User talk:DMySon/Archives/2021

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 2021

Information icon Hello CAPTAIN RAJU. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1) and content (CSD A3) moments after they are created, as you did at Challengers Friendster. It is also suggested that pages that might meet CSD A7 criteria not be tagged for deletion immediately after they are created. It's usually best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:36, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

CAPTAIN RAJU, Thank you for your message. I tagged the article CSD:A1 after waiting 15 minutes of its creation. However, i will take care your advice in future. DMySon 17:02, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

hy do you delete the articles of many such actors?

Brother, if article of Chandan Madan (Indian TV Actor) is based on a living and conscious person, then why do you delete the articles of many such actors? Ulinksbas (talk) 16:29, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ONG&ONG

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ONG&ONG, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CUPIDICAE💕 11:46, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

OK, got it. DMySon 07:32, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Swami Avdheshanand Giri for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Swami Avdheshanand Giri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swami Avdheshanand Giri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Vikram Vincent 13:28, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

warning #1

Information icon Hello, I'm Thedefender35. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Preceding undated comment added 18:59, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi User:Thedefender35, Can you please explain what are my edits, which are not neutral? DMySon 19:04, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

i think i accidently sent you the warning instead of the user who did it that is my fault and I apologize for the inconvenience — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thedefender35 (talkcontribs) 19:12, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Its OK. I would also suggest you to use 4 tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comment. As Schazjmd already explained it on your talk page. DMySon 19:20, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi DMySon,

you recently created this article, which currently does not currently seem to satisfy the requirement that information on Wikipedia should be based on independent reliable sources.

In particular, I am curious about your claim that he won a Millenium Mathematics Prize. This is not consistent with Wikipedia's article about these prizes.

I have also posted a note on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics.

Regards, HaeB (talk) 15:15, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank You HaeB, for my attention. I found the Millenium Mathematics Prize claim from here (Indian Institute of Social Welfare and Business Management). At he time of writing i added most of the information on the basis of IISWBM. However, i also couldn't found any solid evidence. The prize and other edits done by ip address have been undone and page is semi protected by David Eppstein, Thank You for your help. DMySon 17:29, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Soumitra Kumar Mallick for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Soumitra Kumar Mallick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soumitra Kumar Mallick until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MarkH21talk 19:06, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Swami Avdheshanand Giri for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Swami Avdheshanand Giri, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swami Avdheshanand Giri (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of R Venugopal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article R Venugopal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R Venugopal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SportingFlyer T·C 14:33, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Sanjeev Tyaagi

why are u reverting my edit on sanjeev tyagi article. please give reason so that i not change after u — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vansh tyagi24 (talkcontribs) 10:39, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

user:Vansh tyagi24, it seems like you are connected with the subject and the resources you provided are not reliable and independent of the subject. please provide better resources.DMySon 10:46, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Joe Vulpis

Hello, I need your help please. The page I was editing was deleted however the page meets criteria for WP:MusicBio. May you please assist on how to proceed. I need help with the process for review to undelete. Thank you. I appreciate your help M1321

Hello M1321, your article is deleted as per deletion discussion. If you re-create this article without improving the issue (i.e. notability) And citations from reliable resources which are independent of the subject.DMySon 05:12, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you DMySon for your feedback- I had updated with sources, I will obtain additional references and content as requested. user: M1321 — Preceding unsigned comment added by M1321 (talkcontribs) 15:28, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Before you continue moving pages,

there are objections to three of your moves for which you are accountable. -- RZuo (talk) 08:12, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Oh really, Can you Please share those three moves?DMySon (talk) 08:15, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi DMySon,

Can you explain the reasoning behind draftifying the article on Justin Barbour? I'm curious to know because the reason stated doesn't seem clear enough. If it is about sources then let me explain that the CBC is a reputable and reliable independent media agency, being Canada's primary broadcasting agency. Because each of those stories is dated from different years they would be considered separate sources and demonstrate a longevity of the subjects potential notability therefore they pass WP:BIO1E. I didn't know if you were aware of this so I wanted to let you know just in case the reason was its sources. While I would not base notability on any of the other sources, alone, they do cover the subject and are independent and secondary. The lone exception would be YouTube. It should be removed from the references but can be left as an external source. Their reliability may be in question but the CBC sources are enough to establish notability. Are there other reasons? --ARoseWolf 20:26, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi ARoseWolf, I can see only CBC references which are reliable but those are not secondary and independent of the subject. Other resources which are Social Blade (Self published): a YouTube, Twitch, Twitter, & Instagram Statistics platform, YouTube(Self published): Not reliable, Flanker: a selling book platform, nfldherald.com: about his book self published, Flanker: biography of the subject self published]. Now fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. DMySon (talk) 00:32, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
I disagree. The CBC sources are both primary and secondary. There is also biographical information and analytical information in the voice of the journalist written into the article about the events. It is not strictly an interview in the traditional sense. I agree with most of the other sources as you described them here. I encourage you to re-evaluate the CBC sources and read them in detail. --ARoseWolf 13:16, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Tagging pages for deletion

Hello, DMySon,

Whenever you tag a page for deletion, please post a notice on the page creator's talk page informing them of the tagging and the reason for it. If you utilize Twinkle and set up your Preferences to "Notify page creator", Twinkle will post these notices for you which makes things easy. Thank you! Liz Read! Talk! 06:21, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Liz, Thank You for the information. I will fix it in my Twinkle preferences. Just for my knowledge, can you please guide me where i missed to inform the creator of the article. Thank You. DMySon (talk) 07:20, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Nixxes Software page deletion

I don't suppose there's any chance that you could tell me why you deleted the page I created, as in actually tell me what's wrong with it that needs fixing rather than vaguely regurgitating part of the guidelines while giving no actual reason at all?

Please drop your message with your sign using four tiddles (~). Moreover the recent article 9Nixxes Software) that you directly published in mainspace lacking siginificant coverage in reliable resources which should be independent of the subject. I also mentioned the same on your talk page. DMySon (talk) 09:03, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Regarding nomination for deletion of page Anjali Rattan Nashier

India a country where gender discrimination is prevalent. Anjali is one of the few women who have broken the glass ceiling and has taken the charge. She is leading a corporate house from the front. She has played a pivotal role as a business leader in renewable energy sector when solar energy generation projects were in nascent stage (https://issuu.com/solarquarter/docs/solar_quarter_magazine_august_2017_/28). Now she is creating ripples in electric mobility through her new venture by investments in Revolt Motors. There are not many female corporate leaders in India that have such charisma. That is the reason the article was written on wikipedia. As far as RattanIndia is concerned then it is a big group and does not require publicity. There are already two entities in the group that are listed on Indian stock exchanges and both of them have combined market capitalization of about $1.8 Billion (as on today). Most of the business newspapers publish articles regarding their initiatives regularly.

Hello User:Bhambhuvikram, a deletion discussion is already placed for Anjali Rattan Nashier. You can participate by clicking here, and put your opinion there. And leave the decision on admins. And do not forget to sign after writing your comment.DMySon (talk) 09:00, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Removal of promotional tone

Thanks for your guidance! I have removed the promotional tone in the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Dinesh_S._Katre Sahalekhak (talk) 06:39, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Acharya Shri Nana Lal ji Maharaj sa

Should not be considered for deletion. We should keep it. The page talks about a legendary man with adequate references. Pooja Kankaria06 (talk) 05:18, 2 August 2021 (UTC) Pooja

There is a deletion discussion going on, you can participate here and put your comment there. DMySon (talk) 05:30, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

my mistake?

Can you clarify what happened? This is how a new page is created. If not, can you teach me how to create a new page? Now how to make a new one.Alisjohn (talk)

Hope this will help you Wikipedia:Articles for creation. DMySon (talk) 10:09, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Zubair Anam

Hi there, it looks like your PROD got removed on Zubair Anam. You may wish to AfD it. The creator claims that it does pass WP:NPOL but I'm not so sure, admittedly I'm not an expert on NPOL and usually steer clear. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:53, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi Spederone, Thank You for your notification. I am sure Zubair Anam is a non notable politician who does not pass GNG. I take it for afd here. DMySon (talk) 11:08, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi DMySon. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

  • Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
  • If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. signed, Rosguill talk 20:00, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

I am not the owner of the high school, I'm just a student that just graduated. I have permission from the school for the article to be created and it's confirmed that the user is me

Hello there, I would like to publish this page for my high school under the CEO of the school's permission. I've already added a lot of sources about it the best way I can to make it as a reliable as possible. Please let me know if there's another way to get it to move to a page with no risk of deletion. Thank you.

Hi User:Hotshot bro, Please read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and disclose your COI on your user page. And please user your signature while drooping message to anyone's talk page (using four Tildes). Please also read Wikipedia:Signatures. DMySon (talk) 06:13, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

A7 CSD nominations

Hello. This is a courtesy note to let you know that I have declined both of your CSD nominations at Aditya Dubey and Unqork. My reasoning can be found here and here. If you still want to put them through the deletion process, please use PROD or AfD. Sdrqaz (talk) 17:33, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Article Draft:Ridma Weerawardena approval

Ridma Weerawardena has been featured in Sri Lanka's top Newspapers (Lankadeepa and Sunday Observer)[1]. Was chosen for the ILO's Global Music Against Child Labour Initiative. He had a concert in Sri Lanka[2]. Are these not enough for the notability?. And he is very popular throughout Sri Lanka in general, as noted in the Daily News article. Is it impossible for less-known nationalities to have a Wikipedia entry? Why are you so racist? YaSiRu11 (talk) 15:58, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

The subject does not satisfy Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines. It lacks reliable references that they do not show significant coverage about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. DMySon (talk) 14:00, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi I undid the speedy contest of Normand Latourelle as it clearly fails any speedy criteria deletion criteria as per the available refs ! But you can AFD it if you feel any consensus should be taken on it !! Thanks

Approve Articles

hey check this article Shweta Bhattacharya please check this article he have Ben cost Check his Filmography and sources kindly told me are he notable Tanvirnahid565 (talk) 17:03, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi User:Tanvirnahid565 If you think the subject is notable, you may contact the Draft mover Hatchens who moved your article into draft.DMySon (talk) 17:51, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Bambi Northwood-Blyth

Hello you submitted the page Bambi Northwood-Blyth for deletion. This is a prominent and well known model and should have a page on Wikipedia. I have added more sources to the article and opposed the deletion in the project notes.Grapepinky (talk) 14:06, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi Grapepinky, i can see your comment on its afd. And Yes, you can put your opinion there. DMySon (talk) 14:11, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Aditya Tiwari draft/article

Need your input on Draft:Aditya Tiwari which is being created. Please discuss at Talk:Wiki Loves Pride AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 17:45, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Courtesy ping

Hi and welcome to the New Page reviewers cohort of editors! Just a quick note to let you know I removed the notability tag from Sonya Monina as I had already patrolled it and checked sources, usually (but not always) if you see articles on foreign language versions of wikipedia, the notability should be there - I use google translate then to spot check sources. Obviously you may re-add the tag if you still feel it is warranted. Thanks JW 1961 Talk 18:53, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Draft: Alastair J Sloan

Hi DMySon,

Thanks for your comment my page, about it looking like a resume instead of information about the person.

I have removed some sections and focused more on the person itself. Can you guide me on how I can improve the article ?

Thanks! Markcommon369 (talk) 06:38, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi Markcommon369 , Draft:Alastair J Sloan is still looking like a resume and promotional. It needs improvement.DMySon (talk) 05:08, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi DMySon,

Thanks for your comment my pag, about it looking like a resume instead of information about the person.

I have removed some sections and focused more on the person itself. Can you guide me on how I can improve the article ?

Thanks!

Markcommon369 (talk) 04:21, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Replied on your Previous post. DMySon (talk) 05:11, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Why did you decline the page on FTX, arguably one of the most important companies in our lifetime?

New page reviewer granted

Hi DMySon. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

  • Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
  • If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. – bradv🍁 01:21, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Thank You bradv. DMySon (talk) 05:24, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Moving page directly and changing page name to avoid past deletion history

Hi, User:DMySon, This draft was rejected earlier Draft:Manoj_Kumar_Pramanik. Instead of submitting again the creator directly moved it to live space Manoj Kumar Pramanik. I suspect COI editing here. Also, upon checking more this page seems to be deleted before too under the name [[1]]. The creator seems to have used the full name to avoid past deletion history. I guess some action should be taken here. NagalimNE (talk) 10:55, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello, DMySon,

The previous AFD on this article was about a person with the same name in a different field, entertainment vs. police investigation. You would have no way of knowing this as you couldn't see the previous version of the article but I thought I'd let you know. A new AFD is probably called for with this new article though.

This is an amazingly empty user talk page, you must archive messages on a daily basis! Liz Read! Talk! 04:34, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi Liz, Thank you for notifying me. My bad, i couldn't check the previous content. Is there any way to check the previous content for deleted pages? DMySon (talk) 04:49, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021

New Page Review queue September 2021

Hello DMySon/Archives,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.

Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.


To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Anjali Rattan Nashier

Dear Sir/Mam,

This is to bring to your notice, that Wikipedia Page of Our Business Chairperson, of RattanIndia Enterprises Anjali Rattan Nashier has been deleted under " section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion". Our request is to reinstate the page of Anjali Rattan Nashier back. If there are certain requirements from our side that can aid in fulfilling his identity of importance then we would be happy to provide you with it.

In the meanwhile, I am sharing her LinkedIn Profile link and also as her coverage across news and media websites.

LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/anjali-rattan-nashier-3b89a311a/

News & Business Websites Quoting our chairpersons message on Drone Business can be found here https://www.outlookindia.com/newsscroll/rattanindia-appoints-peeyush-kumar-as-head-of-drone-business/2163864 https://auto.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/industry/rattanindia-appoints-peeyush-kumar-as-head-of-drone-business/86400802 https://www.business-standard.com/article/news-cm/rattanindia-enterprises-appoints-peeyush-kumar-to-lead-its-drone-business-121092100779_1.html https://www.apnnews.com/rattanindia-enterprises-appoints-mr-peeyush-kumar-as-head-for-their-drone-business/

Best Regards Rattan India Team --Bhambhuvikram (talk) 10:37, 23 September 2021 (UTC) Our company Power plant Wiki Page : AmravatiOur Company Owned Nashik Thermal Power station

Contact Person 1: Vikram Bhambhu vikram.bhambhu@rattanindia.com --Bhambhuvikram (talk) 10:37, 23 September 2021 (UTC) Direct Line: +91 11 46611664 Mobile No- +91 836 828 8232

Contact person 2: Nikhil Kumar Mishra Deputy Vice President- Marketing Nikhil.mishra@rattanindia.com --Bhambhuvikram (talk) 10:37, 23 September 2021 (UTC) Mobile No- +91 821 028 9121

Hi User:Bhambhuvikram, you accepted that you are the employee of the company or connected with the subject. It is the case of COI. Please read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. COI editing is strongly discouraged on Wikipedia. DMySon (talk) 09:14, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Regarding Santosh KC Deletion

Hello sir, I am a journalism student from Nepal, I was writing a Wikipedia of Santosh KC however it was sent to speedy deletion. He is a well-known singer in Nepal, especially for festive songs. He has given hits each year since 2016. Few of the citations there talk about his contribution there. Please guide me. I am also looking for more sources in the meantime.

This page is nominated for afd here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santosh KC, you can participate this discussion and put your thoughts there. I would also suggest you to use your signature after dropping any message. You can do this using 4 (~). DMySon (talk) 09:06, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

SmartLabs page

Hi DMySon

I would like to try again to create the page for SmartLabs as I have now collated significantly more media links, as advised, in order to verify the page.

PCCSSL (talk) 10:13, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

A goat for you!

I create leads4needs company page not my and i not promote so please not delete my page

Anmolleads258 (talk) 11:16, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Ooops, you are blocked. DMySon (talk) 07:27, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Altered speedy deletion rationale: WealthLander

Hello DMySon. I am just letting you know that I deleted WealthLander, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which didn't fit the page in question. Thank you. œ 07:57, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi OlEnglish, Nice to meet you. Thank You for your notification. I will try to focus on more accurate tags in future. DMySon (talk) 08:08, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi DMySon! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How to check content of Previously deleted pages?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Undisclosed paid

Hello, @DMySon! Sorry to bother you, But I didn't get any money to create Dhindora. I'm creating it because I never create any web-series or flim article. Please don't misunderstood me! Thanks. Limited Idea4me (talk) 06:44, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Can you please explain why do you have your keen interest in this particular YouTube webseries which is not yet released and declined multiple times? DMySon (talk) 07:00, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, @DMySon:Sorry to bother you again! because, I am from India, and he is a celebrity... I followed him since a long time... also fan of his comedy skills.. if you watch his comedy you also will be fan of him. I hope you also from India. I felt that, it's his first film or web-series and this series is close to his heart because his team make it since 6 years... so I was created this article, I know that the article previously deleted multiple times, When I started looking for a reason to delete it, I didn't find the solid reason... then I watch Bingo Comedy Adda & Category:2021 Indian television series debuts.. then I realized that it would also be notable. .. so that I started to create this article, Bhuvan Bam already get honored from create of Baahubali, S. S. Rajamouli, then immediately I started to make this Dhindora. Your friend -- Limited Idea4me (talk) 07:47, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

😠 @DMySon: You claimed me as a Sockpuppet of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iamjeetmallick, now you also tell me... How I'll defend myself against this false claim? 😑 😤 Limited Idea4me (talk) 10:37, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Jatin Sadhu page speedy Deletation

We have more details to update this article please give some time to update hgvyas (talk) 11:44, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Persecution Relief for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Persecution Relief is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Persecution Relief until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Wiki Linuz💬 ) 12:47, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Regards protection of Super Dancer

Many unknown id and new users are trying to spoil the Super Dancer. This is very frustrating to reedit again and again. So protect the page to extend confirm users. Vikassharmasafidon (talk) 16:38, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Vikassharmasafidon, Any article can be protected if there is edit warring on the page. You may raise request for page protection from here. DMySon (talk) 02:58, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

I wonder if you have any opinions on your migration back to draft having been undone? It is something an editor is entitled to do, but looks very much like an attempt to force articles though FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 15:52, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi Timtrent, Thank you for your notification. I can see the Spax (producer) draft is moved into User:Eddysocial/Spax (producer) by Celestina007. Though St theresa01 tried to add few more references and improve the article but Celestina007 claimed it is a case of UPE. If so, then the user has to be disclosed his COI/UPE with the subject first. DMySon (talk) 02:45, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Article on Rangnath Thakur

Hello Sir, I created an article on Rangnath Thakur yesterday which was rejected. Request your support so that the article is selected for approval with necessary changes you deem fit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vatuk10 (talkcontribs) 03:13, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021 backlog drive

New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive
  • On November 1, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 01:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Draft: Toomaj Salehi

Good day. I have resubmitted the mentioned draft after small edits and adding a new source. However, I was informed by another user that I shouldn't "simply" resubmit the rejected article because I did not "understand" why it was moved to draft space. I ave not "simply" re submitted the draft. I have done whatever I understood I should do based on my experience in wikipedia (Farsi and English). Please kindly let me know exactly what should I do to make the article suitable for namespace. Thanks. Gharouni Talk 03:31, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi Gharouni, The comment by other reviewer that clearly indicates that you should address the issues in your draft first, then you may submit it for review. I can see clearly this draft still lacks siginificant coverage that are independent of the subject. It does not pass general notability criteria of Wikipedia. DMySon (talk) 03:40, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for reply. I do try to fix this asap. Gharouni Talk 04:11, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

@DMySon: Thanks for your edit on the article. But I do not think that the article falls WP:TOOSOON. As per TOO SOON, A film could merit an article if it meets either WP:Notability (film) or WP:GNG, and the Article just need to meet one of them otherwise it could be on WP:TOOSOON. This is the first Indian multilingual off-road race film and I believe that there is a scope for WP:FILMS Project. The article is well-sourced from reliable sources such as National media also the film is completed and confirmed the release on 10 December also the release date confirmation is sourced. Somebody from Wikipedia told me earlier on live chat that a film which is not been released yet but if its release is confirmed and sourced may have an article and also there are so many upcoming film articles are on Wikipedia. I researched the film, Muddy, before I create the article. I didn't expect an Afc redirect. What else should I include in the article? Kindly do the needful Onmyway22 (talk) 07:49, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi Onmyway22, Yes i know any film is notable if it passes notability criteria of Wikipedia but it lacks siginificant coverage from reliable references that are independent of the subject and fails WP:GNG. And this is not yet released. DMySon (talk) 12:27, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
@DMySon: Thanks for the kind assistance, I completely understand and I am developing the article. I am expecting further assistance with the article. Thank you so much. I also raised support regarding this on the help page. some admins also told me the same and suggested me to develop production. I am working on it Onmyway22 (talk) 13:35, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Re Proposal for Speedy Deletion - Thompsons Solicitors Scotland

Thank you for your information about the article. I am new to editing on Wikipedia and realise I should have used the Wikipedia Article Wizard to submit this article. I also acknowledge the COI which I will address on the Talk Page. I have already addressed the ownership issue on Patrick McGuire image and have been in contact with other editors about their comments. All of which are clearly valid. I am very happy to engage with editors to make this encyclopedic content and will abide by the Wikipedia rules and guidelines. ShimsCabot (talk) 08:43, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

This article is full of advertisement and does not satisfy WP:GNG. DMySon (talk) 12:30, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

The tag on Pouya Kolahi page.

Hi there. hope you are fine. Thank you for your attention to the page "Pouya Kolahi". I added some English and Persian independent references to the page. Can you please remove the tag from the page? Best regards.

It does not meet WP:GNG. DMySon (talk) 12:32, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Hamad Saeed Al Balushi the subject is qualified for wikipedia article

Dear DMySon,

I do believe that the person is qualified for wikipeda as he won 6th place at the Million poet. He also has singles that got over 10 million views on youtube. can you please assist on what needed to be edited? Radhihudijan (talk) 18:02, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi Radhihudijan, First i want to tell you about how to use your signature when you do talking on anyone's talk page. Signing your posts on talk pages (normally using four tildes: ~~~~) at the end of your conversation/talk. For more information, please read Wikipedia:Signatures. Now i come to your Draft:Hamad Saeed Al Balushi; it still lacks siginificant coverage from reliable sources that are independent of the subject. You may add better resources then submit it again. DMySon (talk) 03:31, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the review

Just a quick callout to say thanks for reviewing my article ICES Statistical Rectangles... All the best from Australia - Tony Rees Tony 1212 (talk) 19:16, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi Tony 1212, Always happy to review good articles. I can see you have a good track record and Appreciating your work on Wikipedia. Keep editing with your good edits. :) DMySon (talk) 03:38, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Claude Addas Article

Hello, you’ve marked my article on Claude Addas she may not meet general notability guidelines. However, she is an academic. She does not need to meet general notability guidelines. She needs to meet WP:ACADEMIC. The first criteria is, “The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources.” Per this page, academics can be notable for their work with not being the subject of secondary sources on their biography. It is a substitute for general notability guidelines.

She meets this guideline by publishing one of the most major biographies of Ibn Arabi which I provided reviews for in the reference section as well as quotes by scholars on its notability. Google scholars has 109 citations for Ibn Arabi ou la quete de sulfre rouge. The English language version is at 242 citations. Quest for the Red Sulphur has 399 world cat holdings. Ibn Arabi: The voyage of no return has 200 world at holdings. --Zaynab1418 (talk) 14:50, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

You have already removed the tag without addressing the issue. DMySon (talk) 02:08, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Great Work. Best of luck ❤️❤️ Md Nahid Islam Sumon (talk) 05:13, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Thank You Md Nahid Islam Sumon. DMySon (talk) 01:48, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Ensonhaber

Hi I’ve had a request to move this back to mainspace after you draftified it. What is it about the article that promoted to to send it to draft? Thanks Mccapra (talk) 09:31, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi Mccapra, Thanks for the notification. I just moved the draft into mainspace. DMySon (talk) 01:46, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

ok. thank you Md Nahid Islam Sumon (talk) 01:51, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

For creating upcoming films

Hi, I need help from you in creating articles of upcoming films. I recently created a film article Muddy (film and you moved it to Draft: Muddy (film), and also declined the draft because it's not released yet. But when I check the catagory https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Upcoming_Malayalam-language_films, there are so many upcoming films which are not released yet. What's the difference between those and one which I created. Because I didn't understand and learn the difference. Please help. This is not complaining. It's completely a help seeking request to crack it!! Hope you can help me Onmyway22 talk 21:02, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Mental Health First Response for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mental Health First Response is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mental Health First Response until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

(t · c) buidhe 06:53, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Best of luck Md Nahid Islam Sumon (talk) 13:27, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ONG & ONG, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. scope_creepTalk 16:07, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Arun Pathak

Hello, you sent Arun Pathak to speedy deletion. It did get deleted, and I put it back into User:Bluerasberry/Arun Pathak.

The article has gotten noisy but years ago when I set it up - see [2] - I cited sources and think this passes WP:GNG.

I would like to get the article back in mainspace. I support you nominating it for WP:AfD, if you like. I do not have much time to develop this article, but I support cutting anything without a reference. Do you have any suggestions or wishes for how to proceed? Thanks. Blue Rasberry (talk) 21:29, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi Bluerasberry, Nice to meet you. I can see you had tried to create the article in 2010. The topic seems notable but at this moment the article needs cleanup and more references, it is a mixed article of two languages Hindi and English. This is an English language Wikipedia. I believe you can better understand this. You are more experienced editor/admin than me. DMySon (talk) 03:50, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Request on 15:16:46, 11 November 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Barberknows


This draft has been unfairly rejected on the grounds that it does not have sufficient media coverage (!): this has been New Zealand’s MOST PUBLICIZED sexual abuse trial, and the draft has shown numerous links and references to the country’s main newspapers where it made headlines for an extended period of time. It is a very important article to have on Wikipedia, to raise awareness of child abuse that often goes unnoticed and uncredited.

Barberknows (talk) 15:16, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi Barberknows, If you think Draft:Frank Walmsley's rejection is not fair. You may submit the draft again for review. Let other editors review it. DMySon (talk) 17:09, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Ahmed Adel Alykob

Hello, thank you. This profile is the source that I relied on in the article. Excuse me. This is my first article. I was going to add a lot of reliable sources.

https://www.transfermarkt.com/ahmed-adel/profil/spieler/945815

https://www.goalzz.com/main.aspx?player=136398

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ahmed_Adel_Alykob

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Natasha m jad (talkcontribs) 08:48, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi Natasha m jad, Welcome to Wikipedia. I would suggest you to add more references from English language and then submit the draft for review and let the other editors review it. Happy Editing. DMySon (talk) 09:24, 14 November 2021 (UTC)


Thank you. Unfortunately, there is no news in English for the Arab player. There is a profile that I attached to the article. Most of the Arab player has no news in English. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Natasha m jad (talkcontribs) 09:38, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Request for advice on how to improve my article

Hello DMySon,

Thanks for taking the time to review my article on Tempura (magazine). I'm not an experienced contributor, so I'm trying to get a proper understanding of Wikipedia. I saw the article has been moved to draft, as it is not ready yet.

This article was a translation of the one I did on the French Wikipedia, since the magazine has an English-speaking readership. The French version has been validated, so I kept the same sections and references. I used references in French, English and Japanese to justify the notoriety of the magazine.

May I ask for your help with two questions?

1) If my understanding is correct, it is not because an article has been validated on one local Wikipedia that it will be validated on another one?

2) What do you advise me to do in order to get my article validated on the English Wikipedia? Is there anything in particular missing from my article?

Thanks again for your time,

Best Regards.
--HippoDream12 (talk) 10:46, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi HippoDream12, Nice to meet you. I would suggest you to add more references from English language as this is the English language Wikipedia. Though other language resources are not strictly denied here but this is an English language Wikipedia so please try to put the reliable references in English language. After adding such resources you may submit it for review and let the other editors review it. DMySon (talk) 14:08, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your reply. I have replaced the reliable Japanese references by ones in English language, and submitted the article for review. Have a nice weekend! HippoDream12 (talk) 14:41, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

A7/G11 speedies on Bhuwan Dhungana & Hmadya Ayashi

Hi DMySon -- I've declined a couple of your A7/G11 joint nominations recently. Whilst neither article is perfect, imo, neither is anything like the standard for speedy deletion via either A7 or G11 (though other admins might well differ). To be blunt, I had assumed that the nomination yesterday was the work of a newbie. I'd suggest going the Articles for Deletion route on similar material in future. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 00:44, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

ETA: Looking at your CSD log there are several other declined A7/G11s this month, by myself and other admins, as well as articles that were deleted but not A7 or G11. Please review the rubric for A7 and G11 carefully before nominating anything else for deletion. Espresso Addict (talk) 00:59, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Thank You for the notification. Noted your points. DMySon (talk) 03:09, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

heyworld GmbH rejection

Hi,

I am writing this message in regard to the rejected "heyworld GmbH" article. I do not really understand the reply. Should I add more references (all now used references are from independent sources) or should I get rid of some irrelevant content?

Thanks for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bo6dan at heyworld (talkcontribs) 12:10, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi Bo6dan at heyworld, Nice to meet you. I can see you already accepted that you are get paid for creating this wiki page. I really appreciate your honesty. But the company is not meeting general notable criteria of notability for now. Please provide more references and submit the draft for review. DMySon (talk) 19:22, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Help me to publish new article

Hi, I’m learning how to publish new article on Wikipedia. I will use real sources for creating new article help me on same — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ppch83 (talkcontribs) 18:38, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

DovForman draft

Hi, I was wondering if the draft is now okay? 86.1.49.74 (talk) 18:27, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

hello

@DMySon:

I will add 30 sources to it for tomorrow, thanks. I will send you the inspection request.M.EE.E.JK.U (talk) 17:28, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi Maximilian1985, Nice to meet you. Please add those 30 resources and submit it for review. And let the other editors review it. DMySon (talk) 17:33, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
@DMySon: : ok .M.EE.E.JK.U (talk) 17:41, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Ahmed Adel Alykob

Hello, sorry for the inconvenience again

 Adding English language sources to the article and it has been sent for review. I hope to see the article now

Can you bring it back I added a global resource specialist to the players profile Thank you again https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ahmed_Adel_Alykob — Preceding unsigned comment added by Natasha m jad (talkcontribs) 14:36, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

New article for creation

Hello, do review my draft Draft:Funmilayo Waheed-Adekojo and suggest ways I can improve it. I have fixed other concerns earlier raised by editors when the article was submitted for review with shorter content and use of peacock words. In case it's fit for mainpage, guide me on how to clear it off from draft. OLYRIDWANA (talk) 16:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi OLYRIDWANA, This draft is completely an advertisement of the subject. You may reduce the promotional tone and provide enough coverage from reliable references of primary and secondary resources which are independent of the subject. Please read the comments by other reviewers carefully. DMySon (talk) 01:37, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. This is close to the remarks of the last reviewer. Been a hard time trying to re-develop. Will revisit draft and see what to expunge this time. Thanks. OLYRIDWANA (talk) 05:23, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

The Sopranos (pinball) deletion

I would like to propose discussion of deletion of this page. The subject is part of a large franchise and the content is supported by multiple sources establishing WP:N. In addition, it passes WP:GNG based on WP:SIGCOV in multiple independent reliable sources and has significant coverage. All sources cover the topic in detail and directly as per the standard.

Expandinglight5 (talk) 03:06, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

It is deleted under deletion discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sopranos (pinball). DMySon (talk) 16:33, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your participation in the November 2021 New Pages Patrol drive

The Patroller's Barnstar
For reviewing at least 100 articles during the drive.

Thank you for reviewing or re-reviewing 153 articles, which helped contribute to an overall 1276-article reduction in the backlog during the drive. (t · c) buidhe 12:27, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Thank You Buidhe DMySon (talk) 16:16, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia delete

hello Why did you send a deletion request for my article?😔 I'm a musician, I want to be there on Wikipedia to achieve more success.😔 Amir Khajeh Justamir (talk) 13:34, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi Amir, Self biography is strongly discouraged by Wikipedia. Please read: Wikipedia:Autobiography. DMySon (talk) 13:46, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

The film article Draft:Muddy (film), you moved (Draftify), was released yesterday !!

An article Draft:Muddy (film) was moved from article space to draft space, for the reason that the film was not released. The film was released yesterday. Could you move back to the mainspace? Onmyway22 talk 06:16, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello, DMySon,

If you ever come across an editor working on any main space or draft version of an article about a Bikram Malati, please report them to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bikram L malati. Most of the obvious page titles have extended protection so the pages won't be recreated again but that doesn't stop sockpuppets from coming up new varieties of page titles for his autobiography. This has been going on since 2018 when the sockpuppeteer was only 15 so it is likely to continue into the future. Just thought I'd give you a head's up.

Thanks for all of the work you do! Liz Read! Talk! 02:09, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi Liz, Thank You for your appreciation. I will surely keep an eye on Bikram Malati page creation activity. DMySon (talk) 10:49, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Observation

Hello DMY, it seems you do a lot of new page reviewing, I do too, in order to save you the stress, why don’t you go here and apply for Page Mover rights? I believe it is concomitant for extremely trusted new page reviewers like yourself to have both as they are complementary, i for one find it useful when carrying out my NPR duties. Can you consider this? Celestina007 (talk) 14:43, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Dear Celestina007, Thank You for suggesting the Page mover rights. After your message i read about Wikipedia:Page mover and found this tool helpful. I will surely apply for the permission. Thanks Again. :) DMySon (talk) 04:08, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Ah I see you were granted the perm and rightfully so! I’m happy you are happy, thank you for your works in new page reviewing and thank you in advance for the good works you will still do. Celestina007 (talk) 14:30, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Notability tag

Good day. You added a senseless (senseless, as the article largely met Wikipedia's general notability guideline, 1) Notability tag to an article I created based on the history of the article creation (the page had been deleted in the past) rather than an objective assessment of what I published. There were six links to articles published by the top-notch Belgian publishers, and by googling the article's subject one immediately realizes whether they are notable or not. The latter you either didn't or neglected the result, for whatever reason.

I advise, for the future, you actually review the article, not its history of creation. Maybe do that later, first review the article.--Cassius Fury (talk) 12:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi Cassius Fury, Nice to meet you. I can see you removed notability tag by your own from the article which is created by you. And as per special request i just unreviewed the article. Thank you. Happy Editing. DMySon (talk) 15:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi DMySon, nice to meet you too. I wanted to let you know that I am taking action to report everything that happened here and, regardless of the administrators' decision (or whoever it will concern), because of your action Wikipedia will lose my (however humble and not very important) contributions for a period of three weeks. Nice job.--Cassius Fury (talk) 16:05, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
  • May I know the reason for unreviewing the article? Thanks. ~StyyxTalk? ^-^ 16:10, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi Styyx, Cassius Fury who is the creator of the article thinks he created a notable topic. I added a notability tag and reviewed the article. But Cassius Fury removed the tag without addressing the issue. And i unreviewed the article. If you think Cassius Fury has did the right things here, you may review the article, i would not oppose. DMySon (talk) 16:26, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Adding 10 more sources is "not addressing the matter"? Maybe you are right, it's actually solving the problem (a problem that had no reason to exist, what's more).--Cassius Fury (talk) 16:30, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Page history says no but whatever, I didn't come for that. I was contacted by Cassius Fury earlier today about the article and he indeed thinks that it's notable. Cassius asked me to review the article, and knowing Dutch, I looked at sources in the article and online, then responded, and then reviewed the article. Reading what you said, something isn't right. According to the page logs, you didn't tag the page as "reviewed" in the first place and you marked it unreviewed roughly three hours after Cassius added extra sources and I reviewed it, so, something went wrong I suppose? I just came here to ask why you unreviewed it, that's all. ~StyyxTalk? ^-^ 16:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi Styyx, i checked the article logs swiftly and skip that it was reviewed by you. My apologies for that. I also re-reviewed the article. DMySon (talk) 17:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
@Cassius Fury:, I can re-review your article, please answer one simple question. Why did you choose this topic to publish in mainspace, while the article was deleted previously? Did you receive any financial stake? or you are connected with the subject? DMySon (talk) 16:46, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
@DMySon:The reason is I'm currently focusing on Geel and I've been making articles about notable people from Geel for the past few days. The subject is from Geel.
But, see this is exactly what I was talking about: people can have whatever reason to create articles, but what's important to you is whether they meet notability or not. You should focus on that, not why the article is being created or why it was previously deleted. Imo.--Cassius Fury (talk) 16:56, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Cassius Fury, Thank you for your explanation. I re-reviewed your article. I would also suggest you one thing please make your chat friendly. Happy Editing. DMySon (talk) 17:00, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Allright @DMySon:, that's fine. I never refuse advice, so I gladly take yours. Maybe I was a bit unfriendly, you're right. Have a nice day, and happy editing to you as well.--Cassius Fury (talk) 17:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Page mover granted

Hello, DMySon. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Primefac (talk) 14:12, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Thank You Primefac. DMySon (talk) 17:09, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

people of Iran

Hi, the article by Javad Safaee, an Iranian musician, is a complete article with local and international sources. It has all the credentials of a musician. We are Iran, you deal with this, please do not differentiate between us and the rest of the world. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Babakbaris (talkcontribs) 11:15, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Article's ready!

Hi DMySon (talk), I noticed you draftified the Barbie: Princess Adventure article as it wasn't ready for a live WP article view yet, but it is now! Can you please get it to the live WP article namespace? Polygork (talk) 21:04, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Please have patience, other editors will review it soon. DMySon (talk) 03:08, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Melcous. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Vishva Nath Attri, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Melcous (talk) 08:32, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi Melcous, Any specific reason that you unreviewed a page that i reviewed. DMySon (talk) 09:02, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Oh sorry, that was a mistake - I thought I had accidentally reviewed it when I made one small change, and unreviewed because I hadn't taken time to look at it beyond that issue. Will revert. Cheers Melcous (talk) 12:03, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Thank You Dear Melcous, Happy Editing. DMySon (talk) 14:29, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Salvatore Ambrosini

The article on Salvatore Ambrosini should be kept because the subject in question is a public figure, who he appeared in many newspapers and he was interviewed by various Italian radios. In addition, he played in two web series. The links I inserted in the article are not spam, but they are news of Italian newspapers where Salvatore Ambrosini appeared.

- User:Nonna Angelina — Preceding undated comment added 15:57, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Ahmed Adel Alykob

Hello how are you sir Can you review the article now? Some English language resources have been added

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ahmed_Adel_Alykob

thank you sir — Preceding unsigned comment added by Natasha m jad (talkcontribs) 19:30, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

speed deletion for pugazh (actor)

Fazil casim (talk) 16:00, 23 December 2021 (UTC)fazil casim--Fazil casim (talk) 16:00, 23 December 2021 (UTC) "If this should be deleted , there is no valid reason while this page was been made by different people and although that has been deleted for no reason or etc. This information are gathered from different websites while resource respond them and almost 99% of websites had followed the same article towards this person. Meanwhile some reached websites too has the same information of this person while there is no additional details about him. Though after re creating this there won't effecting the person for some personal reasons while the other websites haven't provided the source while I had provided them according to the Rules and Regulations. Although this is to inform that if there are valid source and had mentioned them why should we delete them saying that violating the rules of wiki. This won't be any Plagiarism while source is clearly mentioned and there is no hiding information and deals with others and this is made for someone who is still not recognized in wikipedia but had recently recognized by the audience. Meanwhile if there is any violence already had been removed by 'Editiors' (Like Profile Picture , Some unknown Personal Details) and why there shouldn't be this article for some personal paid reasons or saying that this is violating. SOURCE IS CLEARLY MENTIONED BY A PERSON CALLED 'EDITIORS' AND THIS IS NOT ANY PAID BOT OR PERSON WHO MADE THIS ARTICLE WHILE IF THERE ARE ANY COPYRIGHTS ISSUES ANYONE CAN EDIT (THERE NO PROTECTION MODE ACTIVATED) WHILE NOT TO DELETE THIS ARTICLE FOR SOME PERSONAL PAID REASON AND ANYOTHER ETHICS FOR SAYING DIFFERENT REASONS THOUGH THIS COULD CAUSE A LIVING PERSONS FUTURE WORKS AND FINALLY THIS IS NOT A PAID ARTICLE CREATED AND THIS IS FOR A SUPPORT TO A PERSON WHO IS INTERESTED TO REACH SUCCESS. —Editiors (talk) 15:33, 23 December 2021 (UTC)" This is the un deletion request made by the creator while this is been copied and pasted to talk towards you meanwhile keep supporting for the valid reason... A kind request

Fazil casim, please do not remove CSD tag as you did on Pugazh (actor). It also seems like your account is sock of User:Divya shaastri, User:Wiswiped and User:Editiors. DMySon (talk) 03:23, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

TECH Technological University article

Hello DMySon, nice to meet you. I am contacting you regarding the TECH Technological University article. I see two warnings were added: notability and advertisement. I would like to know how to improve the writing in the article. I have checked the Talk Section of the article but there is no annotation about the parts that should be edited or deleted. If you would be so kind as to point out the sections that need to be improved, I would appreciate it. I am translating this and other university articles and any help to improve is welcome.

I would like to make a few notes regarding the notoriety. I have read the Wikipedia guidelines about it and in them it is pointed out that: “Notability requires only the existence of suitable independent, reliable sources, not their immediate presence or citation in an article. Editors evaluating notability should consider not only any sources currently named in an article, but also the possibility or existence of notability-indicating sources that are not currently named in the article.”.

On this matter, as you can see all the information in the article has been referenced . I have included different sources to make the information as objective as posible. You can find in the different sources provided the enormous notoriety the university has acquired since 2019. Moreover, searching “TECH Universidad Tecnologica” in Google will show lots of intormation found in all sorts of media.

Regarding the advertisement warning, I would like to improve the redaction style as I mentioned before. In that order, I would like to know which parts of the article are subjected to this warnin in order to edit them. I remain attentive to your comments.

Warmest regards and Merry Christmas to you.--Luisgonzalez74 (talk) 10:44, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2022!

Hello DMySon, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2022.
Happy editing,

Orlandofoster (talk) 16:24, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Thank You and Wish you the same. DMySon (talk) 16:49, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Happy Holidays and Happy New Year!

Thank You Beccaynr. DMySon (talk) 13:36, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message
Thank You CAPTAIN RAJU. DMySon (talk) 13:37, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Thank You Mhawk10. DMySon (talk) 13:38, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Thank you for the wishes. - SUN EYE 1 19:32, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Thank You Suneye1. DMySon (talk) 13:39, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you filed an SPI which included User:DareshMohan, suggesting that they were a sockpuppet of User:Editiors. I do not see any evidence at all that they are engaging in sockpuppetry, and the only thing that they did was improve a new article, which is quite typical, especially for that editors area of interest. I have made similar mistakes myself in the past, and I learnt from them. I hope you can learn from this too. We need people who can look out for sockpuppetry and report it when they see it. I suggest using Twinkle to do so, as it makes it much easier to list the puppets. You may want to read Wikipedia:Signs of sockpuppetry, if you haven't already, it has some good guidance on spotting fairly straightforward cases. If you think it necessary, you may want to comment on the SPI and say that you would like to withdraw your accusation against DareshMohan, as you don't think that there is any evidence. You may also want to look at their contributions, and compare them to the other socks on the list, you will see a massive difference. Anyway, everyone has to start somewhere, I started off my presence at SPI by filing some which were fairly ridiculous, so don't feel too bad about this one. Mako001 (C)  (T) (The Alternate Mako) 03:16, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi Mako, Thank You for your message. I appreciate your advice and will be more careful next time. DMySon (talk) 03:29, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

TECH Technological University article

Hello DMySon, nice to meet you. I am contacting you regarding the TECH Technological University article. I see two warnings were added: notability and advertisement. I would like to know how to improve the writing in the article. I have checked the Talk Section of the article but there is no annotation about the parts that should be edited or deleted. If you would be so kind as to point out the sections that need to be improved, I would appreciate it. I am translating this and other university articles and any help to improve is welcome.

I would like to make a few notes regarding the notoriety. I have read the Wikipedia guidelines about it and in them it is pointed out that: “Notability requires only the existence of suitable independent, reliable sources, not their immediate presence or citation in an article. Editors evaluating notability should consider not only any sources currently named in an article, but also the possibility or existence of notability-indicating sources that are not currently named in the article.”.

On this matter, as you can see all the information in the article has been referenced . I have included different sources to make the information as objective as posible. You can find in the different sources provided the enormous notoriety the university has acquired since 2019. Moreover, searching “TECH Universidad Tecnologica” in Google will show lots of intormation found in all sorts of media.

Regarding the advertisement warning, I would like to improve the redaction style as I mentioned before. In that order, I would like to know which parts of the article are subjected to this warnin in order to edit them. I remain attentive to your comments.

Warmest regards and Merry Christmas to you.--Luisgonzalez74 (talk) 08:45, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi User:Luisgonzalez74, Thank you for contributing on Wikipedia. The article you published still looks like an advertisement. Please improve the tone of the article and provide significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject that would be needed for notability through WP:GNG. DMySon (talk) 12:10, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

TNC Pro Team

Hello sir why did you move the TNC Pro Team in the draft, It has complete citations and information and verified MLBB and DOTA 2 team. Thank you so much i hope can move again in livespace so that other users can add more many information. Yamete1111 (talk) 00:31, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi Yamete1111, Nice to meet you. I moved your article into draft as it lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them though the question on notability. I can see you have submitted the draft for review. Now please have patience and let the other editors review it. DMySon (talk) 05:02, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Happy New Year!
Hello DMySon:


Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels?

Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters.

CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:57, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message
Thank You my friend CAPTAIN RAJU, I wish you a very Happy New Year, good health and happiness. DMySon (talk) 06:02, 31 December 2021 (UTC)