User talk:Cirt/Archive 24

Archive 20

←

Archive 22

Archive 23

Archive 24

Another one

		The Deletion to Quality Award
		For your contributions to bring The Signpost (Wikipedia) (prior candidate for deletion at: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Signpost (Wikipedia)) to Good Article status, I hereby present you The Deletion to Quality Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Esquivalience t 01:46, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you ! — Cirt (talk) 02:53, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Signpost (Wikipedia)

The article The Signpost (Wikipedia) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Signpost (Wikipedia) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Esquivalience -- Esquivalience (talk) 02:01, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks very much ! — Cirt (talk) 02:53, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Congratulations! It's always nice to see articles from RfD to GA or even FA. ツ FrB.TG (talk) 08:03, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you, FrB.TG (talk · contribs), I do so very much enjoy taking articles from WP:AFD to both WP:GA and WP:FA, and it's a most satisfying accomplishment to increase their quality in this manner. — Cirt (talk) 13:05, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you + invitation

Thank you for your contributions to women's football/soccer articles. I thought I'd let you know about the women's football/soccer task force, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women's football/soccer. If you would like to participate, join by visiting the Members page. Thanks!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hmlarson (talk • contribs) 20:54, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your appreciation, Hmlarson, I've currently embarked on a Quality improvement effort to try to improve the article Jenna Fife, which I first noticed during its deletion debate. — Cirt (talk) 20:54, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Moveable Feast page moves

In the future, please avoid performing unilateral page moves without engaging in discussion.

Please enlist feedback from our Wikipedia community via our WP:REQMOVE standard procedures.

Especially if you realize -- by the 2nd time -- that it is possible the page move could fall under potentially controversial moves.

Thank you for reading above,

— Cirt (talk) 20:19, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

The page you link to says this: "If you have no reason to expect a dispute concerning a move, be bold and move the page." If I had expected a dispute I would have discussed the matter. My recent moves seems uncontroversial. The principal meaning of the word "giraffe" is a certain animal with a long neck, and if there's also an organization called "Giraffe", one would expect the article title Giraffe to be about the animal and Giraffe (organization) to be about the organization. To have an article titled Giraffe (animal) would be unreasonable, to say the least. Michael Hardy (talk) 20:25, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Perhaps the first time. But the second (2nd) time, you should have sought out discussion through the Wikipedia community. In the future, please do not communicate solely by edit summaries during your reverting process. Thank you, — Cirt (talk) 20:26, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

DIFF1 = 1 April 2016, and then again, with zero discussion the second time, in violation of WP:REQMOVE and WP:BRD at DIFF2 = 10 April 2016. — Cirt (talk) 20:32, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Moveable Feast (organization) listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Moveable Feast (organization) to be moved to Moveable Feast. Interested members of the Wikipedia community may want to participate in the discussion here.

— Cirt (talk) 20:29, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

• Note: Please see my comment at DIFF. — Cirt (talk) 20:48, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

WARNING: Editing other people's comments is NOT allowed

Your edit [[1]] edited my comments. This is explicitly NOT ALLOWED. 99.249.130.248 (talk) 11:00, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Please read WP:REFACTOR. Cirt fixed your broken copy-and-pasted templates in the edit, which falls into the Fixing technical matters of wikitext formatting, tables, templates, broken links, and the like category. Zhaofeng Li ^talk (Please {{Ping}} when replying) 11:06, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

IP was blocked two weeks. — Cirt (talk) 21:14, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Coverage of butterfly vibrators?

Hello, Cirt. There's an open AfD concerning Butterfly vibrator. I noticed that, in opposing a merge, you mentioned that there's significant coverage of the topic. I tried my best, but I couldn't find anything besides sales websites and the most incidental of mentions—nothing covering butterfly vibrators qua butterfly vibrators. Perhaps you can find something?  Rebbing  04:41, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Please un-delete the page Nyla Hasan

Hi you had deleted NYLA HASAN but there are many good and reliable new links for her

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nyla_Hasan&action=edit&redlink=1

Please see the news links: http://www.insidehalton.com/news-story/2988345-mother-of-three-surprised-to-be-crowned-mrs-pakistan-world/ http://tribune.com.pk/story/132516/mrs-pakistan-world-forever-young/#comment-166753 http://www.fashioncentral.pk/people-parties/events/celebrations/story-565-nyla-hasan-wins-mrs-yummy-mummy-2011/

Please can you revert the page,. Thank you --MinkyThePet (talk) 15:16, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Created article on satirical comedy film - Climate Change Denial Disorder

I've created a new article on the satirical comedy short film Climate Change Denial Disorder.

Help with additional research would be appreciated on the article's talk page, at Talk:Climate Change Denial Disorder.

Thank you,

— Cirt (talk) 03:02, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Anthony Anderson FA nomination

I have nominated the Anthony Anderson (basketball) article to possibly have it be promoted to a featured article. Could you please leave some comments on areas that you would want to fix so that it meets the FA criteria? If so, add your opinion on the article on the nomination page. TempleM (talk) 00:07, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lie-to-children

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lie-to-children you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Markworthen -- Markworthen (talk) 21:00, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks very much, Markworthen, let me know what else I can do. — Cirt (talk) 02:53, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Climate Change Denial: Heads in the Sand

Hello Cirt:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Climate Change Denial: Heads in the Sand has been completed. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind regards, Twofingered Typist (talk) 19:38, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lie-to-children

The article Lie-to-children you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Lie-to-children for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Markworthen -- Markworthen (talk) 14:01, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise for peer review

I've listed The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise for peer review.

Comments would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Peer review/The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise/archive1.

Thank you for your time,

— Cirt (talk) 23:24, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Emma Stone

After making her article a GA, I have opened a peer review for a possible FAC. If you have some time, consider reviewing it, Wikipedia:Peer review/Emma Stone/archive1. ツ FrB.TG (talk) 17:21, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Gamaliel and others arbitration case opened

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel and others. The scope of this case is Gamaliel's recent actions (both administrative and otherwise), especially related to the Signpost April Fools Joke. The case will also examine the conduct of other editors who are directly involved in disputes with Gamaliel. The case is strictly intended to examine user conduct and alleged policy violations and will not examine broader topic areas. The clerks have been instructed to remove evidence which does not meet these requirements. The drafters will add additional parties as required during the case. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel and others/Evidence.

Please add your evidence by May 2, 2016, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel and others/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. This notification is being sent to those listed on the case notification list. If you do not wish to recieve further notifications, you are welcome to opt-out on that page. For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Two to review

I will review these two for GA candidacy:

1. Spectre (2015 film)
2. Harmy's Despecialized Edition

— Cirt (talk) 03:35, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

GA on Hold for Spectre (2015 film). — Cirt (talk) 21:08, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Placed article Harmy's Despecialized Edition as GA on Hold. — Cirt (talk) 01:57, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

New two to review

New two to review:

1. Der Brænder en Ild
2. Leprechaun (film)

— Cirt (talk) 02:26, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Emily Ratajkowski/archive4

Do you have any more comments or concerns at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Emily Ratajkowski/archive4. If not feel free to stop by and support/oppose based on the current state of the article and your involvement in FAC1 and FAC3 involvement.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 13:22, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Der Brænder en Ild

Hello friend! I hope you haven't forgotten about the GA-review. No rush, just a friendly reminder. :) Best, Doctor Papa Jones • (Click here to collect your prize!) 20:50, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Emily Ratajkowski/archive4

You were involved in one of the prior WP:FAC or WP:PR discussions about Emily Ratajkowski. The current discussion at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Emily Ratajkowski/archive4 needs more discussants. In my prior successful FACs, success has been largely based on guidance at FAC in reshaping the content that I have nominated. I would appreciate discussants interested in giving guidance such guidance.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:55, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

The Land of Gorch

Note: Copy edit appears to still be ongoing by Baffle gab1978 (talk · contribs). Much appreciated, — Cirt (talk) 23:11, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

I've finished my c/e, sorry it took longer than usual. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:51, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Userfied article: Taekwondo Association of Great Britain

Hi Cirt, I wish to either create or reinstate the article about TAGB. As you are the deleting administrator for this I would like your input on how to proceed. Hope to hear from you soon. Thanks very much. LiLT — Preceding unsigned comment added by TaylorTKD (talk • contribs) 13:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Bad for children listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bad for children. Since you had some involvement with the Bad for children redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:28, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel and others closed

An arbitration case regarding Gamaliel and others has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

1. Gamaliel is admonished for multiple breaches of Wikipedia policies and guidelines including for disrupting Wikipedia to make a point, removing a speedy deletion notice from a page he created, casting aspersions, and perpetuating what other editors believed to be a BLP violation.
2. DHeyward and Gamaliel are indefinitely prohibited from interacting with or discussing each other anywhere on Wikipedia, subject to the usual exemptions.
3. DHeyward (talk · contribs) is admonished for engaging in incivility and personal attacks on other editors. He is reminded that all editors are expected to engage respectfully and civilly with each other and to avoid making personal attacks.
4. For conduct which was below the standard expected of an administrator — namely making an incivil and inflammatory close summary on ANI, in which he perpetuated the perceived BLP violation and failed to adequately summarise the discussion — JzG is admonished.
5. Arkon is reminded that edit warring, even if exempt, is rarely an alternative to discussing the dispute with involved editors, as suggested at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE.
6. The community is encouraged to hold an RfC to supplement the existing WP:BLPTALK policy by developing further guidance on managing disputes about material involving living persons when that material appears outside of article space and is not directly related to article-content decisions.

For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:38, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel and others closed

Your GA nomination of Climate Change Denial Disorder

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Climate Change Denial Disorder you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 02:01, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Lie-to-children

Wow, you did a lot of great work on Lie-to-children! I'm impressed. :-) --Kim Bruning (talk) 00:12, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Good work there. The only things I can think of might be the absence of indicators where Pratchett himself discussed the idea in his other novels. I don't know if they qualify as RS, but this page and maybe this one, or others like it, can be used to indicate where else he discussed the idea. John Carter (talk)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Deletion to Quality Award

Wikipedia:Deletion to Quality Award, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Deletion to Quality Award and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Deletion to Quality Award during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mootros (talk) 08:24, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

TWL Questia check-in

Hello!

You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

• Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch.
• When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia.
• Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
• Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, email us and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thanks! 20:23, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Climate Change Denial Disorder

The article Climate Change Denial Disorder you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Climate Change Denial Disorder for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 22:41, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Climate Change Denial Disorder

The article Climate Change Denial Disorder you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Climate Change Denial Disorder for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 22:41, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Centre for Equality and Inclusion.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Centre for Equality and Inclusion.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Four Award!

		Four Award
		Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on R U Professional. Wugapodes [thɔk] [ˈkan.ˌʧɻɪbz] 19:04, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Tokelau National football team

Hello there Cirt, my name is Audi1merc2, and I want to ask you for permission to recreate the Tokelau national football team, the reason for this is because I have some sources enough for a stub class article, thank you, if you want to respond, please do it at my talk page. Audi1merc2 (talk) 15:13, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Four Award

		Four Award
		Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on From The Doctor to my son Thomas. starship.paint ~ KO 08:29, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 10:44, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wisconsin Law Journal

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wisconsin Law Journal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Atlantic306 (talk) 03:28, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

From The Doctor to my son Thomas - TFA

You will probably remember this slight kerfuffle on Dank 's talkpage, 31 March 2016 over the TFA scheduling of the above article on 6 November. My final comment in that discussion reads: "I stress this is not a reservation, merely a reminder to me when I schedule November. Cirt should nominate at TFAR in the normal way, when nominations for that month are open." Unfortunately you didn't; as I made clear, it is not our policy to reserve dates far in advance. Meanwhile, another well-supported nomination has claimed the date, unaware of your prior request. The fairest thing to do, I think, is to schedule "From the Doctor" for 7th November, when the western hemisphere at least will have it as their TFA on a part of the 6th. Otherwise, if you would prefer a different date, please let me know quickly, as I am scheduling at the moment. Brianboulton (talk) 16:23, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Propose to reconsider article Peace Revolution, previously deleted

@Cirt, DGG, Whpq, Ron Ritzman, and Cybercobra: in the past 7 years the online platform Peace Revolution has become more notable, with scholarly articles about it and numerous occurrences in news sources. Propose to revive this page. If disambiguation issues may be relevant, I can address them in a disambiguation page, but there is currently no other page about any Peace Revolution subject.--S Khemadhammo (talk) 19:28, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

S Khemadhammo Looking at User:S Khemadhammo/Peace Revolution.I see exactly one reference. Checking it at Google Scholar, it has never been cited by anyone. If you have additional good sources, the appropriate procedure for a new article would be to move the draft when you have finished it into Draft Space7, and ask for a review. DGG ( talk ) 20:32, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

DGG, I didn't intend to propose this specific write-up, it is merely a draft. I will add more sources, as I have just started. Do you mean to say the article must first be written fully? Could notability first be established by submitting a list of secondary sources? I didn't intend to write this article all by myself, but asking for other people's input would be easier if some level of assurance could be provide in advance. I am not familiar with these procedures, as I have never done any new article which has been deleted before. Thanks.--S Khemadhammo (talk) 21:00, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

DGG, in all fairness, Hardy et al.'s article has been quoted here. S Khemadhammo (talk) 21:10, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

that's a mere mention as one of a list in a conference paper. That single quote doesn't imply notability of the topic. Significant papers are cited many times. You'll need more and better. DGG ( talk ) 21:18, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

I concur with DGG. A draft with appropriate references submitted for review seems a reasonable approach. -- Whpq (talk) 02:05, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Okay, I'm on it. Wikiman5676, do you have some time to help me on this?S Khemadhammo (talk) 07:16, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

sure i can take a look Wikiman5676 (talk) 01:10, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

DGG, could you expand on what you meant by "draft space 7"?--S Khemadhammo (talk) 11:57, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

the admittedly confusing "7" is just my typo. I simply meant "in Draft Space" DGG ( talk ) 18:02, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

DGG, okay, thanks anyway!--S Khemadhammo (talk) 20:20, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

@Cirt, DGG, Whpq, Ron Ritzman, and Cybercobra:, I am proposing a new article for the namespace Peace Revolution at Draft:Peace Revolution. There is a review for undeletion going on at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2016 October 21#Peace Revolution. In case the new proposal gets through this will make it easier to post it. There is also a notice which I am supposed to put on the talk page of the admin who closed the 2009 article, but I am not sure who that is.--S Khemadhammo (talk) 22:39, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

I went ahead and performed a history merge of the deleted article with the draft. You can view the history in your draft. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:51, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

That's exactly what I need, Amatulic! Thanks very much! --S Khemadhammo (talk) 07:31, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

TFA

Precious again, your From The Doctor to my son Thomas, "a heartwarming video sent from actor Peter Capaldi in-character in his role as the Doctor on Doctor Who, to console an autistic young boy over grief from the death of his grandmother"!

Heartwarming also your acknowledgement in the FAC of people who were instrumental in shaping the article! I hope they all watch here, - too many (for the first time I do this, beginning of this year) to address them all. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:33, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Michael Messenger & Victoria Nixon

Cirt

First of all I want to apologise for making a complete mess, not only of my page but also of Victoria Nixon's (my wife) at about the same time in March 2016. No excuse - no mitigation - I just didnt read the rules before I jumped in, albeit with good intent. As result her page was deleted by Saraj2107 on april 08 this year. My question to you is: what can we do to start over and have or not have wikipedia pages based on the correct tenets of notoriety. Victoria's 'problem' particularly was that so much data that might be considered appropriate comes from the pre-digital era and is therefore so hard to know how to reference, and I interfered with good intention but should have kept out of it. More recently, since her page has been deleted, she does have suitable material such as audio-interviews/newspapers etc - which in sum total with what was valid before seems to make a valid page... I am asking your advice, or from anyone to whom you might refer, as I am scared of putting a foot wrong again! Messengero

Messengero (talk) 12:45, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

The Challenge Series

The Challenge Series is a current drive on English Wikipedia to encourage article improvements and creations globally through a series of 50,000/10,000/1000 Challenges for different regions, countries and topics. All Wikipedia editors in good standing are invited to participate.

• Use {{subst:The Challenge series invitation}} to invite others using this template.
• Sent to users at Northamerica1000/Mailing list using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:15, 19 November 2016 (UTC).

Orphaned non-free image File:Circle of Power Mimieux.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Circle of Power Mimieux.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:12, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Cirt. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

Hello Cirt: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:30, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Merry, merry!

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 19:14, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Temple of Robotology.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Temple of Robotology.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:48, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

CSQ

Hi. I am still relatively new to wiki. Do you remember or know how to access the original CSQ Magazine page that was deleted in 2008? Ferociouslettuce (talk) 21:52, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Happy New Year!

Hi Cirt - I hope you had a very merry holiday season. May your new year be happy and prosperous! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 03:53, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Globe logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Globe logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:07, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Godwin's law listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:Godwin's law. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:Godwin's law redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:31, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

March Madness 2017

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Big new article

Hi Cirt, you might be interested in Tax status of Scientology in the United States. I'd appreciate (by email?) any thoughts you might have. Prioryman (talk) 15:35, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tom Cruise All the World's a Stage.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tom Cruise All the World's a Stage.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:23, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Truth in Numbers: The Wikipedia Story listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:Truth in Numbers: The Wikipedia Story. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:Truth in Numbers: The Wikipedia Story redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:19, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

In some benign wp:CANVASSING

Community input is politely requested for Jimbo's tkpg with regard ur expertise in gen. notability per wp:GNG & applicabilities of eg wp:PROF, wp:AUTH, etc. w/in AfD's
... here: User talk:Jimbo Wales#Suggested fix.--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 01:06, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

I.e.: Is Matthew Grow, editor of The Council of Fifty, Minutes, March 1844–January 1846 (The Church Historian's Press, which is an imprint of Deseret Book; 2016), notable? Is Benjamin E. Park, who reviews him here: "The Mormon Council of Fifty: What Joseph Smith’s Secret Records Reveal" (Religion & Politics, September 9, 2016)? Please chime in on a way to determine such questions in a much more consistent manner than at present...here: User_talk:Jimbo_Wales#Suggested_fix.--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 18:59, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) § RfC about marking the Featured portals process as "historical"

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) § RfC about marking the Featured portals process as "historical". Despite your general inactivity on Wikipedia as of late, I'm surprised that nobody has informed you of this discussion yet. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:15, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Is this notable?

I was prodding a bunch of non-notable fictional elements and found something you may enjoy looking into and rescuing: Frak (expletive). Cheers! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:43, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Cirt! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 20:21, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red online editathon on sports

		Welcome to Women in Red's May 2017 worldwide online editathon. Participation is welcome in any language.
		"Sports"

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Ipigott (talk) 13:39, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Meetup Invitation

You are invited to the upcoming Asian Pacific American Heritage month edit-athon.

This will be held on the first floor of the Knight library at the University of Oregon.

For more information please see: Wikipedia:Meetup/Eugene/WikiAPA, a Facebook event link is also available on the Meetup page.

• Date: Friday, May 26, 2017
• Time: 12:00 pm – 4:00 pm
• Location: Edminston Classroom, Knight Library, Room 144
• Address:1501 Kincaid Street, Eugene, Oregon, 97403-1299

Hope to see you there!

(This message was sent to WikiProject members via Wikipedia:Meetup/Eugene/WikiAPA/MailingList on 23:32, 10 May 2017 (UTC). To opt-out of future messages please remove your name from the mailing list.)

Orphaned non-free image File:Centre for Equality and Inclusion.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Centre for Equality and Inclusion.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Template:Editnotices/Page/No worries

I have started looking at edit notices, and I wonder whether Template:Editnotices/Page/No worries is still needed. It appears to have been instituted to warn against some inappropriate edits more than seven years ago, which appear to no longer be going on. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:08, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Editnotices/Page/No worries

Template:Editnotices/Page/No worries has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:02, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Jared Leto fimography

Hi Cirt. I noted that you participated in previous FLC for Jared Leto filmography and I was wondering if you could leave a comment on the article's current nomination. The review seems to have stalled and I'm afraid it will be closed for the fourth time due to lack of comments. Your help would be very much appreciated.--Earthh (talk) 10:44, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sex Sin and Blasphemy.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sex Sin and Blasphemy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Backpfeifengesicht

The article Backpfeifengesicht has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Why do we need a soft redirect for a German word on the English Wikipedia? We are not wiktionary, and we are even less the German wiktionary

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 09:51, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Hitachi--magic--wand.com listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hitachi--magic--wand.com. Since you had some involvement with the Hitachi--magic--wand.com redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. feminist 06:36, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

The Hitachi listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Hitachi. Since you had some involvement with the The Hitachi redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. feminist 06:37, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Janet Jackson (album)

Janet Jackson (album) is undergoing a GA reassessment. Most problems have been tackled, however, the article does not meet criteria 3a, as it does not address the main aspects of the topic - there is almost nothing about production of the album, and little about critical reception on release. The reassessment is on hold for seven days to allow time to build the article. SilkTork (talk) 02:05, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

A quick favour, please

On 16 July 2010, the page on Rab Corbett was deleted, see here. Part of this page was a transcript of a phone call. Is it possible for you to put this transcript on my talk page? It took me a while to add it to the page and I'd like to get it back. I'm not going to start the page again, I'd just like the words back. Thanks. --ML5 (talk) 12:59, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Afd

Hi, I found an article, List of places described as the end of land or the world, that looks like an indiscriminate list of places named “End of the Land/World” in some language; for example, Cape Finisterre breaks down into finis (first/second person singular present tense of finir: to end, to finish) and terre (land, earth), or “Cape End Land”. It looks like one of the articles for which you closed an AfD here. As an unregistered user, I need someone to AfD this one for me. Thanks. 165.91.12.190 (talk) 12:07, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

User group for Military Historians

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Seasons' Greetings

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 02:47, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Mass message log

I can't find my own username in the log, so I'm blaming this spam on you for being the creator of the page. Begone from my realm! Cornea Scratcher (talk) 13:34, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Isle of Man

Hello, Cirt, I was reading the article Isle of Man, but when I click on any site of the article, the site launche me to a [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYntVKsbvFM YouTube video]. I've tried to solve this problem editing the code of the page, but I can't find the problem. Can you help me? Thanks LyingB (talk) 04:37, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) One of the templates used on that page had its code altered. This has now been fixed; there's a page on the bottom of WP:VPT talking about it. Enterprisey (talk!) 04:50, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CARM logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CARM logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:19, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Ten Year Society

Dear Cirt/Archive 24,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.

Best regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evrik (talk • contribs) 14:18, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

List of YouTubers

The List of YouTubers is being nominated for deletion again. I don't know why. It's been nominated so many damn times. Take a look here. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 00:23, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:60 Minutes on Cult Awareness Network.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:60 Minutes on Cult Awareness Network.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo NEW cult awareness network.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo NEW cult awareness network.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Wikinewshas/Scientology

Template:Wikinewshas/Scientology has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jc86035 (talk) 13:59, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Tiens Group for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tiens Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiens Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Luftfall (talk) 05:40, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Number of portals

Template:Number of portals has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Evad37 [talk] 07:05, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Tears (Rush song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tears (Rush song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tears (Rush song) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Richhoncho (talk) 14:50, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Video spokesperson recreated

You were the closing/deleting admin for WP:Articles for deletion/Video spokesperson. It has been recreated, but it may be substantially different from the deleted article. Could you take a look at the original? Abductive (reasoning) 05:28, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Abductive I checked and Cirt hasn't edited since April of 2016. If you know another admin you could try asking them. A noticeboard would be the next step - though I'm not sure which would be best at the moment. If there is an admin who watches this page they might be able to help as well. Thanks for your vigilance. MarnetteD|Talk 05:38, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

MarnetteD Wow, it never occurred to me that Cirt would stop editing. Thanks. I think I'll just redirect the article to spokesperson for the time being. Abductive (reasoning) 05:48, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Sounds good Abductive. Regards. MarnetteD|Talk 05:51, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Teaneck Kebab House for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Teaneck Kebab House is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teaneck Kebab House (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 04:52, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Teaneck Kebab House.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Teaneck Kebab House.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:41, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

GA reassessment

Chris Field (composer), an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Richard3120 (talk) 15:18, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

invite to help edit some Fourth Amendment related pages

Hi Cirt, just wanted to invite you to help edit some Fourth Amendment related pages. I left a message on WikiProject US Constitution Talk which fills out the details and lists the pages.

Thanks! Seahawk01 (talk) 03:23, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

@Seahawk01: Cirt last edited in April 2016, so there's probably not much point in inviting him or her to help. Also, while I do not think it a good idea to speculate on the reason for his/her stopping editing, the end came very abruptly, which usually means that the editor will never be back. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:45, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

@JamesBWatson: ...ah, very good idea to check user's contribution history. I'm pretty new on Wikipedia and just finding my way around. Thanks! Seahawk01 (talk) 01:24, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Greetings and Salutations

To Cirt:

Hello!

Congratulations!

You have been included in my first, and possibly only, Very Early Christmas List!

As an earnest fellow believer in Santa Claus, and possibly in Our Redeemer Liveth as well, you may wonder how you got on this list.

I have no idea!

That's my story and I'm sticking to it.

Unless I tracked down the connection in our user talk archives, in which case you know who you are!

Or not.

All the best for you and yours this Christmas 2018 and New Year 2019!

– Athaenara jingles all the way 02:35, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Reappropriation

I am doing a c/e and expansion of this, and I thought you may be interested in this topic area... --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:56, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Vajrayana Buddhism portal

A tag has been placed on Category:Vajrayana Buddhism portal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:50, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:Supreme Court of the United States

Portal:Supreme Court of the United States, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Supreme Court of the United States and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Supreme Court of the United States during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 19:50, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:Terrorism

Portal:Terrorism, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Terrorism and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Terrorism during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 22:00, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:Biological warfare

Portal:Biological warfare, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Biological warfare (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Biological warfare during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 05:57, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Gilbert and Sullivan portal

A tag has been placed on Category:Gilbert and Sullivan portal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:36, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Supreme Court of the United States portal

A tag has been placed on Category:Supreme Court of the United States portal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:53, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Biological warfare portal

A tag has been placed on Category:Biological warfare portal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:32, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

TFA

Thank you today for what you did for The City of New York vs. Homer Simpson! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:03, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Buddhism portal

A tag has been placed on Category:Buddhism portal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:49, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Works by Dan Savage

A tag has been placed on Category:Works by Dan Savage requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:57, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Aaron Sexton

Hello, Cirt. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aaron Sexton".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 12:18, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Category:People from South London has been nominated for discussion

Category:People from South London, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 14:15, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:58, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Jason Beghe

Jason Beghe, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 20:59, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Woodhull logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Woodhull logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 05:29, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Corbin Fisher.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Corbin Fisher.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:User FT

Template:User FT has been nominated for merging with Template:User Featured topics. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 22:59, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Autism films

Template:Autism films has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. ★Trekker (talk) 04:27, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cirt, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

gnu57 17:50, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Deletion review for Austin Powell

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Austin Powell. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Cactusdillinger (talk) 00:52, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

"Wikipedia:Freedom of speech" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikipedia:Freedom of speech. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 15#Wikipedia:Freedom of speech until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Interstellarity (talk) 18:23, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:27, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:09, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

"Queer Latinos in Cinema" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Queer Latinos in Cinema. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 17#Queer Latinos in Cinema until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BDD (talk) 14:22, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Philip Gale.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Philip Gale.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Mystery of a Hansom Cab.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Mystery of a Hansom Cab.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jan Groenveld.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jan Groenveld.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:57, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jeffrey Lundgren.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jeffrey Lundgren.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:59, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Editnotices/Page/Golden Raspberry Awards

Template:Editnotices/Page/Golden Raspberry Awards has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Yaksar (let's chat) 18:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Project Chanology protests, February 10, 2008

Template:Project Chanology protests, February 10, 2008 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. IznoPublic (talk) 04:49, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

"Feminist views of stripping and sex work" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Feminist views of stripping and sex work and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 26#Feminist views of stripping and sex work until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. feminist (talk) Слава Україні! 14:57, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Commitment by Dan Savage.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Commitment by Dan Savage.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Paxata

Paxata has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 09:52, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:UpdatedDYKportal

Template:UpdatedDYKportal has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Trialpears (talk) 03:54, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Paul McDermott

Paul McDermott has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. LibStar (talk) 23:34, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lou Papan.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lou Papan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:17, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

"Wikilove" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Wikilove has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 18 § Wikilove until a consensus is reached. #prodraxis ^connect 04:11, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 09:33, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Deletion review for Nikolai Ogolobyak

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Nikolai Ogolobyak. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. CJ-Moki (talk) 02:31, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for The Sopranos

The Sopranos has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:55, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for James Strang

James Strang has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:50, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Anthony Lewis bibliography

Template:Anthony Lewis bibliography has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 12:31, 17 January 2024 (UTC)