User talk:Franpopstar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2009[edit]

Your recent edit to the page Out of Control (Girls Aloud album) appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you may do and take a look at the welcome page, if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. ~~ [ジャム][t - c] 18:25, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your comment[edit]

It's not an incorrect information. "The singles box" a box that contains all the 20 singles of Girls Aloud, as they are celebrating the 20th consecutive top 10 single. It's confirmed on their website, and the box is a limited edition of 5,000 copies, available exclusively through their website. Thank you.

Just fyi, a band's website isn't considered a reliable source, in that it's usually not unbiased. Things need to be sourced to third-party sources usually, which is probably why the above editor removed it. Raven1977Talk to meMy edits 20:39, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, I don't want to be rude, but that website IS the official Girls Aloud website, not any fan website or something. So, I think it's totally reliable, cos' it's supported by they label, Fascination/Polydor. Thank you.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Girls Aloud discography, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please read the talk page, where it is indicated that Untouchable should remain in "other singles" until it is released. There's only two days to go so please wait until it officially comes out before moving it. ~~ [ジャム][t - c] 12:22, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! "Untouchable" IS a single by itself, OK?? It's been released tomorrow, so IT IS a single. So stop you!

Per the talk page, UNTIL it is released tomorrow, it should stay in the 'other singles'. If you don't like it, take it to the talk page. ~~ [ジャム][t - c] 19:10, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! ˉˉanetode╦╩ 19:33, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alesha Dixon template[edit]

I'm not sure if you know how to use templates, but you don't need to copy the content into each page. If you want to add a template to a page (for example, the Alesha one, use {{Alesha Dixon}}, which will automatically include the template on the page. ~~ [ジャム][t - c] 20:21, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BADCHARTS[edit]

Please do not add charts listed on WP:BADCHARTS, such as the Bulgarian Singles Chart and the United World Chart, to any Wikipedia articles. Please also not that single station airplay charts are not acceptable, nor is sourcing material to a fansite or blog.—Kww(talk) 02:09, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To re-iterate this comment again, charts on TV channels are not acceptable - please don't add them. ~~ [ジャム][t - c] 16:52, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Heartbreak (Make Me A Dancer). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. You must not add charts listed on WP:BADCHARTS or sourced to fansites and blogs to articles.—Kww(talk) 16:00, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sophie Ellis-Bextor's Fourth Studio album[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sophie Ellis-Bextor's Fourth Studio album, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Entire article is based on speculation and reference to a single that is not even on the album. WP:HAMMER applies here. Wait for the final details and release before writing an article.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Trevor Marron (talk) 23:19, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Sophie Ellis-Bextor's Fourth Studio album[edit]

I have nominated Sophie Ellis-Bextor's Fourth Studio album, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophie Ellis-Bextor's Fourth Studio album. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Trevor Marron (talk) 23:30, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Sophie Ellis-Bextor's Fourth Studio album[edit]

I have nominated Sophie Ellis-Bextor's Fourth Studio album, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophie Ellis-Bextor's Fourth Studio album (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Trevor Marron (talk) 23:45, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Booty_Luv_-_Say_It_(Official_Single_Cover).jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Booty_Luv_-_Say_It_(Official_Single_Cover).jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:56, 28 June 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 20:56, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reversions[edit]

Please do not undo my edits without explanation. Can you explain why you believe that the source for the Flanders chart should be one that changes every week instead of staying stable? Why you think the Ultratip chart should be mislabeled as the "Wallonian" chart (which it isn't). Why a tiny country the size of Belgium should have a minor chart like the dance chart listed? Why a single radio station from Albania should be able to pretend that it represents the entire country?—Kww(talk) 14:22, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

-- Meanwhile the single doesn't hit the Ultratop, I think it's important to keep the Ultratip chart, cos' I think it's quite relevant. And the Dance Chart it's important. No matter the size of the country, everyone has an official Dance chart. Thank you. --

Actually, my country (the Netherlands Antilles) has no charts at all. Having the two charts for Belgium in nearly every article gives them a lot of weight compared to other countries of similar size, and there's no excuse for three. There's no archive for the Ultratip chart, either: once it goes off the chart, there's no way to link to it to provide a source.—Kww(talk) 15:15, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you?[edit]

In the page Sophie Ellis-Bextor discography you appear to have made a Revision as of 20:26, 2 May 2009 by adding text and citations to the article. One of those citations is causing a cite error. Could you please go back and fill out the full source information for the reference tag <ref name="US Hot Dance/Club"/>? Thanks. 75.69.0.58 (talk) 10:03, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your sock has been blocked[edit]

Do not create any additional User accounts or this one will also end up blocked indefinitely. - eo (talk) 22:09, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sophie Ellis-Bextor.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sophie Ellis-Bextor.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:16, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Franpopstar&oldid=1054299354"