User talk:Iangpark
Welcome[edit]
|
Carlin's Cairn moved to draftspace[edit]
An article you recently created, Carlin's Cairn, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 19:57, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Carlin's Cairn has been accepted[edit]
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Theroadislong (talk) 22:54, 24 February 2020 (UTC)Ways to improve Milldown[edit]
Hello, Iangpark,
Thank you for creating Milldown.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Meatsgains(talk) 20:18, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Ways to improve Pykestone Hill[edit]
Hello, Iangpark,
Thank you for creating Pykestone Hill.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Meatsgains(talk) 20:43, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]
Hello, Iangpark
Thank you for creating Cairnsgarroch.
User:Insertcleverphrasehere, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Please add Wikiproject tags and a reflist to future creations (As I have done just now).
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Insertcleverphrasehere}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
— Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)(click me!) 21:02, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Articles about hills :)[edit]
Hi there, I hope you're well. Thanks very much for your contributions to Wikipedia - I'm glad you've got the motivation to get these articles up!
I've noticed that many of the articles you've posted about these hills rely solely on the single source of hill-bagging.co.uk, and I can see it's been mentioned further up here. On Wikipedia, it's generally accepted that articles have multiple references from different sources to prove their notability, and to help researchers follow up with anything they want to investigate. For instance, a quick search shows me several other references that are available talking about King's Seat Hill which I've just seen.
It'd be brilliant if you could include some of these in your future edits - and, whilst I don't think there's any issue with notability here at all, you might want to take a glance over the policy on notability of geographic features - specifically, referencing further information to ensure that the content is encyclopedic.
All the best, and please do get back to me if you have any questions! | Naypta✉ opened his mouth at 13:20, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi Naypta, thanks so much I will definitely get more references in. They only have so little at the moment as I wanted to finish creating the articles for a certain list first before I standardise them and went further in depth with each one. Kind regards, Ian iangpark (talk) 13:23, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- I am afraid I don’t see Hill Bagging as meeting our guidelines for reliable sources as it appears to be a personal website. There is a lot of data on there but it is not clear how this is sourced, and for example where it conflicts with OS data, why it should be considered more accurate or reliable. If Hill Bagging is using published data, it would be good to reference that directly. —--Pontificalibus 17:23, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi Pontificalbus, the HB website is the interactive copy of the official website for the standardisation and numeration of all hills within the United Kingdom and ROI, and has been so for a good number of years. The website is administrated by one individual who has been directly involved with the individuals who mapped the hills. Quite simply, it is, by an enormous margin, the most reliable website by which to extrapolate topographical hill data in the United Kingdom and ROI - OS maps, although extremely useful, does not normally provide accurate summit information. The data is sourced from http://www.hills-database.co.uk/, which is a place to hold the official release of the frequently-updated database; HB is the interactive, user-friendly format of this Excel database, copied directly. I have only used HB so that a reference can be taken directly for each hill, which is not possible with the older website. If you like, at the end of each article, I can reference the website on which the official database can be downloaded? Kind regards, iangpark (talk) 17:50, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]
Hello, Iangpark
Thank you for creating Alhang.
User:Amkgp, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
A suggestion is that you add this at the end for proper reference structure.
==References==
{{reflist}}
I usually find the above missing in your articles for review
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Amkgp}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Amkgp (talk) 17:29, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]
Hello, Iangpark
Thank you for creating Stob Law.
User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start. Really needs another reference to confirm it's naming and existence.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 23:09, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 3[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mountains and hills of Scotland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mull. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:33, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 10[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mountains and hills of Scotland, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Arrochar, Fort William and Lorn.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The article Live in Berlin 1991 Vol. I has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This article needs more reliable references as per WP:NMUSIC.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Whiteguru (talk) 03:34, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Live in Berlin 1991 Vol. II has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This article needs more reliable references as per WP:MUSIC
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Whiteguru (talk) 03:35, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)