User talk:Epec 2000

This is Epec 2000's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Epec 2000/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:23, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Epec 2000, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:23, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:-Users-admin-Downloads-Murnane3-page-001.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:-Users-admin-Downloads-Murnane3-page-001.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 18:19, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:-Users-admin-Downloads-Murnane3-page-001.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:-Users-admin-Downloads-Murnane3-page-001.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

D.J. Murnane[edit]

Please STOP moving this article about - there is no reason for anything in the title other than D.J. Murnane - it does not need disambiguation as there is no other D.J. Murnane on Wikipedia. - Arjayay (talk) 14:57, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of W A Cuscaden[edit]

Hello Epec 2000,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged W A Cuscaden for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Meatsgains (talk) 16:25, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content there[edit]

Hello. It seems you have usurped the page and overwritten all content. I am trying to fix it. Please do not revert me. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 02:11, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider waiting for a while. I will need to help fix the page first. What happened was that you overwrote an existing page. I am trying to fix it now and would appreciate if you don't edit on that for a few hours. Please don't worry - your content will not be lost. I will restore it on a separate page and you can edit that. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 02:15, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi .... wow. i'm new to this and am learning. This needs vigilant editors but the truth is they may shut down good research a bit too early. EG my research on the background of a former police commissioner WA Cuscaden was also deleted.

Conor (talk) 02:20, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your understanding. I understand that you efforts were in good faith. But what it did was to overwrite an existing page which was then moved to a new title. This creates a bit of problems with attribution. In addition, someone from an external website who could have been looking for that article wouldn't be able to find it. I have now restored Murnane Service Reservoir to it's original content. The content which you wrote is now at D. J. Murnane and you can edit it. Thank you. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 05:51, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you would like to get back W A Cuscaden, you can request for it to be userfied at WP:REFUND. I usually create article in draftspace. That allows me to edit and finish article before publishing it to the main space. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 05:57, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Peirce (engineer) has been accepted[edit]

Robert Peirce (engineer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 07:54, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Epec 2000/sandbox[edit]

Hello, Epec 2000. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 15:05, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:-Users-admin-Downloads-Murnane3-page-001.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:-Users-admin-Downloads-Murnane3-page-001.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Guan aco 22:46, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Epec 2000. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Gunong Pulai Water Supply Project concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Gunong Pulai Water Supply Project, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gunong Pulai Water Supply Project[edit]

Hello, Epec 2000. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gunong Pulai Water Supply Project".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Epec 2000. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]