User talk:64.105.174.210

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Raja Raja Chola I, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 02:04, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Raja Raja Chola I worked, and it has been reverted or removed. However, if you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. kongr43gpenTalk 19:01, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit warring according to the reverts you have made on Raja Raja Chola I. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:17, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Sitush. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. LadyofShalott 04:19, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at User talk:Sitush, you may be blocked from editing. Personal attacks will get you blocked from editing wikipedia. Refrain from attacking other editors Sodabottle (talk) 05:27, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for attempting to harass other users at User Talk:Sitush. If you have a problem with a user's edits, discuss them on the article's talk page, civilly. If you think the user has violated policy, there are a variety of noticeboards you can bring the issue to. You may not attack other editors, ever, period. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Qwyrxian (talk) 10:18, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:45, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

placement of comments at talk:Yadav[edit]

Please, why much we have new sections for every new comment? If you have difficulty in placing your comments in previous sections, I could help out with that.-MW 03:53, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Pallava dynasty has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Sitush (talk) 09:33, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Evasion of the block of User:Truefact1979[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for Block evasion and sockpuppetry. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

For evidence, compare the edits by Truefact1979 and those of this IP at Talk:Yadav. See:

The second passage was added while Truefact1979 was blocked. In both passages Truefact is arguing for the warrior ancestry of the Yadavs, by identifying them with the Kshatriyas. Both Truefact and the IP misspell Kshatriyas as Khastriyas. Much of the talk page (prior to this exchange) is devoted to a well-sourced discussion of whether the Yadavs have Kshatriya ancestry. Truefact1979, like the blocked editor User:Bill clinton history, defends the Kshatriya connection, although modern reliable sources don't appear to support it, according to what others say on this page. EdJohnston (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]