User talk:LAJ007

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello LAJ007, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction. Please bear in mind that we are all people (except for the bots), even I am a person. As such, please treat us all with respect.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page, or ask ata the Teahouse, a collection of experienced editors.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Getting started:

Additional tips...

Welcome! Here, have a plate of fresh cookies
You are now a Registered Editor, and entitled to display this Service Badge.

LAJ007, good luck, and have fun.Matty.007 08:59, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Snapplify) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Snapplify, LAJ007!

Wikipedia editor Matty.007 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Looks great!

To reply, leave a comment on Matty.007's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Would you mind if I nominated it for DYK, which would hopefully end up with the article being linked from the main page? Thanks, Matty.007 09:01, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of iOS e-book reader software / Snapplify[edit]

Hello LAJ007,

thanks for commenting on the talk page of Comparison of iOS e-book reader software about my revert of adding the Snapplify reader.

I wasn't aware of the Snapplify page which does have external links, indeed. I think it's still a bit on the border line of notability as an *app*, though. Pretty much all other apps in the comparison have at least >= 100.000 hits on Google and extensive external media coverage with about half on them having their own Wikipedia article.

I was slightly in doubt about the "independent" part as well because, looking at your contributions, they are solely about Snapplify. So I - probably wrongly - assumed you might an employee or otherwise affiliated with Snapplify.

I'm glad, though, you're open to discussion. So, what makes the Snapplify reader app notable in order to be added to the comparison chart?

Best regards, Philantrop (talk) 22:17, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]