User talk:Craftyminion/I'm not proud

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is a Wikipedia user talk page.

This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original talk page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Craftyminion/I%27m_not_proud.

Bad Crafty![edit]

In Which Crafty is Scolded for Using the Eff Word in an AfD

Crafty,

I was alerted to this comment of yours. Since I unblocked you, I take some responsibility for your subsequent behavior, and I don't want to see foul language. Now, I think you're kidding around, but be careful ... not everyone gets it that way, and an AfD can be fraught enough without needlessly raising the temperature. Daniel Case (talk) 11:58, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You should have kept it out. Daniel Case (talk) 18:20, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yup I was doing teh funneh. Your advice is noted. ;) Crafty (talk) 19:40, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Guitarherochristopher[edit]

Apparent edit conflict at WT:AC/N[edit]

Josef Rudolf Zavrtal[edit]

HYPERSPIN - notability[edit]

Your note[edit]

Haha![edit]

ANI[edit]

ANI blather

I'm not sure I understand this (rather aggressive) comment you've made. I never endorsed John Carter's protection of his talk page, and indeed, I agree that it was inappropriate. But the dispute was largely a result of UnitAnode's actions, hence my initial post. –Juliancolton | Talk 03:01, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry if my tone seems aggressive, but I find this stuff rather frustrating. John shouldn't have protected his talkpage, he should have sought the assistance of one of his brother admins. You need to understand that the rest of us have to put up with talkpage grief all the time and we don't have the privilege of the protect button to deal with hostile editors. Further it's this sort of carry on (and your rather bland equivocation in response to it) that is degrading the reputation of Wikipedia's administrators. Crafty (talk) 03:07, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry you feel that way, but Wikipedia's administrators are only human, and they occasionally have lapses in judgment. JC acknowledged his fault and quickly endeavored to correct his actions. –Juliancolton | Talk 03:17, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah it's funny how y'all are above reproach until there's a clusterfuck. Then you're "only human". It's an easy way to be, Julian. No wonder the ArbCom is thinning the admin ranks at a rate of knots of late. Crafty (talk) 04:08, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA...[edit]

Qwiggalo[edit]

DRV:Colorado ballon incident[edit]

Allied Artists Pictures Corporation DOES still exist, Help Request =[edit]

Wordsoup
  • Do you know how to dig deeper to see what is really going on here?
  • I suggest you and everyone start out HERE - [[2]] - , by getting out your Microfishe Reader, as you will not be able to search it, and find the name Allied Artists Records.
  • I transcribed this[[3]] - into Microsoft Word yeserday, but I do not know how to post such information on Wikipedia, after doing all that work (as a periphheral observer to a curious spectacle at first, but now a party in what you all call an edit war, in which I am out of my league).
  • I poseted the above on the main article talk page up for deletion for NN. I believe KDR's SP is the originator of all these Allied Artists pages.
  • But it is likely the article will be deleted entirely, leaving all of the other WarriorBoy articles associated with this still standing and hard to find.
  • I am just a Philosopher of Mathematics, not an Encyclopedia of Corporations researcher. My best friend's father-in-law ran the Mathematics Olympiad in Gansu China, and I began to edit articles on China. So I am about as far from reality, physical or virtual, reality as it gets.
  • I came into this because I do assistance to famous high end thinkers who are abandoned in old age, such as people going blin with macular degeneration, who need someonw to read to them the latest Journal of String Theory, etc., which the Braille Institute does not provide for, but I do. These people have minds that work fine, but their bodies are failing.
  • I was personally helping Louis Lesser, a 93 year old man who is computer illiterate.
  • Lesser told me, INCREDIBLY, that he used to be partners with President John Fitzgerald Kennedy in the largest urban renewal project in the history of the western United States, Barrington Plaza. Lesser said that he sold the Las Vegas New Frontier Hotel to Howard Hughes, and that he was landlord to Hughes Aircraft. Lesser said that he was mentor to Warren Buffett and Kirk Kirkorian, and others whose names i knew from the press. Lesser said that he sold the Taj Majal in New Jersey to Donald Trump, and stayed with Trump in a spare bedroom of the Trump Towers penthouse whenever he was in New York. Lesser said he was partners with so many incredible people, that I did not believe a word he said.
  • I checked everything, and every thinkg he said turned out to be true!
  • Lesser said that some "crook" was trying to make others think otherwise.
  • One of those to whom Lesser was mentor said that a convicted felon, KDR, had committed massive fraud on Union Bank, and other major banks, using the name Allied Artists, and associated names.
  • I went to Wikipedia to get information, and found nothing but the pages of KDR's SP's. I found what seemed like hindreds of them, in a virtual fraud scheme similar to what I read in the federal indictments.
  • I just now found this here - [5] - . What does it mean?
    • Then I found the many newspaper articles, most from the late 70's and early 80's on microfische, on solicitation to commit murder, felony wire fraud convictions, computer fraud convictions, etc., at which point I got that CLEAR LEGAL THREAT.ChinaUpdater (talk) 16:44, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Then I found out about WikiLaw, and EditWars. Whew!
    • I do not want a hit put out on me, like happened in one of KDR's prior convictions.
    • Do you know anyone who can find out online what exactly is going on here? As a retired philosopher of mathematics, I am not exactly up to the task. My first efforts at joint editing ended up with the exposure of KDR, his SP's, and his MULTIPLE (hundreds of them) phony ADVERT NRS NN WIki pages. Who at Wikipedia is good at finding out who really owns this company? ChinaUpdater (talk) 16:44, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bastard[edit]

Be careful what you are reverting......[edit]

Noleander[edit]

Using templates[edit]

Could you please explain...[edit]

Thank you[edit]

Prod2[edit]

Asshole[edit]

User page[edit]

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Retailing/Noticeboard[edit]

Alternative HIV viewpoints[edit]

Thanks[edit]

Civility[edit]

Robert K S[edit]

I don't want him blocked unless it escalates. If he continues to edit-war with me even after my discussion of the matter on the talk page (I always stop at three), and if he continues to edit-war on every article he touches (as has been the case in the past), and if he continues to make blatantly false accusations about me and/or other editors (he's accused me at least twice of having some sort of vendetta against game show articles, Jeopardy! in particular), then maybe. It's not just about his edit-warring with me, but about his edit-warring with others in general. He has a history of edit-warring dating back at least a couple years, and all I really want him is to understand that his constant snippy demeanor, blatantly false accusations and blind reversion of content are detrimental. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many ottersOne batOne hammer) 05:03, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As intimate as this could get, probably it's better to keep it at AN/I, whaddya say? ;) Crafty (talk) 05:05, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshop[edit]

Requesting input for proposed community sanction of User:Neuromancer[edit]

You commented at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive editing by User:Neuromancer, a thread which has now led to proposals that the user in question be topic banned or site banned, or that review of the issue be put aside while Neuromancer seeks a mentor. Your further input to that discussion would be welcome. - 2/0 (cont.) 18:10, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fact vs. Opinions[edit]

Cheers[edit]

Good work I will not file with the police[edit]

Thanks for the userpage RV[edit]

ANI[edit]

Thanks[edit]

Hello[edit]


Thank You[edit]

Thanks for the welcome! LoudHowie (talk) 21:47, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all. The pleasure is all mine. Crafty (talk) 21:56, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note[edit]

Thanks for your welcome. I do have an old and well-established account here but I'm on a wikibreak now, as my comment on ANI explains. Cheers. 75.100.83.178 (talk) 00:38, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Crafty (talk) 00:43, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the revert[edit]

To my user page (in the middle of the night) - they must have thought I was in bed, they were right! - I've only just noticed the edits - and thanks for the congrats to my RfA.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:47, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to be able to lend a hand. Now go and delete something important. ;) Crafty (talk) 00:51, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In Which Admiration is Expressed for the Manner Whereby Crafty "Rolls"[edit]

There's always something on your userpage to brighten up my day. I have never got the hang of those vulgar "barnstars" otherwise I would gladly give you one. (A barnstar that is).   pablohablo. 10:15, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stop it! :"> You'll swell Ol' Crafty's head! The absence of a tacky-barnstar is more thanks than I could ask for. :) Crafty (talk) 10:44, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI[edit]

I added a number of third party RS refs today to the Bethlehem Baptist Church (Minneapolis) article (the subject of the AfD that you've participated in). Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 18:52, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're a credit to yourself and the project. Crafty (talk) 19:03, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hahaha. That's not what some are saying at my ANI! Many thanks.--Epeefleche (talk) 19:21, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Heed not the nattering nabobs of the noticeboards, my lad. Crafty (talk) 19:23, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I notice[edit]

Thanks for the notice. --IP69.226.103.13 (talk) 22:06, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're more than welcome. Crafty (talk) 22:08, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User:Underageasstickler[edit]

Thanks[edit]

For userpage cleanup. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 23:14, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're too kind, sir. :) Crafty (talk) 00:19, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you didn't mind, but...[edit]

Inflammatory commentary[edit]

Question[edit]

Thank you! :)[edit]

Someone vandalized my Userspace! I must of really made someone angry. But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you! You can thank others by using {{subst:Vangel}}! --Meaghan the vanilla twilight 14:10, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh honey, Crafty's no angel. Nice template though. :) Crafty (talk) 18:59, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Craftyminion. You have new messages at Thejadefalcon's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks for the revert on my user page, too. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:20, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MFD vote[edit]

It really isn't appropriate to call something a cunt. Can you refactor the comment, please? (It's also not an "article," just a "page," but I'm far less concerned about that.) --MZMcBride (talk) 20:29, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I believe I changed it from "article" to read "page". As for it being a cunt, have you read the page in question? Crafty (talk) 20:39, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Nope. I skimmed the intro, but it didn't seem like a good use of my time to read the whole thing. Regardless of whether it is a cunt or not, there's a certain level of decorum expected at public deletion discussions. While I can appreciate calling a spade a spade, surely there are better descriptors available? (Apologies for not noticing the subsequent edit changing "article" to "page.") --MZMcBride (talk) 20:47, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Crafty is referring to use of the very word "cunt" in the page being considered for deletion. Which would be a good point. Two wrongs, Crafty. Equazcion (talk) 20:50, 7 Dec 2009 (UTC)
I agree that using this word is unnecessary, it is simply inflammatory. Swearing has its place, but this wasn't it. Please use that word sparingly or it will lose its effect! Fences&Windows 21:07, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh alright then, I'll fix it up. Honestly the subtle touch is wasted these days. Also, it's nice to see you here Quaz, given the subject matter. Most apt. ;) Crafty (talk) 21:17, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
As it seems just as apt, Crafty, to see you delighting in veiled provocation, skirting the bounds of civility in an effort to maintain general unpleasantness. Equazcion (talk) 21:31, 7 Dec 2009 (UTC)
Has anyone ever told you how beautiful you are when you're being stern, Quaz? <3 Crafty (talk) 21:38, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for cleaning that up. :-) It's quite an interesting talk page you've got here—certain to stay on my watchlist. A good read, through and through. --MZMcBride (talk) 00:50, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, it's a regular hoot around here. Crafty (talk) 05:09, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 05:09, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IP[edit]

Don't you feel so honoured to have him return and leave a message for all of us? /sarcasm I snarked at him. :P --ThejadefalconSing your songThe bird's seeds 16:00, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Knowing I was amongst his chosen few gave me half a mongrel. It's moments like this that make Wikipedia worthwhile. :) Crafty (talk) 19:07, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A what?! XD! That's a new euphemism for me... --ThejadefalconSing your songThe bird's seeds 19:09, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Stick with Ol' Crafty and you'll learn a lot brother. Mainspace isn't the only place where educations are had. Crafty (talk) 19:17, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, thanks. My girlfriend's education enough. O.o She scares me sometimes. :) --ThejadefalconSing your songThe bird's seeds 19:24, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Crafty, I see you beat me to nominating that for deletion. Just to let you know, for some reason no template was created on the article itself, but I've gone ahead and done so. --Glenfarclas (talk) 00:33, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for that. I twinkled it, but somehow it got all fux0r3d up. I think the server popped out to get a coffee or something. I was getting lots of "high database lag" messages and the like. All good nao! Cheers! Crafty (talk) 00:35, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 15:28, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays[edit]

Since you participated in the DRV for Secret Maryo Chronicles, you may be interested in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secret Maryo Chronicles (3 nomination). Tim Song (talk) 07:39, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:45, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your User Page.[edit]

The Socratic Barnstar
I gotta say you are very direct, and I absolutely love your Userpage! Hell In A Bucket (talk) 16:35, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Craftyminion. You have new messages at Hell in a Bucket's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I am disappointed[edit]

I am disappointed that you chose to insult me rather than join in a productive dialog. However, if you'd like to do that now, it would be more than welcome!--Jimbo Wales (talk) 21:46, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Er, I'm sorry you think I insulted you - that was not my intention. I dont resile from anything I said on your talkpage, though I am surprised to learn that the Alabama home-schooled are so thin skinned. You will, I trust accept my apologies for the lateness of this reply as I had like stuff to do. :) Crafty (talk) 03:13, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RFB vote[edit]

A couple of concerns about this:

  1. I think it's "Adderall-crazed";
  2. You should link unfamiliar terms (I doubt the children in Africa know what "Adderall" is, and that's who you're writing for, bub);
  3. Try as I might, I can't figure out what Meta has to do with local bureaucratship.

--MZMcBride (talk) 10:22, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As always I defer to you in these matters, Sir. That said I respectfully note your attention to the unmentionable but yet I query your neglect regarding Soup. How do you explain this dereliction of decency? Crafty (talk) 10:49, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It was a Juno reference? (That's what Google suggests, at least. I saw the movie and didn't find it memorable enough to store that line.) You'll get credit for the good cultural references; the mediocre ones I'll pay no mind to. --MZMcBride (talk) 11:01, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfA Thanks[edit]

My RFA →→→

Dear Craftyminion, here is a little note to say thank you for your kind vote on my request for adminship which failed with a final result of (40/19/12).

Thank you for your participation in my RfA which I withdrew after concerns of my knowledge of policy. Special thanks are owed to Coffee, who defended me throughout and whom I cannot thank enough for the nomination; to 2over0 for being supportive and helpful; to A Stop at Willoughby for the thorough, thoughtful and articulate support rationale; to IP69.226.103.13 for maintaining composure and for a pleasant interaction on my talk page and, last but not least, to Juliancolton who was good enough to close the RfA at my request and, frankly, because an editor whom I respect so much found the time to support me! If the need for more admins at the main page is still apparent in a few months, I may try again. Thank you all for a relatively drama-free RfA and for providing me with much material from which to learn from my mistakes. You're all welcome to drop by my talk page any time. God save the Queen Wiki! HJMitchell You rang? 20:32, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:04, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:00, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 08:20, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 18 January 2010[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 14:23, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:33, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 20:55, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:20, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 12:40, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 11:40, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010[edit]

Use of the F word[edit]

Hi Crafty, would you mind not using the F word in edit summaries? ϢereSpielChequers 11:01, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010[edit]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Craftyminion. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Elockid.
Message added 03:29, 10 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

About your oppose. Airplaneman 03:29, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 April 2010[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 April 2010[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 April 2010[edit]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Craftyminion. You have new messages at Airplaneman's talk page.
Message added 16:41, 2 May 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Airplaneman 16:41, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 3 May 2010[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 10 May 2010[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 17 May 2010[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 24 May 2010[edit]

User:Observoz @ Tony Abbott[edit]

Hello there. Could you please explain why Observoz's edits to Tony Abbott and Talk:Tony Abbot are vandalism? You may not agree with his article edit - and you can change it. But you cannot remove good faith talk page additions citing them as vandalism. I've restored Observoz's edits, pending an explanation from you. regards --Merbabu (talk) 09:42, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Eat me. Crafty (talk) 10:57, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Merbabu (talk) 11:42, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
hah! yeah, stop being so precious and eat him, Merbabu --Surturz (talk) 11:18, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Douchenozzle?[edit]

Lol --Surturz (talk) 11:07, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, "fuckhead" seemed a little over the top. Crafty (talk) 11:08, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
your eloquence has convinced me. The Australian Women's Weekly will now be my "go to" reference for WP :-) --Surturz (talk) 11:14, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You could do worse. Crafty (talk) 11:23, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for repeated personal attacks and incivility. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Nick-D (talk) 11:46, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Relevant diffs are [17] in which you reverted what appear to be good faith edits as 'vandalism' and [18] in which you also reverted a perfectly acceptable talk page post by the same editor as 'vandalism', [19] in which you also reverted what appears to be an OK edit as 'vandalism' and the following abusive comments: [20], [21] (in the edit summary) and [22] (response to being asked why you'd labeled the edits to the Tony Abbott article vandalism). The length of the block has been set in recognition of your previous indefinite block for disruptive editing and the above warnings for this kind of uncivil conduct. Nick-D (talk) 11:46, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
FWIW I was not offended by the "douchenozzle" remark on Craftyminion's edit summary, and I thought his "eat me" comment vs. Merbabu was justified, given the patronising comment Merbabu left on Craftyminion's talk page. --Surturz (talk) 11:56, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Naughty boy. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:39, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LOL! Nice work![edit]

Good to see you're being justly regarded with contempt by people who actually care about Wikipedia quality. Thanks for the note on my talk page. Want to go for zero? Cy Q. Faunce (talk) 14:32, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010[edit]

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors, which you did not on Portia de Rossi. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. This is not vandalism.Bdb484 (talk) 14:44, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 31 May 2010[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 June 2010[edit]

You Assholes![edit]

I step out for a week or so and I'm blocked? Well, I'd file a cranky thingo at AN/I but fortunately for you lot the block has expired.

Don't do this again. I'm rather sensitive. Crafty (talk) 18:14, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's what he said. --MZMcBride (talk) 19:02, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 June 2010[edit]