User talk:Delldot/Archive 7
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
You're getting too quick!
Hee hee. Good job on chasing those IPs! Before I can even get a report, poof! You've got it done. Thanks! 
Ariel♥Gold 03:18, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- See how nice I am? User_talk:91.108.244.247 Ariel♥Gold 03:21, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Should we delete this list
Some people are selective they would like to see only lists of their own domination, what do u think does this list warrant deletion or should we let it stay?[1]--יודל 13:47, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
WADL
Regarding WADL
We have a listener base that monitors this community site. The fact that you refused to list the correct programming or even the fact that this station has the only African American President or the fact that the programming has dramatically changed and they carry Chapelle. If you are going to edit , then do it with RESPONSIBILITY. A formal compalint has been registered with Wikipedia. On Tuesday the phone number to WIKIPEDIA Corporate will be aired on 11 radio stations in Detroit. We cannot allow you to hurt the URBAN community this way. This appears to be very malicious. when we look at the history , it states that you have verifiable information . You have not verified anything in the past 2 years. Block me if you want to. There are iver 20,000 people who as of Tuesday will protest that your site is not doing what it was designed to do. BE OBJECTIVE!
Fell free to write any of us back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cavern Kowalski (talk • contribs) 16:00, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Could you please nominate the page for deletion on my part (I prefer to edit as an IP, so I can't go through the formal process)? It is basically the same as WP:CVU, and it is pretty much inactive (the new announcements bulletin's most recent addition is from Sept. 2006, for example. The page seems redundant to me, or it at least needs attention.--68.91.192.173 03:38, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, and that edit to Taliban wasn't by the person who posted the above comment. I have dynamic/shared IPs.--68.91.192.173 03:47, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- My reply delldot talk 16:39, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- That sounds like a good idea. Could you please add the merge tag to Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit since it's locked.--68.91.192.173 18:03, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- My reply delldot talk 16:39, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Please remove the information which make us problem
These type of information makes us serious problem of the student which are already passed from this informatin some of the information is not real. Please remove the information which make us problem. It’s need not focus. This is why who give this information please allow us to remove the other parts.
here in a first line of Others told "It was one of the 11 universities that went operational without University Grants Commission (UGC) approval which was made a necessity under the Private University Act (1992) in Bangladesh" but in a UGC website "http://www.ugc.gov.bd/traning.php" you can see the approval year 1996. so how it's real so, that kind of information makes us problem of the student of that university. this is why i try to remove that kind of information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bangla2007 (talk • contribs) 06:52, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
My recent change to '4g'
Hi, I got a message saying i edited a page with inapropriot content. Well i never edit pages with that and i certinily did not write inapropriate content. Can you please tell me what 'I' wrote? Also cann you please tell me how this could of happened when i dident do this? Thanks, From Anonomous. PS: I promisei did not do this but i think it is good how you help out wiki. How could i help? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.29.30.133 (talk) 07:34, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Please see your edit here for clarification, and review the shared IP information given on your talk page. Ariel♥Gold 07:37, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Need your input
I have a Sandbox and today I found a bunch of editors adding items to it that I do not know about nor understand. [[2]] Would you please explain if I am doing something wrong? I use it for reminders and also to learn how to do things. I need the reminders do to my disabilities about retaining information. Something seems really wrong since most of what is written I don't know about, have not been involved in and so forth. Please check out my Sandbox for me. I am totally confused about all of this and it looks like there is going to be a complaint and a deletion of my Sandbox. You can find my original link on my user page. Thanks,--CrohnieGalTalk 12:59, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Hey, I had a quick look, but couldn't seen any edits by anyone else. Who has a problem with it and what did they say the problem was? It seems like it's your sandbox, so as long as there's nothing blatantly out of line on it, you should get to do what you want. Anyway, give me more background and I'll see if I can talk to them about it. Peace, delldot talk 17:11, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, it looked like I accidentally copied the stuff to my sandbox instead of the one reminder I was trying to put there. I deleted all the posts that didn't belong, I hope that's ok since I don't know how to archive and have a bot do it for me. Thanks and again sorry for wasting your time. --CrohnieGalTalk 19:08, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Re: alleged vandalism at Green Hornet
Just found your note responding to my request for help with the vandals---yes, vandals, although it may very well be one person using two computers---on the articles The Green Hornet and The Lone Ranger. You asked if I'm familiar with WP:3RR---I am and it's not relevant, as it specifies in no uncertain terms that it requires the reversions be made three times in one 24 hour period, and we've been going back and forth on an approximately daily basis. Once, I think, I did it twice in a single day, but I haven't paid attention to the logged dates/times of theirs and have no idea how many times they have done it twice within 24 hours. Maybe they did it thrice the one time I did it twice---the only time they could have, as no one but me has been putting them right this time around---but why warn me? Or was that "glimpse at the histories" (I assume you mean the edit summaries on the articles' history pages, but if you don't, please explain) too quick? Besides, how can you have taken such a glimpse and have failed to see the personal sarcasm and such in theirs which alone eliminates any possibility of good faith on their part, and hence any chance that it is merely a content dispute? To say nothing of their "forging" an administrator's "signature" to a "last warning" for vandalism on my Talk page? (Did the link to that not work? No, I checked it before I saved and it went right to the spot.) A "polite reminder" of anything to somebody who would do that is obviously a waste of time! Indeed, part of my posting pointed out that, given their recorded behavior, vandalism warnings posted on their talk pages would surely be disregarded if they came from me, as the rules implied they should. So it is vandalism, specifically, what Wikipedia rules call sneaky vandalism (I don't know the "code" to make the link take you to that sub-sub-section directly {assuming that there is one}, so you'll have to scroll down a little bit, unless you're willing to take my word for the following), and I quote: "...adding plausible misinformation....and some vandals even use the edit summary 'rv vandalism' to mask the change." This is precisely what is happening here, and what I described in detail. The name "Andy Reid" and the link made of it are absolutely, irrefutably wrong for the character under discussion in those articles, and can't be put up that many times in good faith. As I had stated, a previous "editor"'s insistence on putting it in back in February resulted in the GH article getting semi-protected status. I honestly cannot conceive how you can have so much as read my posting on WT:VAN fully and thought your response to be an appropriate one (this might be interpreted as a violation of civility rules, but I'd rather give you a chance to improve your performance on your own than file a complaint about you on the proper page on first offense, and letting this completely slide is not a viable option; I talk to you about this, or I talk about you to authorities, so fair enough?). I now ask for some relevant and usuable advice or other assistance, please. Thank you. Ted Watson 20:34, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Just found your response to the above, and I see your point---while I said it couldn't do any good, posting polite messages on their talk pages couldn't hurt either, and would, as you put it, cover the bases. Good point, I'll try it, and thanks. As for sources, I have cassettes and CDs of actual broadcasts/episodes, 78 GH so far, plus one LR tape (sort of a montage of important events on Side 1, and the 25th anniversary episode on the reverse. Yeah, that's it, I'll cite the GH episode---title, original broadcast date (dare I assume Fran Striker wrote it? God knows who directed) and all---which made the connection explicit. Oh, yeah, also thanks for taking the criticism the way it was intended. Ted Watson 21:39, 9 September 2007 (UTC) QUICK UPDATE: They haven't reverted since yesterday (Saturday), when I mentioned in my summary the phony warning; maybe the fact that I figured that out scared them off. It just might be over! Ted Watson 21:46, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Need your opinion please
I have left Wikipedia do to be outted by two people. Would you please email me so I can talk openly? I appreciate you being my mentor and trust your opinions. Thanks, --CrohnieGalTalk 13:22, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Why did you revert my changes?
??? Per wikipedia policy, non-vandalism requires an explanation. These were attempts to answer questions on the talk page. — BQZip01 — talk 17:00, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, you already fixed it. Thanks! — BQZip01 — talk 17:01, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
O.H.B
I think your minor edits have improved this article.Are you now reading the book? It made a big impression on me as a youngster.I feel a bit bad about trashing the previous version as I suspect some teenager has worked pretty hard on it.The book appeals to weedy introspective young men.Dave59 10:51, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for reverting back my talk page! -Lemonflash(do something) 00:51, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Feeding Trolls
I guess you didn't realise that [3] was an attack name. I don't think we should be encouraging them to find another name. Spartaz Humbug! 18:10, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
What it do
what up blood.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bsad 65 (talk • contribs) 15:33, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Page clean up
I don't think I've thanked you yet. :) My page has been hit so often recently by disgruntled Australian college students that I've lost track. So...thanks. :) --Moonriddengirl 17:10, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
- I use Twinkle. What's really rather funny is that it's all in response to this. I would have expected this kind of response to some of the more politically charged changes I've made, not to removing an assertion that the graduates of a high school haven't amounted to much. You never know with people. --Moonriddengirl 17:16, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Materia Magica Changes
I just wanted to insure that you guys don't delete my internal reference link to addiction. I've played the game for 9 years plus and been an admin on it and they refuse to admit that their game is a source of addiction and people spend lots of money on donations (into the thousands). So I justify the internal link like this. If you wish to discuss it further I welcome it but I would hope it wouldn't be deleted by the people who made the game as this is a factual site. Xanax has to put up the side effects it causes why shouldn't these people get the same knowledge?
Joe
Hi
Hi, i wanted to let you know why I reverted your edit. The Israel of God are noted Black Hebrew Israelites in the United States who claim to be descendants of the ancient Israelites. They claim that blacks in Brazil, Madagascar, and the Caribbean, are also descended from the Israelites. That information is pertinent to the articles topic “Black Hebrew Israelites” and has been publicized with permission. Leave me a message on my talk page if you have any questions or want to discuss anything. Peace. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.36.182.179 (talk) 17:26, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
AFD for Hamid Palo
I saw you on not that long ago, so could comment on the AFD for the article Hamid Palo. [4]. Its my first time posting an article for AFD, so if you have any tips for how I have handled it, that would be nice. Sifaka talk 22:20, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thanks a lot
thanks for the info it really helped me —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrisbrownwifey07 (talk • contribs) 23:33, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Just a quick question
Will my persoal Sandbox also be cleared after twelve hours, or is that only the community one? Avatarcloud 20:18, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks a lot for replying so quickly.
Avatarcloud 21:01, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Last warning???
When did i ever get any other warnings. And the reason i did that was because that person kept on deleting facts on the page that i was editing, so please can you check it out for yourself. Thankyou, Brian 8915 xxx —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brain 8915 (talk • contribs) 22:32, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Clearing up the matter
Thanks for getting back to me about the issue that i had prevously raised with you. Brian 8915 xxx —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brain 8915 (talk • contribs) 22:40, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
About the Bulma Matter.
I'm sorry about this. I truly am. I mean, with it being considered for Deletion at this very moment, I was actually trying to shorten it and fix it up to fit with the guidelines. I did not intend to do ANY type of vandalism at any point. All I was actually trying to do is SAVE this article, and I don't think trying to go against the deletion on the discussion page will help. It won't happen again. -- ZeroGiga 19:22, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Your welcome
Your welcome :D —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dacheatcode (talk • contribs) 00:23, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you!
Delta1989 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Thank you for catching that vandal!
Molemanscott
Notice this? :) Happy tracking. Keegantalk 04:22, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Like most things I find, it was random. Looking through new user log, then all logs, saw that account creation. No footwork required. You're doing a fine job. Keegantalk 04:36, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Palestinian people
Hi, Someone has completely vandalised the 'Palestinian People' page. I just found this out when searching for some specific info, but I only know Wikipedia from a user's point of view and don't understand how to edit it/ revert it, so I'm messaging you instead! Hopefully someone will have corrected it by the time you get this. Shouldn't this page be somehow locked? Surely it gets this type of idiot all the time? Thanks for your help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.178.254.18 (talk) 10:27, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
:(
I am very sad now —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bowchicawowwow (talk • contribs) 19:32, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Aw! Sorry! delldot talk 01:24, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you!
Thank you for the barnstar, it is greatly appreciated! Happy Editing! Tiptoety 01:18, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Barnstar
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| I meant to do this earlier, but then got sidetracked by a couple other things. I wanted to acknowledge your hard work at vandal fighting. Excellent! Into The Fray T/C 09:41, 26 September 2007 (UTC) |
- Thank you! delldot talk 19:12, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Re: Review
Thank you for the review, which was great to read. I was a little long-winded in my response, but it's because you provoked me into (gasp) thinking. Anyway, I really appreciate it. Into The Fray T/C 17:13, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Revert at 16:45 September 26 2007
Hate to turn on you after the vandal-block, but you do know that your revert was unnecessaty on the paradox page? Also, nurses do not operate. You know that, right? I'm just saying. --Delta1989 23:01, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- My reply delldot talk 23:15, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, okay. --Delta1989 23:34, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Ok
Ok thanks, hehe sorry about that, I'm pretty much a newbie. мιІапэџѕ 01:43, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- No problem at all. delldot talk 19:12, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Your Edits to Health effects of tobacco smoking
Hey,
Good article to get involved with. However changing it to "there are none" isn't going to fly with these guys. Theres a group of about 4 guys (unfortunately including an admin) who protect the smoking related articles (smoking, Tobacco Smoking and Health effects of tobacco smoking with their lives. They refuse to allow any real fact to be added to these articles, and create consensus simply by ganging up on anyone who disagrees with them.
Instead of vandalizing the article (removing the article in that way will be seen as such) instead consider joining the discussion pages on these articles. Any help with Smokers Rights would also be appreciated.
Be very careful - they are attempting to have me banned for discussing the issue. Another way you could help would be to comment on the banning discussion at Wikipedia:Community sanction noticeboard (its the bottom discussion).
Anyway thanks for taking in interest in Human Rights. :) Naacats 04:21, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Hehe - Not guilty! I swear! :) delldot talk 14:27, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Fake PermBlock request
- I apologize for the vandalism done under this IP address, it was not me (the guy who made all of the positive contributions). After editing Ms. Marvel I noticed the vandalism done 'in my name' and I think this incident has inspired me to register a username. See you all in the land of respectability!! I apologize for whomever claimed to want a permanent block, it was not me. I will have a permanent user ID in a few. 144.92.58.224 18:53, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Glad to hear it! delldot talk 19:12, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Pesticide def.
Hi Delldot:
Ok please move my proposed def. down to the bottom of the talk page and we'll see what happens. I'll work on the refs. formatting, I remember seeing those instructions somewhere...
Maybe this private note is the place to ask this: there is a sentence at the bottom of the Introduction that says something like "many pesticides are toxic to humans", something like that. I find it jarring because it seems to have no purpose except (maybe) to establish a point of view? The statement is correct but many classes of substances have many members that are toxic to humans--solvents, medicines, detergents, even foods. Removing this (it's truth needs to be put in context, I think, and maybe clarified) would probably improve the overall sense of objectivty.
By the way I am going to put more info on my personal page so readers can get a clearer idea of who I am and where I come from...also, THANKS for your feedback, by the way, Wikipedia is really cool and an adventure but intimidating and your "hospitality" helps!
Don —Preceding unsigned comment added by DonWauchope (talk • contribs) 15:30, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Neuroscience et al.
Hey, thanks for the message. I am interested in neuroscience, cancer, and most other subjects. Thanks for the information on the neuroscience wikiproject, I'll take a closer look and contribute where I can. Ramorum 03:20, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Dominican Republic
Hey, I finished adding my piece, so if you want to re-lock it go ahead. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Freakazzoid (talk • contribs) 03:34, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Well, it's been getting annoying to find information for projects lately, and usually you need to go to more than one website if it's not already on Wikipedia to find everything you need. So now whenever I do a project or something, and see that some of the stuff I found isn't already on Wikipedia, I'll add it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Freakazzoid (talk • contribs) 03:42, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Pesticide Article
Hi Deldot:
I'm going to China Saturday, so its going to be a couple of weeks before I can do anything about the edits we've been discussing. I'll be giving a paper there talking about the critical need for global transparency in pesticide risk assessments and registrations by regulatory agencies, see http://www.pesticidechemistry.com/index_en.htm.
Don —Preceding unsigned comment added by DonWauchope (talk • contribs) 13:06, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- See you when you get back! delldot talk 19:12, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Re: Barnstar
Whatever
Vandalism my ass, it's a valid comment -- it IS a trap. 68.191.176.47 00:55, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Jog my memory? delldot talk 16:49, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello
Hi Delldot, and i have been blocked from editing twice for providing unreliable sources. My first block was for 48 hours , my second was for 72 hours and i was just wondering how many times does it take for you to get blocked permenantly?, because i don't want to! thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Surfer-boy94 (talk • contribs) 14:18, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi Help Please!
Hi Delldot, and i have been blocked from editing twice for providing unreliable sources. My first block was for 48 hours , my second was for 72 hours and i was just wondering how many times does it take for you to get blocked permenantly?, because i don't want to! thanks. Plus, thanks for being more understanding of my mistakes :) , I will provide more sources in the future!—Preceding unsigned comment added by Surfer-boy94 (talk • contribs)
A New Talk Page
Hi Delldot , it's Surfer-boy94 again, and i was just wondering if I could delete all of the stuff i have on my talk page and restart it because I have created lots of unsourced articles and I want a new start as a good wikipedian who creates Sourced articles and who only makes good contributions to wikipedia instead of getting a bad reputation.
PS-could you tell all of the people who are annoyed with me that I am Sorry , because I am going to stop being a pain!.
Also , how do you add people as a friend?
Thanks again, Surfer-boy94 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.100.235.176 (talk) 07:46, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Just dropping in
Hi Delldot, I just wanted to let you know that I am still around. I figure that is the least I can do for my mentor! :) Seriously, real life has been keeping me real busy along with bad health problems. I have done some minor things here off and on. I hope you are well. Feel free to email me if you would like and I'll fill you in, that is if you are interested. I have been finding new articles lately that I hope are less controversal then the ones I have been involved in lately.
Anyways, my main purpose was to let you know I am still around and to say hello. I hope all is well with you and yours. --CrohnieGalTalk 20:17, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
your cite box
Hello, I was wondering if you would mind if I borrowed your Citing navbox for my userpage? I keep forgetting the syntax for citing sources, and when I stumbled upon your page, I thought it was a great idea. I'll be sure to give you credit for the design element. If you are curious, I'm playing around with a new design here. Thanks! --Kyoko 05:39, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Just noticed a move you made
The Anna Fredericks page should not be listed as Anna Fredrick DiMera. The user who originally tried to move the page GrantChuggle is a known vandal and most of what he did was contrary to consensus agreements. As are edits by 71.125.212.188 who also tried to move the page. Could you please move the page back? It was appropriate as Anna is not officially a DiMera no is she credited that way. Thank you ~ IrishLass0128 19:56, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- Undid the move, left a note on the talk page. delldot talk 07:31, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Ping you have mail
I just want to let you know I have emailed you, but more important there is an attachment for you to look at. I like to let people know when I send an attachment. --CrohnieGalTalk 19:28, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
May I know what's wrong with that name? Can you please explain to me? Thank you! --Edmund the King of the Woods! 09:53, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
But what does it mean? I know nothing of Pig Latin nor the "proper" Latin. Don't be afraid to translate directly into English profanity to me, I accept profanities in my talk page except personal attack against me. Thanks.
Oh yes, can you please do me a favour? I'd just like to ask you to help me to check what was the license tag being used before it was deleted by Misza13, please? I'm not wanting it to be restored, but I've found such image in the Malay Wikipedia, so I'd like to give the most suitable license tag over there. Thanks a lot! --Edmund the King of the Woods! 10:01, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Oops sorry, I've just transferred the message from another admin's talk page. The image is Image:Doraemon hat.jpg. Thank you and sorry for my mistake. --Edmund the King of the Woods! 10:08, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks.
HI, um, im not logged in (im gerbilfyed4), but thanks for like protecting the Krueger MIddleschool article. I used to regularly edit it until I graduated from it. INfact, I created and made the article and totally upped its total structure. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.160.145.3 (talk) 22:57, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
OH, and one more thing
Um, I have a feeling the IP that troubles Krueger Middle School is actually the real school itself.
I suggest blocking it, and put a note saying that if you wish to edit sign in. I am like blocked on my school's IP but signing in grants me access to edit (i do positive edits). OMGWTFBBQ BLAH 00:49, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
I have the feeling that we have a sockpupet issue on our hands, i don't understand why you would vandalize the page of a retired wikipedian's account. Tiptoety 06:31, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Yea, im glad you blocked him as a sock. Yea, thats probably what it is, i don't know any other reason someone would go to all that effort just to vandalize a users page. Tiptoety 06:37, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- That is one idea, but over all i recommend that we leave it unprotected due to the fact that it is a talk page, and someone may actually need to use it for legit purposes.Tiptoety 06:49, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey would you mind deleting this Entireholidays.com, i have had it tagged a little while. Thanks Tiptoety 06:54, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Just FYI the page did not get protected, just to let you know. I will keep an eye on it still. Thanks for all your help again. Tiptoety 22:36, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
My articles
Hello, it is me, ABNPY6062464163.
I am writing to inform you about my articles on wikipedia.
I have started to work on two articles, both on Victorian Railway locomotives, though my work has been constantly distured by you 'deleting' of my work.
Could I ask you a favor, please do NOT touch my articles. They are a long term project I will be working on and the last thing I need is for my work to be deleted.
Also, I am proposing to write about all Victorian Railways diesel locomotives.
If you have any problems or you would like to know a bit more, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Yours Sincerly,
ABNPY6062464163
(P.S. you may as well stop telling me to chang my name, because I won't! ) —Preceding unsigned comment added by ABNPY6062464163 (talk • contribs) 05:21, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- Didn't respond because I didn't see this till after the user was usernameblocked. delldot talk 07:31, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Redirect of Feathermoon
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Feathermoon, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Feathermoon is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Feathermoon, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 06:32, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Duly deleted as dead redirect to an article deleted through AFD. I created this redirect through WP:AFC. delldot talk 07:05, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
| This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |