution Party category you added is for users, though, so it should only go on user pages. Does that clear that up any? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 06:25, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Category:Constitution Party Wikipedians

How do you like the template? John R G 06:24, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Looks fine to me, except you included the code for it on that page and not a transclusion to a template. You made that yourself and didn't get it from a preexisting template page, right? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 06:30, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Ignore that part about transclusion -- doing that seems to cause problems with recursive inclusion or something. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 08:35, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians by politics

Can you merge the three Republican categorys into one. That would help. If anything I am typing alot also. John R G 06:28, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

First, did you read my other comments above? Those categories are not all meant for the same namespace. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 06:31, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

I got a good start on the republican and constitiution parties if you want to make any changes go ahead. I just wanted to get a good start the template works fine on the sandbox I dont know why it doesnt work on the site. Again make any changes you feel that you need done. John R G 06:35, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

I figure you wont do any harm so do what you need to do. I hope that I was able to help. If you want to change the colors of the template go ahead I had to pick something. Thanks for you time and help. John R G 06:39, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

If you look at my main page you will see the CONS will link to the site but I still have to make the category. John R G 06:52, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Let me help you by making the template. I will place it in your user space (see: the German userbox solution) and then I will post the link to it to you. Then you can just include a link to it on your user page (something like {{User:John R G/User Constitution Party}}). Okay? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 06:54, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

That is fine you can even put it on your site. John R G 06:57, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Seems more appropriate for it to be on yours (since you're the one who made it)! I'll go ahead and put it in your userspace, if you don't have any strong objections, and you can move it over to mine if you don't like that. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 06:59, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

That is fine one last thing can you get the templates for the Constitution Party and the Libertarian Party on User:Rfrisbie/Userboxes/Political Parties. That might not be easy but it would be great. If you want to delete any of the stuff I made for the parties go ahead. See you tommorrow. John R G 07:05, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Actually it should be pretty easy. Have a good night (assuming it's night where you are). -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 07:05, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm actually not going to put it on that page yet, since the only national parties listed there are Republicans and Democrats. I'm sure the Constitutional Party is notable and important and all that, but since no others are listed there (in my very scant research), I'm going to leave it as is for now. I did put an appropriate userbox category on the userbox I put in your userspace. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 07:38, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

... Which is at {{User:John R G/User Constitution Party}}. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 08:25, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

los alamitos high school

You went to los alamitos high school? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ad10am (talk • contribs) 23:34, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Nope, sorry. I just reverted vandalism to it. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 23:35, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Alcoholics Anonymous

You keep taking the picture of Ice Cube away from the Alcoholics Anonymous page. Ice Cube was a alcoholic and he his now sober. I feel his picture should be on this page to show people that it is possible to quit drinking, and this picture will inspire them to quit. Please re-insert or alow the picture Image:Icecube06.jpg|thumb|250px|Ice Cube - Recently became sober with help from Alcoholics Anonymous to be view on this page. Thank You. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Roberthill (talk • contribs) 23:53, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Stephen Colbert

The changes I made to the article are valid on the basis of Stephen Colbert's arguments. Given the fact that the article is about Stephen Colbert I would like my changes not to be removed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lukis100 (talk • contribs) 03:14, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

On an interview with Lukis100 Stephen said ...

Uh huh. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 03:17, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

yEP

I don't know how to do it. Could you write the whole signature? Mine just says Adrienna, my name. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bethicalyna (talk • contribs) 03:45, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Sure. Is the "Raw signature" box on your preferences page checked? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 03:46, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Actually, I don't think that's the problem anyway. I'm working on it. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 03:47, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Okay, I recoded what you posted, and I think it would look like this:

A d r i  e n v e a

But if you wanted "Adrienna" and the same color sequence was being followed, it would be more like:

A d r i  e n n a

Are either of these close? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 03:55, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Okay, I found a correctly coded one on your talk page:  Adrienv<n>ea 

The letters look a little off -- any idea what went wrong? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:00, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Link

Seeing as this post is about you, I'll link you to it: Talk:Terrell_Owens#Omicronpersei8. alphaChimp ^laudare 04:04, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Oh, thanks. I'd stopped watching that guy. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:05, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

pERFECT

My sister left but she said it wa sperfect. Lindsay1980 04:06, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Great! -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:07, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

dunnes stores

Why have you reversed my addition to this page

193.120.102.4 08:39, 17 August 2006 (UTC)A

More on DUNNES STORES

The message I posted was "This company has a long history of poor labour relations. It currently has a large amount of part time & temporary staff. Typically when a temporary staff member hands in their notice they are removed from the roster for the period of their notice. Effectively once part time staff hand in their notice they are fired without pay. "

Can you tell me why it was removed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 193.120.102.4 (talk • contribs) 08:42, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

The screwed up notice

You should really consider removing that notice. 12 mess ups isn't a lot considering the masses of RC patrol you do, and it makes you look like a poorer patroller than you actually are (and just encourages people to complain). -- Steel 16:56, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, but I really hate the idea of appearing to hide my mistakes. I'm actually pretty used to complaints by now, and some of them really are well-founded. Thank you for the kind words, though. If you feel it looks bad at the top formatting-wise or something like that, please let me know. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 16:58, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

I really hate the idea of appearing to hide my mistakes
I can't really argue with that, it's a very respectable opinion/attitude/thing. Though I think there's a difference between "hiding" mistakes and just not having a huge banner which the whole world sees when they visit your talk page. -- Steel 17:02, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Tacky? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 17:09, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

I dunno. Personally I think your userbox which ackowledges you make mistakes is enough, up to you though. I think my main point is that a lot of these "mistakes" are from months ago, and the header makes it look like you're constantly making them. -- Steel 17:14, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For the countless hours you have spent fighting the good fight. Numerous times I have found myself trying to revert a page or give a user a warning only to see that you just completed the task milliseconds before me. Keep up the good work! Wikipediarules2221 19:34, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

I just came here from viewing the history page of Brisbane Boys' College where I saw your constant work reverting vandalism there. A look at your contributions shows how much work you are putting in to the fight against vandalism. May I second Wikipediarules2221's thanks. Keep up the good work. Blarneytherinosaur 02:12, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you! -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 02:13, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice!

Thanks for the notice! Make you wonderwhy peopleeven bother. They can't prusue legal action lol Æon ^{Insane Ward} 19:50, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Lance Bass

Are you retarded? Why the f**k did you revert my changes to the Lance Bass page? I changed "a American" to "an American" and added a comma where it was a grammatical necessity.

Find a new hobby other than ruining Wikipedia with your ignorance. And try reading a book on how to use English grammar correctly, you borderline-illiterate menace. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.33.49.251 (talk • contribs) 21:12, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Answer my question

Long, regrettable argumentative nonsense hidden, click 'show' to view (JavaScript) 

Why did you revert back to an older version of Lance Bass after I edited it? What possessed you to do that? My changes were valid, and you eliminated them! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.33.49.251 (talk • contribs) 21:12, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

That was an error on my part -- since the link was "[[United States|American]]", I mistakenly thought the text read as "a United States..." However, it obviously read as "a American" and your edit was right. I missed this, because I only saw the code and had a brainfart at that moment. I probably also jumped to conclusions because there recently have been people editing that very part of the page into incorrect grammar.

Now, here's my question: who gets this riled up over one letter? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 21:23, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Ironic that you're accusing me of overreacting when you seem to have crowned yourself "Miss Grammar" here on Wikipedia, and yet you actively troll recent changes to incorporate errors that others have been astute enough to catch and to fix. Perhaps you need to re-assess your skills and your holier-than-thou attitude before spending your time (despite your claims to be busy "in real life") making Wikipedia worse than it was before you got online. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.33.49.251 (talk • contribs) 21:29, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Actually, you're the one engaging in trolling. Perhaps you should look into anger management? Regards -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 21:30, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Actually, no, I was engaging in Wikipedia editing -- quite successfully and accurately, I might add. You, however, went out of your way to put a stop to that. And thanks for the medical advice. From what medical school did you receive your degree? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.33.49.251 (talk • contribs) 21:32, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Are personal attacks successful and accurate editing? And my medical degree is from the University of WP:CIVIL. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 21:34, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

I'd have had no reason to make a personal "attack" had you not gone out of your way to undo my contribution. I guess you were done playing around on the masturbation and vagina entries and decided it was time for some Lance Bass destruction. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.33.49.251 (talk • contribs) 21:35, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

I made a simple mistake in the course of vandalism reverting. I didn't even send you a warning or anything, so why are you going completely nuts over my reverting your one letter change? Don't you think you're acting pretty irrational? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 21:36, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

This was simply the culmination of weeks of seeing accurate, thoughtful work being undone by self-appointed Wikipedia queens who've decided, for no justifiable reason, that they know how things ought to be around here. This is a shame, since it surely drives away those such as myself who are careful to make only grammatically and factually correct edits to articles. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.33.49.251 (talk • contribs) 21:41, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Well, it was very misdirected, as I am not responsible for all of your Wikipedia ills, and as I said, it was a mistake, not a case of me butchering all the grammar on that article. As for us "Wikipedia queens", while we may not know everything regarding the best way to run Wikipedia, we do understand the concept of civility. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 21:44, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

And any more dumb jokes involving misspellings like that and I'll report you for incivility. Either you neglected to read the explanation for my mistake or else you just don't care and want to fling insults. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 21:44, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

(Clarification: I might have been wrong here about there being a "dumb joke", but the user removed a letter from my name in the course of an edit that I originally thought consisted only of this change, so I took it as a snipe about not being able to spell my username correctly. This may have not been the case, although it would have been absolutely hilarious.) -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 22:33, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Wow, a threat. Congrats. I'm so proud of you. But I have to ask: what "dumb joke involving misspellings" are you talking about? If you're referring to Lance Bass, that wasn't a joke; someone actually edited the article to say something along those lines. That's the kind of vandalism for which you ought to be trolling. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.33.49.251 (talk • contribs) 21:48, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

You aren't wrong much, are you? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 21:49, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

I try not to be when I put forth things as fact, as is the case with my work on Wikipedia. And if I ever did make an error, I'd apologize and thank the person who pointed it out to me. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.33.49.251 (talk • contribs) 21:51, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

I saw the error right after I made it, but it appeared someone else had already fixed it or else I became preoccupied with other counter-vandalism. It was my fault, certainly, and I admitted it, but if you wanted a "thanks", the way to go about getting it wasn't coming in here and initiating conversation with "are you retarded?" Now I'm sitting here arguing with you pointlessly, and you're sitting there steaming over a letter and a comma. So now where are we? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 21:55, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm not "steaming" over anything. I am actually having fun. Let's not exaggerate the gravity of this situation. We both seem like intelligent, reasonable people with at least one common interest. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.33.49.251 (talk • contribs) 22:01, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

If you don't mind my saying, it really doesn't seem like you consider me anywhere near intelligent, and I'm not yet prepared to consider you "reasonable". I am a moron, sure, but that doesn't mean you have to rub it in my face. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 22:03, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm also willing to admit that I am in fact "retarded" for letting this argument go on this long, and I will stay out of your way if you will just please, please try to exercise more civility on this site. There's absolutely no need to kick my Internet ass when I have acknowledged that I'm wrong and am willing to fix the error I made. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 22:07, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Gee, can I report you for using the word "ass" on a discussion page? It offended me; I found it quite "uncivil." You didn't fix the error you made; I fixed your error, and that was only because I happened upon it. If you consider yourself a "moron," you probably shouldn't be editing Wikipedia. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.33.49.251 (talk • contribs) 22:10, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

And I just noticed this paragraph that I accidentally reverted off of this page:

Anyway, how can someone mistake changing "a" to "an" for vandalism? Did you think I had actually written "Lance Bass wants to suck cock and be defecated on in space" (like one of the previous editors) instead of adding the letter "n" onto the word "a"? You sound a little too trigger-happy to be correcting vandalism.

Who said I thought it was vandalism? Can't I try to correct what I (mistakenly) think are grammar issues? Again, all I did was read the front of the wikilink instead of the end of it. That was the genesis of my error. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 22:10, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

I wrote the sentence you deleted after you wrote, "I made a simple mistake in the course of vandalism reverting." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.33.49.251 (talk • contribs) 22:13, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

By that I meant I was on RC patrol, therefore seeing all new edits, and saw what I thought was a grammatical error.

Gee, can I report you for using the word "ass" on a discussion page? It offended me; I found it quite "uncivil." You didn't fix the error you made; I fixed your error, and that was only because I happened upon it. If you consider yourself a "moron," you probably shouldn't be editing Wikipedia.

There's a case of true trolling, for your reference. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 22:15, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Not following you there. What's a case of "true trolling"? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 2006 129.33.49.251 (talk • contribs) 22:19, 17 August (UTC)

I'm trying to respond to you and reason with you, convincing myself that you really aren't just trying to be a troll, and then you come out with "oooh, you offended me, I'm going to report you" (right after all the remarks you've made). You're not doing a good job of establishing good faith is my point. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 22:21, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Well, I guess we won't be best friends forever. I have to be running along and moving on with my life, but you know where to find me should you ever need pleasant conversation. I enjoy long walks on the beach, pina coladas, and editing articles about recently outed pop stars. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.33.49.251 (talk • contribs) 22:23, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

And I waste my time trying to convince narcissists of their humanity. I really do need a new hobby. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 22:24, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Again

Thanks for the revert again. I seem to be a popular Vandal desination lately. Æon ^{Insane Ward} 22:03, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks again from me too. DVD+ R/W 01:39, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

User:64.169.99.74

Hello-

This is Steve Niles. You have a page dedicated to me and my work, but recently a disgruntled person named Matt Busch has taken it upon himself to add a factually incorrect account of a personal issue in my life. I would like it removed. Is that possible? Matt Busch himself is posting this and it is not relevant to my career and like I said is factually incorrect and only being posted because Busch lost his girlfriend.

Thank you,

Steve Niles —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.169.99.74 (talk • contribs) 23:15, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi, Steve --

To be honest, I'm still pretty new here, and I definitely do not have the power to take care of something like this. Probably the place to discuss this is at the Wikipedia help desk. If you'd like I can post your question there for you. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 23:19, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

I've removed the content per WP:LIVING and WP:Reliable sources. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:22, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. I probably should've known that content didn't conform to those policies. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 23:25, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Not satisfactory

It appears that you are responsbile for a bot that reverted my edit on John Howard. This is highly unsatisfactory and completely breaks Wikipedia as it is intended to function. Please turn off the bot or fix it to ensure that it only reverts known malicious editors. Please advise a.s.a.p. when you have restored my ability to edit this article.

Insofar as the bot may be a useful tool, there is insufficient documentation as to what authority the bot operates under and how to counter its unwanted actions. If you are going to operate this bot - it is VERY UNSATISFACTORY to also have a notice on your home page advising that you may not respond to messages. If you wish to operate the bot you should be available to account for the actions of the bot. --Wm 03:19, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

That was not a bot. That was me reverting a bad grammar edit you made. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 03:20, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

I was in the process of correcting it myself. The link to VS is very confusing as is your notice about not being available. If you are not available, how is it that you are reverting edits? There is no need to jump on an edit milliseconds after completion. Reverting is lazy. You can see the clumsy writing I am trying to correct - instead of reverting, try to improve the artcile. --Wm 03:31, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

1. Sir/ma'am, all of my revert edit summaries have a link to WP:SNIPE in them. Please visit that page and read the first thing in bold at the top of that page.
2. I'm responding, am I not? {{busy}} isn't "{{not here, not responding}}".
3. I'm sorry you feel I'm lazy. If I corrected it, then what's the complaint here?
4. How is fixing grammar mistakes not improving the article?

-- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 03:36, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Have a look at the sentence that you reverted to. I believe that its meaning is inaccurate. What is worse bad grammer or a misleading meaning? Anway I accept that I initially misunderstood the situation but I have also made a few comments which I believe may be worth considering. Happy editing. --Wm 03:45, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Fair enough -- I won't revert you again while you're in the middle of an edit. Happy editing to you as well. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 03:47, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. I run a Debian based distro myself so may consider installing VS over the weekend. --Wm 03:53, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

I apologize if I've been snappy; I guess I've had a hard day. Having said that, if you have any trouble with installing VS, please let me know and I'll be more than willing to help you out if I can. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 03:55, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

For you

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For you laseer quick and prefect reverts you are awarded this star Æon Insane Ward 03:29, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Keep up the good work! I VERY rarely give that Barnstar away! Æon ^{Insane Ward} 03:31, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Edited Message

I don't feel this addition I made should have been edited. It only sayed positive things.

"This demonstrated why the Steelers were such an amazing team. Despite all the obstacles in their way, they continued to play with great heart and will which was key." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.51.176.22 (talk • contribs) 04:14, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

The reason I removed it is because it appears to be a statement of opinion and thus unencyclopedic (see WP:NPOV, WP:OR). If you reinsert it I won't revert you again, but please give those pages some consideration. I can't promise what the reactions of other editors will be, though. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:17, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Beating me to the punch.

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For beating me to the revert punch more times than I can count <sigh>. Cassavau 05:07, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome. If you have any suggestions which might help (e.g. from your own experiences), I would welcome them. And if you find me doing something stupid or ignorant, let me know. --Cassavau 05:16, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Sure thing. The only advice I can think of right now is that you can receive complaints over virtually anything in the "line of duty" (not that they're always undeserved, at least in my case). It takes a lot of patience sometimes; I still have quite a ways to go as far as dealing with criticism appropriately, it would seem. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 05:23, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you

For referring the policy in your response and actually being helpful.

I will chill out. Now can you tell these other admins to stop reverting my edits and calling me a vandal? I thought the idea of this place is that you can edit the article to make it better? So why is that article, filled with speculation, 'some sources say' with citations to tabloids and etcetera not worthy of being edited? I read a lot of articles on here, and the steven seagal one is not up to snuff. I don't even care about steven seagal, but i do care about wikipedia having pages like this. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.26.94.95 (talk • contribs) 05:10, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

From what I can tell, the controversy is over your deletion of sections. The best way to go about fixing the article would be to try to edit the existing sections into sanity, or at least include edit comments with your deletions. Because page blankings are a common form of vandalism from IPs, it's always hard to tell if a large deletion is being made in good faith or with the intent of vandalism. Does that help any? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 05:14, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Scott Keith

I noticed you reverted an edit to Scott Keith that put back in that he died. This is a hoax. I think an anon editor who has previously vandalized the page put it in due to the WP:BLP policy and his death would supposedly make the policy moot. I think you are overall doing a good job but just wanted to get that to your attention. MrMurph101 05:40, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

To me, that was a really convincing hoax. Thanks for letting me know -- I'll start monitoring that article to keep the nonsense out. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 05:42, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

the pentagon "advertising"

I think people need to know the alternate version of events to balance out the article. please put back the external link. Regards, David Noonan

(I am using a proxy so I diddnt do any other offences you accused me of) many people use this IP adress —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 208.113.136.24 (talk • contribs) 05:45, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

User:203.97.169.118

By putting up the link to Zetapets i am merely giving an example of a virtual pet site. If people like the sound of it they can click on the link for easy access to the site. They may be interested in the example I have given (eg. Zetapets) and want to see what it is about. Please can you reconsider your decision to revoke my edit. =) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.97.169.118 (talk • contribs) 07:52, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

OK!

Ok I was just trying to clear it out so I could await new messages I will keep it there if its important to you...btw...where did you get my name? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Malcomdavidkelly (talk • contribs) 21:44, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Special:Recentchanges -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 21:45, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Births 22nd January

I added a birth to 22nd January and this user deleted it. It was fully verifiable. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.154.29.55 (talk • contribs) 22:26, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

A 15-year-old surgeon? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 00:10, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Brisbane Boys' College reverts

thanks for reverting that persistent vandal. It's amazing to think he was so determined to keep vandalizing. good work, thanks again :) SMC 23:30, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

thanks

thatnk !paradigm! 03:32, 19 August 2006 (UTC)!paradigm!

The Beast1234

There's no point asking or pleading with him. He must be banned immediately. Look at his history!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by MikailMoolla (talk • contribs) 06:22, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Alright. I will comply. I apologise.I eat cake! :-> 06:27, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you kindly on all of our behalf! *hug* Again, my apologies. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by MikailMoolla (talk • contribs) 06:29, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

It's cool; you're welcome, but User:Antandrus was actually the one who did it. I don't have the power to block, just make vandal reports. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 06:30, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Well, thank you anyway. *hug* —The preceding unsigned comment was added by MikailMoolla (talk • contribs) 06:33, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks again for reverting the vandalism on my user page. Funny thing is that I was right in the middle of sticking a tpv2 in his Talk page, when up popped an edit conflict from you issuing the bv to him on vandalizing my user page. =) -- Gogo Dodo

My bad. He's been reported, at any rate. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 07:38, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Nyah, not a bad thing. Just had a laugh. When I got the edit conflict, I thought "Did Omicronpersei8 beat me to a revert yet again?" Only after I looked carefully did I realize that you were warning him for something else. Laughed a bit more when it was vandalism to my user page. Thanks for incrementing my counter, too. -- Gogo Dodo 07:42, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Beat you!

I managed to beat you to the punch, on your own user page too! Shame on you! (:P). Happy editing. --Daniel Olsen 07:45, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Did you? Thanks! -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 07:49, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

www.millerandzois.com

You have deleted several links that we have put up. Our site is a commerical site but it is 80% attorney education and is one of the leading attorney education sites on the web (do a blog seach of the reviews that have been done on our Attorney Help Center). EVERY link put up is not commerical in nature, it is only included if it adds to the dialogue. In many cases, we offer examples of those things not available on the Internet. Please check out the site and consider the entire picture before blocking more of our links. Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mike Teflon (talk • contribs) 18:34, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Dinosaurs

Sir,

You say that I had vandalised the page 'Dinosaurs'. Let me tell you that I DID NOT. I had never read the page until this morning regarding the vandalism.

Please explain as to how you arrive at the conslusion that it was I who vandalised ?

Tony Smith —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.93.21.134 (talk • contribs) 03:29, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

You're an anonymous IP user. If you create an account that message will not display for you - people from the IP address you are using (America Online) probably *have* vandalized Dinosaurs. SMC 08:24, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the help with this, SMC. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 09:26, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

NOOR LEGHARI

I am surprised that reverts and edits are taking place on this article without paying any attention to the explanations and verifications provided from time to time to this article.

Pleae explain why this is so. It would seem that reverts and edits are being done without any respect to verified details given.

mindboglled —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.81.232.40 (talk • contribs) 13:39, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Windows Vista article - security

Hi. As an editor of the Windows Vista article, you may be interested in commenting or expressing your opinion on this discussion on the article's talk page at Security updates and patches --Peter Campbell Talk! 23:14, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Good Question

I say report it to AIV and leave it to the blocking admin. I honestly have no idea. =). nite, alphaChimp ^laudare 04:41, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

To hell with it, 3 hours. =) alphaChimp ^laudare 05:02, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

I don't give out inaccurate barnstars! -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 05:03, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

reverting Talk:Main Page

Please note that it says "Irrelevant discussion may be removed" at the top of Talk: Main Page. Why revert my removal of spam there ? -- 64.229.177.244 07:03, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

I did see that, but is it really "spam"? Isn't the main page a community page and thus deserving of being included in the discussion in question? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 07:04, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Don't mix up the Community Portal with Talk: Main Page. -- 64.229.177.244 07:05, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

I can't say I really see a problem with announcing dealings with the community portal on the main talk page, though, as portals are linked to from it. I'm not sure if it qualifies as wikispam for that reason, unless it has been posted to many other pages that are clearly unrelated. I'm certainly not infallible or authoritative in this viewpoint, but I, again, don't see the problem. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 07:08, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Oh God, is this poll about naming towns? I thought it was about naming Wikipedia "communities"/portals/whatever. If that's so, I apologize and I agree with you. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 07:10, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for agreeing with me. I can't touch it or get blocked due to 3RR. Would you mind removing the spam, please ? Thanks in advance. -- 64.229.177.244 07:13, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Already took care of it. I will try to be a more patient reader next time. Happy editing -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 07:14, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for taking care of it. Don't be so harsh on yourself in the edit summary. You aren't dumb at all. Take care. -- 64.229.177.244 07:21, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank You

I wish to thank you for reverting the edits made by IP user81.76.121.222. You beat me to it! --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 18:24, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

No problem, any time. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 18:24, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

yo

yo man change that richard simmons shit back , that shit is fukin funny man! change it back aye?? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.70.146.92 (talk • contribs) 18:39, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

?? are you going to change it back?!

change that richard simmons page back man!! hjahaha its so funny! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.70.146.92 (talk • contribs) 18:41, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Hellgauth entry

I would like to know how to prevent the deletion of the entry I started concerning the Helgauth on wikipedia. I am the author of the book and would like my information to appear as soon as possible. Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.97.105.100 (talk • contribs) 18:52, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

You are more than welcome to argue your case at the AFD discussion for your article. Please understand first that notability is an important criterion for Wikipedia subjects. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 18:55, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Hellgauth

I would like the article on the Hellgauth to remain and not be deleted. I will be adding to it over the course of the next few days. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.97.105.100 (talk • contribs) 18:53, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

You will have the time to do that, as the page's deletion is pending community approval. This will take a few days. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 18:56, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Barnstahhh

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		You deserve this, without any question. Congrats! Yanksox 20:21, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

omicronpersei8

do u no where i can find a copy of mein kompf, i love hitler lol —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.6.141.101 (talk • contribs) 21:50, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

User:80.189.64.10

Heh :)

Seeing as you dealt with my vandalism in such a polite way I'm sorry and i promise i wont do it again, really.

I just hate bill gates so much you know.... i need to release this anger somehow (reverting from ie to firefox just isn't enough) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.189.64.10 (talk • contribs) 00:30, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Use Linux ... ? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 00:32, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Fungus fungus

Yoooouu have my userpage watchlisted, don't you? :p Thanks a bunch. Luna Santin 00:41, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, hope that's okay. Seriously though, you have no previous warnings, a bluelink user page with lots of evidence that you're on the up-and-up, and even used an automated edit summary in your reversion. Why would anyone conclude you're a vandal? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 00:43, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Oh, that's quite alright, I appreciate it. I've had yours watched for awhile. To be fair, I did make a pretty dumb mistake. :) Thanks again. Luna Santin 00:54, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Sandbox yeller

I wrote in Sandbox and you yelled at me —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nxghost (talk • contribs) 00:59, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

How do you know?

How do you know that Myers Park doesnt really have a secret building under the mufasa tree? I seriously doubt you go there or anything. Ive been there personally. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.74.67.245 (talk • contribs) 03:00, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

The Many-Headed Hydra of Freezer Man's sock puppets

Insofar as you were briefly involved in a "revert war" with Freezer Man on the Ben Best page on August 11 I thought that you might find this reference to be of interest: Talk:Ben_Best#The_Many-Headed_Hydra_of_Freezer_Man.27s_sock_puppets. I have been trying since June to ignore this person and his many sock puppets, but without avail. You seem to have some expertise with vandals, and any help you can contribute would be appreciated. After trying to be co-operative and accommodating for so long without success I have decided that some form of counter-attack is the only thing that might work. I know very little about fighting vandals and it seems that I may be learning in the most difficult of ways. If this is of no interest to you I thank you again for your reverts on August 11th. --Ben Best 07:36, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

John Ling

I propose that you go ahead and get the John Ling article removed completely. It is clear that he and his supporters have been quite a nuisance. I can't believe you've allowed this prick to run around for so long with no consequences. He flaunts Wikipedia rules with no regard. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 222.152.218.193 (talk • contribs) 11:39, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Ricknewton

Sorry, tried to rollback, but there aren't any non-vandalism edits to that page--172.130.227.58 18:25, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Oh, gotcha. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 18:26, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

that wasn't vandalism i'm stupid and forgot my password you big meanie —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 165.138.231.200 (talk • contribs) 17:59, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Nose

I'm sorry but I do belive that Nose is also comparable to randomness. Sorry if I had made a mistake. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zharta (talk • contribs) 21:24, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Dinosaurs

What I added was actually Fact, Sting Rays are Dinosaurs and my title "About Dinosaurs" was a lot broader. I am also correct about terrestrial not being a real word to use.

I HOPE YOU RE-CONSIDER —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zharta (talk • contribs) 21:32, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

I hope you reconsider trying to play me for a fool before I have to get your account permablocked. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 21:33, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Hey Gwerno

I was righjt acctually i havce evidence. Cave people did actually use some of the first pens!!!!!!!!!!!!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zharta (talk • contribs) 22:00, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

First, you should have put this message on my talk page, not Omicronpersei8's. Second by definition a rock cannot be a fountain pen so your edit was factually incorrect. Third, if you did have evidence then you need to provide it not just claim you have it. Fianlly, as Omicronpersei8 said, do you think we're fools. Stop vandalizing Wikipedia or we'll stop you via a block. Gwernol 22:04, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Zharta

Hi Aeropagitica, I'd like to talk with you about the block on this user. I believe its possible that I may be able to talk some sense into this one, so I'd like to consider lifting your block on him/her. The condition would be that if the user returns to adding nonsense to articles, I will reinstate the block without warning and with a longer duration (probably 1 week). Are you comfortable with this? Thanks, Gwernol 23:15, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Gwernol, thanks for backing me up on my talk page regarding this user. While I still feel that this person was knowingly vandalizing, I hope you don't feel I was too hasty in my decision to report him or her to AIV. I certainly hold myself responsible if the block is to be deemed inappropriate. That said, I will go along in complete agreement if this user is unblocked, and will continue to monitor him or her myself, if that's alright, while exercising neutrality and not rushing to any more conclusions. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 23:19, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Please understand that my request here is absolutely not a critisism of either of you. The block (and the request for it) were totally appropriate. The only reason I'm making this suggestion is that I see some glimmer of hope that we can make a productive editor out of Zharta. I could well be wrong about this, in which case it will only reflect poorly on me, not on either of you. Hopefully the worst case is we have to revert a few more nonsense edits, and the best case is we gain a valuable contributor. Best, Gwernol 23:39, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

OK, I will do so on the basis that Zharta is under your supervision. Regards,  (aeropagitica)   (talk)  04:58, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

User:125.255.18.34

thanks sorry for that can you please not delete the one the is formal and instead add it to a new site that is Marcellin College Randwick i do not know how to do this

thankyou in advance —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 125.255.18.34 (talk • contribs) 08:11, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Are you talking about this edit? Because I'm really not sure it's acceptable either. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 08:13, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

soz

hey soz can you pleas delete that i was messin round and accidentaly pressed save i was gonning create a serious one on Marcellin college randwick —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 125.255.18.34 (talk • contribs) 08:19, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Already took care of it. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 08:20, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

yo have a point delete all that you see as inappropriate please and then submit it the school really exists —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 125.255.18.34 (talk • contribs) 08:21, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

I do believe that the school exists, but please be careful about what you add to or remove from it. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 08:22, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Blocking

hey can you help me out on how to block a user there has been a user creating inappropriate things about me in the user talk section it started in the ----bensafag---- in user talk i edited this back again inappropriatly because i did not know you could change things if you didnt guess i am ben but not a fag —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 125.255.18.34 (talk • contribs) 08:25, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

That user's already been blocked for having an inappropriate username. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 08:26, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

thank you very much sorry for the inappropriate stuff i also put there agian and could you help me out by deleteing all the stuff from MCR marcellin college randwick but can you leave the basic scaffold —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 125.255.18.34 (talk • contribs) 08:28, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Don't worry, other editors and I have removed everything questionable recently added to that article. It's all been taken care of. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 08:29, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

User:125.255.18.34

i am this person i just created an account can you please in future write to this account —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Derek007 (talk • contribs) 08:30, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Sure, and if you use "~~~~" after your posts, it will sign your username and people will know automatically who to respond to. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 08:32, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Can i just ask how to access the Marcellin college Randwick wikipage and just add great job keep up the good work —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Derek007 (talk • contribs) 08:32, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

You mean this page? [[Marcellin College]] -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 08:34, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

User:222.155.156.37

YOU DELETED MY POOOOOOOST! THE NORRIS WILL GET YOUUUUU! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 222.155.156.37 (talk • contribs) 08:37, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

who what -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 08:38, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Marcellin College Randwick

No that is a different school we share the same name but are in different staes i was wondering if we could get a name change so that when you type in marcellin college one of those redirect pages comes up because i currently know of three schools with the same name and i would like to add a page for Marcellin College randwick which was what i was doing with the page that was mostly relevant but with some irrelevant stuff such as hot teachers i would like to re add that page under the name Marcellin College Randwick but with some obvious exclusions to the page from the original thanks for your time —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Derek007 (talk • contribs) 08:42, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Well, you're welcome to start the article (perhaps under the title you proposed at Marcellin College Randwick), but it's important to make sure that your additions are factual, neutral, and relevant. You might want to check out Wikipedia:How to write a great article first. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 08:44, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

User:84.164.31.32

mmbot is a program for cheating in online games. the article features links to the program and information on how it manages to work undetected.

Its like an article about the latest cracks and serial codes for computer software. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.164.31.32 (talk • contribs) 10:41, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Just Another Vigilante.....

Hi. I know you must have a million things to do on Wikipedia already, but I really need to talk to you about User:72.225.51.162. I have the "Africa" article watchlisted, and today when I went on I saw that you reverted some edits by this user -- really racist stuff, I'm sure you know what I'm talking about. When I went to this user's talkpage, I saw that you and some other people had given him a final warning: If you vandalize one more time, then you WILL be banned from editing Wikipedia. Well, it appears that the time has come for that. This user doesn't appear to have any legitimate edits, indicating that he is the only one using this IP address, and that the community would not lose anything by blocking him. I would have done it myself, only I'm not an administrator. (I would recommend banning him for one month or possibly one year, but that's just me. Those edits were really offensive.)

Just helping to improve the community. :) Ellie041505 13:56, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Zharta2

I have had some trouble with edirting and uploading images, Could you help me? Also how do you get awards, is it just by editing articles corecctly or do you have to do something else? Url:http//www.freewebs.com/hawkwing4/ Zharta 15:45, 23 August 2006

Futurama

I noticed because of your user name that you are probably a Futurama fan. I am always glad to meet new people who like the show and wanted to invite you to WikiProject Futurama, a project to help improve and expand Wikipedia's Futurama content. Thank you for your time, and have a nice day! --WillMak050389 16:40, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Help

I need Help with Sandbox

Zharta 16:50, 23 August 2006 (UTC)Thank You

Watchmen

Hey, if you want to keep reverting the frequent vandalism of that page, go ahead ... I was just trying to help by adding the "sprotect" tag. (I've taken it off my watch list.) --Dennette 17:32, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you. Your efforts are appreciated. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 17:33, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Huh?

I have not done anything with the IP adress, I am not sure waht you are even talking about. I had No Idea i had done anything with an IP adress, Please explain this to me? Zharta 17:57, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

huyut

Sometimes I have something that will fit into an article yet I can't find a section to put it in, what should I do? Zharta 20:05, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Unwarranted Removal of External Links

I have twice added a legitimate, non-commerical web site related to the content of a page (www.dailynewshaikus.com on the haiku and senryu pages) only to have you revert and remove it. Can you explain why? Are the posts or links in violation of some guidelines? The linked site is related to the article topics and not corrupting content, as they are merely included in the external link section, like many similar web pages.

What gives? Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by KDog1749 (talk • contribs) 02:38, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism about me on Pachydermata. I'll admit I chuckled when I read it. Cheers. Canadian-Bacon ^(contribs) 03:07, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

My apologies - problem solved

I would like to apologize on behalf of my family. Apparently last night my sixteen year old son was making inappropriate changes to your website. I can assure you that this problem will not EVER occur again.

I do not condone vandalism or pranks and will not tolerate such behaviour under any circumstances.

I made the mistake of giving him a tad bit more latitude than I should have and for that I take full responsibility.

Be assured, there will be no further incidents such as you had with him last night.

Sincerely,

Mr. Mark Hogan —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.135.40.211 (talk • contribs) 03:40, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

No biggie. Thank you, and don't be too hard on him. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 03:53, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Vandals (no, not the Vandals who invaded Roman Iberia ;))

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=72.66.11.196

I would like to report this user for vandalism in addition to another vandalism you've already warned him about back in July. I was checking on Paducah, Kentucky article (my hometown w00t! ;D) and was shocked to find that there are some unneeded stuff in Contemporary Paducah section. For some reason, it was never removed. I then checked history page and found out which one put that stuff in and followed up on some of his/her contributions. I found out that you did warned him/her about it. I even noticed that there are still some vandalism left over in one of those articles about Southern Illinois routes that clearly was never noticed by anyone, it appears. These articles and those vandalism I'm speaking of can be found in articles above.

I tried to find a link to report that user but was unable to find so I found your name on that user's log and decided to contact you. Thanks in advance.

Respectfully Yours, Legion 13:31, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Omar Amanat

Thanks for reverting the edit to OMar Amanat. If you check the history this troll has been vandalising this section over and over in violation of NPOV and posting personal defamatory comments about the subject. How can we stop this? thanks rumination. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rumination (talk • contribs) 14:12, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Random Stuff

Hello again. I just wanted to tell you that there's a Wikipedian called "Omicronpersi8" (no "e") that is "a suspected sockpuppet of Willy on Wheels and has been blocked indefinitely." I just thought you would want to know, if you didn't know already, because I got confused when I was trying to find your userpage again and I was like, "wait, isn't the other dude a countervandalism person?"

Speaking of which, how does one do RC patrol? I'm interested in becoming a "countervandalism person" myself. (Can you respond on my talkpage, please?) Ellie041505 14:30, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Cool. Thanks. What's with the guy who posted the comments below? :0 :) Ellie041505 13:46, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Ah, he's just some spoiled kid, probably. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 18:19, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Fuck you!

You are a stupid bitch. Go fuck yourself, your family, and all of your friends. And any pets you might have. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.23.135.228 (talk • contribs) 00:17, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Do you think warning me is funny?

I will come to your house and kill you and all of your family and friends and any pets you might have. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.23.135.228 (talk • contribs) 00:18, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for giving me the death threat so I can skip the rest of the warning steps. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 00:20, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Im very sorry.

I never meant to hurt you. I love you. Please can we get married? Cause then I could love you forever!!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.23.135.228 (talk • contribs) 00:19, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Hey!

Funny comments above. XD

I just wanted to thank you for all of the work you've put into your anti-vandalism efforts on Wikipedia. Every time I go to a recently-edited page, I see that you have beat me to it and reverted the vandalism. (I would have sooo many more edits if you weren't here haha)

Anyway, I know you have gotten this before, but I think you deserve it again:

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I, Nishkid64, hereby award Omicronpersei8 the RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for his amazing anti-vandalism work that he has put into Wikipedia. Without you, Wikipedia would not be in good shape. Thank you for everything, fellow Futurama-lover. P.S. I still don't know why you think you wouldn't be a good admin. I think you'd do a phenomenal job as admin on Wikipedia and if you ever reconsider, I'll be the first to nominate you. =) --Nishkid64 00:38, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for everything, and happy editing!

--Nishkid64 00:38, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Steve Niles

Hello-

I contacted you before about removing the Matt Busch Incident section from my bio page. What they are posting, and it is being posted by those involved, is not true and only being posted to do harm. The factrs are skewed and is about a small part of my personal life, not the 20 years of writing I have done.

If that section cannot be removed, can I ask that my entire entry be removed?

Thank you

Steve —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.169.99.74 (talk • contribs) 03:57, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Subject: Steve Niles

Hello-

My name is Steve Niles. I’m a writer and recently someone has been adding something called “The Matt Busch Incident” to the page you have posted about me. The incident they are referring to is only a small part of my almost 20 year carrier and is being posted by someone who is either a friend of Matt Busch, Don Murphy or one of those two people themselves.

The incident itself was about a girlfriend and they are both using Wikipedia to slander my name and career. The facts are skewed and just plain incorrect.

You were kind enough to remove the text before, but it reappeared a few hours later.

If the text cannot be removed, can my entry be removed entirely? I enjoy Wikipedia but allowing bullies and thugs to post slanderous articles isn’t something I want to be a part of.

Please, just let me know what I can do.

Thank you.

-Steve Niles —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.169.99.74 (talk • contribs) 04:16, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

GIen's RfA: Thank you!

Omicronpersei8 for your Support! I I feel truly humbled & honored by your support in my RfA, which closed at 90 / 5 / 0. Thank you! If you need me for anything, just say the word. For now however, just like Mr Potter here: My mop & I shall thwart all evil :) IThank you once again my friend. GIen

PS: YES YOU'RE RIGHT HARRY POTTER USES A BROOM! (BUT GOOD MOPS ARE HARD TO FIND!!)

PS: I'm gonna get a mop in your hand if its the last thing I ever do!! Mwahahaha!! (queue evil futurama laugh :) Thanks again mate - GIen 04:36, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

Many thanks for helping fend off the vandals while Gregorian chant was on the main page. I wasn't prepared for the level of vandalism. It's heartening to know how efficient and diligent you WP admins and editors are to revert it! Peirigill 07:22, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Soup

Okay, here's the thing. The "soup nazi" userbox had been listed for speedy deletion. I never liked that particular concept anyway, so when it was listed, I deleted it.

It's a peculiar concept, sort of like a reverse euphemism treadmill? When Clarence Thomas was being criticised during his confirmation hearings, he described it as being a sort of "high-tech lynching"... except in the old days, lynching did not involve insulting a black man prior to putting him on the Supreme Court, but rather in hanging him by the neck until he was dead. In fact, I nearly wrote that Thomas was pilloried.

Calling someone a "soup Nazi" always gave me the image of a customer asking for soup, and instead the restaurant owner shoots him in the head and rapes his wife to death. DS 16:00, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

But you get the reference, right? It's just a Seinfeld joke. (I realize you were trying to make me understand a possible insidious nature behind the use of the term, but, again, it's "just a Seinfeld joke".) -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 17:54, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

I do get the reference, but I never liked it. Al Yaganeh hates it too. And not everyone watched Seinfeld, or did so enough to get references like that. It was not a good userbox. DS 18:29, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you so much for your help!

You rock!!!

-Steve Niles —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.169.99.74 (talk • contribs) 20:35, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Displaced Brit

He needs a longer block, he's now gone to vandalizing others userpages. He was banned previously for personal attacks and disruption. --CFIF ☎ 20:52, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

OS

Do you use Linux? Bigtop 20:56, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Yes, sir. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 20:56, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

One of our ahem "larger" members

Good work on protecting Penis enlargement from spammers. Hopefully he'll go away soon, this Whack-a-mole game is tiresome :-) Gwernol 20:58, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you. Your clever puns have restored my CV energy. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 20:59, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Ah, the day my puns are truly clever is the day that they start ordering space heaters in hell. Anyway, I've sprotected the page now so that at least we can take a break. I hope it doesn't cause the vandal to pop-up elsewhere. I have several of the related pages on my watchlist, so hopefully if it does I'll catch it. Keep up the good work. Gwernol 21:13, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Vandal Reversion

Hi. Just to let you know you don't seem to be warning any/many of the vandals you revert ([6]). Thanks, — FireFox ^(talk) _{21:10, 25 August 2006}

Yeah, I was kind of getting overwhelmed so I tried to do more reverts than warnings. Most of them are either not "repeat offending" or are being warned by others. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 21:11, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

There are many people here to revert with you, you know. You're not on your own. Remember it is very important to warn the vandals or they'll just keep doing it. — FireFox ^(talk) _{21:14, 25 August 2006}

Mercury

Take note, the ip vandal has done a lot of vandalism edits. so much of his work is still showing up (bepicolumbo). I've attempted to edit it out all the changes, but for some reason the edits are not going through. You might want to give it a shot. Have a good weekend!Rsm99833 21:19, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Hey, thanks! You too! -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 21:20, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism

I was not vandalizing the Stuart Johnson page. what I had done is copy the code from the rex grossman page into the stuart johnson page. stuart is a coworker of mine. i was setting up the page for him, but do not currently know all the wikipedia coding. therefore, i copied code from a page i had been reviewing and began to edit it. please revert the page back to how i had it since it was not vandalised, but factual! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wadeboggs (talk • contribs) 21:27, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Not Vandalism

Please explain why this revert is justified:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AHolywarrior&diff=71883628&oldid=71883595

User Holywarrior has been unilaterally deleting material from talk page of Talk:Kancha Ilaiah without consensus or justification to push his POV. Please reply in my talk page with a justification. Thanks.Hkelkar 21:30, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

As I explained in the edit summary, you edited his or her user page. Please leave those kinds of messages on talk pages. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 21:31, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Sorry about that

Looked like it was vandal-impersonation for a moment there. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rsm99833 (talk • contribs) 21:41, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

No problem at all. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 21:42, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

You're wrong

I am fucking not a vandal. So FUCK OFF!!! 128.101.29.11 21:54, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

But why did I just report you if you're not a vandal? It just doesn't make any sense! -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 21:55, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Chicken

Why did you revert my edit to Chicken? MrMurph101 21:57, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

An Imageshack link is not a "cite". -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 21:57, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Ok, maybe you're right. :-) But it does verify the statement. MrMurph101 21:58, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for identifying vandalism on AIV

Your report of the edit summaries threats is appreciated. Looks like the same AOL troll has been bouncing between IP addresses. Thanks. — ERcheck (talk) 22:21, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

And thank you for helping with the blocks. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 22:21, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism to my user page

Hey Omicron!

Thanks for reverting the tagging on my userpage. Much appreciated! :) Looks like the vandal's been blocked for a week, so I leave you to your work. Thanks again, Firsfron of Ronchester 02:39, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Outsid3r

Dear Wikipedia anti-vandalist

When I visited Wikipedia I got a notice that there was a new message for me (my IP address). Someone with my IP had commited vandalism.

The problem is that there are maybe 1000 people with my IP address, due to the cheap ISP putting us all on a network (I live in Albania and there is no other way here).

Although I haven't contributed much to Wikipedia, mainly due to english not being a mother language, I would like not to use the ability to add knowledge to our encyclopedia. I use Wikipedia more than all other websites combined and it would be awkward to be considered a "vandal".

I have registered under the username "Outsid3r". Is there any way I can be allowed to edit content even if my IP gets banned?

Thank you Albi Gjino —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Outsid3r (talk • contribs) 04:07, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

User:207.246.162.160

go away —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 207.246.162.160 (talk • contribs) 04:18, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

John Ling

Dear Omicronpersei8

I would like to request that you cease your edits of John Ling. These edits are, by and large, vandalism, and may be taken as malicious. If you have any disagreement, please take it up on the talk page.

Regards Tanyiliang

My reverting this was malicious? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:20, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Please do accept my sincere apologies, Omicronpersei8. It was a honest mix-up on my part when I checked John Ling . I apologise for the false accusation, and I thank you for your revert back to its proper form.

Tanyiliang

No problem. I'll keep monitoring that page. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

trust me it is a shitty village full of knackers

i ve been there —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.42.145.68 (talk • contribs) 05:53, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

For reverting vandalism to my user page. MER-C 06:42, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Reza1

Thanks Omicronpersei8. I tried Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents‎. I hope I haven't made a new mistake :P. Omicronpersei8, the point is that I honestly don't have time to argue with them on this very simple issue. I am not happy with the progress. I don't want the users to get blocked but rather I want the section to stay there in the article. Thanks again for your warm comment on my talk page. Best wishes, --Reza1 09:07, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks very much again. :) --Reza1 09:10, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: Vince Carter

Omicronpersei8 vandalized the 'Family' section of the page by deleting all the text from it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.12.145.90 (talk • contribs) 14:18, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

The reason I gave in the edit summary was "WP:LIVING". This addresses the additions of "Carter and his wife of two years, Dr. Ellen Rucker, have filed for divorce" and "He is no longer on speaking terms with members of his paternal family" [7]. These are objectionable edits and they have no sources to back them up. Mr. Carter is still living, so extra effort must be made to prevent spurious claims or libel against him from showing up on Wikipedia, as policy dictates. Another editor also feels that these additions are too closely resembling of rumors [8].

The following addition is also questionable, as is the whole "Family" subheading:

They have one daughter - Kai Michelle Carter, named after his mother Michelle Carter-Robinson. Carter has one brother and a half-sister.

-- because notability is not inherited (though I am open to argument on this particular addition), and because this part of the addition seems trivial overall. I hope this is a good enough explanation for my reversion. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 18:30, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Steve Niles

Sorry, just because a subject informs you that he wishes to have the details of a scandal omitted does not mean that you can then remove nearly three paragraphs of writing and four links of proof. Furthermore you falsely claim while doing the edit that the dispute is resolved. On what do you base this? A report from ONE side of the dispute? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ColScott (talk • contribs) 07:59, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

When did I ever say it was resolved? ¹ Still, insignificant personal life trivia that comprises practically half of the article is not "details" of a "scandal", and, as well as being overkill, was poorly sourced and lacking of the attention to sensitivity for an article about a living person. Those reasons don't even cover my opinion of it being unencyclopedic, off-topic, and written in poor taste (and though it's not a good reason, it's something I really wouldn't care about even if I did know anything about the subject). It's written like a tabloid article and has an obvious POV slant, and it's neither noteworthy nor educational. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 08:58, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

As for proof, as I stated in my deletion edit summary, two of the four references are links to Livejournal pages. The second reference, it appears, is a message board thread, and the third is an editorial site. I mean, come on. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 09:10, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

¹ What I said was that in my personal opinion the usage of the {{npov}} and {{copyedit}} tags had been resolved, through removal of the only apparent section with a questionable point of view, and also through recent copyediting of the article. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 09:33, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

I replied to your claim using multiple news outlet sources. ColScott —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ColScott (talk • contribs) 01:48, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Water ski jump record

You reverted a change I made regarding the world water ski jump record holder. Freddy Krueger is actually the current world jump record holder at 240'. This was not a joke, that's actually his name. Sammy Duval has not held the world record since 1995.

http://www.iwsf.com/history/rechist.htm —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.157.72.229 (talk • contribs) 17:23, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Looks like you're right! Sorry for jumping to conclusions. What a crazy world we live in. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 23:04, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

User 68.81.102.73

This user has just added nonsense to The Beatles page. As you issued a last warning, I thought I would make you aware of this. Best wishes, Lion King 00:18, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

You sure that's the right IP? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 00:20, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Nevermind, found him/her. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 00:20, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

My mistake, 102. - not 107. Lion King 01:07, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Headline text

Get a life —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.231.163.130 (talk • contribs) 00:24, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletions

Hello, Omicronpersei8. Please note a redirect after something's been merged isn't speediable. In fact, it's not deleteable- the history needs to be preserved under the GFDL. Thanks- end communication. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 11:19, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism

Please don't revert my edits as it is vandalism. Thank you. Brammen 12:37, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Reverting edits is not automatically vandalism. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 12:38, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

DUDE!

No fair dude —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.202.163.130 (talk • contribs) 23:29, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the snowball!

Thanks for bring up Snowball (was about to). I have been debating that MfD for the last hour (and enjoying it, not letting it go down without a hell of a fight) Æon ^{Insanity Now!}_EA! 05:02, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

I think it's an incredibly stupid thing to waste time debating about (er, not saying you're wasting your time, but rather it's stupid to bother nominating it for deletion). -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 05:03, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

LOL I didn't think you were and I brought that up to the nom. I'm taking a brak from vandal hunting tonight aways so I have the time to fight this thing for a while! Æon ^{Insanity Now!}_EA! 05:04, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Would it really be detrimental to wikipedia if this article remained? Have you even listened to the song? I believe if you did then you would realize how amazing he is. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Paukka12 (talk • contribs) 05:35, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Nope, sure haven't. Not really interested, sorry. Yes, it is actually detrimental to the site, because everyone can't be in an encyclopedia. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 05:37, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

k sori

i wil stop —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.112.33.232 (talk • contribs) 19:49, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Dennis Stamp

Who the fuck do you think you are, deleting pertinent information and then locking the page to prevent the public from reposting? Who died and made you God and almighty censor of information?

Let me remind you that when you are not online, revelling in the limited authority that Wikipedia affords you, you are just a 9-5 jobber who puts his pants on one leg at a time.

You are nothing special - there is no special criteria, qualification or skill to be a wiki mod. I'll simply register to be one myself. And I'll revert all your disgusting, immoral censorships.

you are a disgrace to Wikipedia - a selfish, stubborn "I'm always right" lunatic. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.66.203.21 (talk • contribs) 20:04, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

User:205.210.47.14

The edit I made to Flowervale Public School was true to the best of my knowledge (I'm unsure about and not wiki-vandalism. Why should I bother updating things that I know if you're just going to delete them? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 205.210.47.14 (talk • contribs) 20:12, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Nob Head

To be honest you are just a stupid pric who thinks he is all that when really you are a fucking idiot.P.S Fuck off in future! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.122.37.112 (talk • contribs) 20:16, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Sorry about that...

If I went too far about what I said in my remarks about the anon editors, I apologize. Duo02 *Shout here!** 20:18, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Is this regarding Dennis Stamp? Because I wouldn't apologize just yet if I were you (see above). -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 20:19, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Well well...

Looking at this page, it seems there are many other members of the public who are being denied the chance to share pertinent, relevant (and often specialist) knowledge because of narrow minded, ignorant mods. Just because it is not of interest or receollection to you does not give you the right to censor, delete and ban.

I will be reporting you to admin. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.66.203.21 (talk • contribs) 20:28, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

WP:AIV, WP:AN, WP:ANI -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 20:29, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Bios of semifamous people

Please do not reinsert deleted birth dates of semi-famous people. As per WP:BLP, we do not mention birth dates unless they are widely known. David.Monniaux 22:52, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Okay, but I'm not exactly sure which edit you're referring to. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 22:53, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Karen Russell. Please read WP:BLP before doing RC-patrol work on any article mentioning a living person. The Foundations gets tons of complaints because subjects of articles removed personal or libellious information and it gets reinserted. David.Monniaux 22:57, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Tut tut....I see more evidence of over-zealous editing and deleting. So Stamp isn't the only victim of power crazed editors anyway. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.114.247.64 (talk • contribs) 23:42, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

You know, there really seems to be a trend on my talk page today. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 23:43, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Apparently the trend is users and members of the public getting frustrated and generally sick to death of your over zealous editing, rude attitude and zero tolerance policy on any entries that aren't of your interest. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.114.247.64 (talk • contribs) 23:50, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm not exactly sure what overzealous editing you're talking about in your case, because I didn't AFD the article, just made a comment at the discussion. This also brings your accusation that I have "zero tolerance" into question, and before you call me rude, I'm not the one making personal attacks against Wikipedia editors as a whole. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 23:51, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

I also find it interesting that there is such a positive correlation between flinging insults and accusations completely based on erroneous assumptions and a lack of willingness to read policy or listen to advice. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 23:53, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

huh?

what are you talking about?

i got attacked. how is it anybodys business that i got kicked out? how is it relevant to the article deletion discussion page?

Taylor Hewitt 00:05, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

[9] -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 00:06, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

okay well its nobodys business is it? i admit i shouldn't have called him a jerk but will you please agree that what he said was irrelevant? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Taylorhewitt (talk • contribs) 00:11, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

I can't really comment. Thanks for agreeing about the personal attacks being unnecessary, though. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 00:13, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

User:64.12.117.10

stop sending me messages about how im screwing with the darn wikipedia pages. seriously it know its b/c im on AOL but please find a way to stop doing it to me..its SOOO annoying thanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.12.117.10 (talk • contribs) 02:51, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Fuck you

Why don't you read changes that are made to articles before reverting them? Just because you THINK a change is vandalism, doesn't mean it is. You really need to look.

Fucking pigs. 75.3.91.220 14:22, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Whoops...

Sorry I reverted your edits- I intended to undo the IP's contributions, so whoops! --Alex ^{(talk here)} 19:17, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Oh, okay, it's cool. Thanks -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 19:18, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

All one has to do is look at the history to see how active you've been. Thanks for all the reverts. KOS | talk 19:26, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Looks like you have a loyal fan club, kind of like me recently (see above for examples of good tidings from admirers). -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 19:29, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

All that means is that you are an excellent vandal whacker/sniper/stomper/slayer, etc etc. :) KOS | talk 19:49, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you! You too (and obviously you don't need me to point that out). -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 19:50, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

al-qaeda

Why isn't Al-qaeda a terrorist organization? I have tried to change the definition and you have reversed it. Why?

Dincher 20:43, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi -- the reason I reverted it was because it's POV language. I know the distinction may seem nitpicky, given that Al Qaeda is frequently referred to as a terrorist organization in the news, but the verbiage "terrorist" has been posted in replacement of "militant" many times and has been reverted many, many times by many, many, many editors. "Militant" seems to be a good, neutral term for an encyclopedic article. I hope you will see the reasoning for this as valid, and I thank you for your attempts to improve the site. I really do understand that you're just trying to help out, and it looks like you're editing in good faith. Please let me know if you have any further objections to my edits. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 20:47, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Al-Qaeda

Okay thanks. I just wanted to know. I won't fool with it anymore. Dincher 20:55, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Ohnoitsjamie violation of 3RR

She is in violation of the 3RR on my page also abuse of power.TheTruth2 21:10, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

[10] -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 21:18, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

• So you were the one looking into it, So you should be the one with the decision. Jaranda does not. She went one over on my page according to you so in that case she is in violation of the 3RRTheTruth2 21:27, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

1. I'm not an admin
2. You should respect Jaranda's administrative decision and move onwards and upwards
3. My decision would be in favor of Ohnoitsjamie in this case anyway
4. Ohnoitsjamie was authorized to go one over because you were participating in what is tantamount to vandalism
5. If you'd have just read the policy that Ohnoitsjamie cited in reply to you on his talk page, you could have avoided this whole thing
6. Wikilawyering is a lot more detrimental to Wikipedia than what Ohnoitsjamie did
7. I feel it necessary to suggest that you slow down and read up a bit on how Wikipedia operates rather than spending time attempting what looks to me like revenge
8. Again, Jamie is a he

-- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 21:34, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Jamie did in fact violate 3RR as I have stated before I have deleted before and had no trouble. What is the big deal?TheTruth2 21:38, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

You're not listening to anything anyone else says, so I give up. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 21:39, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Still if that is the case Jamie could have gotten another admin to come in. JAmie still went one over.TheTruth2 21:41, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Controversy

I became interested in controversial topics on Wikipedia. If you look up Lumbee you will see that it is one of the more controversial subjects on wikipedia. It's a long story about the Lumbee. I won't get into it. Anyway the Lumbee site is one that not just anybody can edit. So I decided to look for other sites that had the same issues. I was surprised to see that Osama bin Laden was less controversial than the Lumbee. Then I edited Osama to include the terrorist aspect of his "definition." I was surprised to see that you edited my edit so quickly. I certainly consider Osama to be a terrorist. One of the worst of all time. I do respect the differing opinions of Osama. I guess I have too. And I understand that the encyclopedia needs to be as neutral as possible. Anyway, thanks for the answers. I am appreciative of your "calmness" as well. Thanks again. Dincher 00:56, 31 August 2006 (UTC)Dincher

Seems you have most of the barnstars, except this vanilla one...

I award this Barnstar to Omicron Persei 8 for being the one person who has consistently appeared on my watchlist, tirelessly reverting vandalism, day in and day out, for the best part of a year. HawkerTyphoon

Ditto Your Response!

--Robdurbar 22:17, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Defamatory

Why is it defamatory for Jesse Jackson and Al Shaprton to be included into a category that which applies to them but it is not defamatory for everyone else in that category? 75.2.247.21 22:40, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

If you look at that category, it's mostly established racists or white supremacists. In general, these people have themselves announced that they hold this viewpoint. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton are at best in a gray area on this point, and if it helps, I can tell you that this category has been added to these article pages many times and has been removed from them an equal number of times. I really don't mean you any ill will and do not assume bad faith in your edits, but we have a pretty strict policy about making assertions such as these. There need to be very reliable sources to back up this claim, as it could mean legal trouble otherwise. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 22:43, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

I notice you also removed this category from the Joseph P. Kennedy, Sr. page. I personally don't have an objection to this (and I try to function as damage control and not an opinionated editor), but he is nonliving and thus being in this category is not quite as strongly enforced, and there also appears to be ample proof of anti-Semitism on that page (although I only gave it a cursory glance). Really, the main distinction here is that he is deceased and the two aforementioned people are not – sorry if that sounds silly. It's still policy that we all have to abide by, though.

Thanks for trying to help out – your attempts really are appreciated. If you'd like, you're free to remove my warning from your talk page, too, as long as you can be sure to be a little more careful about adding articles to that category. I know it's kind of a hassle, but I just want what's best for the site. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 22:47, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

I removed J.P. Kennedy Sr. because he doesn't belong in that category if Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton don't. 75.2.247.21 22:56, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Conflicts

I dunno how you get about so much... I keep clashing with you and Wiki alf on the vandalism reversion as well. No I don't mind at all... Thanks. --Alex ^{(talk here)} 23:49, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Well, he probably has admin rollback at his disposal, and I use this, which makes it almost unfairly easy to track vandalism. You might want to give it a try if you're willing to use Linux. Thanks for the kind regards, by the way. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 23:52, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

This is an archive of past discussions. Please do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, you can do so on the current talk page.

← Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 →