User talk:65.88.88.173

April 2011

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Kashmiri Pandit. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:38, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jiddu Krishnamurti bibliography with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ocean Shores 21:51, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Kashmiri Pandit appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Nasnema  Chat  15:35, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Kashmiri Pandit. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Nasnema  Chat  15:39, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Kashmiri Pandit with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Nasnema  Chat  15:45, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Kashmiri Pandit. Nasnema  Chat  16:02, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Kashmiri Pandit

I have removed your recent contribution to the talk page of Kashmiri Pandit. It was unconstructive, potentially offensive and has no bearing on the article. Article talk pages are for discussion of the article, not the general subject. - Sitush (talk) 17:09, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

To edit, please log in.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

15:01, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
MalnadachBot (talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. Favonian (talk) 17:31, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Comments: Blocked for one more year.

January 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Great Gatsby, you may be blocked from editing. Seduisant (talk) 15:43, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Kashmiris article

Hi, Kashmiris origin is a controversial one and there are many points of view on this. Your Aryan hypothesis has both sides. There are scholars who refute the theory as a myth and there are those that support it. There are good evidences to support semitic origin as well. But for the moment there is nothing conclusive. However Kashmiris have been classified a Dardic Linguistic group similar to the Dard in Gilgit. There is agreement to the fact that Kashmiri language by root belongs to non-indo languages, howeverwas influenced by Sanskrit and Persian. So classifying them as dardic ethno group is fine and the the best option. If you still have issues that you can explain, then we can remove the group classification altogether.Thanks. Yanniel908 (talk) 17:46, 4 November 2015 (UTC) Furthermore, do you know that Aryan theory has been disputed by many scholars especially in modern times? Do read the different views on that. This is why i said that Dardic is the most accurate classification because George Grierson classified Kashmiri as dardic similar to Shina. Kashmiri has overtime been heavily influenced by sanskrit and persian.Yanniel908 (talk) 21:27, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Kashmiris. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. At this point, your refusal to discuss in an orderly fashion (at the bottom of a page or an existing relevant section) despite having been instructed repeatedly on proper talk page behavior amounts to disruptive editing. From now on I'm removing any contributions you make in the wrong place on the grounds of disruptive editing, and I'm going to add another warning here each time. Also, repeating yourself ad infinitum amounts to disruptive editing as well. You've made your point, no one has agreed, and your idea that Jews sit around thinking about how to get Kashmiris, of all people, classified as Semitic is absolute, 100% nonsense. Where in the world did you get the idea that Kashmiris have any particular place in the Jewish world view? —Largo Plazo (talk) 17:36, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Kashmiris. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 20:39, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2016

Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kashmiris has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 17:12, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

He isn't experimenting. He's the same person, largely using 65.88.88.* addresses at the New York Public Library, who's been trying, without citations and against consensus, to get Kashmir articles to reflect his views for years. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:17, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

---