User talk:208.131.181.126

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. I've noticed some of your recent valuable contributions... Wikipedia can always use more regular editors like you. Consider creating an account and logging in using a user name, which has many benefits. In the meantime, here are some useful links if you need any help:

Hope to see more of you! Karol 20:02, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This message is regarding the page Christianity. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks. Jkelly 07:46, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This message is regarding the page Master's degree. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. JHCC (talk) 16:12, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. FearÉIREANN\(caint) 23:45, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for experimenting with the page Blaine (Pokemon) on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Celestianpower háblame 14:14, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Life imprisonment[edit]

Your recent edit to Life imprisonment was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 00:19, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to RNA. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Rambutan (talk) 17:13, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Corbin Bleu on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.- Gilliam 18:18, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to Konvict Muzik:[edit]

Your recent edit to Konvict Muzik (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a non-talk page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 23:13, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Calvin cycle. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. X Marx The Spot (talk) 08:47, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Vybz Kartel has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Atif.t2 (talk) 21:02, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Atlantic_slave_trade. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--TParis00ap (talk) 22:24, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Rafael Benítez. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Wyatt915 22:42, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Pharmacist, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Pharmacist was changed by 208.131.181.126 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-12-19T22:16:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 22:16, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Amplified fragment length polymorphism has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tommy2010 20:50, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Type polymorphism. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tommy2010 20:59, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Cultural determinism has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Orphan Wiki 19:46, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Clown has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tiderolls 00:50, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Human (disambiguation) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. ” TeLeŞ(PT @ L C G) 20:11, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Animal. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Old Moonraker (talk) 14:38, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

March 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Common cold, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 19:13, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to The Lazy Song, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. Yves (talk) 22:48, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Form of government, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 18:15, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2011[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Max Weber. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. RashersTierney (talk) 16:47, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Systematic error. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SuperMarioMan 23:46, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to John Edward Underhill, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  TheArguer  SAY HI! 03:34, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2012[edit]

Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia. Your edit to Black body was successful, but because it was not considered beneficial to the page, the edit has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:57, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Nsaa. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Comparison of revision control software, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Nsaa (talk) 19:12, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

September 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Pinethicket. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to PH because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Pinethicket (talk) 20:01, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ebenezer Assembly of God, Lorrimers, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:11, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted material[edit]

Please do not copy and paste copyright material into articles. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 19:09, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Nick Levine. An edit that you recently made to Succubus seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Nick Levine (talk) 12:51, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello 208.131.181.126. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Ebenezer Assembly of God, Lorrimers".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ebenezer Assembly of God, Lorrimers}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Caribbean, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:13, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Caribbean ‎ , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:37, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm BU Rob13. An edit you recently made to Haitian Vodou seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~ RobTalk 19:40, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Crystallizedcarbon. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Jade Emperor— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 21:34, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Transcendence. I noticed that you recently removed content from Berezovsky v Michaels without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Transcendence (talk) 07:54, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.