User talk:Frankymulls

What's on your mind?[edit]

I have a problem with an article you created/edited.
what is your real name?
Where are you originally from?
Post original Topic instead.

If you are adding a comment or topic, please be respectful of the talk page and do no remove or vandalise this space as it is a space to interact as matured adults and comment only on things you have a response too, if you have a new question please do leave a new topic as we are trying to keep Wikipedia a clean and neat place.

Nomination of B Major (South African musician) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article B Major (South African musician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B Major (South African musician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

dxneo (talk) 17:17, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:B Major (Producer) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:B Major (Producer). Thanks! Hammersoft (talk) 18:15, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:B Major (Producer)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:B Major (Producer), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 21:44, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Bmusique99 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bmusique99. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Spicy (talk) 20:26, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that his block be reviewed[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Frankymulls (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked from wikipedia because I told another user that I created a different and new page at B Major (South African musician) and compared it to the one he had B Major SA but what I was telling him was it got deleted and I never bothered with the article again because there wasn't enough sources to establish notability.

I than saw a notification that said Uncle Cedrics talk page has been changed because I watched the page awhile back when I first discovered him. And I thought the page is being improved now because there were only two links of what I used last time but the article was a stub this time meaning it can be expanded still.

Im learning as I go along, but I'm definitely not stupid to go and tell on myself if I was a sockpuppet!

I hothis is huge mistake as I have no link or Ties to Bmusiq99, I'm using my wikipedia account everyday at my work and I would hate to start a new account. As you can see I had one attempt at creating that article and accept that it's gone but got some hope for it today when I saw another editor published it. But doesn't matter, what matters is please do further investigation and see that I'm no way link to these accounts.

This guy Uncle Cedric should be the one blocked as he knew the consequences of creating it again! He was in the deletion discussion too! That should make you see he truly has an obsession on B Major. Or it's just a coincidence Frankymulls (talk) 21:12, 9 February 2024 (UTC) Frankymulls (talk) 21:12, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The "further investigation" you asked for has already been done, which proved you are a sockpuppet, along with your sockpuppets at User:UncleCedric and User:Jezebel1997. Your attempts to explain away your behavior are not working. You've been advised how to proceed before; see User_talk:Sweettooth031#Blocked. You've chosen to ignore that advice and have continued your never ending spree of sockpuppets, apparently thinking we're too stupid to notice. This has been going on for three years now. All of your attempts have failed to generate an article about B Major. They will always fail. Do you understand what a colossal waste of time this is for you? Do not make another unblock request. I will reject it procedurally. Not only is this a checkuser block, which only a checkuser can undo, but per WP:THREESTRIKES any request to be unbanned is going to have to go before the community. Given your atrocious record of sockpuppet abuse (more than two dozen sockpuppets now), any attempt to make such a request any time in the next six months will be utterly ineffective. You are banned; not any one of your accounts in particular (they're all blocked), but you personally. It doesn't matter what sockpuppet you attempt to operate. It doesn't matter how many ridiculous permutations of Bjorn Martin's name you try to get past people's notice. They've all been deleted. PLEASE give up. PLEASE make some attempt to do this right, per the advice I gave you at User_talk:Sweettooth031#Blocked. --Hammersoft (talk) 01:02, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've also blocked your sockpuppet at User:JohnnyCPT. --Hammersoft (talk) 01:33, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Doc Shebeleza (South African musician)[edit]

Hello, Frankymulls. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Doc Shebeleza (South African musician), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Doc Shebeleza (South African musician)[edit]

Hello, Frankymulls. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Doc Shebeleza".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:56, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]