Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-03-15/In the news
Studies on collaboration and student usage, Main Page drives traffic to Time.com
New study on Wikipedia collaborations
Sudha Ram and Jun Liu of University of Arizona completed a study on the relationship between the quality of Wikipedia articles and the nature of the collaboration among its authors. They divided editors up into seven categories, including starters, content justifiers, copyeditors, and all-round contributors. They found that the success of an article depends largely on the participation of authors with diverse roles.
How U.S. college students use Wikipedia
In an article entitled "How today’s college students use Wikipedia for course-related research" (appearing in this month's issue of First Monday), researchers Alison J. Head and Michael B. Eisenberg from the "Project Information Literacy" at the University of Washington Information School describe findings from 11 student focus groups with 86 participants on seven U.S. college campuses and an online survey generating 2,318 responses from six U.S. colleges. Wikipedia was used by 85% of the surveyed students to obtain background about a topic, slightly less frequently than other sources such as course readings, Google and scholarly research databases. As major findings from the study, the researchers list:
- "1. Far more students, than not, used Wikipedia. Wikipedia was used in addition to a small set of other commonly used information resources at the beginning of the research process.
- 2. Reasons for using Wikipedia were diverse: Wikipedia provided students with a summary about a topic, the meaning of related terms, and also got students started on their research and offered a usable interface.
- 3. Respondents who were majoring in architecture, engineering, or the sciences were more likely to use Wikipedia than respondents in other majors...."
(See also last year's Signpost coverage of Head's and Eisenberg's first report)
In related news, German magazine Der Spiegel recently interviewed 17-year-old Moscow high school student Andrey Ternovskiy about the success of his web start-up Chatroulette (which according to Der Spiegel "is already being talked about as the next big thing on the Internet"). Asked whether he had learned the required programming skills in school, Tarnovsky admitted that he "rarely" attended it, adding:
- "I am a nerd. The web is everything for me. School bores me. I have my own way of learning: I read Wikipedia. School is a waste of my time and I'd rather use that time to program and for business negotiations."
"Today's Featured Article" impacts readership numbers on Time.com
In a posting entitled "Wikipedia Breathes New Life Into Seminal Scientology Expose" on Mediabistro.com, U.S. journalist Mike Taylor examined the impact that the listing of the article "The Thriving Cult of Greed and Power" as "Today's featured article" on 12 March had on the subject of that article, a 1991 Time magazine feature about Scientology by investigative journalist Richard Behar. According to stats.grok.se, the Wikipedia article received 78,500 hits on 12 March. Taylor writes:
- "The recent bump in traffic to Behar's article reflects the power of the Wikipedia home page in driving reader interest. Before Wikipedia linked to the article, it was the 22nd most popular article on Time.com. After the link, it was the 2nd most popular."
Taylor cited generally high reader interest in the subject, partly due to recent critical media coverage of Scientology, as another cause for the change. He also mentioned last year's Arbitration Committee decision to block editing from Scientology IP addresses and by some anti-Scientology activists (see Signpost coverage).
Briefly
- Evgeny Morozov has reviewed the book You Are Not a Gadget by Jaron Lanier. The review (and the book itself) discusses Wikipedia, in the context of its unpredicted origins as well as technical choices that have social consequences.
Discuss this story
I think Wikipedia can be very happy with the college research presented in First Monday. Wikipedia often comes in for criticism when people take its word for law; here we see considered use of Wikipedia for what it is, combined with other sources. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 21:36, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]