User talk:DJS92

License tagging for Image:Akoninmyghettoback.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Akoninmyghettoback.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:06, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Donald Smith, 1st Baron Strathcona and Mount Royal, are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --KenWalker | Talk 08:04, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Dr-dre.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Dr-dre.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:04, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Big-pun.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Big-pun.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:59, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Fat-joe.jpg[edit]

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Fat-joe.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rappingwonders2 (talk) 22:44, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Akon Ghetto.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Akon Ghetto.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rappingwonders2 (talk) 01:55, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of 300 brolic[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on 300 brolic, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because 300 brolic seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting 300 brolic, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 17:00, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Jauerback. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 17:57, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Donald Smith, you will be blocked from editing. Mrprada911 (talk) 14:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 15:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:36, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. PseudoOne 19:39, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Akon.jpeg[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Akon.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Spellcast (talk) 10:47, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as User:UniverSearleStudios, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 14:30, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for I warned you not to recreate the WP:SPAM page, then you asked me a question about why it was deleted. Before I could answer, you decided to personally attack me on your user page.. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 14:46, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In answer to your question, a user page still cannot be used to advertise. You may give personal information about yourself, but this isn't MySpace or your personal website. See WP:UP#NOT for more information. Besides, David, User:UniverSearleStudios isn't your user page, is it? Or is that a violation of WP:SOCKPUPPET, too? Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 14:52, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, DO NOT make personal attacks like this one [1]. The next one will most likely result in a permanent block. Nobody of Consequence (talk) 02:11, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism, personal attacks, and spamming/advertising. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. ¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 02:29, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Lilwaynecarter3cover.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on Image:Lilwaynecarter3cover.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria.

If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the image can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the image is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the image. If the image has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Lilwaynecarter3cover.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. seicer | talk | contribs 02:30, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Universearlelogo.jpg[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Universearlelogo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. seicer | talk | contribs 02:32, 11 April 2008 (UTC) --seicer | talk | contribs 02:32, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]