User talk:Delldot/Archive 8
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | → | Archive 15 |
Ping you have mail, --CrohnieGalTalk 15:55, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- I wrote back delldot talk 05:19, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
I have added Studio Music & Lyrics
Hello Delldot,
I have added Studio Music & Lyrics as an studio where something is going on in the city of Groningen, The Netherlands. The link to another website as reference is because many bands who rehearsal at Music & Lyrics could be found in the archive to. My add is in duscusion for some kinda reasson to be wikiproof or not. So I wait until I can edit the artikel for more interesting links to all kinds of bands in connection with Music & Lyrics. Even bands from the USA played at Music & Lyrics. We do run this reahersalroom for about 13 years right now so we have a small reputation.
Some time ago I was looking to write a reaction about this artikel I wrote on wikipedia but could not find out how.
Sincere, Tremmal —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tremmal (talk • contribs) 13:08, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Time to bring this conversation to talk?
Hi, got your email, and in a hurry so I thought it was time to bring it to Wikipedia. I sure hope all the stuff I had to do to get it allowed was done correctly. Boy did I do a lot of reading to figure things out, and with your excellent help and support I hope it's time to start putting it into articles, probably something else I'll need to read and learn and need help with. I really think bringing [1] who is a GI would be a great asset to us, what's your thoughts?
I agree with you and think we should wait to see if there is going to be a problem with the picture's release. Do you know anyone who can tell us if I did it right so that it won't be deleted and we can get started? I know a couple of editors that might be able to tell me so let me know. Emailing on the Village site I found the answer not too clear at the time other than saying it could be deleted in 7 days. Thanks again, --CrohnieGalTalk 14:18, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
- Responded back to you. Please let me know where you add it on my talk page so I see where and how you did it, thanks,--CrohnieGalTalk 12:41, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Why?
Why did you delete my information on Dani Rogers? —Preceding unsigned comment added by MilanKitty (talk • contribs) 18:15, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Excuse me but i have a shared IP address so i am continuelly blocked from editing because of other people who make vandal edits to wikipedia from the same ip address. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris Iz Cali (talk • contribs) 18:26, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
THanks
Thanks!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris Iz Cali (talk • contribs) 18:47, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Bad revert
Hi Delldot thank you for your message. If you look at the history of Mitchel, Cornwall, you will see that it has been totally vandalised by someone. I knew the person who did it and made a wikipedia account to get rid of their edit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Green buttons (talk • contribs) 19:34, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
This user deserves a lengthier block than the one he just got handed for 1 week. He has a history of compulsive vandalism over the last year with more than 150 edits. This is his 7th block but he continues vandalising immediately after block expiry. SWik78 20:53, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
- Well, the articles being picked on are pretty major and the edits can get pretty inflammatory (ie, replacing the whole article Ethiopia with 'Niggers'). Whoever it is that's doing this seems to know when the blocks expire because they're back immediately afterwards and they know they're about to get blocked again so that's why they get their money's worth and edit 5 or 10 articles within a half an hour before they're blocked again. The point I'm trying to make is that I think it's the same person or group of people because there is a pattern of behaviour. I know that the school is located in Rose Hill, Kansas but what are the odds of someone different vandalizing the same article almost every month since September 2006, even if it is your home town? I would say to give them about 2 months and hope that it's long enough for the main violators to forget about vandalizing Wikipedia and find something else interesting to do like throwing rocks at cars or whatever it is that keeps them happy. By the way, I always say Peace! in real life. So Peace! right back at you! SWik78 21:43, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
blocks
this edit seems rather wrong, even on peoples own talk page. Martijn Hoekstra 21:41, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
2000 democratic protest
please delete the2000 democratic protest article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cubman4444 (talk • contribs) 22:28, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Sorry about that!
I have some immature friends at school and I left my wikipedia file up while I was away from the computer. This will not happen again. Thank you for reverting the file. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wrestlerva (talk • contribs) 00:47, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Dear Lordy you sure are fast
I mean literally seconds after the notice comes up in irc, I click it, and it already loads as a revert by delldot. Awesome work dude, vandals don't stand a chance with people like you :D --revotfel★ 21:08, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- You know I tried to use twinkle but I just couldn't figure out how to get it work, adding that line script to the .js page did absolutely nothing. After searching around for a while I went with popups which also included code for the .js, but it worked for some reason. I probably just don't know what I'm doing :) --revotfel★ 21:25, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Oh duh. "Private messages from unregistered users are currently blocked due to spam problems, but you can always message a staffer. Please register! ( http://freenode.net/faq.shtml#privmsg )" I'll do that and message you when I'm done --revotfel★ 21:37, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- That explains it delldot talk 22:37, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- [2]
- After messing with it I have decided that twinkle+popups = Awesomeness. As are you. Thanks again. --revotfel★ 22:09, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- You're very welcome! delldot talk 22:37, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Kai kun
- My reply to original note delldot talk 22:59, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
sorry i ws bored, you are right wiki is cool =D
well i try not to do it again ;) peace —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kai kun (talk • contribs) 22:14, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- Apology accepted delldot talk 22:29, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
yeah =) well what your role in wiki? you work for them? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kai kun (talk • contribs) 22:23, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you
There is nothing more annoying than vandalism. Especially when a message is vandalized. Please don't do that again, Peiton.
- Yeah, I met some of them! delldot talk 22:29, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Kai kun
i see i guess youll need be really intelligent to volunteer for wp. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kai kun (talk • contribs) 22:32, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
hahaha yeah :D oh shit :S i vandled article about, blue peter, finland and pencil and it hasnt been found yet :S oh shit now my account's gunna get deleted when someone finds out —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kai kun (talk • contribs) 23:02, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
oh ok thanks, I know how much wp means to you =) you got myspace? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kai kun (talk • contribs) 23:11, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
yeah you should =D —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kai kun (talk • contribs) 23:39, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Thank you very much for reverting the edit to my user talk page. Lately I've been having trouble with some immature classmates who don't have anything better to do than to completely screw up Wikipedia. I notice they also vandalized your talk page. Do you know them as well?--Padawan Animator 23:38, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Maybe time to block IP
[3] The welcome page was deleted of all conversations and warning to start fresh for the editor. But as you can see by the contributions, there is no reason to try to keep this IP editor, all I see is attacks and very rude behavior. Did I miss something which allowed the reversal of what you said by another editor to start frest when this editor seems obviously just out to attack and vandalize. If I am missing something please share it with me. I try also to do clean ups of vandals and inappropriate things likes blogs, my space, you tube and so forth. Thanks, off to bed for me. --CrohnieGalTalk 01:22, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Padawan Animator won't leave us alone
I have noticed that Padawan Animator is always changing the WAIS page. Is there any way that you can block him from doing so?
DemonicRhino (talk) 22:52, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- There is no reason for me to be blocked. I am a contributor. Not a vandal. Thank you.--Padawan Animator (talk) 23:21, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
My Note
Yeah, no problem. And yes, I do think it ought to be semiprotected. I also think that users who vandalize should be banned on sight. I've become irritated by constantly seeing messages that say "If you do that again you will be banned." One time I even noticed one user talk page that had much more than one message that said "This is your last warning." For Pete's sake! Just delete the user! I'm on a quest to become an administrator, so I'm sure this recent history will look good once I finally suggest to receive this promotion.--Padawan Animator (talk) 23:30, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm seriously getting frustrated. These people will stop at nothing to vandalize Wikipedia. They're so immature it's not even funny. I really don't know what to do.
And I don't think it's a good idea to trust that Kai kun guy.
Oh, and I notice you completely deleted my note. I was so proud of it, too.
May the Force be with you,--Padawan Animator (talk) 23:40, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- My reply delldot talk 04:23, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
- And here is my reply.--Padawan Animator (talk) 05:12, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
- And here is my reply to the reply. delldot talk 17:26, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Referring to Padawan Animator
I have noticed that this person has two accounts: a vandalizing account and a regular account. he is always changing the WAIS page. God, when will he ever leave things alone? DemonicRhino (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Best WP articles
Do you think you could please show me some of the best examples of Wikipedia articles? I'm thinking I could learn from those examples.
May the Force be with you,--Padawan Animator (talk) 16:34, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks...
Thanks for undoing the disruptive edits by troublemaker IP anon 12.168.112.176 (talk · contribs). BTW, can you also watch the Negima!? article for me? That article has been a vandalized several times since last April in between protections. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 16:45, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- Not just that IP, but that IP has been causing some trouble (that's why I reported him to WP:AIV to have him blocked longer). Negima!? has been vandalized several times before simply because the vandals claim that the series does not deserve to have an article. I just think they simply hate it. This is why it has been semi-protected several times, the longest and latest being two months. (I want to have it permanently protected, but since I don't have to authority to do so... you already know.) - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 16:57, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- There's also a discussion in that article where KyuuA4 (talk · contribs) has somewhot found about some of the vandals who, should I say, apparently bastardize the article. Quoting him: "Apparently, that's the group opposing and vandalizing this series and this article. If anyone can find their site, that would be much appreciated. I'm willing to suspect it's this one. Obviously, it is just conjecture at this point. KyuuA4 04:07, 16 September 2007 (UTC)" The problem is the site he is referring to is in Spanish. I hope that anon's actions doesn't trigger another mass vandalism on it (or any of the Negima-related character pages). I may not be around if that time comes. But thanks for the help (even if anime may not your cup of tea). PS: I think two or three months is still good and long enough, if the need arises once again. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 17:24, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
SIGH im bored so im just going around posting things on peoples pages
i like your ideals tho come visit me sometime well visit my userpage that is :/Sladeakakevin (talk) 16:55, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- Bored? Help out! delldot talk 15:26, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
i see
you are more intellegant than most i have talked to lately they have been quite a snore il take your advice somone put like 50 userboxes that said atheist when i had one that siad i go to church thanks for the advice —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sladeakakevin (talk • contribs) 17:03, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- Let me know if you need help delldot talk 15:26, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
i will keep you notified
im going to put you on my watch list actually ive gotten into quite the job of clearing vandalisim lately ive cleared several dozen pages of useless info that people kept complaining about i got 5 minuets befor my free period is over i will message again at lunch —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sladeakakevin (talk • contribs) 17:10, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
back
ugh band sucked im light headed from 67 strait minuets of playing then the rest we had off im eating a cheese burger at the family restaraunt but rite now im at nanas housre Sladeakakevin (talk) 18:21, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Vandal Fighting
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| I, Stormtracker94, award the RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar to Delldot for amazing vandal fighting. STORMTRACKER 94 22:05, 20 November 2007 (UTC) |
- Thank you! :D delldot talk 22:07, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- Wow, Delldot! You're on fire!--Padawan Animator (talk) 01:09, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
WAIS article
What's the quality of this article so far? I've been working hard to improve it many times.
May the Force be with you.--Padawan Animator (talk) 01:34, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
- My reply delldot talk 08:24, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- Response--Padawan Animator (talk) 22:55, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
re: my review
"Criticism?" that was more like "set of helpful pointers". The argument with Isotope's been resolved-as if it never happened. Also, Giove did have a puppet that he used to talk to himself in Italian. It was User:Cherso. Also the RFA was too soon-only 176 edits under my belt at the time-and the skipping of the talk pages? That's because I almost never drastically change a page. Again, thanks. --Gp75motorsports (talk) 02:47, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
grit
i am sorry wat is the difference between the levels
hello you have recently toldme off for vandalism but grit issand wat is the difference —Preceding unsigned comment added by Qwerty1231 (talk • contribs)
Way to go!
Delldot, how do manage to delete the article Will farrar as I'm tagging it for speedy deletion no less than 30 seconds after it was created? WAY TO GO!! —ScouterSig 16:34, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
- Hehe, thanks, I try delldot talk 16:41, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Proofreading
Hello Delldot
I translated a part of an article into English, but I had some grammatical problems. I looked for help on Wikipedia:Questions, it brought me to Wikipedia:Embassy. There, I was suggested to look for a translator, but I am one. I wanted the article to be proofread by a native English speaker. I checked out the proofreaders list, there was just a few of them, because they all can speak Russian, while that was not necessary.
I asked Razorflame what I was supposed to do, he fixed something (he said he could not fix everything) and said I ought to ask an admin. So I ask you.
I cannot find a list of regular proofreaders who have no extra knowledge, i.e. who are less busy.
A. Demidov (talk) 16:38, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks! I read your reply before you told of it here. The browser even informed me of a conflict, when I tried to submit this message at first.
A. Demidov (talk) 08:29, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Re-edited
Thanks for the copyediting again! I re-edited something and explained it on the article's talk page. I will look for an copyedior, when I expand the article.
A. Demidov (talk) 12:06, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello I have a new question
I found the article Boy S Tenyu. Its section Plot summary seems to have wrong style, but I am not sure that it is so. Could you check it, please?
A. Demidov (talk) 09:00, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
It is more than unclear...
You're quite nice person :)
Even if you cannot fix a problem; trying to do that and telling me, you give me fine ideas. When you advised me to compare the Russian article with the one we both had checked, I noticed three things:
- Nearly everything the English version has is the exact translation of that of the Russian Wikipedia.
- The Russian Wikipedia doesn't mention that the boxer was blind (while it's the plot's spring!!)
- Both the articles dragged in the name of a Russian serial of The Brigade, while the only common thing they have is the director and some actors... Well, however, I might be mistaken, I should use search engines.
- The Russian article has little more sections (well, as for this, I knew it before).
- Before you reworded the article, it was more like a poster, than an article, , so is the Russian version. Still. I'll have to fix it.
Thanks for your attention!
A. Demidov (talk) 18:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
P.S.
I added new info to the article you had copyedited so nice. Maybe you are interested to check its talk page. I left some notes there. And I have one more question. When I use data from the city archive, which are cited in a newspaper's article (I've picked them there), what should I refer to? The online site of the paper, or the archive itself?
Thank you for everything you do for Wikipedians!
A. Demidov (talk) 18:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Copyediting
|
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | |
| I, Demidov2007, award the Copyeditor's Barnstar to you, Delldot, for your enormous copyediting efforts. A. Demidov (talk) 08:30, 27 November 2007 (UTC) |
- Thank you! :D delldot talk 09:35, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Question on e-mail address.
I have registered my e-mail address on my account. But recently someone has been trying to hijack my account. I know this because I keep receiving "New temporary password for Wikipedia" e-mails which I didn't request myself. Is it safe to remove my e-mail address from my account so these would stop? After all, it is optional. Or should I just ignore the messages to be on the safer side (I even made a filter on my e-mail account to make sure)? Thanks. Sorry if you're not the guy to answer my question. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 11:30, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Vandal warning
I'm sorry someone changed it when i was away from my computer= apologies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daveyboy16 (talk • contribs) 14:53, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
I Need Help
Hello. There is a user by the name of TTN who is continously reverting and deleting articles left and right without warning, and even threatens several users to do so.
Most of the time he does this without even speaking to the users, and he is leaving chaos and confuson in his wake. Without a doubt that breaks several of the rules established on this site.
In short: he is using the rules against us so he can vandalize articles.
I am requesting that you do something about this user before he continues his actions.
If you do not believe what I say is legit please go here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:TTN
Thank you.—Preceding unsigned comment added by ZeroGiga (talk • contribs)
- Response--Padawan Animator (talk) 22:20, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Response: TTN
Thanks for your response.
However, judging from what I see, no matter how someone talks to him, he still persists in his actions. And I thought that changing articles without one's consent IS illegal in Wikipedians standards and counts as vandalism.
He is the type of user who has barely any sense of compassion when it comes to articles, and if I recall right, several users are leaving Wikipedia because of him. He is like something of a "missing-nin" by wikipedian standards (If you do not know what a missing-nin is, read the Naruto articles.).
However, I do feel that if I talk to him, it would lead to unneccesary conflict, and I'm not the type of person who just jumps in and bark threats at someone given the chance. Too many users have made that mistake against him, and, well, they suffered the consequences for breaking the rules, right? —Preceding unsigned comment added by ZeroGiga (talk • contribs) 16:41, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
I expanded the article a bit, but I got tired up, so I am not sure if my work is clear or not. But I am sure it needs rewording. Also, I think the article should be moved to Shadowboxing, and the page Boy S Tenyu should be converted to a redirect page. How do you think?
Thanks!
A. Demidov (talk) 17:50, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Yes, I see the article of Shadowboxing exists. (I didn't check it before, because I am on my cell phone at the moment.) Actually, it is true for the Russian version too. That's why it is called ru:Бой с тенью (фильм, 2005), i.e. Shadowboxing (film, 2005). I think, it can be called in this way. By the way, how did you figured out the comma was needed, when you fixed the interwiki?
Nobody but you told to me "shall" on the internet. I began to think that the word became obsolete!.. I think, I am not enough skilled to move pages.
Hope, there will be no message about a conflict (I get the messages in Russian, so I don't know, how it looks in original).
A. Demidov (talk) 18:31, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Not vandalizing
William Rodriguez profile was vandalised by the user Jazz as he mentioned on NAtional TV in Spain, London and USA. You have not reverted the edits as the original was and instead have helped on a character assasination. Wiki has to be aware of this and the items reverted to the original article that was posted last year. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.172.110.174 (talk) 19:45, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- My replies, Issue resolved delldot talk 15:15, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
OK, I'll move it...
...when I get continuous internet connection. If not, will you do it by yourself, please? I think, I will do it tomorrow (22:30 over here right now), if everything is okay. I also left some note on the article's talk page.
A. Demidov (talk) 20:27, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Vandalism
How is it vandalism when its the truth —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.242.95.183 (talk) 21:38, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
how is it vandalism when is tru
thanks for the fairness
I did check your fixing on William Rodriguez bio, and indeed, I think it was the right move. One sided views should not be allowed and an overall balanced presentation of an individual should be strive for. Thanks.
Padawawawan Animater =(
I guess, i have to appoligize...im sorry i guess. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DemonicRhino (talk • contribs) 22:05, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delldot wasn't the one you made a personal attack against.
- May the Force be with you,--Padawan Animator (talk) 23:24, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Help!!!!!!!
Delldot, sorry again but now is getting to an edit war. It is obvious that Jazz2006 wants to continue attacking Mr. William Rodriguez. I tried to explain the edit of American Free Press on the discussion page. But Jazz2006 keeps putting and reverting to all the stuff that you did and I corrected. What to do? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jrandi (talk • contribs) 05:52, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
I must have typed wrong info
I had the plot summary by memory. It turned out, the camera showed Las Vegas, not L.A. I am afraid there are other errors in the summary. What tag is used to indicate a section which might contain absolutely wrong data?
Also, I found the official forum of the film. There are many interesting data, like logical errors, pseudo errors (i.e. some scenes that seem to be errors, but they are justified) etc. How can I include them into the article?
Thanks!
A. Demidov (talk) 12:41, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
My reply to your reply A. Demidov (talk) 14:43, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- My reply to the reply to the reply delldot talk 06:17, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Vandalism
Is there any way to revert back to a vandalism free edit when there is a user doing such things as Jarhead is? Thanks. Kaeso Dio (talk) 16:30, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- Why yes, there is! delldot talk 16:42, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
History of logic programming
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article History of logic programming, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of History of logic programming. Charles Matthews (talk) 16:37, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- Fine by me, looks like the only edit I ever made to it was to remove a cv. delldot talk 16:42, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Black Wikipedia
Just now I learned about Blackle. This gives me an idea for a little something new. I think it would be interesting to turn Wikipedia black instead of white. What do you say?
May the Force be with you,--Padawan Animator (talk) 18:47, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- Response--Padawan Animator (talk) 23:26, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I don't see your final warning edit on User talk:76.7.49.8. Did something eat it? Corvus cornixtalk 19:51, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Now that I added a v4 warning, yours shows up. Huh. Corvus cornixtalk 19:53, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- Huh, I have no idea, must have been some kind of weird glitch. :) delldot talk 19:55, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
DemonicRhino
After DemonicRhino completely blanked out my user talk page I decided to leave him a warning message. Thought I ought to mention what a good job I did.
May the Force be with you,--Padawan Animator (talk) 23:23, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- Response--Padawan Animator (talk) 23:47, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- Response--Padawan Animator (talk) 00:00, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
For the reverting the silliness on my talk page.--Sandahl 05:44, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
The picture
It seems to be problematic, I mean emailing to the museum. The have neither site nor email address, the journalists scanned the photos to make them available online. If I go to museum and ask the old women working there about copyright, they'll answer: "£$€¥ off, man, and don't put stupid questions! What is copyright and what is Wikipedia? Wanna copy the pics - please do, but leave us be!" So that's the problem. I cannot communicate the more educated manager, because I don't represent an official person and neither I am one. I actually saw the pictures everywhere, they seem to be usual... But what license should I choose in the uploading form?
About an original research, they cited a newspaper, is it verifyable?
A. Demidov (talk) 07:03, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
What can I say? Only one thing: this is my reply to your reply. A. Demidov (talk) 15:42, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
- My reply to your reply to my reply delldot talk 16:45, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Question
Hi, if someones had a static IP and then doesn't is this a problem here at Wikipedia? I know longer have a static, at least I believe that is what was said during the boring technical talk. ;)
Also, you have mail! Thanks for all you excellent advice and all, --CrohnieGalTalk 14:49, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
- Hit an edit conflict with you! :) No problems at all, just a precaution to make sure I didn't need to do something or tell someone. When you read my email I think it will make it clear why I thought to ask about this. thanks again, --CrohnieGalTalk 15:19, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
| This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | → | Archive 15 |